Search results

Filters

  • Journals
  • Authors
  • Keywords
  • Date
  • Type

Search results

Number of results: 7
items per page: 25 50 75
Sort by:
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

This paper presents a new interim check device for coordinate measuring machines (CMMs) built from an AISI 1020 carbon steel bar with the incorporation of calibrated spheres. This artifact’s construction was made to make the interim checks of machines of this type faster and cheaper. Three devices were designed based on the ISO 10360-2 standard, the good practice guide No. 42 (NPL), and prominent authors’ research on the subject. The three options are presented in detail, but only one was built due to budget, size, and adaptability restrictions. An exploratory study was conducted to verify the device’s usability in two CMMs and concluded that the differences between the measurements are not significant. However, one machine had absolute variation values and a total standard deviation higher than the other, generating a larger expanded uncertainty.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Rodrigo Schons Arenhart
1
Morgana Pizzolato
1
Fernanda Hänsch Beuren
2
Adriano Mendonça Souza
3
Leandro Cantorski da Rosa
1

  1. Federal University of Santa Maria, Department of Production Engineering and Systems, Roraima Avenue, 1000, Santa Maria, Brazil
  2. State University of Santa Catarina, Department of Industrial Technology, Fernando Hastreiter Street, São Bento do Sul, Brazil
  3. Federal University of Santa Maria, Statistics Department, Roraima Avenue, 1000, Santa Maria, Brazil
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Obtaining discrete data is inseparably connected with losing information on surface properties. In contact measurements, the ball tip functions as a mechanical-geometrical filter. In coordinate measurements the coordinates of the measurement points of a discrete distribution on the measured surface are obtained. Surface geometric deviations are represented by a set of local deviations, i.e. deviations of measurement points from the nominal surface (the CAD model), determined in a direction normal to this surface. The results of measurements depend both on the ball tip diameter and the grid size of measurement points. This article presents findings on the influence of the ball tip diameter and the grid size on coordinate measurement results along with the experimental results of measurement of a free-form milled surface, in order to determine its local geometric deviations. One section of the surface under research was measured using different measurement parameters. The whole surface was also scanned with different parameters, observing the rule of selecting the tip diameter d and the sampling interval T in the ratio of 2:1.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Małgorzata Poniatowska
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

One of the main problems of machining of moulds is the need for an effective monitoring system of wear of cutting tools. This paper presents the results of coordinate measurements of a cutting tool which were obtained by using the non-contact measuring system based on the ACCURA II coordinate measuring machine equipped with the LineScan laser measuring probe and the Calypso metrology software. Inves-tigations were carried out for several measurement strategies including different measurement resolutions and scanning speeds. The results of the coordinate measurements obtained by using the above-mentioned coordinate measuring system were compared to the reference data measured by means of the InfiniteFocus microscope. The measurement results were analysed by means of two software packages: Focus Inspection and Zeiss Reverse Engineering. The point clouds measured by using the LineScan probe were characterized by the selected deviation statistics equal to 4-6 μm when a good match between measurement points and the reference data was obtained. Moreover, these statistics mainly depend on the measurement resolution. The results of the performed experimental research allowed for drawing conclusions concerning the significance of the effect of the adopted measurement strategies on the results of the non-contact coordinate measurements of the selected cutting tool. The application of the non-contact coordinate measurements to the above-mentioned measurement task may contribute to the development of regeneration methods for cutting tools applied for mould manufacturing.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

A. Bazan
1
M. Magdziak
1
B. Jamuła
1

  1. Department of Manufacturing Techniques and Automation, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Aeronautics, Rzeszów University of Technology, al. Powstańców Warszawy 12, 35-959 Rzeszów, Poland
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Reliable measurement uncertainty is a crucial part of the conformance/nonconformance decision-making process in the field of Quality Control in Manufacturing. The conventional GUM-method cannot be applied to CMM measurements primarily because of lack of an analytical relationship between the input quantities and the measurement. This paper presents calibration uncertainty analysis in commercial CMM-based Coordinate Metrology. For the case study, the hole-plate calibrated by the PTB is used as a workpiece. The paper focuses on thermo-mechanical errors which immediately affect the dimensional accuracy of manufactured parts of high-precision manufacturers. Our findings have highlighted some practical issues related to the importance of maintaining thermal equilibrium before the measurement. The authors have concluded that the thermal influence as an uncertainty contributor of CMM measurement result dominates the overall budgets for this example. The improved calibration uncertainty assessment technique considering thermal influence is described in detail for the use of a wide range of CMM users.
Go to article

Bibliography

[1] International Organization for Standardization (2009). Geometrical product specifications (GPS) – Acceptance and reverification tests for coordinate measuring machines (CMM) – Part 2: CMMs used for measuring linear dimensions (ISO Standard No. 10360-2:2009). https://www.iso.org/standard/40954.html
[2] International Organization for Standardization (2017). Geometrical product specifications (GPS) – Inspection by measurement of workpieces and measuring equipment – Part 1: Decision rules for proving conformance or non-conformance with specifications (ISO Standard No. 14253-1:2017). https://www.iso.org/standard/70137.html
[3] Mussatayev, M., Huang, M.,&Tang, Zh., (2020). Current issues in uncertainty of dimensional tolerance metrology and the future development in the domain of tolerancing. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 715(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/715/1/012084
[4] Leach, R., & Smith, S. T. (Eds.). (2018). Basics of Precision Engineering. CRC Press.
[5] David, F., & Hannaford, J. (2012). Good Practice Guide No. 80. National Physical Laboratory.
[6] International Organization for Standardization (2013). Geometrical product specifications (GPS) – Coordinate measuring machines (CMM): Technique for determining the uncertainty of measurement – Part 1: Overview and metrological characteristics (ISO Standard No. ISO/TS 15530-1). https://www.iso.org/standard/38693.html
[7] Płowucha, W. (2019). Point-straight line distance as model for uncertainty evaluation of coordinate measurement. Measurement, 135, 83–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2018.11.008
[8] Mussatayev, M., Huang, M., & Beshleyev, S. (2020). Thermal influences as an uncertainty contributor of the coordinate measuring machine (CMM). The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 111, pp. 537–547. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-06012-3
[9] Sładek, J., & G˛aska, A. (2012). Evaluation of coordinate measurement uncertainty with use of virtual machine model based on Monte Carlo method. Measurement, 45(6), 1564–1575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2012.02.020
[10] Saunders, P., Verma, M., Orchard, N., & Maropoulos, P. (2013). The application of uncertainty evaluating software for the utilisation of machine tool systems for final inspection. 10th International Conference and Exhibition on Laser Metrology, Coordinate Measuring Machine and Machine Tool Performance, LAMDAMAP 2013, 219–228.
[11] International Organization for Standardization (2011). Geometrical product specifications (GPS) – Coordinate measuring machines (CMM): Technique for determining the uncertainty of measurement – Part 3: Use of calibrated workpieces or measurement standards (ISO Standard No. 15530-3). https://www.iso.org/standard/53627.html
[12] International Organization for Standardization (2004). Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS) – Coordinate measuring machines (CMM): Technique for determining the uncertainty of measurement – Part 3: Use of calibrated workpieces or standards (ISO Standard No. ISO/TS 15530-3). https://www.iso.org/standard/38695.html
[13] European Cooperation for Accreditation of Laboratories. (1995). Coordinate Measuring Machine Calibration [Publication Reference, EAL-G17].
[14] International Organization for Standardization. (2006). Geometrical product specifications (GPS) – Guidelines for the evaluation of coordinate measuring machine (CMM) test uncertainty (ISO Standard No. ISO/TS 23165). https://www.iso.org/standard/24236.html
[15] Fang, C. Y., Sung, C. K., & Lui, K. W. (2005). Measurement uncertainty analysis of CMM with ISO GUM. ASPE Proceedings, United States, 1758–1761.
[16] Płowucha, W. (2020). Point plane distances model for uncertainty evaluation of coordinate measurement. Metrology and Measurement Systems, 27(4), 625–639. https://doi.org/10.24425/mms.2020.134843
[17] Ruffa, S., Panciani, G. D., Ricci, F., & Vicario, G. (2013). Assessing measurement uncertainty in CMM measurements: comparison of different approaches. International Journal of Metrology and Quality Engineering, 4(3), 163–168. https://doi.org/10.1051/ijmqe/2013057
[18] Cheng Y. B., Chen X. H., & Li Y. R. (2020). Uncertainty Analysis and Evaluation of Form Measurement Task for CMM. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 41(2), 134–138. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-1158.2020.02.02 (in Chinese).
[19] Rost, K., Wendt, K., & Härtig, F. (2016). Evaluating a task-specific measurement uncertainty for gear measuring instruments via Monte Carlo simulation. Precision Engineering, 44, 220–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precisioneng.2016.01.001
[20] Valdez, M. O.,&Morse, E. P. (2017). The role of extrinsic factors in industrial task-specific uncertainty. Precision Engineering, 49, 78–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precisioneng.2017.01.013
[21] Yang, J., Li, G., Wu, B., Gong, J., Wang, J., & Zhang, M. (2015). Efficient methods for evaluating task-specific uncertainty in laser-tracking measurement. MAPAN-Journal Metrology Society of India, 30(2), 105–117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12647-014-0126-9
[22] Haitjema, H. (2019). Calibration of displacement laser interferometer systems for industrial metrology. Sensors, 19(19), 4100. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19194100
[23] Doytchinov, I., Shore, P., Nicquevert, B., Tonnellier, X., Heather, A., & Modena, M. (2019). Thermal effects compensation and associated uncertainty for large magnet assembly precision alignment. Precision Engineering, 59, 134–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precisioneng.2019.06.005
[24] Van Gestel, N. (2011). Determining measurement uncertainties of feature measurements on CMMs (Bepalen van meetonzekerheden bij het meten van vormelementen met CMMs) [Doctoral dissertation, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven]. Digital repository for KU Leuven Association. https://lirias.kuleuven.be/retrieve/157334 [25] Mussatayev, M., Huang, M., & Rysbayeva, G. (2019). Role of uncertainty calculation in dimensional metrology using Coordinate Measuring Machine. ARCTIC Journal, 72(6).
[26] International Organization for Standardization (2005). Test code for machine tools – Part 9: Estimation of measurement uncertainty for machine tool tests according to series ISO 230, basic equations (ISO Standard No. ISO/TR 230-9:2005). https://www.iso.org/standard/39165.html
[27] International Organization for Standardization (2008). Uncertainty of measurement-Part 3: Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (GUM: 1995). https://www.iso.org/standard/50461.html
[28] Cheng, Y.,Wang, Z., Chen, X., Li, Y., Li, H., Li, H., &Wang, H. (2019). Evaluation and optimization of task-oriented measurement uncertainty for coordinate measuring machines based on geometrical product specifications. Applied Sciences, 9(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9010006
[29] Jakubiec W., & Płowucha W. (2013). First Coordinate Measurements Uncertainty Evaluation Software Fully Consistent with the GPS Philosophy. Procedia CIRP, 10, 317–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2013.08.049
[30] International Organization for Standardization. (2013). Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS) – systematic errors and contributions to measurement uncertainty of length measurement due to thermal influences (ISO Standard No. ISO/TR 16015:2003). https://www.iso.org/standard/29436.html
[31] Huang, Z., Zhao, L., Li, K., Wang, H., & Zhou, T. (2019). A sampling method based on improved firefly algorithm for profile measurement of aviation engine blade. Metrology and Measurement Systems, 26(4), 757–771. https://doi.org/10.24425/mms.2019.130565
[32] Ramesh, R., Mannan, M. A., & Poo, A. N. (2000). Error compensation in machine tools. A review: part I: geometric, cutting-force induced and fixture-dependent errors. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 40(9), 1235–1256. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0890-6955(00)00009-2
[33] International Organization for Standardization. (2004). Test conditions for numerically controlled turning machines and turning centres – Part 8: Evaluation of thermal distortions (ISO Standard No. ISO 13041-8:2004). https://www.iso.org/standard/34663.html
[34] Doytchinov, I., (2017). Alignment measurements uncertainties for large assemblies using probabilistic analysis techniques. [Doctoral dissertation, Cranfield University]. CERN Document Server. https://cds.cern.ch/record/2299206
[35] Štrbac, B., Radlovacki, V., Spasic-Jokic, V., Delic, M., & Hadžistevic, M. (2017). The difference between GUM and ISO/TC 15530-3 method to evaluate the measurement uncertainty of flatness by a CMM. MAPAN, 32(4), 251–257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12647-017-0227-3
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Meirbek Mussatayev
1
Meifa Huang
1
Marat Nurtas
2
Azamat Arynov
3

  1. Guilin University of Electronic Technology, School of Mechanical & Electrical Engineering, 1 Jinji Rd, Guilin, Guangxi, 541004, China
  2. International Information Technology University, Department of Mathematical and Computer Modelling, Kazakhstan
  3. School of Engineering at Warwick University, United Kingdom
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Local geometric deviations of free-form surfaces are determined as normal deviations of measurement points from the nominal surface. Different sources of errors in the manufacturing process result in deviations of different character, deterministic and random. The different nature of geometric deviations may be the basis for decomposing the random and deterministic components in order to compute deterministic geometric deviations and further to introduce corrections to the processing program. Local geometric deviations constitute a spatial process. The article suggests applying the methods of spatial statistics to research on geometric deviations of free-form surfaces in order to test the existence of spatial autocorrelation. Identifying spatial correlation of measurement data proves the existence of a systematic, repetitive processing error. In such a case, the spatial modelling methods may be applied to fitting a surface regression model representing the deterministic deviations. The first step in model diagnosing is to examine the model residuals for the probability distribution and then the existence of spatial autocorrelation.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Małgorzata Poniatowska
Andrzej Werner
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The paper presents a detailed theoretical background for coordinate measurement uncertainty evaluation by means of Type B evaluation method, taking into account information on accuracy of a coordinate measuring system given with the formula for maximum permissible errors of length measurement and verification test results. A proposal for evaluation of the verification test results is made. A measurement model based on the point-plane distance equation is presented. A detailed analysis of the partial derivatives (sensitivity factors in an uncertainty budget) of the measurement model is presented. The analyses of measurement uncertainty for different geometrical characteristicswere conducted using this measurement model. Examples of uncertainty evaluation for geometrical deviations are presented: position of a point related to a datum plane and flatness in the case of convex or concave surfaces. The examples include detailed uncertainty budgets.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Wojciech Płowucha
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Coordinate Measurement Machines (CMMs) have been extensively used in inspecting mechanical parts with higher accuracy. In order to enhance the efficiency and precision of the measurement of aviation engine blades, a sampling method of profile measurement of aviation engine blade based on the firefly algorithm is researched. Then, by comparing with the equal arc-length sampling algorithm (EAS) and the equi-parametric sampling algorithm (EPS) in one simulation, the proposed sampling algorithm shows its better sampling quality than the other two algorithms. Finally, the effectiveness of the algorithm is verified by an experimental example of blade profile. Both simulated and experimental results show that the method proposed in this paper can ensure the measurement accuracy by measuring a smaller number of points.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Zhi Huang
Liao Zhao
Kai Li
Hongyan Wang
Tao Zhou
ORCID: ORCID

This page uses 'cookies'. Learn more