Search results

Filters

  • Journals
  • Authors
  • Keywords
  • Date
  • Type

Search results

Number of results: 4
items per page: 25 50 75
Sort by:
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Carbon capture and sequestration from a stationary source comprises four distinct engineering processes: separation of CO2 from the other flue gases, compression, transportation, and injection into the chosen storage site. An analysis of the thermodynamic and transport properties of CO2 shows that dissolving this gas in seawater at depths more than 600 m is, most likely, an optimal long-term storage method; and that for transportation, the CO2 must be in the denser supercritical state at pressures higher than 7.377 MPa. The separation, compression, transportation, and injection processes require significant energy expenditures, which are determined in this paper using realistic equipment efficiencies, for the cases of two currently in operation coal power plants in Texas. The computations show that the total energy requirements for carbon removal and sequestration are substantial, close to one-third of the energy currently generated by the two power plants. The cost analysis shows that two parameters – the unit cost of the pipeline and the discount factor of the corporation – have a very significant effect on the annualized cost of the CCS process. Doubling the unit cost of the pipeline increases the total annualized cost of the entire CCS project by 36% and increasing the discount rate from 5% to 15% increases this annualized cost by 32%.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Efstathios E. Michaelides
1

  1. Department of Engineering, Texas Christian University, Fort Worth, TX, 76129, USA
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Phytolith-occluded carbon (PhytOC) is highly stable, and constitutes an important source of long-term C storage in agrosystems. This stored carbon is resistant to the processes of oxidation of carbon compounds. In our research phytolith content in barley (Estonia) and oat (Poland) grain and straw was assessed at field trials, with Si as a liquid immune stimulant OPTYSIL and compost fertilisation. We showed that cereals can produce relatively high amounts of phytoliths. PhytOC plays a key role in carbon sequestration, particularly for poor, sandy Polish and Estonian soils. The phytolith content was always higher in straw than in grain regardless of the type of cereals. The phytolith content in oat grains varied from 18.46 to 21.28 mg∙g−1 DM, and in straw 27.89–38.97 mg∙g−1 DM. The phytolith content in barley grain ranged from 17.24 to 19.86 mg∙g−1 DM, and in straw from 22.06 to 49.08 mg∙g−1 DM. Our results suggest that oat ecosystems can absorb from 14.94 to 41.73 kg e-CO2∙ha−1 and barley absorb from 0.32 to 1.60 kg e-CO2∙ha−1. The accumulation rate of PhytOC can be increased 3-fold in Polish conditions through foliar application of silicon, and 5-fold in Estonian conditions. In parallel, the compost fertilisation increased the phytolith content in cereals.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Beata Rutkowska
1
ORCID: ORCID
Peter Schröder
2
ORCID: ORCID
Michel Mench
3 4
ORCID: ORCID
Francois Rineau
5
ORCID: ORCID
Witold Szulc
6
ORCID: ORCID
Wiesław Szulc
1
ORCID: ORCID
Jarosław Pobereżny
7
ORCID: ORCID
Kristjan Tiideberg
8
ORCID: ORCID
Tomasz Niedziński
1
ORCID: ORCID
Evelin Loit
8
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Warsaw University of Life Sciences – SGGW, Institute of Agriculture, Nowoursynowska St, 166, 02-787 Warsaw, Poland
  2. Helmholtz Center for Environmental Health, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Research Unit Environmental Simulation, Ingolstädter Landstraße 1, D-85764 Neuherberg, Munich, Germany
  3. University of Bordeaux, Amphithéâtre 3 à 12, 33000, Bordeaux, France
  4. INRAE – National Research Institute for Agriculture, Food and the Environment, 147 rue de l’Université 75338, Paris, France
  5. Hasselt University, Martelarenlaan 42, 3500, Hasselt, Belgium
  6. Fire University, Słowackiego St, 52/54, 01-629 Warsaw, Poland
  7. University of Science and Technology, Kaliskiego Ave., 7, 85-796 Bydgoszcz, Poland
  8. Estonian University of Life Sciences, Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Fr. R. Kreutzwaldi 1, 51006, Tartu, Estonia
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The aim of the study was to recognise the accumulation of organic carbon (SOC) in the soils of Polish grasslands (GL) and to consider the possibility of increasing its sequestration in these soils. The Tiurin method (mineral soils) and the mass loss method (soil of organic origin) were used. It was found that: (i) the average SOC content of mineral soils is 2.44% and of organic soils – 10.42%; (ii) according to the Polish criteria, approximately 84% of GL mineral soils are classified as classes with high and very high SOC content, and over 15% and 1% – in classes with medium and low SOC content, respectively; more than 99% of organic soils belong to two classes with the highest SOC content and less than 1% to the class with an average content; (iii) according to the European Soil Bureau, the share of GL mineral soils with a high SOC content is slightly over 4%, medium – slightly over 47%, and low and very low – around 50%; for organic soils they are 67, 29, and 4%, respectively; (iv) the reserves of organic carbon in the 0–30 cm layer on the entire surface of GL soils amount to 412.7 Tg of SOC. There is considerable scope for increasing the SOC stock in meadow-pasture soils.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Stefan Pietrzak
1
ORCID: ORCID
Jakub T. Hołaj-Krzak
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Institute of Technology and Life Sciences – National Research Institute, Falenty, 3 Hrabska Avenue, 05-090 Raszyn, Poland
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The article analyzes soil organic carbon (SOC) content of in Poland from 2015 to 2021. The research aims to determine SOC levels and their dependence on soil agronomic categories and drought intensity. Soil samples from 1011 farms across 8 Polish voivodships were collected for analysis, all from the same agricultural plots. SOC determination was conducted using the Tiurin method. The results indicate a low SOC content nationwide (0.85-2.35%). Heavy soils exhibited higher SOC accumulation compared to light soils. Moreover, significant drought impact led to decreased SOC content in affected regions. Scientific evidence underscores a declining trend in organic carbon stock within agricultural soils, attributed to natural soil changes and unsustainable management practices. This decline is concerning given the crucial role of SOC in soil health, quality, and crop productivity. Therefore, it is imperative to monitor and address areas with low SOC levels to enhance SOC abundance. Furthermore, when used as a whole-cell biocatalyst in a low-cost upflow MFC, the Morganella morganii-rich SF11 consortium demonstrated the highest voltage and power density of 964.93±1.86 mV and 0.56±0.00 W/m3, respectively. These results suggest that the SF11 bacterial consortium has the potential for use in ceramic separator MFCs for the removal of penicillin and electricity generation.
Go to article

Bibliography

  1. Amoah-Antwi, C., Kwiatkowska-Malina, J., Szara, E., Fentona, O., Thornton, S.F. & Malina, G. (2022). Title of article, Assessing Factors Controlling Structural Changes of Humic Acids in Soils Amended with Organic Materials to Improve Soil Functionality, Agronomy, 12(2), pp. 1–17. DOI:10.3390/agronomy12020283.
  2. Breś, W., Golcz, A., Komosa, A., Kozik, E. & Tyksiński, W. (1997). Fertilization of garden plants. Edited by A.R. w Poznaniu. Poznań (1997).
  3. Castañeda-Gómez, L., Lajtha, K., Bowedena, R., Jauhar, F.N.M., Jai, J., Feng, X. & Simpson, M.J. (2023). Soil organic matter molecular composition with long-term detrital alterations is controlled by site-specific forest properties, Global Change Biology, 29(1), pp. 243–259. DOI:10.1111/gcb.16456.
  4. Communication from The Commission to The Council, The European Parliament, The European Economic and Social Committee and The Committee of The Regions - Thematic Strategy for Soil Protection (2006) Commission of The European Communities. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2006:0231:FIN:EN:PDF.
  5. Cotrufo, M.F. & Lavallee, J.M. (2022). Chapter One - Soil organic matter formation, persistence, and functioning: A synthesis of current understanding to inform its conservation and regeneration, Advances in Agronomy, 172, pp. 1–66.
  6. Dignac, M.F., Derrein, D., Barre, P., Barot, S., Cécillon, L., Chenu, C., Chevalier, T., Freschet, G.T., Garnier, P., Guenet, B., Hedde, M., Klumpp, K., Laschermes, G., Maron, P.A., Nunan, N., Rumet, K. & Basile-Doelsch, I. (2017). Increasing soil carbon storage: mechanisms, effects of agricultural practices and proxies. A review, Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 37(2). DOI:10.1007/s13593-017-0421-2.
  7. Dynarski, K.A., Bossio, D.A. & Scow, K.M. (2020). Dynamic Stability of Soil Carbon: Reassessing the “Permanence” of Soil Carbon Sequestration, Frontiers in Environmental Science, 8. DOI:10.3389/fenvs.2020.514701.
  8. Francaviglia, R. Almagro, M. & Vicente-Vicente, J.L., (2023). Conservation Agriculture and Soil Organic Carbon: Principles, Processes, Practices and Policy Options, Soil Systems, 7(17), pp. 1–35. DOI:10.3390/soilsystems7010017.
  9. Gerke, J. (2022). The Central Role of Soil Organic Matter in Soil Fertility and Carbon Storage, Soil Systems, 6(2). DOI:10.3390/soilsystems6020033.
  10. Giachin, G., Neprawiszta, R., Mandaliti, W., Melino, S., Morgan, A., Scaini, D., Mazzei, P., Piccalo, A., Lagname, G., Paci, M. & Leita, L. (2017). The mechanisms of humic substances self-assembly with biological molecules: The case study of the prion protein, PLoS ONE, 12(11), pp. 1–16. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0188308.
  11. Gonet, S.S. &Markiewicz, M. (2007). The role of organic matter in the environment, PTSH, Wrocław 2007.
  12. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2022). Risk management and decision-making in relation to sustainable development, Climate Change and Land. DOI:10.1017/9781009157988.009.
  13. Kiryluk, A. & Kostecka, J. (2023). Sustainable development in rural areas in the perspective of a decade of ecosystem restoration, Ekonomia i Środowisko - Economics and Environment, 83(4). DOI:10.34659/eis.2022.83.4.535.
  14. Kuś, J. (2015). Soil organic matter - meaning, content and balancing, Studies and Reports IUNG-PIB, 45(19), pp. 27–53. DOI:10.26114/sir.iung.2015.45.02. (in Polish)
  15. Lal, R., Follertt, R.F., Stewart, B.A. & Kimble, J.M. (2007). Soil carbon sequestration to mitigate climate change and advance food security, Soil Science, 172(12), pp. 943–956. DOI:10.1097/ss.0b013e31815cc498.
  16. Lipiński, W., Lipińska, H., Kornas, R. & Watros, A.(2020). Selected agrochemical parameters of grassland soils in Poland, Agronomy Science, 75(2), pp. 5–23. DOI:10.24326/as.2020.2.1. (in Polish)
  17. Łądkiewicz, K., Wszȩdyrówny-Nast, M. & Jaskiewicz, K. (2017). Comparison of different methods for determination of organic matter content, Scientific Review Engineering and Environmental Sciences, 26(1), pp. 99–107. DOI:10.22630/PNIKS.2017.26.1.09.
  18. Myśleńska, E. (2001). Organic soils and laboratory methods of their research, I PWN, Warszawa 2021. (in Polish)
  19. Nachtergaele, F.O., Petri, M. & Biancalani, R. (2016). Land degradation, World Soil Resources and Food Security. DOI:10.4337/9781788974912.l.4.
  20. Nasiri, S., Andalibi,B., Tavakoli, A., Delavar, M.A., El-Keblawy, A., Van Zwieten, L. & Mastinu, A. (2023) The mineral biochar alters the biochemical and microbial properties of the soil and the grain yield of Hordeum vulgare L. under drought stress, Land, 12(3), pp. 1–16. DOI:10.3390/land12030559.
  21. Newton, P., Cyvita, N., Frankel-Goldwater, L., Bartel, K. & Johno, C. (2020). What is regenerative agriculture? A review of scholar and practitioner definitions based on processes and outcomes, Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 4(October), pp. 1–11. DOI:10.3389/fsufs.2020.577723.
  22. Pietrzak, S. & Hołaj-Krzak, J. T. (2022). The content and stock of organic carbon in the soils of grasslands in Poland and the possibility of increasing its sequestration. Journal of Water and Land Development, 54, 68–76. https://doi.org/10.24425/jwld.2022.141556
  23. Pikuła, D. & Rutkowska, A. (2017). Fractional composition of humus as a characteristic of the quality of organic matter, Studies and Reports IUNG-PIB, 53(7), pp. 81–91. DOI:10.26114/sir.iung.2017.53.06.(in Polish)
  24. Robertson, A.D., Paustain, K., Ogle, S., Wallenstein M.D., Lugato, E. & Cotrufo, M.F. (2019). Unifying soil organic matter formation and persistence frameworks: The MEMS model, Biogeosciences, 16(6), pp. 1225–1248. DOI:10.5194/bg-16-1225-2019.
  25. Rusco, E., Jones, R. & Bidoglio, G. (2001). Organic Matter in the soils of Europe: Present status and future trends Institute for Environment and Sustainability European Soil Bureau, European Commission Joint Research Centre [Preprint], (October 2001).
  26. Ryżak, M., Bartmiński, P. & Biegaowski, A. (2009). Methods of determining the granulometric composition of mineral soils, Acta Agrophysica, 175(4), pp. 34-39. http://www.old.acta-agrophysica.org/artykuly/acta_agrophysica/ActaAgr_175_2009_4_1_1.pdf. (in Polish)
  27. Schmidt, M.W.I., Torn, M., Abiven, S., Dittmar, T., Guggenberger, G., Janssen, I.A., Kleber, M., Kogel-Knabner, I., Lehmann, J., Manning, D.AC., Nannipieri, P., Rasse, D., Weiner, S. & Trumbore, S.E. (2011). Persistence of soil organic matter as an ecosystem property, Nature, 478(7367), pp. 49–56. DOI:10.1038/nature10386.
  28. The European Green Deal (2019) European Commission [Preprint], (December), https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=COM:2019:640:FIN.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Urszula Zimnoch
1 2
Paulina Bogusz
1 3
Marzena Sylwia Brodowska
1
Jacek Michalak
4

  1. Department of Agricultural and Environmental Chemistry, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Poland
  2. Complexor Fertilizer Group, Stawiski, Poland
  3. Fertilizers Research Group, Łukasiewicz Research Network–New Chemical Syntheses Institute, Puławy, Poland
  4. Regional Chemical and Agricultural Station in Łódź, Poland

This page uses 'cookies'. Learn more