Search results

Filters

  • Journals
  • Authors
  • Keywords
  • Date
  • Type

Search results

Number of results: 19
items per page: 25 50 75
Sort by:
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

This study investigates Thomas’ cyclically symmetric attractor dynamics with mathematical and electronic simulations using a proportional fractional derivative to comprehend the dynamics of a given chaotic system. The three-dimensional chaotic flow was examined in detail with Riemann-Liouville derivative for different values of the fractional index to highlight the sensitivity of chaotic systems with initial conditions. Thus, the dynamics of the fractional index system were investigated with Eigenvalues, Kaplan–Yorke dimension, Lyapunov exponent, and NIST testing, and their corresponding trajectories were visualized with phase portraits, 2D density plot, and Poincaré maps. After obtaining the results, we found that the integer index dynamics are more complex than the fractional index dynamics. Furthermore, the chaotic system circuit is simulated with operational amplifiers for different fractional indices to generate analog signals of the symmetric attractor, making it an important aspect of engineering. The qualitative application of our nonlinear chaotic system is then applied to encrypt different data types such as voice, image, and video, to ensure that the developed nonlinear chaotic system can widely applied in the field of cyber security.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

NajeebAlam Khan
1
Muhammad Ali Qureshi
2
Saeed Akbar
1
Asmat Ara
3

  1. Department of Mathematics, University of Karachi, Karachi 75270, Pakistan
  2. Department of Physics, University of Karachi, Karachi 75270, Pakistan
  3. College of Humanities and Sciences, PAF-KIET, Karachi 75190, Pakistan
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The optimal design of excitation signal is a procedure of generating an informative input signal to extract the model parameters with maximum pertinence during the identification process. The fractional calculus provides many new possibilities for system modeling based on the definition of a derivative of noninteger-order. A novel optimal input design methodology for fractional-order systems identification is presented in the paper. The Oustaloup recursive approximation (ORA) method is used to obtain the fractional-order differentiation in an integer order state-space representation. Then, the presented methodology is utilized to solve optimal input design problem for fractional-order system identification. The fundamental objective of this approach is to design an input signal that yields maximum information on the value of the fractional-order model parameters to be estimated. The method described in this paper was verified using a numerical example, and the computational results were discussed.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

W. Jakowluk
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The paper presents an interpretation of fractional calculus for positive and negative orders of functions based on sampled measured quantities and their errors connected with digital signal processing. The derivative as a function limit and the Grünwald-Letnikov differintegral are shown in chapter 1 due to the similarity of the presented definition. Notation of fractional calculus based on the gradient vector of measured quantities and its geometrical and physical interpretation of positive and negative orders are shown in chapters 2 and 3.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

R. Cioć
M. Chrzan
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Dynamics and control of discrete chaotic systems of fractional-order have received considerable attention over the last few years. So far, nonlinear control laws have been mainly used for stabilizing at zero the chaotic dynamics of fractional maps. This article provides a further contribution to such research field by presenting simple linear control laws for stabilizing three fractional chaotic maps in regard to their dynamics. Specifically, a one-dimensional linear control law and a scalar control law are proposed for stabilizing at the origin the chaotic dynamics of the Zeraoulia-Sprott rational map and the Ikeda map, respectively. Additionally, a two-dimensional linear control law is developed to stabilize the chaotic fractional flow map. All the results have been achieved by exploiting new theorems based on the Lyapunov method as well as on the properties of the Caputo h-difference operator. The relevant simulation findings are implemented to confirm the validity of the established linear control scheme.
Go to article

Bibliography

[1] C. Goodrich and A.C. Peterson: Discrete Fractional Calculus. Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2015, ISBN 978-3-319-79809-7.
[2] P. Ostalczyk: Discrete Fractional Calculus: Applications in Control and Image Processing. World Scientific, 2016.
[3] K. Oprzedkiewicz and K. Dziedzic: Fractional discrete-continuous model of heat transfer process. Archives of Control Sciences, 31(2), (2021), 287– 306, DOI: 10.24425/acs.2021.137419.
[4] T. Kaczorek and A. Ruszewski: Global stability of discrete-time nonlinear systems with descriptor standard and fractional positive linear parts and scalar feedbacks. Archives of Control Sciences, 30(4), (2020), 667–681, DOI: 10.24425/acs.2020.135846.
[5] J.B. Diaz and T.J. Olser: Differences of fractional order. Mathematics of Computation, 28 (1974), 185–202, DOI: 10.1090/S0025-5718-1974-0346352-5.
[6] F.M. Atici and P.W. Eloe: A transform method in discrete fractional calculus. International Journal of Difference Equations, 2 (2007), 165–176.
[7] F.M. Atici and P.W. Eloe: Discrete fractional calculus with the nabla operator. Electronic Journal of Qualitative Theory of Differential Equations, Spec. Ed. I, 3 , (2009), 1–12.
[8] G. Anastassiou: Principles of delta fractional calculus on time scales and inequalities. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 52(3-4), (2010), 556– 566, DOI: 10.1016/j.mcm.2010.03.055.
[9] T. Abdeljawad: On Riemann and Caputo fractional differences. Computers and Mathematics with Applications, 62(3), (2011), 1602–1611, DOI: 10.1016/j.camwa.2011.03.036.
[10] M. Edelman, E.E.N. Macau, and M.A.F. Sanjun (Eds.): Chaotic, Fractional, and Complex Dynamics: New Insights and Perspectives. Springer International Publishing, 2018.
[11] G.C. Wu, D. Baleanu, and S.D. Zeng: Discrete chaos in fractional sine and standard maps. Physics Letters A, 378(5-6), (2014), 484–487, DOI: 10.1016/j.physleta.2013.12.010.
[12] G.C. Wu and D. Baleanu: Discrete fractional logistic map and its chaos. Nonlinear Dynamics, 75(1-2), (2014), 283–287, DOI: 10.1007/s11071-013-1065-7.
[13] T. Hu: Discrete chaos in fractional Henon map. Applied Mathematics, 5(15), (2014), 2243–2248, DOI: 10.4236/am.2014.515218.
[14] G.C. Wu and D. Baleanu: Discrete chaos in fractional delayed logistic maps. Nonlinear Dynamics, 80 (2015), 1697–1703, DOI: 10.1007/s11071-014-1250-3.
[15] M.K. Shukla and B.B. Sharma: Investigation of chaos in fractional order generalized hyperchaotic Henon map. International Journal of Electronics and Communications, 78 (2017), 265–273, DOI: 10.1016/j.aeue.2017.05.009.
[16] A. Ouannas, A.A. Khennaoui, S. Bendoukha, and G. Grassi: On the dynamics and control of a fractional form of the discrete double scroll. International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos, 29(6), (2019), DOI: 10.1142/S0218127419500780.
[17] L. Jouini, A. Ouannas, A.A. Khennaoui, X. Wang, G. Grassi, and V.T. Pham: The fractional form of a new three-dimensional generalized Henon map. Advances in Difference Equations, 122 (2019), DOI: 10.1186/s13662-019-2064-x.
[18] F. Hadjabi, A. Ouannas,N. Shawagfeh, A.A. Khennaoui, and G. Grassi: On two-dimensional fractional chaotic maps with symmetries. Symmetry, 12(5), (2020), DOI: 10.3390/sym12050756.
[19] D. Baleanu, G.C. Wu, Y.R. Bai, and F.L. Chen: Stability analysis of Caputo-like discrete fractional systems. Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, 48 (2017), 520–530, DOI: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2017.01.002.
[20] A-A. Khennaoui, A. Ouannas, S. Bendoukha, G. Grassi, X. Wang, V-T. Pham, and F.E. Alsaadi: Chaos, control, and synchronization in some fractional-order difference equations. Advances in Difference Equations, 412 (2019), DOI: 10.1186/s13662-019-2343-6.
[21] A. Ouannas, A.A. Khennaoui, G. Grassi, and S. Bendoukha: On chaos in the fractional-order Grassi-Miller map and its control. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 358(2019), 293–305, DOI: 10.1016/j.cam.2019.03.031.
[22] A. Ouannas, A.A. Khennaoui, S. Momani, G. Grassi and V.T. Pham: Chaos and control of a three-dimensional fractional order discrete-time system with no equilibrium and its synchronization. AIP Advances, 10 (2020), DOI: 10.1063/5.0004884.
[23] A. Ouannas, A-A. Khennaoui, S. Momani, G. Grassi, V-T. Pham, R. El- Khazali, and D. Vo Hoang: A quadratic fractional map without equilibria: Bifurcation, 0–1 test, complexity, entropy, and control. Electronics, 9 (2020), DOI: 10.3390/electronics9050748.
[24] A. Ouannas, A-A. Khennaoui, S. Bendoukha, Z.Wang, and V-T. Pham: The dynamics and control of the fractional forms of some rational chaotic maps. Journal of Systems Science and Complexity, 33 (2020), 584–603, DOI: 10.1007/s11424-020-8326-6.
[25] A-A. Khennaoui, A. Ouannas, S. Bendoukha, G. Grassi, R.P. Lozi, and V-T. Pham: On fractional-order discrete-time systems: Chaos, stabilization and synchronization. Chaos, Solitons and Fractals, 119(C), (2019), 150– 162, DOI: 10.1016/j.chaos.2018.12.019.
[26] A. Ouannas, A-A. Khennaoui, Z. Odibat, V-T. Pham, and G. Grassi: On the dynamics, control and synchronization of fractional-order Ikeda map. Chaos, Solitons and Fractals, 123(C), (2015), 108–115, DOI: 10.1016/j.chaos.2019.04.002.
[27] A. Ouannas, F. Mesdoui, S. Momani, I. Batiha, and G. Grassi: Synchronization of FitzHugh-Nagumo reaction-diffusion systems via onedimensional linear control law. Archives of Control Sciences, 31(2), 2021, 333–345, DOI: 10.24425/acs.2021.137421.
[28] Y. Li, C. Sun, H. Ling, A. Lu, and Y. Liu: Oligopolies price game in fractional order system. Chaos, Solitons and Fractals, 132(C), (2020), DOI: 10.1016/j.chaos.2019.109583.
[29] D. Mozyrska and E. Girejko: Overview of fractional h-difference operators. In Advances in harmonic analysis and operator theory. Birkhäuser, Basel, 2013, 253–268.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

A. Othman Almatroud
1
Adel Ouannas
2
Giuseppe Grassi
3
Iqbal M. Batiha
4
Ahlem Gasri
5
M. Mossa Al-Sawalha
1

  1. Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, University of Ha'il, Ha'il 81451, Saudi Arabia
  2. Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Larbi Ben M’hidi, Oum El Bouaghi 04000, Algeria
  3. Dipartimento Ingegneria Innovazione, Universita del Salento, 73100 Lecce, Italy
  4. Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science and Information Technology, Irbid National University, Irbid, Jordan and Nonlinear Dynamics Research Center (NDRC), Ajman University, Ajman, UAE
  5. Department of Mathematics, University of Larbi Tebessi, Tebessa 12002, Algeria
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

This paper addresses the nonlinear Cucker–Smale optimal control problem under the interplay of memory effect. The aforementioned effect is included by employing the Caputo fractional derivative in the equation representing the velocity of agents. Sufficient conditions for the existence of solutions to the considered problem are proved and the analysis of some particular problems is illustrated by two numerical examples.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Ricardo Almeida
Rafał Kamocki
Agnieszka B. Malinowska
Tatiana Odzijewicz
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

In the paper we propose a fractional-piecewise-constant-order PID controller and discuss the stability and robustness of a closed loop system. In stability analysis we use the transform method and include the Nyquist-like criteria. Simulations for designed controllers are performed for the second-order plant with a delay.
Go to article

Bibliography

  1.  R. Hilfer, Applications of Fractional Calculus in Physics, Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Company, 2000.
  2.  R. Almeida, N.R.O. Bastos, and M.T.T. Monteiro, “A fractional Malthusian growth model with variable order using an optimization approach”, Stat. Optim. Inf. Comput. vol. 6, no. 1, pp.  4–11, 2018.
  3.  R. Caponetto, G. Dongola, G. Fortuna, and I. Petras, Fractional Order Systems: Modeling and Control Applications, World Scientific, Singapore, 2010.
  4.  I. Podlubny, “Fractional-order systems and PIlDm controllers”, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 208–214, 1999.
  5.  D. Xue and Y.Q. Chen, “A Comparative Introduction of Four Fractional Order Controllers”, Proceedings of the 4th World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation, Shanghai, P.R. China, 2002, pp. 3228–3235.
  6.  Y.Q. Chen, “Ubiquitous fractional order controls?”, IFAC Proc. Vol., vol. 39, no. 11, pp. 481–492, 2006.
  7.  C.A Monje, Y. Chen, B.M. Vinagre, and V. Feliubatlle, Fractional-Order Systems and Fractional-Order Controllers, Springer Science & Business Media, 2010.
  8.  I. Petras, “Tuning and implementation methods for fractionalorder controllers”, Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 282–303, 2012.
  9.  S. Debarma, L.C. Saikia, and N. Sinha, “Automatic generation control using two degree of freedom fractional order PID controller”, Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst., vol. 58, pp. 120–129, 2014.
  10.  F. Padula and A. Visioli, “Set-point weight tuning rules for fractional order PID controllers”, Asian J. Control, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 678–690, 2013.
  11.  A. Tepljakov, E. Petlenkov, and J. Belikov, “A flexible MATLAB tool for optimal fractional-order PID controller design subject to specifications”, Proceedings of the 31st Chinese Control Conference, 2012, pp. 4698–4703.
  12.  P. Shah and S. Agashe, “Review of fractional PID controller”, Mechatronics, vol. 38, pp. 29–41, 2016.
  13.  A. Veloni and N. Miridakis, Digital Control Systems, Pearson Education Limited, 2017.
  14.  P. Oziablo, D. Mozyrska, and M. Wyrwas, “A Digital PID Controller Based on Grünwald-Letnikov Fractional-, Variable-Order Operator”, 24th International Conference on Methods and Models in Automation and Robotics (MMAR), 2019, pp. 460–465.
  15.  D. Mozyrska, P. Oziablo, and M.Wyrwas, “Fractional-, variableorder PID controller implementation based on two discretetime fractional order operators”, 7th International Conference on Control, Mechatronics and Automation (ICCMA), 2019, pp. 26–32.
  16.  P. Oziablo, D. Mozyrska, and M. Wyrwas, “Discrete-Time Fractional, Variable-Order PID Controller for a Plant with Delay”, Entropy, vol. 22, no. 7, p. 771, 2020.
  17.  P. Ostalczyk, “Variable-, fractional-order discrete PID controllers”, 17th International Conference on Methods and Models in Automation and Robotics (MMAR), 2012, pp. 534–539.
  18.  D. Sierociuk, W. Malesza, and M. Macias, “On a new definition of fractional variable-order derivative”, Proc. of the 14th International Carpathian Control Conference (ICCC), 2013, pp.  340–345.
  19.  D. Sierociuk, and W. Malesza, “Fractional variable order antiwindup control strategy”, Bull. Pol. Acad. Sci. Tech. Sci., vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 427–432, 2018.
  20.  D. Mozyrska and P. Ostalczyk, “Generalized Fractional-Order Discrete-Time Integrator”, Complexity, vol. 2017, p.  3452409, 2017.
  21.  D. Mozyrska, and M. Wyrwas, “Systems with fractional variable-order difference operator of convolution type and its stability”, Elektronika i Elektrotechnika, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 69‒73, 2018.
  22.  F. Haugen, PID Control, Tapir Academic Press, 2004.
  23.  R.C. Dorf and R.H. Bishop, Modern Control Systems, CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, 2018.
  24.  O. Mayr, The origins in feedback control, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, 1970.
  25.  F. Haugen, TechTeach: Discrete-time signals and systems, 2005.
  26.  K. Chen, R. Tang, and Ch. Li, “Phase-constrained fractional order PI controller for second-order-plus dead time systems”, Trans. Inst. Meas. Control, vol. 39, no. 8, pp. 1225–1235, 2016.
  27.  M. Micev, M. Calasan, and D. Oliva, “Fractional Order PID Controller Design for an AVR System Using Chaotic Yellow Saddle Goatfish Algorithm”, Mathematics, vol. 8, no. 7, p. 1182, 2020.
  28.  MathWorks. [Online]. Available: https://www.mathworks.com/help/control/ref/stepinfo.html. [Accessed Aug. 28, 2020].
  29.  G.F. Franklin, J.D. Powell, and A. Emami-Naeini, Feedback Control of Dynamic Systems, Prentice Hall, 2004.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Piotr Oziablo
1
Dorota Mozyrska
1
Malgorzata Wyrwas
1

  1. Bialystok University of Technology, ul. Wiejska 45A, 15-351 Bialystok, Poland
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

In this paper, an adaptive distributed formation controller for wheeled nonholonomic mobile robots is developed. The dynamical model of the robots is first derived by employing the Euler-Lagrange equation while taking into consideration the presence of disturbances and uncertainties in practical applications. Then, by incorporating fractional calculus in conjunction with fast terminal sliding mode control and consensus protocol, a robust distributed formation controller is designed to assure a fast and finite-time convergence of the robots towards the required formation pattern. Additionally, an adaptive mechanism is integrated to effectively counteract the effects of disturbances and uncertain dynamics. Moreover, the suggested control scheme's stability is theoretically proven through the Lyapunov theorem. Finally, simulation outcomes are given in order to show the enhanced performance and efficiency of the suggested control technique.
Go to article

Bibliography

[1] D. Xu, X. Zhang, Z. Zhu, C. Chen, and P. Yang. Behavior-based formation control of swarm robots. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2014:205759, 2014. doi: 10.1155/2014/205759.
[2] G. Lee and D. Chwa. Decentralized behavior-based formation control of multiple robots considering obstacle avoidance. Intelligent Service Robotics, 11:127–138, 2018. doi: 10.1007/s11370-017-0240-y.
[3] N. Hacene and B. Mendil. Behavior-based autonomous navigation and formation control of mobile robots in unknown cluttered dynamic environments with dynamic target tracking. International Journal of Automation and Computing, 18:766–786, 2021. doi: 10.1007/s11633-020-1264-x.
[4] Z. Pan, D. Li, K. Yang, and H. Deng. Multi-robot obstacle avoidance based on the improved artificial potential field and pid adaptive tracking control algorithm. Robotica, 37(11):1883–1903, 2019. doi: 10.1017/S026357471900033X.
[5] A.D. Dang, H.M. La, T. Nguyen, and J. Horn. Formation control for autonomous robots with collision and obstacle avoidance using a rotational and repulsive force–based approach. International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems, 16(3):1729881419847897, 2019. doi: 10.1177/1729881419847897.
[6] M. Maghenem, A. Loría, E. Nuno, and E. Panteley. Consensus-based formation control of networked nonholonomic vehicles with delayed communications. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 66(5):2242–2249, 2020. doi: 10.1109/TAC.2020.3005668.
[7] J.G. Romero, E. Nuño, E. Restrepo, and I. Sarras. Global consensus-based formation control of nonholonomic mobile robots with time-varying delays and without velocity measurements. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 2023. doi: 10.1109/TAC.2023.3264744.
[8] S.-L. Dai, S. He, X. Chen, and X. Jin. Adaptive leader–follower formation control of nonholonomic mobile robots with prescribed transient and steady-state performance. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 16(6):3662–3671, 2019. doi: 10.1109/TII.2019.2939263.
[9] J. Hirata-Acosta, J. Pliego-Jiménez, C. Cruz-Hernádez, and R. Martínez-Clark. Leader-follower formation control of wheeled mobile robots without attitude measurements. Applied Sciences, 11(12):5639, 2021. doi: 10.3390/app11125639.
[10] X. Liang, H. Wang, Y.-H. Liu, Z. Liu, and W. Chen. Leader-following formation control of nonholonomic mobile robots with velocity observers. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 25(4):1747–1755, 2020. doi: 10.1109/TMECH.2020.2990991.
[11] X. Chen, F. Huang, Y. Zhang, Z. Chen, S. Liu, Y. Nie, J. Tang, and S. Zhu. A novel virtual-structure formation control design for mobile robots with obstacle avoidance. Applied Sciences, 10(17):5807, 2020. doi: 10.3390/app10175807.
[12] L. Dong, Y. Chen, and X. Qu. Formation control strategy for nonholonomic intelligent vehicles based on virtual structure and consensus approach. Procedia Engineering, 137:415–424, 2016. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.01.276.
[13] N. Nfaileh, K. Alipour, B. Tarvirdizadeh, and A. Hadi. Formation control of multiple wheeled mobile robots based on model predictive control. Robotica, 40(9):3178–3213, 2022. doi: 10.1017/S0263574722000121.
[14] H. Xiao, C.L.P. Chen, G. Lai, D. Yu, and Y. Zhang. Integrated nonholonomic multi-robot con- sensus tracking formation using neural-network-optimized distributed model predictive control strategy. Neurocomputing, 518:282–293, 2023. doi: 10.1016/j.neucom.2022.11.007.
[15] W. Wang, J. Huang, C. Wen, and H. Fan. Distributed adaptive control for consensus tracking with application to formation control of nonholonomic mobile robots. Automatica, 50(4):1254–1263, 2014. doi: 10.1016/j.automatica.2014.02.028.
[16] Y.H. Moorthy and S. Joo. Distributed leader-following formation control for multiple nonholonomic mobile robots via bioinspired neurodynamic approach. Neurocomputing, 492:308–321, 2022. doi: 10.1016/j.neucom.2022.04.001.
[17] S. Ik Han. Prescribed consensus and formation error constrained finite-time sliding mode control for multi-agent mobile robot systems. IET Control Theory & Applications, 12(2):282–290, 2018. doi: 10.1049/iet-cta.2017.0351.
[18] C.-C. Tsai, Y.-X. Li, and F.-C. Tai. Backstepping sliding-mode leader-follower consensus formation control of uncertain networked heterogeneous nonholonomic wheeled mobile multirobots. In 2017 56th Annual Conference of the Society of Instrument and Control Engineers of Japan (SICE), pages 1407–1412. IEEE, 2017. doi: 10.23919/SICE.2017.8105661.
[19] R. Rahmani, H. Toshani, and S. Mobayen. Consensus tracking of multi-agent systems using constrained neural-optimiser-based sliding mode control. International Journal of Systems Science, 51(14):2653–2674, 2020. doi: 10.1080/00207721.2020.1799257.
[20] R. Afdila, F. Fahmi, and A. Sani. Distributed formation control for groups of mobile robots using consensus algorithm. Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and Informatics, 12(4):2095–2104, 2023. doi: 10.11591/eei.v12i4.3869.
[21] L.-D. Nguyen, H.-L. Phan, H.-G. Nguyen, and T.-L. Nguyen. Event-triggered distributed robust optimal control of nonholonomic mobile agents with obstacle avoidance formation, input constraints and external disturbances. Journal of the Franklin Institute, 360(8):5564–5587, 2023. doi: 10.1016/j.jfranklin.2023.02.033.
[22] Y.-H. Chang, C.-Y. Yang, W.-S. Chan, H.-W. Lin, and C.-W. Chang. Adaptive fuzzy sliding-mode formation controller design for multi-robot dynamic systems. I nternational Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 16(1):121–131, 2014.
[23] X. Chu, Z. Peng, G. Wen, and A. Rahmani. Robust fixed-time consensus tracking with application to formation control of unicycles. IET Control Theory & Applications, 12(1):53–59, 2018. doi: 10.1049/iet-cta.2017.0319.
[24] Y. Cheng, R. Jia, H. Du, G. Wen, and W. Zhu. Robust finite-time consensus formation control for multiple nonholonomic wheeled mobile robots via output feedback. International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, 28(6):2082–2096, 2018. doi: 10.1002/rnc.4002.
[25] Y. Xie, X. Zhang, W. Meng, S. Zheng, L. Jiang, J. Meng, and S. Wang. Coupled fractional- order sliding mode control and obstacle avoidance of a four-wheeled steerable mobile robot. ISA Transactions, 108:282–294, 2021. doi: 10.1016/j.isatra.2020.08.025.
[26] J. Bai, G. Wen, A. Rahmani, and Y. Yu. Distributed formation control of fractional-order multi-agent systems with absolute damping and communication delay. International Journal of Systems Science, 46(13):2380–2392, 2015. doi: 10.1080/00207721.2014.998411.
[27] R. Cajo, M. Guinaldo, E. Fabregas, S. Dormido, D. Plaza, R. De Keyser, and C. Ionescu. Distributed formation control for multiagent systems using a fractional-order proportional–integral structure. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 29(6):2738–2745, 2021. doi: 10.1109/TCST.2021.3053541.
[28] K.K. Ayten, M.H. Çiplak, and A. Dumlu. Implementation a fractional-order adaptive model-based pid-type sliding mode speed control for wheeled mobile robot. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part I: Journal of Systems and Control Engineering, 233(8):1067–1084, 2019. doi: 10.1177/0959651819847395.
[29] D. Baleanu, K. Diethelm, E. Scalas, and J.J. Trujillo. Fractional Calculus: Models and Numerical Methods, volume 3. World Scientific, 2012.
[30] Y.-H. Chang, C.-W. Chang, C.-L. Chen, and C.-W. Tao. Fuzzy sliding-mode formation control for multirobot systems: design and implementation. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics), 42(2):444–457, 2011. doi: 10.1109/TSMCB.2011.2167679.
[31] W. Ren and Beard R.W. Distributed consensus in multi-vehicle cooperative control: Theory and applications. Springer, London, 2007.
[32] T.-L. Liao, J.-J. Yan, and W.-S. Chan. Distributed sliding-mode formation controller design for multirobot dynamic systems. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, 139(6):061008, 2017. doi: 10.1115/1.4035614.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Allaeddine Yahia Damani
1
ORCID: ORCID
Zoubir Abdeslem Benselama
1
ORCID: ORCID
Ramdane Hedjar
2
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Laboratory of signal and image processing, Saad Dahlab University Blida 1, Blida, Algeria
  2. Center of Smart Robotics Research CEN, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The article focuses on the fractional-order backward difference, sum, linear time-invariant equation analysis, and difficulties of the fractional calculus microcontroller implementation with regard to designing a fractional-order proportional integral derivative (FOPID) controller. In opposite to the classic proportional integral derivative (PID), the FOPID controller is defined by five independent parameters. Hence, it is more customizable and, potentially, more precise on condition that the values of fractional integration and differentiation orders are properly selected. However, a number of operations and the time required to calculate the output signal continuously increase. This can be a significant problem considering the limitations of a microcontroller, including memory size and a constant sampling time of the set-up analog-to-digital (ADC) converters. In the article, three solutions are considered, and results obtained in the experiments are presented.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Mariusz Matusiak
Piotr Ostalczyk
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

In order to control joints of manipulators with high precision, a position tracking control strategy combining fractional calculus with iterative learning control and sliding mode control is proposed for the control of a single joint of manipulators. Considering the coupling between joints of manipulators, a fractional-order iterative sliding mode cross-coupling control strategy is proposed and the theoretical proof of its progressive stability is given. The paper takes a two-joint manipulator as the research object to verify the control strategy of a single-joint manipulator. The results show that the control strategy proposed in this paper makes the two-joint mechanical arm chatter less and the tracking more accurate. The synchronous control of the manipulator is verified by a three-joint manipulator. The results show that the angular displacement adjustment times of the three-joint manipulator are 0.11 s, 0.31 s and 0.24 s, respectively. 3.25 s > 5 s, 3.15 s of a PD cross-coupling control strategy; 2.85 s, 2.32 s, 4.22 s of a PD iterative cross-coupling control strategy; 0.14 s, 0.33 s, 0.28 s of a fractional-order sliding mode cross-coupling control strategy. The root mean square error of the position error of the designed control strategy is 6.47 × 10-6 rad, 3.69 × 10-4 rad, 6.91 × 10-3 rad, respectively. The root mean square error of the synchronization error is 3.96 × 10-4 rad, 1.36 × 10-3 rad, 7.81 × 10-3 rad, superior to the other three control strategies. The results illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed control method.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Xin Zhang
Wen-Ru Lu
Liang Zhang
Wen-Bo Xu
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

This paper presents new directions in the modeling of electric arc furnaces. This work is devoted to an overview of new approaches based on random differential equations, artificial neural networks, chaos theory, and fractional calculus. The foundation of proposed solutions consists of an instantaneous power balance equation related to the electric arc phenomenon. The emphasis is mostly placed on the conclusions that come from a novel interpretation of the equation coefficients.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Dariusz Grabowski
1
ORCID: ORCID
Maciej Klimas
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, Akademicka 10 str., 44-100 Gliwice, Poland

This page uses 'cookies'. Learn more