Search results

Filters

  • Journals
  • Authors
  • Keywords
  • Date
  • Type

Search results

Number of results: 19
items per page: 25 50 75
Sort by:
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The article, drawing on the tradition of Frankfurt School, brings to the focus a great paradox of the Enlightenment – a hidden affinity of rationality and mythology. Noticing the phenomenon of great enthusiasm, underlying the message of the Enlightenment, it tries to pin down the starting point of a new scientistic eschatology – bringing to life a mirage of unending prosperity and unlimited profusion, following the advances of science. The idea of accumulation of knowledge is approached as a pivot of a new mythology. At the same time, putting light on the notion of “cognition industry”, the article offers critical insights tracing an inevitable erosion of high-minded dreams and expectations. Cognition industry is studied as a machinery turning up-side down the hopes of the Enlightenment – protecting the interests of instrumental rationality, and replacing the ideal of getting at the truth with the mechanism putting in motion the “production” of truth, operating in a domain of narrowly calibrated utility.
Go to article

Bibliography

Adorno T., Minima moralia. Refleksje z poharatanego życia, przeł. M. Łukaszewicz, Kraków 2009.
Bacon F., Novum Organum, przeł. J. Wikarjak, Warszawa 1955.
Arendt H., Kondycja ludzka, przeł. A. Łagodzka, Warszawa 2000.
Benjamin W., Twórca jako wytwórca, wyb. H. Orłowski, przeł. H. Orłowski i J. Sikorski, Poznań 1975.
Bernstein R., The Pragmatic Turn, Polity Press, Cambridge, 2010.
Blumenberg H., Praca nad mitem, przeł. K. Najdek i inni, Warszawa 2009.
Brunkhorst H., Critical Theory and the analysis of contemporary mass society, [w]: The Cambridge Companion to Critical Theory, red. F. Rush, Cambridge University Press, 2004.
Cassirer E., Logika nauk o kulturze, przeł., P. Parszutowicz, J.K. Kęty 2011.
Cassirer E., Jezyk i mit. Przyczynek do zagadnienia imion bogów, przeł. P. Parszutowicz, Kęty 2021.
Comte A., Rozprawa o duchu filozofii pozytywnej, przeł. J.K., Kęty 2001.
Condorcet A., Szkic obrazu postępu ducha ludzkiego poprzez dzieje, przeł. E. Hartleb, Warszawa 1957.
Derrida J., Fichus. Wykład frankfurcki, przeł. P. Sadzik, Kraków 2021.
Foucault M., Słowa i rzeczy. Archeologia nauk humanistycznych, przeł. T. Komendant, t. 1–2, Gdańsk 2000.
Foucault M., Porządek dyskursu, przeł. M. Kozłowski, Gdańsk 2002.
Freyenhagen F., Critical Theory Philosophy, [w:] The Cambridge Companion to Philosophical Methodology. Gadamer H-G., Prawda i metoda, przeł. B. Baran, Warszawa 2013.
Habermas J., Technika i nauka jako „ideologia”, przeł. M. Łukaszewicz, [w:] Czy kryzys socjologii?, opr. J. Szacki, Warszawa 1977.
Hadot P., Ćwiczenia duchowe i filozofia starożytna, przeł. P. Domański i W. Klenczon, Warszawa 2019.
Heidegger M., Budować, mieszkać, myśleć. Eseje wybrane, Warszawa 1977.
Horkheimer M., Adorno T., Dialektyka oświecenia. Fragmenty filozoficzne, przeł. M. Łukaszewicz, Warszawa 2010.
Horkheimer M., Krytyka instrumentalnego rozumu, przeł. H. Walentowicz, Warszawa 2007.
Husserl E., Kryzys nauk europejskich i fenomenologia transcendentalna. Wprowadzenie do filozofii fenomenologicznej, przeł. S. Walczewska, Kraków 2017.
Kierkegaard S., O pojęciu ironii z nieustającym odniesieniem do Sokratesa, przeł. A. Djakowska, Warszawa 1999.
Jaeger W., Paideia, przeł. M. Plezia i H. Bednarek, Warszawa 2001.
James W., Pragmatyzm. Nowe imię paru starych stylów myślenia, przeł. M. Szczubiałka, Warszawa 1998.
Kołakowski L., Horror metaphysicus, przeł. M. Panufnik, Kraków 2012.
Komendant T., Władze dyskursu, Warszawa 1994.
Kornbilth H., A naturalistic methodology, [w:] The Cambridge Companion to Philosophical Methodology.
Krois J., Cassirer: Symbolic Forms and History, Yale University Press, 1987.
Krokiewicz A., Sokrates. Dzieła, t. 3, Warszawa 2000.
Kuhn T., Struktura rewolucji naukowych, przeł. H. Ostromęcka, Warszawa 2009.
Lakoff G., Johnson M., Metafory w naszym życiu, przeł. P. Krzeszowski, Warszawa 2020.
Leśniak K., Franciszek Bacon, Warszawa 1961. Nagel T., The View from Nowhere, Oxford University Press, 1986.
Nietzsche F., Wiedza radosna, przeł. M. Łukaszewicz, Gdańsk 2008.
Putnam H., Pragmatism and Realism, [w:] The Revival of Pragmatism. New Essays on Social Thought, Law, and Culture, red. M. Dickstein, Duke University Press, 1998, s. 37–53.
Putnam H., Pragmatyzm. Pytania otwarte, przeł. B. Chwedeńczuk, Warszawa 1999.
Putnam H., Wiele twarzy realizmu i inne eseje, przeł. A. Grobler, Warszawa 2013.
Quine W., Słowo i przedmiot, przeł. C. Cieśliński, Warszawa 1999.
Readings B., Uniwersytet w ruinie, przeł. S. Stecko, Warszawa 2017.
Reale G., Historia filozofii starożytnej, t. 1, przeł. E. Zieliński, Lublin 2005.
Roberts J., The dialectic of enlightenment, [w:] The Cambridge Companion to Critical Theory, red. F. Rush, Cambridge University Press 2004.
Rorty R., Essays on Heidegger and Others. Philosophical Papers. t. 2, Cambridge University Press 1991.
Rorty R., Filozofia a zwierciadło natury, przeł. M. Szczubiałka, Warszawa 1994.
Rush F., Conceptual foundations of Early Critical Theory, [w:] The Cambridge Companion to Critical Theory.
Skarga B., Kwintet metafizyczny, Kraków, 2005.
Skidelsky E., Ernst Cassirer. The Last Philosopher of Culture, Princeton University Press 2008.
Schopenhauer A., Świat jako wola i przedstawienie, przeł. J. Garewicz, Warszawa, 2012, t. 1.
Siemek M.J., Wykłady z filozofii nowoczesności, Warszawa 2012.
Sloterdijk P., Co się zdarzyło w XX wieku?, przeł. B. Baran, Warszawa 2021.
The Cambridge Companion to Philosophical Methodology, red. G. D’Oro i S. Overgaard, Cambridge University Press 2017.
Taylor Ch., The Language Animal. The Full Shape of the Human Linguistic Capacity, Harvard University Press, 2016.
Whitehead A.N., Przygody idei, przeł. M. Piwowarczyk, Warszawa 2020.
Wittgenstein L., Dociekania filozoficzne, przeł. B. Wolniewicz, Warszawa 2008.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Stanisław Filipowicz
1 2
ORCID: ORCID

  1. członek rzeczywisty PAN
  2. Wydział Nauk Politycznych i Studiów Międzynarodowych Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Claude Carloman de Rulhière was a French diplomat and writer who was sent to Russia in 1762 as a secretary to the French ambassador. During his stay in St. Petersburg, he eye-witnessed the coup d’état staged by the future Catherine II to dethrone Peter III and to seize the imperial power. Upon his return to Paris, Rulhière publicized his testimony of the event. It soon became notorious and provoked controversy, splitting French elites into supporters and detractors of Catherine II. The agents of the empress attempted to persuade him not to divulge his text, but Rulhière did not succumb to their financial offers and resolved to reveal the truth.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Marek Mosakowski
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The article integrates the 18th century vampire discourse with problems and approaches of postcolonial studies on the one hand, and with the Galicia research in historical and cultural studies on the other hand. For this purpose, vampirism and postcolonial studies are defined at first, while the change of the vampirism discourse – passing from the revenant image to the one of bloodsucker – is analysed in the next step. Finally it is shown how the vampire’s character and discourse have been adjusted and narratively transformed in 18th-century travel literature on Galicia

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Christoph Augustynowicz
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

This article presents Gdansk calendars by the mathematician Johann Gottlieb Bartoldi (1736–1788), which were published from 1776 until 1789. The almanacs were entitled: “Neuer und Alter Kunst- und Tugend-Calender”, “Neuer und Alter Haus- und Geschichts-Calender” and “Allgemeiner Landwirtschafts-Calender”. This text highlights those aspects which depict the traditionalism and conservatism of the calendars, originating from the beginning of the eighteenth century.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Piotr Paluchowski
1 2
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Zakład Historii i Filozofii Nauk Medycznych Gdańskiego Uniwersytetu Medycznego
  2. Muzeum Historyczne Miasta Gdańska
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The first part of the article presents historical origins of Moses Mendelssohn’s Jerusalem (1783). It discusses Mendelssohn’s polemics with Johann Caspar Lavater, Christian Wilhelm Dohm and August Cranz which paved the way for the publication of the book. The second part treats Mendelssohn’s notion of Judaism as it is expressed in Jerusalem. Here the article argues for a fundamentally orthodox attitude of Mendelssohn toward Judaism, which prevented him from creating (a fact sometimes lamented by commentators) a far‑reaching ‘synthesis’ between the Jewish religion and the Enlightenment.
Go to article

Bibliography

1. Altman A. (1973), Moses Mendelssohn. A Biographical Study, Philadelphia: The Jewish Publication Society of America.
2. Altman A. (1981), Essays in Jewish Intellectual History, Hanover – New Hampshire – London: Brandies University Press.
3. Altman A. (1983), Commentary, w: M. Mendelssohn, Jerusalem or on Religious Power and Judaism, przeł. A. Arkush, Hanover – London: University Press of New England, s. 141–241.
4. Bałaban M. (1925), Historia i literatura żydowska, t. III, Lwów – Warszawa – Kraków: Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich.
5. Cranz A. (1781), Ueber den Missbrauch der geistlichen Macht, oder, Der weltlichen Herrschaft in Glaubenssachen durch Beyspiele aus dem jetzigen Jahrhundert ins Licht gesetzt, Berlin.
6. Cranz A. (1782), Das Forschen nach Licht und Recht in einem Schreiben an herrn Moses Mendelssohn auf Veranlassung seiner merkwürdigen Vorrede zu Menasseh Ben Israel, Berlin: Friedrich Maurer.
7. Feiner S. (2002), The Jewish Enlightenment, przeł. Ch. Naor, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
8. Feiner S. (2010), Moses Mendelssohn: Sage of Modernity, przeł. A. Berris, New Heaven – London: Yale University Press.
9. Fichte J.G. (1793), Beitrag zur Berichtigung der Urteile des Publikums über die französische Revolution. Erster Teil. Zur Beurteilung ihrer Rechtmäßigkeit, Danzig: Ferdinand Troschel.
10. Gottlieb M. (2011a), Introduction, w: M. Mendelssohn, Writings on Judaism, Christianity, and the Bible, red. M. Gottlieb, przeł. C. Bowman, E. Sacks, A. Arkush, Waltham, MA: Brandeis University Press.
11. Gottlieb M. (2011b), Faith and Freedom: Moses Mendelssohn’s Theological‑Political Thought, New York: Oxford University Press.
12. Graetz M. (1996), The Jewish Enlightenment, w: M.A. Meyer (red.), German‑Jewish History in Modern Times, Vol. l: Tradition and Enlightenment: 1600–1780, przeł. W. Templer, New York: Columbia University Press.
13. Heine H. (2018), Z dziejów religii i filozofii w Niemczech, w: tenże, O Niemczech i o sobie. Wybór pism, przeł. T. Zatorski, Warszawa: Fundacja Augusta hr. Cieszkowskiego.
14. Herder J.G. (2013), Gott. Einige Gespräche über Spinoza’s System nebst Shaftesbury’s Naturhymnus, Berlin: Holzinger.
15. Hess J.M. (2000), Johann David Michaelis and the Colonial Imaginary: Orientalism and the Emergence of Racial Antisemitism in Eighteenth‑Century Germany, „Jewish Social Studies” 6 (2), s. 56–101.
16. Katz J. (1980), From Prejudice to Destruction. Anti‑Semitism 1730–1933, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
17. Kozyra (2020), Kant on the Jews and their Religion, „Diametros” 17 (65), s. 32–55.
18. Kuehn M. (2001), Kant. A Biography, New York: Cambridge University Press.
19. Lavater J.C. (1770), Johann Caspar Lavaters Zueignungsschrift der Bonnetischen Philosophischen Untersuchung der Beweise für das Christenthum an Herrn Moses Mendelssohn in Berlin, Zürich.
20. Lavater J.C. (1843), Antwort an den herrn Moses Mendelssohn, w: M. Mendelssohn, Gesammelte Schriften. Dritter Band, red. G.B. Mendelssohn, Leipzig: F.U. Brodhaus, s. 51–79.
21. Leibowitz Y. (1994), Gespräche über Gott und die Welt, red. M. Shashar, przeł. M. Schmidt, Frankfurt am Main – Leipzig: Insel Verlag.
22. Lessing G.E. (1959), Die Erziehung des Menschengeschlechts, w: tenże, Gesammelte Werke, t. I, red. W. Stammler, München: C. Hanser, s. 1010–1035.
23. Levinas E. (1991a), Przypadek Spinozy, w: tenże, T rudna wolność. Eseje o judaizmie, przeł. A. Kuryś, Gdynia: Atext, s. 111–115.
24. Levinas E. (1991b), Myśl żydowska dzisiaj, w: tenże, Trudna wolność. Eseje o judaizmie, przeł. A. Kuryś, Gdynia: Atext, s. 167–175.
25. Łastik S. (1961), Z dziejów Oświecenia żydowskiego, Warszawa: Państwowy Instytut Wydawniczy.
26. Majmon S. (2007), Autobiografia, t. 2, przeł. L. Belmont, Warszawa: Midrasz.
27. Margalit A., Halbertal M. (1994), Liberalism and the Right to Culture, „Social Research” 61 (3), s. 491–510.
28. Mendelssohn M. (1782), Vorrede, w: Menasseh Ben Israel, Rettung der Juden, przeł. M. Herz, Berlin – Stettin: Friedrich Nicolai.
29. Mendelssohn M. (1843a), Schreiben an der herrn Diaconus Lavater zu Zürich von Moses Mendelssohn, w: tenże, Gesammelte Schriften. Dritter Band, red. G.B. Mendelssohn, Leipzig: F.U. Brodhaus, s. 37–51.
30. Mendelssohn M. (1843b), Betrachrungen über Bonnet’s Palingenesie, w: tenże, Gesammelte Schriften. Dritter Band, red. G.B. Mendelssohn, Leipzig: F.U. Brodhaus, s. 135–177.
31. Mendelssohn M. (1844), Moses Mendelssohns Briefe an Herz Homberg, w: tenże, Gesammelte Schriften. Fünfter Band, red. G.B. Mendelssohn, Leipzig: F.U. Brodhaus, s. 651–687.
32. Mendelssohn M. (2005), Jerusalem oder über religiöse Macht und Judentum, red. M. Albrecht, Hamburg: Felix Meiner.
33. Mendelssohn M. (2011a), Letter to Rabbi Jacob Emden, 26 October 1773, w: tenże, Writings on Judaism, Christianity, and the Bible, red. M. Gottlieb, przeł. C. Bowman, E. Sacks, A. Arkush, Waltham, MA: Brandeis University Press, s. 32–35.
34. Mendelssohn M. (2011b), From Light for the Path, w: tenże, Writings on Judaism, Christianity, and the Bible, red. M. Gottlieb, przeł. C. Bowman, E. Sacks, A. Arkush, Waltham, MA: Brandeis University Press, s. 189–202.
35. Mendelssohn M. (2013), W kwestii: co znaczy oświecać, w: tenże, Wybór pism filozoficznych, przeł. R. Kuliniak, T. Małyszek, Wrocław: Atut.
36. Mendelssohn M. (2015), Do przyjaciół Lessinga, przeł. A. Chmielewski, red. T. Małyszek, R. Kuliniak, Wrocław: Atut.
37. Meyer M.A. (1967), The Origins of the Modern Jew. Jewish Identity and European Culture in Germany 1749–1824, Detroit: Wayne State University Press.
38. Meyer M.A. (1995), Response to Modernity. A History of the Reform Movement in Judaism, Detroit: Wayne State University Press.
39. Moritz K.P. (2015), Moses Mendelssohn do przyjaciół Lessinga. Dodatek do korespondencji Pana Jacobiego na temat nauki Spinozy, przeł. T. Małyszek, R. Kuliniak, w: M. Mendelssohn, Do przyjaciół Lessinga, przeł. A. Chmielewski, red. T. Małyszek, R. Kuliniak, Wrocław: Atut.
40. Pilarczyk K., Dublański R. (2016), Moses Mendelssohn a judaizm i kultura żydowska, „Studia Gdańskie” 38, s. 75–87.
41. Popkin R.H. (2002), Spinoza’s Excommunication, w: H.M. Ravven, L.E. Goodman (red.), Jewish Themes in Spinoza’s Philosophy, Albany: State University of New York Press, s. 263–281.
42. Rosenstock B. (2010), Philosophy and the Jewish Question. Mendelssohn, Rosenzweig, and Beyond, New York: Fordham University Press.
43. Schulte Ch. (2002), Die jüdische Aufklärung. Philosophie, Religion, Geschichte, München: C.H. Beck.
44. Sorkin D. (2008), The Religious Enlightenment. Protestants, Jews, and Catholics From London to Vienna, Princeton – Oxford: Princeton University Press.
45. Stern E. (2017), Enlightenment Conceptions of Judaism and Law, w: Ch. Hayes (red.), The Cambridge Companion to Judaism and Law, New York: Cambridge University Press, s. 215–232.
46. Wahle H. (1993), Wspólne dziedzictwo: judaizm i chrześcijaństwo w kontekście dziejów zbawienia, przeł. Z. Kowalska, Tarnów: Biblos.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Wojciech Kozyra
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The paper discusses conditions of proper communication between the doctor and the patient focusing on the Treatise of the Hypochondriack and Hysterick Passions (1711) by Bernard Mandeville. The method of treating hypochondria, based mainly on dialogue, presented in this work allows the doctor to correctly recognize disease and to awaken self-knowledge in the patient. Combining hypochondria with stomach problems, expanding the field of factors influencing the development of this disease proves that Mandeville interprets man holistically in the treatment process, and his preferred method focuses more on psychological rather than physical problems. Philopirio, as a representative of Mandeville’s medical views, assumes the role of a medical advisor, whose main task is physical and constant contact with the patient. The Philopirio’s method of treatment becomes effective thanks to medical virtues, especially diligence and empathy. Mandeville’s work unambiguously proves that in the process of diagnosis and convalescence communication between the doctor and the patient has an important role, and sometimes it is essential in the process of curing the patient.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Agnieszka Droś
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The Enlightenment occupied an important place in the oeuvre of Professor Józef Andrzej Gierowski. This piece presents his evolving views on the Enlightenment in three syntheses of the history of early modern Poland and the Polish‑Lithuanian Commonwealth: two university textbooks first published in 1967 and 1978 respectively, and a book addressed to a wider, non‑academic readership first published in 2001, much of which was presented to Anglophone readers in 1996. J. A. Gierowski’s views are presented against the background of the sardonic references to “the enlightened age” and “enlightened Europe” in the synthesis published by his supervisor, Władysław Konopczyński in 1936, as well as the Marxist‑Leninist scheme of the Enlightenment forced on historiography and the humanities in postwar Poland, especially by Celina Bobińska. J. A. Gierowski’s view of “the ideology of the Enlightenment” gradually shifted from the primacy of rationalist and materialist thinking to the aim of the pursuit of happi-ness within human society. While still emphasising economic and social factors, including the role of the bourgeoisie in the Dutch Republic, England and France, he increasingly distanced himself from the model of the Enlightenment as the ideology of the rising bourgeoisie, forced on him in the early stages of his academic career. After long reflection on the question of the reception and originality of the Enlightenment in the Commonwealth, he came to appreciate the contributions of Royal Prussian burghers, the Catholic clergy and the Polish‑Lithuanian nobility. He also jettisoned the postwar dogma that the beginning of the capitalist order in Poland should be dated to 1764.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Richard Butterwick
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. University College London
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The article discusses the dispute over the chronology of the Enlightenment in Poland and the views of Józef Gierowski and Jacek Staszewski regarding the assessment of the Saxon times and the origins of the Polish Enlightenment. The problem of the reception of Western cultures (French, English, Italian and German) in the times of the Enlightenment in Poland was also treated more broadly.
After presenting various understandings of culture in Polish historiography, the positions of Polish researchers on the assessment of the Enlightenment in Europe (Emanuel Rostworowski) and then the culture of the Saxon times and the Enlightenment in Poland (Józef Andrzej Gierowski, Janusz Maciejewski, Jacek Staszewski) were discussed. The achievements of Polish historiography in the field of research on the reception in Poland of the works of the most eminent authors of the French Enlightenment (these were primarily Voltaire, Rousseau, Diderot, Montesquieu), English (including Locke), Italian (Genovesi, Beccaria) and German (including Wolff, Gottsched) were shown in greater detail. The reception of this work would not have been possible without the appearance in Poland of an intellectual elite, often speaking French, who were able to evaluate and appreciate the innovative views of Western writers and philosophers.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Marian Chachaj
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Uniwersytet Marii Curie‑Skłodowskiej
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Józef Andrzej Gierowski’s academic profile is presented in the light of his interest in the problems of universal history in relation to events, but above all to phenomena which allow for a better knowledge and understanding of the mentality of the people of the time, their activities and their consequences. Gierowski’s studies on the history of Europe were closely linked to the history of the Polish‑Lithuanian Commonwealth (especially the period of the Saxon Wettin dynasty on the Polish throne), highlighting its international position and associations, and the resulting foreign policy of its rulers. Among the questions raised, there was no shortage of issues relating to the culture and ideology of the Baroque and the Enlightenment and, of primary interest to the researcher, the problem‑laden, not fully deciphered transition period between the two currents.
The second ‘part’ of the article emphasises Józef Andrzej Gierowski’s understanding of Europe as a certain whole, encompassing not only political history, social or economic affairs, but also cultural patterns and phenomena to which he was particularly sensitive.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Andrzej K. Link Lenczowski
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Uniwersytet Jagielloński
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The publication of Dialectics of Enlightenment by M. Horkheimer and T. Adorno in 1947 provoked a fundamental shift in social philosophy of that time. It forced post-war philosophy to look for a new theory that could be used to analyze ‘the society of late
capitalism’. According to the common view, Dialectics of Enlightenment did not propose any new theory that could fulfill the expected role. Because of that, Horkheimer and Adorno allowed post-war ‘anti-enlightenment’, postmodern philosophical currents to deliver a solution to this problem, which ‘cut this Gordian knot’ by getting rid of the idea of determinate negation from philosophy – which had been one of the most fundamental assumptions of modern philosophy from Hegel to Lukács. According to this popular interpretation, works of critical deconstructors of the discourse of modernity, such as e.g. G. Bataille, J. Lacan, M. Foucault, J. Derrida, F. Jameson, N. Land, G. Deleuze, J.F. Lyotard or J. Baudrillard, were a necessary implication of Dialectics of Enlightenment and its inability to form a new theory. My main aim in this work is to undermine such misinterpretations of Dialectics of Enlightenment and to show errors underlying such views about the ‘counterenlightenment’ as its necessary, long-term effect. My goal is to show that Horkheimer and Adorno in fact considered their book to be a beginning of a new, still ‘proenlightenment’ method of critical social philosophy. They also inserted in the book a real solution to the post-war crisis of social philosophy. The ongoing work of contemporary Frankfurt School representatives is a proof that Dialectics of Enlightenment and the critical theory are still alive and actual nowadays.
Go to article

Bibliography

1. Adorno T. (1939), On Kierkegaard’s Doctrine of Love, „Zeitschrift für Sozialforschung” / „Studies in Philosophy and Social Science” 8 (3), s. 413–429.
2. Adorno T. (2009), Minima moralia, przeł. M. Łukasiewicz, Kraków: Wydawnictwo Literackie.
3. Adorno T. (2012a), Świadomość negatywna, przeł. P. Graczyk, „Kronos” 3, s. 9–15.
4. Adorno T. (2012b), Umieranie dzisiaj, przeł. P. Graczyk, „Kronos” 3, s. 16–21.
5. Adorno T. (2017), Introduction to dialectics, przeł. C. Ziermann, Cambridge: Polity.
6. Benjamin W. (2006), Paralipomena to „On the Concept of History”, w: tenże, Selected Writings, t. 4, przeł. E. Jephcott, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, s. 401–411.
7. Deleuze G. (2012a), Nietzsche, przeł. B. Banasiak, Łódź: Officyna.
8. Deleuze G. (2012b), Nietzsche i filozofia, przeł. B. Banasiak, Łódź: Officyna.
9. Geuss R. (2005), On the Usefulness and Uselessness of Religious Illusions, w: R. Geuss, M. Kohlenbach (red.), The Early Frankfurt School and Religion, przeł. L. Löb, New York: Palgrave, s. 29–44.
10. Habermas J. (2005), Filozoficzny dyskurs nowoczesności, przeł. M. Łukasiewicz, Kraków: Universitas.
11. Hegel G.W.F. (2002), Fenomenologia ducha, przeł. A. Landman, Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
12. Honneth A. (2007), Disrespect: The Normative Foundations of Critical Theory, Cambridge: Polity.
13. Honneth A. (2009), Pathologies of Reason, przeł. J. Ingram, New York: Columbia University Press.
14. Horkheimer M. (2011), Odpowiedzialność i studia, przeł. H. Walentowicz, „Kronos” 2, s. 237–248.
15. Horkheimer M., Adorno T.W. (1994), Dialektyka oświecenia, przeł. M. Łukasiewicz, Warszawa: Wydawnictwo IFiS PAN.
16. Jameson F. (1990), Late Marxism, London: Routledge.
17. Jameson F. (1991), Postmodernism or the Cultural Logic of Capitalism, New York: Duke University Press.
18. Jameson F. (1994), The Seeds of Time, New York: Columbia University Press.
19. Jarvis S. (1998), Adorno: A Critical Introduction, New York: Routledge.
20. Kierkegaard S. (2011), Nienaukowe zamykające postscriptum do „Okruchów filozoficznych”, przeł. K. Toeplitz, Kęty: Marek Derewiecki.
21. Kloc-Konkołowicz J. (2018), Czy Odyseusz dopłynie do Itaki? Od Hegla, przez Marksa, do Frankfurtu, „Przegląd Filozoficzny – Nowa Seria” 4, s. 331–341.
22. Kołakowski L. (2012), Dialektyka negatywna, „Kronos” 3, s. 226–234.
23. Land N. (1992), Georges Bataille and virulent nihilism, London: Routledge.
24. Leder A. (2018), Był kiedyś postmodernizm... Sześć esejów o schyłku XX stulecia, Warszawa: Wydawnictwo IFiS PAN.
25. Markowski M.P. (2001), Nietzsche. Filozofia interpretacji, Kraków: Universitas.
26. Momro J. (2012), Teoria estetyczna jako protodekonstrukcja, „Kronos” 3, s. 98–112.
27. Mörchen H. (1999), Władza i panowanie u Heideggera i Adorna, przeł. M. Herer, R. Marszałek, Warszawa: Oficyna Naukowa.
28. Olesik M. (2012), Krytyka i utopia – kręte drogi dialektyki jako idei mesjańskiej w filozofii T.W. Adorna, „Kronos” 3, s. 113–126.
29. Rorty R. (2009), Przygodność, ironia i solidarność, przeł. J.W. Popowski, Warszawa: W.A.B.
30. Schnädelbach H. (2001), Próba rehabilitacji „animal rationale”, przeł. K. Krzemieniowa, Warszawa: Oficyna Naukowa.
31. Siemek M. (1994), Posłowie do wydania polskiego. Rozum między światłem i cieniem oświecenia, w: M. Horkheimer, T.W. Adorno, Dialektyka oświecenia, przeł. M. Łukasiewicz, Warszawa: Wydawnictwo IFiS PAN.
32. Siemek M. (2018), W kręgu filozofów, Warszawa: Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.
33. Sloterdijk P. (2008), Krytyka cynicznego rozumu, przeł. P. Dehnel, Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Dolnośląskiej Szkoły Wyższej.
34. Sloterdijk P. (2012), Teoria krytyczna umarła, „Kronos” 3, s. 59–65.
35. Walentowicz H. (2008), Utopia i antyutopia w Szkole Frankfurckiej, „Przegląd Filozoficzny – Nowa Seria” 3, s. 179–208.
36. Žižek S. (2008), W obronie przegranych spraw, przeł. J. Kutyła, Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Krytyki Politycznej.


Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Karol Staśkiewicz
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The issues of the history of culture and science of the eighteenth‑century Polish‑Lithuanian Commonwealth are rare in the works of Józef Andrzej Gierowski. This article analyses his views on these issues. He devoted most attention to the subject of the beginnings of the Enlightenment in Poland, joining a long scholarly discussion about it. He agreed that the precursors of the Enlightenment in Poland were already active in the 1740s, during the era of the Wettins’ rule. He pointed to educational reform, writing activity (Benedykt Chmielowski’s, the political and journalistic work of a number of writers) and publishing (especially of the Załuski brothers), and the development of periodicals as the three pillars on which reforms were carried out in the future – during the reign of Stanisław August Poniatowski. In addition, and just as importantly, he drew attention to methodological weaknesses concerning the study of intermediate periods, i.e. between the Baroque and the Enlightenment. He also pointed out the need for a comprehen-sive picture of the cultural history of the Polish‑Lithuanian Commonwealth in the 18 th century – proponents of both Sarmatian culture and Enlightenment thought.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Joanna Orzeł
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Uniwersytet Łódzki
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

In this article, the imperial idea and civilising missions in the Habsburg Monarchy, mainly of the nineteenth century, are refracted through the prism of the legacy of enlightened absolutism. The article tries to dispel mythologies about its demise around 1800, and about those who could subscribe to its programme throughout the nineteenth century. It questions templates of national history writing which too unanimously connect the Enlightenment to the origins of the various national revivals of the early nineteenth century, and discusses concrete examples of enlightened absolutism’s civilising impulses, among them law, Roman imperial patriotism, and the Catholic religion.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Franz Leander Fillafer
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

On the base of Emil Cioran's philosophical concepts, the Author undertakes an attampt to interpret the ethic and intellectual tensions between the traditional and Enlightenment ideas of Polish eighteenth century thinkers: Hugo Kołłątaj, Stanislaw Staszic, Jan Śniadecki and Tadeusz Czacki.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Anna Łysiak
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

In these remarks I recall the attempts of pointing out the relations between philosophy and modernity in sciences in three distinctively differing point of view, that is the achievements of “the Enlightened Age” (in the sense of Ernst Cassirer), phenomenological philosophy (in the sense of Edmund Husserl) and the classicist conservatism (in the sense of Allan Bloom). In each of these cases an importance of those relations is being acknowledged. However it is not just differently evaluated and justified, but also the diagnoses and forecasts related to it look differently either.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Zbigniew Drozdowicz
ORCID: ORCID
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

In the last phase of Franciszek Karpiński's life as a writer (the first quarter of the 19th century), he practically gave up poetry and concentrated instead on writing memoirs. This article tries to find out to what extent his autobiographical work, especially his Historia mego wieku i ludzi, z którymi żyłem [A History of My Century and the People with Whom I Lived], is influenced by an attitude characteristic of the sentimentalism of the previous century. As this analysis shows Karpiński's narrative exhibits both a sensitivity much indebted to Rousseau's autobiographical method and skilful shifts of tone, from satire and irony to various shades of melancholy. For sentimentalist aesthetic and poetics the continual manipulation of tone is a means of alerting the reader to the world's complexity. As in the novels of Lawrence Sterne, that complexity is experienced by way of careful observation of fragments of reality, defined by the subjectivity of the observer and the truth of his emotions.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Grzegorz Zając
ORCID: ORCID
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The Thornische Nachrichten von gelehrten Sachen, published in Toruń in 1762–1766, was a learned review journal, the first periodical of this kind in Poland. As one of its editors' priorities was to keep track of current Polish writing, the magazine regularly published reviews of the most notable books of Polish Enlightenment (among its reviewers were Stanisław Konarski, Wacław Rzewuski, Franciszek Bohomolec, Józef Minasowicz).

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Katarzyna Chlewicka
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The article is an attempt to outline the theoretical and methodological reflection on public history in the context of some conceptual models and concrete examples of case studies. Considering discursive situations, suppositions, suggestions and interpellations on the enlightenment postulate with regard to public history (including the issues: magistra vitae, emancipatory project, affirmative history, emotive revolution, critical discourse in the public space, modus art based research) I deal with the issues: what is actually the content of public history: history or memory? Does the enlightenment postulate with regard to public history turn memory into history? Are we dealing with some project concocted by the intelligentsia and scientific elite? What are the current trends in the implementation of critical discourse in public history?

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Ewa Solska
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

This article takes a look at the development women’s press in the first half of the 19th century. A comparison of the press market in the Romantic Age in France, Poland and the United States shows that usually women were eager to take up journalism as a sideline to their literary careers. The article discusses the journalistic work of three women writers — Delphine de Girardin, Wanda Malecka and Margaret Fuller. While each of them was inspired by Romantic and Preromantic writers, their journalism was for the most part a continuation of the Enlightenment models of journalism.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Edyta Żyrek-Horodyska
ORCID: ORCID
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

From its beginnings – in Poland it was the second half of the 18th century – the novel, a genre that eluded the distinctions of traditional normative poetics, had to face all kinds of strictures, not only in the sphere of aesthetics. At the same time, due to its innovatory representation of reality and its effectiveness as a tool of persuasion, it aroused a genuine interest among the enlightened elites. This positive attitude appears to have been shared by Ignacy Krasicki, whose work (not excepting novels) was generally regarded as a model of unparalleled literary excellence. This article re-examines his achievement as a novelist and discusses at greater length his first novel Mikołaja Doświadczyńskiego przypadki. Published in 1776, it was the first Polish novel and the most interesting example of early realistic fiction until the appearance in 1815 of Dwaj panowie Sieciechowie by Julian Ursyn Niemcewicz.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Grzegorz Zając
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Uniwersytet Jagielloński, Kraków

This page uses 'cookies'. Learn more