Search results

Filters

  • Journals
  • Authors
  • Keywords
  • Date
  • Type

Search results

Number of results: 5
items per page: 25 50 75
Sort by:
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development was adopted in 2015. The United Nations framework does not directly include raw materials in Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The mining industry has a great impact not only for the environment but also for its stakeholders, both from the nearest and the most remote surrounding. As such, the mining industry has the opportunity and potential to both positively and negatively impact on all seventeen SDGs. The introduction of the EU directive on the disclosure of non-financial data has a great impact on the reporting of sustainable development reporting. Additionally, in March 2020, the European Commission published the EU Taxonomy. With regard to the current geopolitical situation, some European Union members, such as Germany, France and the Netherlands, have taken the decision to open or re-open of their coal-fired plants. Admittedly, these countries underline that the inclusion of coal in their power industry is only temporary and limited to a well-defined period of time. The implementation of the SDGs should be partially important in the case of mining, the activities of which involve the extraction of various types of mineral resources, especially non-renewable resources. This raises two fundamental research questions; what is the actual level of the reporting of SDGs in the polish mining industry, and if the EU Taxonomy Regulations will increase the reporting of SDGs in Polish mining?
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Olga Julita Janikowska
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Mineral and Energy Economy Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków, Poland
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The importance of increasing the level of renewable energy sources is connected with the fact that its share in the total volume of energy consumption is still insufficient. This is why this article focuses on the development of the motivation system aimed at the more active transition to renewable sources consumption in the balanced combination alongside the traditional sources. The research question is whether digital public goods (DPG) may be a mean to support “Affordable and Clean Energy’’ use. The theoretical approach to our research problem is stakeholder’s theory, while the concept applied to the motivation mechanism implementation is the United Nations Organization’s concept of sustainable development goals (SDG). The research design is as follows: study of the actual data of energy structure of the world economy; identification of the current instruments of renewable energy distribution; analysis of the DPG as a perspective form of the sustainable energy behavior introduced [AO1] in the digitalized environment; definition of the energy industry stakeholders; development of the architecture of energy consumption by DPG application to reach SDG “Affordable and Clean Energy”. The main findings of the study are that DPG has been found to be a relevant means for the motivation and support of sustainable energy behavior through the architecture of energy consumption, based on research and development, customer relationship management, corporate social responsibility – sustainable development, technical implementation, and the diversity of traditional and alternative sources of energy.
Go to article

Bibliography


Boosting Virtual Reality Learning within Higher Business Management Education. [Online] http://www.vrinsight.org [Accessed: 2021-09-07].
Chan, N.W. and Kotchen, M.J. 2014. A generalized impure public good and linear characteristics model of green consumption. Resource and Energy Economics 37, pp. 1–16, DOI: 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2014.04.001.
Digital Public Goods Definition – Official web-site Digital Public Goods Alliance. [Online] https://digitalpublicgoods.net/registry/ [Accessed: 2021-09-07].
Eberhard, A. et al. 2015 – Eberhard, A., Metternich, J., Tisch, M., Chryssolouris, G., Sihn, W., ElMaraghy, H., Hummel, V. and Ranz, F. 2015. Learning Factories for Research, Education, and Training. Procedia CIRP 32, pp. 1–6.
Estefam, A. 2021. Strategic overview of digital public participation tools for urban planning. Journal of Science-Informed Design, DOI: 10.33797/SIDE.21.008.
Greenstein, S. 2013. Digital Public Goods. IEEE 33(5), pp. 62–63, DOI: 10.1109/MM.2013.96.
Gurumurthy, A. and Chami, N. 2019. Digital Public Goods: A Precondition for Realising SDGs. Global Governance Spotlight 4, pp. 1-5. [Online] https://www.researchgate.net/publication/343547426_Digital_ Public_Goods_A_ Precondition_for_Realising_SDGs [Accessed: 2021-09-07].
HEIn4 2021. Boosting the role of HEIs in the industrial transformation towards the Industry 4.0 paradigm in Georgia and Ukraine. [Online] http://www.hein4.net [Accessed: 2021-09-02].
Hulshof, D. and Mulder, M. 2020. The impact of renewable energy use on firm profit. Energy Economics 92, Article 104957, DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104957.
İkiz, A. Ed. 2019. Energy Economics. Economic dynamics of global energy geopolitics. Hershey PA, USA, IGI Global Engineering Science Reference, 333 p. [Online] https://www.researchgate.net/publication/337198803_ Energy_Economics [Accessed: 2021-09-07].
Jarke, J. 2021. Co-Creating Digital Public Services. [In:] Co-creating Digital Public Services for an Ageing Society. Public Administration and Information Technology 6, pp. 15–52. Springer, Cham, DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-52873-7_3.
Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen, S.I. and Jollands, N. 2013. Human security and energy security: a sustainable energy system as a public good. [In:] H. Dyer and M.J. Trombetta (Eds.), International Handbook of Energy Security 23, pp. 507–526, Edward Elgar Publishing, DOI: 10.4337/9781781007907.00036.
Norouzi, N. and Norouzi, M. 2020. Energy Analysis Framework. An Introduction to the Energy Economics. Scholars’ Press, 391 p. [Online] https://www.researchgate.net/publication/342393402_An_Introduction_ to_ the_Energy_Economics [Accessed: 2021-09-21].
Sackey, S. et al. 2017 – Sackey, S., Bester, A. and Adams, D. 2017. Industry 4.0 Learning Factory Didactic Design Parameters for Industrial Engineering Education in South Africa. South Africa Journal for Industrial Engineering 28(1), pp. 114–124.
Sæbø, J.I. et al. 2021 – Sæbø, J.I., Nicholson, B., Nielsen, P. and Sahay, S. 2021. Digital Global Public Goods. [Online] https://www.researchgate.net/publication/354088457_Digital_Global_Public_Goods [Accessed: 2021-09-13].
Steg, L. et al. 2021 – Steg, L., Perlaviciute, G, Sovacool, B. K., Bonaiuto, M., Diekmann, A., Filippini, M., Hindriks, F., Bergstad, C. J., Matthies, E., Matti, S., Mulder, M., Nilsson, A., Pahl, S., Roggenkamp, M., Schuitema, G., Stern, P.C., Tavoni, M., Thøgersen, J. and Woerdman, E. 2021. A Research Agenda to Better Understand the Human Dimensions of Energy Transitions. Front. Psychol. 12, Article 672776, DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.672776.
Szalbierz, Z. and Ropuszyńska-Surma, E. 2017. Energy security as a public good. E3S Web of Conferences 14, Article 01005, DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/20171401005.
Udayasankaran, J.G. et al. 2021 – Udayasankaran, J.G., Kallander, K., Woods, T., Landry, M., Benjamin, P., Harris, L., Nordhaug, L., Fourie, C., Blaschke, S., Grubb, B., Bendor, A. and Downey, M. 2021. Understanding the Relationship between Digital Public Goods and Global Goods in the Context of Digital Health. Digital Public Goods Alliance, Digital Square, UNICEF Health and Information Communication Technology (ICT) Divisions. [Online] https://www.researchgate.net/publication/350959100_Understanding_the_Relationship_between_Digital_Public_Goods_and_Global_ Goods_in_the_Context_of_Digital_Health [Accessed: 2021-09-20].
Wiser, R. and Pickle, S. 1997. Green Marketing, Renewables, and Free Riders: Increasing Customer Demand for a Public Good. [Online] https://www.researchgate.net/publication/252267623_Green_ Marketing_Renewables_and_Free_ Riders_Increasing_Customer_Demand_for_a_Public_Good [Accessed: 2021-09-21].
Yin, Y. et al. 2021 – Yin, Y., Dong, Y., Wang, K., Wang, D. and Jones, B.F. 2021. Science as a Public Good: Public Use and Funding of Science. Proceedings of the 1st Virtual Conference on Implications of Information and Digital Technologies for Development. [Online] https://www.researchgate.net/ publication/351298734_Science_as_a_ Public_Good_Public_Use_and_Funding_of_Science/citations [Accessed: 2021-09-20].
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Iryna Nyenno
1
ORCID: ORCID
Vyacheslav Truba
2
ORCID: ORCID
Iryna Lomachynska
3
ORCID: ORCID
Olena Mazur
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Management and Innovations, Odessa I.I Mechnikov National University, Ukraine
  2. Civil and Law Disciplines, Odessa I.I. Mechnikov National University, Ukraine
  3. Economics and Entrepreneurship, Odessa I.I. Mechnikov National University, Ukraine
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The world prefers to increase energy efficiency and use energy from renewable and alternative sources. Ukraine has chosen the same path. To form recommendations for improving state support schemes for the sustainable development of renewable energy, the authors conducted a thorough analysis of the state of renewable energy in Ukraine and its legislative support. The advantage of the study is the visual presentation of data. Thus, the authors presented and analyzed which energy sources Ukraine uses for its own needs, the essence of the Ukrainian energy balance and its state in 2019. The authors found that the development of renewable energy is one of the “Sustainable Development Goals of Ukraine”, which are based on the world. The authors noted the objectives and indicators of the goal, assessed the value of the indicators and found that, even though the goal is one of the most important goals because it is in third place in the number of amendments to existing regulations, there is a lag in plans and more lag on some additional tasks. The authors systematized the legal basis for the functioning of renewable energy and revealed this process’ subject-object relations. The analysis showed that the improvement of state support schemes for the sustainable development of renewable energy should be based on European norms and standards but consider national specifics. The authors proposed and described the principles of improving state support for the sustainable development of renewable energy, which should be based on ensuring the balance of interests of the three main stakeholders of the renewable energy market: the state, energy consumers and investors.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Olha Prokopenko
1
ORCID: ORCID
Anna Chechel
2
ORCID: ORCID
Iryna Sotnyk
3
ORCID: ORCID
Vitaliy Omelyanenko
4 3
ORCID: ORCID
Tetiana Kurbatova
3
ORCID: ORCID
Tetiana Nych
5
ORCID: ORCID

  1. International Humanitarian University, Odessa, Ukraine
  2. Donetsk State University of Management, Mariupol, Ukraine
  3. Sumy State University, Sumy, Ukraine
  4. Institute of Industrial Economics of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine
  5. Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The 15th of United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) aims to protect, restore, and promote sustainable use of terrestrial ecosystems, sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, and halt and reverse land degradation and halt biodiversity loss. This paper investigates the approach adopted by indigenous peoples for conservation of woody plant species diversity in some selected spots in Abia State, Southeastern Nigeria.
Relying on mixed method approach to research, data collection comprising field observation, ground truthing, plant species inventory, and key-informant interviews and analysis of data, two spots were purposively sampled, one from each of the two LGAs; Mbom in Bende LGA and Amangwu in Ohafia Local Government Area (LGA). A 50 × 20 m quadrat was sampled from each site, from where plant species inventory was undertaken. Shannon– Wiener diversity index (H’) was used to analyse the data.
The result of Shannon–Wiener diversity index, shows that the diversity indices of the plant species for the two sites were 3.20 (Mbom) and 3.95 (Amangwu) respectively. The people of Bende and Ohafia LGAs employ some traditional laws to ensure conservation of woody plant species so as to achieve goal 15th of the SDGs. This paper advocates sustenance of those traditional laws that encourage conservation of woody plant species in the study area with enforceable sanctions to deter defaulters.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Godson Chinonyerem Asuoha
1
ORCID: ORCID
Uchenna Paulinus Okafor
1
ORCID: ORCID
Chukwuemeka Anthony Onyekwelu
1
ORCID: ORCID
Romanus Udegbunam Ayadiuno
1
ORCID: ORCID
Philip Ogbonnia Phil-Eze
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. University of Nigeria, Department of Geography, Faculty of the Social Sciences, Nsukka Road, 410001 Nsukka, Nigeria
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is an important tool of Circular Economy (CE), which performs the analysis in a closed loop (“cradle-to-cradle”) of any product, process or technology. LCA assesses the environmental threats (climate change, ozone layer depletion, eutrophication, biodiversity loss, etc.), searches for solutions to minimize environmental burdens and together with CE contributes to reducing greenhouse gas emission, counteracts global climate crisis. The CE is a strategy for creating value for the economy, society and business while minimizing resource use and environmental impacts through reducing, re-using and recycling. In contrast, life cycle assessment is a robust and science-based tool to measure the environmental impacts of products, services and business models. Combining both the robustness of the LCA methodology and the principles of circular economy one will get a holistic approach for innovation. After a presentation of the LCA framework and methods used, 27 examples of case studies of comparative LCA analysis for replacement materials to reduce environmental load and their challenges as assessment methods for CE strategies are presented. It was concluded that there is a need for improvement of existing solutions, developing the intersection between the CE and LCA. Suggestions for developing a sustainable future were also made.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Stanisław Ledakowicz
1
ORCID: ORCID
Aleksandra Ziemińska-Stolarska
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Faculty of Process and Environmental Engineering, Lodz University of Technology, 213 Wólczańska Street, 90-924 Lodz, Poland

This page uses 'cookies'. Learn more