Search results

Filters

  • Journals
  • Authors
  • Keywords
  • Date
  • Type

Search results

Number of results: 3
items per page: 25 50 75
Sort by:
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The mining industry, including hard-coal mining, has a significant and multifaceted impact on all components of the environment. One of the factors is the production of various types of waste which, due to their physico-chemical and ecotoxic properties, do not always pose a threat to the environment and can be used in various ways. Such treatment of waste perfectly fits into the concept of the circular economy through the protection of natural resources and the maximum re-use of waste. One of the wastes generated by hard-coal mines is coal sludge from the purification of underground water in surface settling tanks. The article presents the results of research on the physico-chemical and phytotoxic properties of carbon sludges from two settling tanks with regard to assessing the possibility of their re-use in the reclamation of degraded areas. These sludges contain mainly sand fractions. An analysis of their chemical composition revealed the presence of heavy metals. Leachability studies have shown that despite the high concentrations of metals, a small quantity of these metals passes into the solution. In this respect, therefore, they do not pose a threat to the environment. However, a threat may result from the presence of chlorides and sulphates, the amounts of which are influenced by, among other factors, the time of waste storage in the settling tank. Phytotoxicity tests performed on garden cress ( Lepidium sativum) did not show a toxic effect at any concentration of the water extract. In addition, for one of the sludges, water extracts with concentrations starting from 12.5 and 50% stimulated the growth of the plant’s shoots and roots, respectively. The results show that the tested coal sludges may be used in appropriate doses for reclamation work, for example, when establishing a plant cover.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Małgorzata Śliwka
1
ORCID: ORCID
Waldemar Kępys
1
ORCID: ORCID
Małgorzata Pawul
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. AGH University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Resource Management, Kraków, Poland
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Ecotoxicological biotests were applied in order to evaluate their suitability as early warning systems in the continuous monitoring of lowland shallow dam reservoirs located in Central Europe. The following biotests were used: Daphtoxkit F™magna, Algaltoxkit F™, Ostracodtoxkit F, Phytotoxkit and MARA Test. The experiment was conducted from July 2010 to December 2012 in Goczalkowice Reservoir (the Vistula River, Poland), serving as a model. For the analysis, 41 out of 52 measured water indices were used to assess its toxicity to living organisms. The results of biotests were correlated with 41 hydrochemical indices of water quality. The pattern of relationships among the result of biotest and hydrochemical indices as well as Factor Analysis (FA) and Primary Component Analysis (PCA) revealed that: i) signs of ecotoxicity detected with biotests were associated with either low fl ow periods or spring surface runoff of water; ii) single events of increased ecotoxicity in the depression areas behind saddle dam pump stations appearedafter high fl ow periods; iii) elevated toxicity was accompanied by high concentrations of dissolved and suspended substances; iv) FA and PCA demonstrated correlations among the results of biotests and damming parameters, water conductivity, alkali and transitory metal metals (Ca, Fe, Cu, Zn), and several forms of nitrogen phosphorous and carbon compounds concentration. The relationships suggest that batteries of biotests may serve as a cost-eff ective tool for continuous monitoring of water quality in dam reservoirs and can detect eff ects of extreme hydrologic events, local toxic discharges, and signs of the trophic status of the reservoirs
Go to article

Bibliography

  1. Baran, A. & Tarnawski, M. (2013). Phytotoxkit/Phytotestkit and Microtox® as tools for toxicity assessment of sediments. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 98, pp. 19–27.
  2. Baudo, R., Sbalchiero, A. & Beltrami, M. (2004). Test di Tossicita acuta con Daphnia magna (Acute toxicity test with Daphnia magna). Biologi Italiani, 6, pp. 62–69.
  3. Blaise, C., Gagné. F., Chèvre, N., Harwood, M., Lee, K., Lappalainen, J., Chial, B., Persoone, G. & Doe, K. (2004). Toxicity assessment of oil-contaminated freshwater sediments. Environmental Toxicology, 19, 4, pp. 267–273.
  4. Blaise, C. & Férard, J-F. (2006). Microbiotests in aquatic toxicology: the way forward. [in:] Environmental Toxicology, Kungolos, A., Brebbia, C.A., Samaras, C.P. & Popov, V. (Eds.). UK WIT Press, Southampton, pp. 339–348.
  5. Calabrese, E.J. (2004). Hormesis: A revolution in toxicology, risk assessment and medicine. EMBO Reports, 5, Suppl 1, pp. S37–S40.
  6. CAS Registry. (2022). CAS REGISTRY®. A division of the American Chemical Society. (https://www.cas.org/cas-data/cas-registry (14.07.2022))
  7. Chial, B.Z., Persoone, G. & Blaise, C. (2003). Cyst-based toxicity tests. XVIII. Application of ostracodtoxkit microbiotest in a bioremediation project of oil-contaminated sediments: sensitivity comparison with Hyalella azteca solid-phase assay. Environmental Toxicology, 18, 5, pp. 279–283.
  8. Cloete, Y.C., Shaddock, B.F. & Nel, A. (2017). The use of two microbiotests to evaluate the toxicity of sediment from Mpumalanga, South Africa. Water SA, 43, pp. 409–412. DOI:10.4314/wsa.v43i3.05
  9. Czerniawska-Kusza, I., Ciesielczuk, T., Kusza, G. & Cichoń, A. (2006). Comparison of the Phytotoxkit Microbiotest and chemical variables for toxicity evaluation of sediments. Environmental Toxicology, 21, pp. 367–372.
  10. Daniel, M., Sharpe, A., Driver, J., Knight, A.W., Keenan, P.O., Walmsley, R.M., Robinson, A., Zhang, T. & Rawson, D. (2004). Results of a technology demonstration project to compare rapid aquatic toxicity screening tests in the analysis of industrial effluents. Journal of Environmental Monitoring, 6, pp. 855–865.
  11. EU Water Framework Directive. (2000). Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of October 23, 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy. Official Journal L, 327, 22/12/2000, pp. 1–73.
  12. Fai, P.B. & Grant, A. (2010). An assessment of the potential of the microbial assay for risk assessment (MARA) for ecotoxicological testing. Ecotoxicology, 19, 8, pp. 1626–1633.
  13. Gabrielson, J., Kühn, I., Colque-Navarro, P., Hart, M., Iversen, A., Mckenzie, D. & Möllby, R. (2003). Microplate-based microbial assay for risk assessment and (eco)toxic fingerprinting of chemicals. Analytica Chimica Acta, 485, pp. 121–130.
  14. Gagne, F. & Blaise, C. (2005). Review of biomarkers and new techniques for in situ aquatic studies with bivalves, [in:] Environmental Toxicity Testing, Thompson, K.C., Wadhia, K. & Loibner, A.P. (Eds.). Blackwell Publishing Ltd., Oxford, pp. 206–228.
  15. Goczalkowice Resorvoir. (2022). The Goczałkowicki reservoir (the so-called Goczałkowickie Lake). (http://web.archive.org/web/20140828020743/http://www.gocz.pl:80/content/view/63/39 (14.07.2022)). (in Polish)
  16. Górecki, T. & Heba El-Hussieny, M. (2010). Total Parameters as a Tool for the Evaluation of the Load of Xenobiotics in the Environment. [in:] Analytical Measurements in Aquatic Environment, Namiesnik, J. & Szefer, P. (Eds.). CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, pp. 223–241.
  17. Heisterkamp, I., Ratte, M., Schoknecht, U., Gartiser, S., Kalbe, U. & Ilvonen O. (2021). Ecotoxicological evaluation of construction products: inter‑laboratory test with DSLT and percolation test eluates in an aquatic biotest battery. Environmental Science Europe, 33, pp. 1–14. DOI:10.1186/s12302-021-00514-x
  18. Jabłońska-Czapla, M., Kowalski, E. & Mazierski, J. (2013). The role of point and non-point water pollution in metal deposits dispersion in Goczalkowice water reservoir, [in:] Current issues in water treatment and distribution, Zimoch, I. & Sawiniak, W. (Eds.). Institute of Water and Wastewater Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, pp. 47–57. (in Polish)
  19. Journal of Laws. (2009). Regulation of the Minister of the Environment of May 13 2009 on the forms and methods of monitoring surface and groundwater bodies, Journal of Laws of the Republic of Poland 2009 No. 81, item 685, (https://dziennikustaw.gov.pl/DU/2009/s/81/685 (14.07.2022)). (in Polish)
  20. Journal of Laws. (2011). Regulation of the Minister of the Environment of November 15, 2011 on the forms and methods of monitoring surface and groundwater bodies, Journal of Laws of the Republic of Poland 2011 No. 258, item 1550, (https://dziennikustaw.gov.pl/DU/2011/s/258/1550 (14.07.2022)). (in Polish)
  21. Kahru, A., Põllumaa, L., Reiman, R. & Rätsep, A. (1999). Predicting the toxicity of oil-shale industry wastewater by its phenolic composition. Alternatives to Laboratory Animals, 27, pp. 359–366.
  22. Kielka, E., Siedlecka, A., Wolf, M., Stróżak, S., Piekarska, K. & Strub, D. (2018). Ecotoxicity assessment of camphor oxime using Microtox assay – preliminary research. E3S Web of Conferences 44, 00066. DOI:10.1051/e3sconf/20184400066
  23. Kostecki, M., Kernert, J., Nocoń, W. & Janta-Koszuta, K. (2013). Seasonal and spatial variability of selected hydrochemical indices in Goczalkowice Reservoir. [in:] Current issues in water treatment and distribution, Zimoch, I. & Sawiniak, W. (Eds.). Institute of Water and Wastewater Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, pp. 93–103. (in Polish)
  24. Latif, M. & Licek, E. (2004). Toxicity assessment of wastewaters, river waters, and sediments in Austria using cost-effective microbiotests. Environmental Toxicology, 19, 4, 302–309.
  25. Lucivjanska, V., Lucivjanska, M. & Cizek, V. (2000). Sensitivity comparison of the ISO Daphnia and algal test procedures with Toxkit microbiotests. [in:] New Microbiotests for Routine Toxicity Screening and Biomonitoring, Persoone, G., Janssen, C. & De Coen, W. (Eds.). Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York, pp. 243–246.
  26. Mankiewicz-Boczek, J., Nałęcz-Jawecki, G., Drobniewska, A., Kaza, M., Sumorok, B., Izydorczyk. K.M., Zalewski, M. & Sawicki, J. (2008). Application of a microbiotests battery for complete toxicity assessment of rivers. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 71, 3, pp. 830–836.
  27. Manusadzianas, L., Balkelyte, L., Sadauskas, K., Blinova, I., Põllumaa, L. & Kahru, A. (2003). Ecotoxicological study of Lithuanian and Estonian wastewaters: selection of the biotests and correspondence between toxicity and chemical-based indices. Aquatic Toxicology, 63, 1, pp. 27–41.
  28. Maradona, A., Marshall, G., Mehrvar, M., Pushchak, R., Laursen, A.E., Mccarthy, L.H., Bostan, V. & Gilbride, K.A. (2012). Utilisation of multiple organisms in a proposed early-warning biomonitoring system for real-time detection of contaminants: preliminary results and modeling. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 219–220, pp. 95–102.
  29. Moser, H., Angrick, M. & Römbke, J. (2009). Ecotoxicological Characterisation of Waste: Results and Experiences of an International Ring Test, Springer, Stuttgart, 2009.
  30. Nałęcz-Jawecki, G., Wadhia, K., Adomas, B., Piotrowicz-Cielak, A.I. & Sawicki, J. (2010). Application of microbial assay for risk assessment biotest in evaluation of toxicity of human and veterinary antibiotics. Environmental Toxicology, 25, 5, pp. 487–494.
  31. Nature 2000 Area. (2022). Central Register of Forms of Nature Protection. GDOŚ, (https://crfop.gdos.gov.pl/CRFOP/widok/viewnatura2000.jsf?fop=PL.ZIPOP.1393.N2K.PLB240001.B (14.07.2022)). (in Polish)
  32. Olkova, A. & Berezin, G. (2021). Battery of bioassays" for diagnostics of toxicity of natural water when pollution with aluminum compounds. Journal of Ecological Engineering, 22, 2, pp.195–199. DOI:10.12911/22998993/131029
  33. Palma, P., Alvarenga, P., Palma, V., Matos, C., Fernandes, R.M., Soares, A. & Barbosa, I.R. (2010). Evaluation of surface water quality using an ecotoxicological approach: a case study of the Alqueva Reservoir (Portugal). Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 17, 3, pp. 703–716. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-009-0143-3.
  34. Pejman, A.H., Nabi Bidhendi, G.R., Karbassi, A.R., Mehrdadi, N. & Esmaeili Bidhendi, M. (2009). Evaluation of spatial and seasonal variations in surface water quality using multivariate statistical techniques. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 6, 3, pp. 467–476.
  35. Persoone, G., Baudo, R., Cotman, M., Blaise, C., Thompson, K.C., Moreira-Santos, M., Vollat, B., Törökne, A. & Han, T. (2009). Review on the acute Daphnia magna toxicity test – Evaluation of the sensitivity and the precision of assays performed with organisms from laboratory cultures or hatched from dormant eggs. Knowledge and Management of Aquatic Ecosystems, 393, pp. 1–29.
  36. Persoone, G., Marsalek, B., Blinova, I., Törökne, A., Zarina, D., Manusadzianas, L., Nalecz-Jawecki, G., Tofan, L., Stepanova, N., Tothova, L. & Kolar, B. (2003). A practical and user-friendly toxicity classification system with microbiotests for natural waters and wastewaters. Environmental Toxicology, 18, pp. 395–402.
  37. Szara-Bąk, M., Baran, A., Klimkowicz-Pawlas, A., Tkaczewska, J. & Wojtasik, B. (2021). Mobility, ecotoxicity, bioaccumulation and sources of trace elements in the bottom sediments of the Rożnów reservoir. Environmental Geochemistry Health, 43, pp. 4701–4718. DOI:10.1007/s10653-021-00957-4
  38. Szklarek, S., Stolarska, M., Wagner, I. & Mankiewicz-Boczek, J. (2015). The microbiotest battery as an important component in the assessment of snowmelt toxicity in urban watercourses – preliminary studies. Environmental Monitoring Assessment, 187, 16, pp. 1–12. DOI:10.1007/s10661-014-4252-1
  39. Szklarek, S., Kiedrzyńska, E., Kiedrzyński, M., Mankiewicz-Boczek, J., Mitsch, W.J. & Zalewski, M. (2021). Comparing ecotoxicological and physicochemical indicators of municipal wastewater effluent and river water quality in a Baltic Sea catchment in Poland. Ecological Indicators, 126, pp. 1–12. DOI:10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107611
  40. Törökne, A. & Toro, K. (2010). Evaluation of the toxicity of river and creek sediments in Hungary with two different methods. Environmental Toxicology, 25, 5, pp. 504–509.
  41. Vandenbroele, M.C., Heijerick, D.G., Vangheluwe, M.L. & Janssen. CR (2000). Comparison of the conventional algal assay and the Algaltoxkit F microbiotest for toxicity evaluation of sediment pore waters. [in:] New Microbiotests for Routine Toxicity Screening and Biomonitoring, Persoone, G., Janssen, C. &, De Coen W. (Eds.). Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York, pp. 261–268.
  42. Vliet Van der, L., Velicogna, J., Princz, J. & Scroggins, R. (2012). Phytotoxkit: a critical look at a rapid assessment tool. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 31, 2, pp. 316–323.
  43. Wadhia, K. & Thompson, K.C. (2007). Low-cost ecotoxicity testing of environmental samples using microbiotests for potential implementation of the Water Framework Directive. Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 26, 4, pp. 300–307.
  44. Wadhia, K. & Dando, T.R. (2009). Environmental toxicity testing using the Microbial Assay for Risk Assessment (MARA). Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 18, 2, pp. 213–218.
  45. Wielen Van der, C. & Halleux, I. (2000). Shifting from the conventional ISO 8692 algal growth inhibition test to the Algaltoxkit F microbiotest. [in:] New Microbiotests for Routine Toxicity Screening and Biomonitoring, Persoone, G., Janssen, C. & De Coen, W. (Eds.). Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York, pp. 269–272. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4615-4289-6_44.
  46. Wolska, L., Kochanowska, A. & Namiesnik, J. (2010). Application of Biotests – chapter 9. [in:] Analytical Measurements in Aquatic Environment, Namiesnik, J. & Szefer, P. (Eds.). CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, pp. 189–223.
  47. Zgórska, A., Bondaruk, J., Dudziak, M. & Hamerla, A. (2020). Impact of industrial discharge on aquatic ecosystems of the Kłodnica River with reference to Water Framework Directive objectives. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 29, 4, pp. 2945–2953. DOI:10.15244/pjoes/112931
  48. Zhengjun, W. & Huili, G. (2010). Evaluating the effectiveness of routine water quality monitoring in Miyun reservoir based on geostatistical analysis. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 160, pp. 465–478. DOI: 10.1007/s10661-008-0711—x.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Piotr Łaszczyca
1
ORCID: ORCID
Mirosław Nakonieczny
2
ORCID: ORCID
Maciej Kostecki
3
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Retired university professor, University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland
  2. University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland
  3. Institute of Environmental Engineering Polish Academy of Sciences, Zabrze, Poland
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The aim of the study was to determine the toxicity of the extract obtained from the cyanobacterial cells derived from the waters of Zemborzycki dam reservoir with use of a battery of biotests. The taxonomic identification of the bloom-forming cyanobacteria revealed high abundance of Aphanizomenon flos-aquae and Dolichospermum spp. (Anabaena spp.) and in a lower degree of Microcystis aeruginosa and Planktothrix agardhii. In the extract obtained from concentrated cyanobacterial cells, hepatotoxin microcystin-LR at a concentration of 22.89 ± 3.74 μg/L and neurotoxin Antx-a at 13.02 ± 0.01 μg/L have been detected. Toxicity of the extract was evaluated with the following assays: Daphtoxkit F magna with the crustacean Daphnia magna, Thamnotoxkit F with the crustacean Thamnocephalus platyurus, Rotoxkit F with the rotifer Brachionus calyciflorus and Protoxkit F with ciliate Tetrahymena thermophila. The most sensitive organism among all studied was T. platyurus for which EC50 was estimated to be 1.2% of the initial extract concentration. On the basis of the highest obtained value of the toxicity unit (TU = 83) the studied sample was classified to the IV class, which is of high acute toxicity. Additionally, it was found that reactivity on cyanobacterial products differs greatly among organisms used in bioassays, which indicate the need for using a set of biotests.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Anna Sierosławska
Anna Rymuszka
Tadeusz Skowroński

This page uses 'cookies'. Learn more