Search results

Filters

  • Journals
  • Keywords
  • Date

Search results

Number of results: 2
items per page: 25 50 75
Sort by:
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The article is a commentary on the Code of Ethics of the Polish Historical Association published in March 2021. In the first part of the article, we critically discuss the Code using the metaphor of a “besieged fortress” and the categories of hierarchy and truth. In our view, by taking a defensive position, reproducing hierarchical relations within the community of historians and in relation to the public, and by placing the category of truth at the centre of the principles of the discipline, the authors of the Code do not respond to the contemporary challenges facing history. In the second part, we postulate the rebuilding of the Code on the basis of the categories of dialogue, polyphony and democracy, and we propose a number of amendments to its content.
Go to article

Bibliography

American Historical Association. „Statement on Standards of Professional Conduct”. https://www.historians.org/jobs‑and‑professional‑development/statements‑standards‑and-guidelines‑of‑the‑discipline/statement‑on‑standards‑of‑professional‑conduct (ostatnia aktualizacja: 2019; dostęp: 29.04.2021).
Assmann, Aleida. Między historią a pamięcią. Antologia. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego, 2014.
Europejski kodeks postępowania w zakresie rzetelności badawczej. Berlin 2020. https://allea.org/wp‑content/uploads/2020/09/Polish_European_Code_of_Conduct_for_Research_Integrity_2010.pdf (dostęp: 14.06.2021).
Historia w przestrzeni publicznej, red. Joanna Wojdon. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, 2018.
Kodeks Narodowego Centrum Nauki dotyczący rzetelności badań naukowych i starania o fundusze na badania. Kraków 2016. https://www.ncn.gov.pl/sites/default/files/pliki/uchwaly-rady/2016/uchwala39_2016‑zal1.pdf (dostęp: 14.06.2021).
Marsh, Herbert W., John Hattie. „The Relation between Research Productivity and Teaching Effectiveness: Complementary, Antagonistic, or Independent Constructs?”. The Journal of Higher Education 73, 5 (2002): 603–641.
Nie‑miejscapamięci 1. Nekrotopografie, red. Roma Sendyka, Maria Kobielska, Jakub Muchowski, Aleksandra Szczepan. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Instytutu Badań Literackich PAN, 2020.
Pomian, Krzysztof. O autonomii uniwersytetu. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, 2020.
Schweizerische Gesellschaft für Geschichte. Ethik‑Kodex und Grundsätze zur Freiheit der wissenschaftlichen historischen Forschung und Lehre. 2004. www.sgg‑ssh.ch/sites/default/ files/files/SGG‑EthikKodex_Grundsaetze.pdf; www.sgg‑ssh.ch/sites/default/files/files/ethikkodex_grundsaetze_layout_f_erg_0.pdf (dostęp: 29.04.2021).
Topolski, Jerzy. Wprowadzenie do historii, wyd. 2. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Poznańskie, 2001.
Werner, Wiktor, Adrian Trzoss, Dawid Gralik. „Historia i YouTube. Narracja historyczna w dobie Web 2.0”. Nauka 3 (2020): 119–140.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Anna Brzezińska
1
ORCID: ORCID
Tomasz Falkowski
2
ORCID: ORCID
Piotr Kowalewski Jahromi
3
ORCID: ORCID
Artur Kula
4 5
ORCID: ORCID
Aleksandra Kuligowska
4
ORCID: ORCID
Jakub Muchowski
6
ORCID: ORCID
Katarzyna Nowak
7
ORCID: ORCID
Marcin Stasiak
8
ORCID: ORCID
Agata Tatarenko
9
ORCID: ORCID
Tomasz Wiśniewski
10
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Uniwersytet Łódzki
  2. Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza, Poznań
  3. Uniwersytet Śląski, Katowice
  4. Uniwersytet Warszawski
  5. EHESS, Paryż
  6. Uniwersytet Jagielloński, Kraków
  7. University of Manchester
  8. Uniwersytet Jagielloński
  9. Instytut Europy Środkowej, Lublin
  10. Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The article discusses the complex issues related to 19th-century reproductive prints. Its starting point is the oeuvre of Feliks Stanisław Jasiński, a Polish engraver who was mainly active in France. He specialized in reproductive prints of works of art, and is a relatively well- -known and researched figure in the history of Polish graphic arts. Outlining the context for his activities also becomes a contribution to reflections on the place of reproductive prints in 19th century artistic culture, as well as an attempt to define a framework for considering this type of graphic production. In citing various examples of modern reproductive graphics, its diversity is proven. Theses on the primacy of the criterion of “fidelity” and technological determination in the history of reproduction are rejected. Instead, the complex links between this field and various aspects of artistic culture are pointed out. Particular emphasis is placed on the links between the functions, form and production methods of such prints. Chief consideration is given to the type of reproductive graphics made by using traditional metal techniques, which apart from their informative functions, also performed important artistic functions, as evidenced by the described phenomena occurring within this field in the second half of the 19th century, and the accompanying written tradition, formed since the 18th century.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Katarzyna Ubysz-Piasecka
1

  1. Uniwersytet Warszawski

This page uses 'cookies'. Learn more