Search results

Filters

  • Journals
  • Authors
  • Keywords
  • Date
  • Type

Search results

Number of results: 5
items per page: 25 50 75
Sort by:
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Schwartz created a circle of values reflecting people’s individual systems of goals and motivations. These values can be grouped into different dimensions: self-protection versus self-growth and concentration on others versus concentration on self. In the present study, we analysed how these dimensions are related to hedonic and eudaimonic well-being; N=747 participants, representative of the general Polish population, completed the Portraits Value Questionnaire, Satisfaction with Life Scale and Questionnaire for Eudaimonic Well-being (online study). A series of models were tested using structural equation modelling. We found that concern for self and self-protection values were related to higher hedonic well-being, whereas concern for others and growth values were related to its lower levels. However, growth and concern for others were positively linked to eudaimonic well-being, but they may also positively and indirectly impact hedonic well-being (suppression effect). These results suggest that some values are associated with a feeling of self-realisation at the cost of current hedonic well-being.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Agnieszka Bojanowska
Agnieszka Czerw
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The study aims to examine the role of Self-Forgiveness in shaping the Human Flourishing of the adults. Two hundred fourteen participants (18 to 30 years) comprising 100 males (Mean Age = 22.15(1.61)) and 114 females (Mean Age = 22.00(1.95)) were chosen for the study. Self-forgiveness (Mudgal & Tiwari, 2017a) and Mental Health Continuum-Short Form (Keyes, 2005) were used as the tools. Self-forgiveness comprises Realization & Reparation, Guilt, Attribution and overall self-forgiveness (sum of the first three) while Human Flourishing consists of Hedonic and Eudaimonic (Social plus Psychological) Well-Being. The aggregate of Hedonic and Eudaimonic is overall Human Flourishing. The findings suggested no gender differences in Self-Forgiveness of the participants. Conversely, gender differences were observed in all the dimensions of Human Flourishing in favour of males. Irrespective of gender, Realization & Reparation was positively correlated with Hedonic, Social, Psychological and Eudaimonic Well-Being as well as Human Flourishing except for Guilt and Attribution that showed small positive or negative correlations. Irrespective of gender, Overall Self-Forgiveness correlated positively with all the dimensions of Flourishing. Gender and Realization & Reparation emerged as the significant predictors accounting for significant variance in all the dimensions of Flourishing while Guilt and Attribution did not. The findings suggested that remorse, easy acceptance of wrongdoing, repairing the relationship with self and others, ability to minimize negative emotions towards self, monitoring others’ positive behaviours and acknowledgements of valued and close relationships were the psychological mechanisms that may underlie the predictive strengths of self-forgiveness in regulating flourishing.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Ruchi Pandey
Gyanesh Kumar Tiwari
Priyanka Parihar
Pramod Kumar Rai
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The possibility of applying gas chromatograph to air samples discrimination in regard to odour intensity and hedonic quality was examined. The air samples were arornatised with lemon oil and four admixtures. fourteen distinctive points of a chromatogram were appointed and the distances from the points lo a set basis were measured. The set of h 1-h 14 parameters (inputs) and varied individual sensory estimations of I and H (outputs) was used as a training data set for NN. Possibility of discrimination of the odour quality of the samples situated close to the threshold of odour quality difference detectability was confirmed on the level of approximately one.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Joanna Kośmider
Beata Krajewska
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The hedonic tone of an environmental odor is a powerful predictor of annoyance. Pertinent field surveys combined with laboratory analysis of landfill, pharmaceutical factories and rubber factories have been conducted, with the purpose of obtaining a behavior curve of the hedonic tone for specific odor emissions, and comparing the annoyance potential and odor persistence of the sources under investigation. The 9-point scale was used to determine the hedonic tone, and the odor concentration was measured using the Triangle Odor Bag Method. The concentration to be presented to panel members comprises a range of 5 or 6 dilution steps which differ by a factor of approximately 3. Using a suitable curve fitting procedure, a line can be fitted through the points obtained in the experiment. Characteristic H values at any concentration can be derived from the hedonic behavior curve. The relationship between the hedonic tone and lgOC conforms to the quadratic polynomial for the three sources. The persistence of odor is expressed as a dose (concentration) response and (intensity) function. According to the rate of change in odor intensity, the pharmaceutical odor is the strongest, followed by the landfill odor, and then the rubber odor. Annoyance potential is calculated by multiplying lgOC with the max hedonic value, meaning that the three sources are sorted as follows: rubber factory>landfill>pharmaceutical factory. This study will further the understanding of the sensory characteristics of different odor source
Go to article

Bibliography

  1. Chaignaud, M., Cariou, S., Poette, J., Fages, M. & Fanlo, J. L. (2014). A new method to evaluate odour annoyance potential. Chemical Engineering Transactions, 40, pp.13-18. DOI:10.3303/CET1440003
  2. Fournel, S., Pelletier, F., Godbout, S., Lagace, R. & Feddes, J.J.R. (2012). Odor emissions, hedonic tones and ammonia emissions from three cage layer housing systems, Biosystems Engineering,112,pp.181-191. DOI: 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2012.03.010
  3. GB/T 14675(1993). Air Quality–Determination of Odor–Triangle Odor Bag Method, China Environmental Protection Agency Beijing, China. . (in Chinese)
  4. HJ 732(2014).Emission from stationary sources-Sampling of volatile organic compounds-Bags method, China Environmental Protection Agency Beijing, China. . (in Chinese)
  5. HJ 905(2017).Technical specification for environmental monitoring of odor, China Environmental Protection Agency Beijing, China. . (in Chinese)
  6. Idris, N. F., Kamarulzaman, N. H. & Nor, Z. M. O. H. D. (2017). Odor dispersion modelling for raw rubber processing factories. Journal of Rubber Research, 20,4,pp.223-241. DOI:10.1007/BF03449154
  7. Li, J., Li. W., Geng, J., et al. (2020). Prediction model and sensory evaluation of odor pollution in pig farms, Research of Environmental Sciences,32, 1, pp. 88-93. (in Chinese)
  8. Li, J., Zou, K., Li, W., Wang, G. & Yang, W. (2019). Olfactory characterization of typical odorous pollutants part i: relationship between the hedonic tone and odor concentration. Atmosphere, 10, 9,pp. 524-534. DOI: 10.3390/atmos10090524
  9. Li, W. , Li, J., Zhai, Z. , et al.(2018). Chinese population evaluation characteristics of the hedonic tone of two standard odorous substances,The Administration and Technique of Environmental Monitoring,30,1,PP,58-60. (in Chinese)
  10. Miedema, H. M. E., Walpot, J. I., Vos, H., & Steunenberg, C. F. (2000). Exposure-annoyance relationships for odor from industrial sources. Atmospheric Environment, 34,18,pp. 2927-2936. DOI: 0.1016/S1352-2310(99)00524-5
  11. Mueller, B. & Panaskova, J. (2015). Acceptability, perceived intensity, hedonic tone and pd-value - the relationship of these measurement categories. Gefahrstoffe Reinhaltung Der Luft. 75, 10, pp. 421-426. (in German)
  12. Nicell, J. A. (2009). Assessment and regulation of odour impacts. Atmospheric Environment, 43,pp.196-206. DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.09.033
  13. Nimmermark, S. (2011). Influence of odour concentration and individual odour thresholds on the hedonic tone of odour from animal production. Biosystems Engineering, 108, pp. 211-219. DOI:10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2010.12.003
  14. Schauberger, G. & Piringer, M. (2015). Odor impact criteria to avoid annoyance. Austrian Contribution to Vetennary Epodemiology, 8,pp.35-42.
  15. Sucker, K., Both, R., Bischoff, M., Guski, R., Krämer, U. & Winneke, G. (2008). Odor frequency and odor annoyance part ii: dose-response associations and their modification by hedonic tone. International Archives of Occupational & Environmental Health, 81, 6, pp. 683-694.
  16. VDI 3882-2(1997). Olfactometry – Determination of hedonic odor tone, Germany. Verlag des Vereins Deutscher Ingenieure, (1997)
  17. Wang, D., Zhu, X., YANG, X., et al. (2019). Advances and Perspectives in Pollution Characteristics and Prevention and Control Technology of VOCs and Odor Emitted from Pharmaceutical Fermentation Industry, Environmental science,4,pp.1-12. (in Chinese)
  18. Wang, Q., Zuo, X., Xia, M., Xie, H. & Zhu, L. (2019). Field investigation of temporal variation of volatile organic compounds at a landfill in Hangzhou, China. Environmental science and Pollution Research,26,18. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-019-04917-5
  19. Winneke, G. & Kastka, J. (1987). Comparison of odor-annoyance data from different industrial sources: problems and implications. Developments in Toxicology & Environmental ence, 15,3,pp. 129-137.
  20. Yan, F., Li, W., Wang, G., Li, J. & Zhai, Z. (2019). Study on pollution characteristics and sensory of NH3 in industrial site of Tianjin city, Environmental Chemistry,38,11, pp.2505-2509. DOUI: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2019031401 (in Chinese)
  21. Yan, F., Li.W. F., Han, M., et al. (2018). Sensory characteristics and specific pollutants for typical odor emission sources in China, Research of Environmental Sciences, 31, 9, pp. 1645-1650. (in Chinese)
  22. Yang, W., Zou, K., Li, W., et al. (2018). Odor concentration prediction method and hedonic tone evaluation for sewage treatment plant, Environmental Pollution & Control,40,11,pp. 1306-1309. (in Chinese)
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Fengyue Yan
1 2 3
Weifang Li
1 2
Gen Wang
1 2
Jing Geng
1 2
Zhiqiang Lu
1 2
Zengxiu Zhai
1 2 3
Yan Zhang
1 2 3

  1. State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Odor Pollution Control, Tianjin 300191, China
  2. Tianjin Academy of Eco-environmental Sciences, Tianjin, 300191, China
  3. Tianjin Sinodour Environmental Protection Science and Technology Development Co., Ltd.,Tianjin 300191, China
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

We aimed to investigate whether educational activities in the form of guided tours through an exhibition change the appreciation of art when young experts (i.e. first-years students of artistic faculties) view contemporary art in a gallery. Participants viewed and assessed the artworks presented at the gallery twice – before and after taking part in a guided tour led by a gallery educator. The guide-led tour increased both understanding and ratings (the hedonic value) of the artworks, which is consistent with the “effort after meaning” hypothesis and also with the model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments. Our results suggest that the reception of works of art by young experts is changed when they are under the influence of extensive contextual information.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Magdalena Szubielska
Agata Sztorc

This page uses 'cookies'. Learn more