Search results

Filters

  • Journals
  • Authors
  • Keywords
  • Date
  • Type

Search results

Number of results: 70
items per page: 25 50 75
Sort by:
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Conventional membranes used in the process of premix membrane emulsification are prone to fouling, especially when biopolymers are employed as surfactants. An alternative to conventional membranes are dynamic membranes consisting of an unconsolidated porous medium. Dynamic membranes have the advantage of enabling easy cleaning of the inside of the pores. Experimental research carried out to date has focused on the application of hydrophilic dynamic membranes composed of glass microbeads for producing o/w emulsions. The aims of this study were to determine the efficiency of droplet size reduction in a w/o emulsion when passed through a dynamic hydrophobic membrane consisting of a bed of irregular polymer particles, and to assess the effect of multiple membrane passes on the properties of the w/o emulsion. The dynamic membranes evaluated in the tests were found to reduce the diameters of premix droplets when an appropriate pressure level was reached. Higher bed porosity was associated with greater fluxes achieved across the packed bed, but the resulting emulsions were less homogeneous. Multiple passes of the emulsion through the dynamic polypropylene membrane led to a further reduction in droplet size, but it was accompanied by a decline in emulsion homogeneity.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Adrianna Frankiewicz
1
ORCID: ORCID
Jacek Różański
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Poznan University of Technology, Institute of Chemical Technology and Engineering, ul. Berdychowo 4, 60-965 Poznan, Poland
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

A simple model of behaviour of a single particle on the bulging membrane was presented. As a result of numerical solution of a motion equation the influence of the amplitude and frequency of bulging as well as the particle size on particle behaviour, especially its downstream velocity was investigated. It was found that the bulging of a membrane may increase the mean velocity of a particle or reinforce its diffusive behaviour, dependeing on the permeation velocity. The obtained results may help to design new production methods of highly fouling-resistant membranes.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Jakub M. Gac
Leon Gradoń
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Integrated gasification combined cycle systems (IGCC) are becoming more popular because of the characteristics, by which they are characterized, including low pollutants emissions, relatively high efficiency of electricity production and the ability to integrate the installation of carbon capture and storage (CCS). Currently, the most frequently used CO2 capture technology in IGCC systems is based on the absorption process. This method causes a significant increase of the internal load and decreases the efficiency of the entire system. It is therefore necessary to look for new methods of carbon dioxide capture. The authors of the present paper propose the use of membrane separation. The paper reviews available membranes for use in IGCC systems, indicates, inter alia, possible places of their implementation in the system and the required operation parameters. Attention is drawn to the most important parameters of membranes (among other selectivity and permeability) influencing the cost and performance of the whole installation. Numerical model of a membrane was used, among others, to analyze the influence of the basic parameters of the selected membranes on the purity and recovery ratio of the obtained permeate, as well as to determine the energetic cost of the use of membranes for the CO2 separation in IGCC systems. The calculations were made within the environment of the commercial package Aspen Plus. For the calculations both, membranes selective for carbon dioxide and membranes selective for hydrogen were used. Properly selected pressure before and after membrane module allowed for minimization of energy input on CCS installation assuring high purity and recovery ratio of separated gas.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Janusz Kotowicz
Anna Skorek-Osikowska
Katarzyna Janusz-Szymańska
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The paper presents results of the field tests on membrane biogas enrichment performed with the application of mobile membrane installation (MMI) with the feed stream up to 10 Nm3/h. The mobile installation equipped with four hollow fibre modules with polyimide type membranes was tested at four different biogas plants. Two of them were using agricultural substrates. The third one was constructed at a municipal wastewater plant and sludge was fermented in a digester and finally in the fourth case biogas was extracted from municipal waste landfill site. Differences in the concentration of bio-methane in feed in all cases were observed and trace compounds were detected as well. High selectivity polyimide membranes, in proper module arrangements, can provide a product of high methane content in all cases. The content of other trace compounds, such as hydrogen sulphide, water vapour and oxygen on the product did not exceed the values stated by standard for a biogas as a vehicle fuel. The traces of hydrogen sulphide and water vapour penetrated faster to the waste stream enriched in carbon dioxide, which could lead to further purification of the product – methane being hold in the retentate (H2O > H2S > CO2 > O2 > CH4 > N2). In the investigated cases, when concentration of N2 was low and concentration of CH4 higher than 50%, it was possible to upgrade methane to concentration above 90% in a two-stage cascade.

To performsimulation ofCH4 andCO2 permeation through polyimide membrane,MATLABwas used. Simulation program has included permeation gaseous mixture with methane contents as observed at field tests in the range of 50 and 60% vol. The mass transport process was estimated for a concurrent hollow fibre membrane module for given pressure and temperature conditions and different values of stage cut. The obtained results show good agreement with the experimental data. The highest degree of methane recovery was obtained with gas concentrating in a cascade with recycling of the retentate.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Andrzej Grzegorz Chmielewski
Agata Urbaniak
Jacek Palige
Otton Roubinek
Katarzyna Wawryniuk
Andrzej Dobrowolski
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Production of sanitary safe water of high quality with membrane technology is an alternative for conventional disinfection methods, as UF and MF membranes are found to be an effective barrier for pathogenic protozoa cysts, bacteria, and partially, viruses. The application of membranes in water treatment enables the reduction of chlorine consumption during final disinfection, what is especially recommended for long water distribution systems, in which microbiological quality of water needs to be effectively maintained. Membrane filtration, especially ultrafiltration and microfiltration, can be applied to enhance and improve disinfection of water and biologically treated wastewater, as ultrafiltration act as a barrier for viruses, bacteria and protozoa, but microfiltration does not remove viruses. As an example of direct application of UF/MF to wastewater treatment, including disinfection, membrane bioreactors can be mentioned. Additionally, membrane techniques are used in removal of disinfection byproducts from water. For this purpose, high pressure driven membrane processes, i.e. reverse osmosis and nanofiltration are mainly applied, however, in the case of inorganic DBPs, electrodialysis or Donnan dialysis can also be considered.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Michał Bodzek
Krystyna Konieczny
Mariola Rajca
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

This paper presents an experimental study on chicken egg white solution ultrafiltration, where membrane fouling has been the main point of concern. Separation process has been performed with a 150 kDa tubular ceramic TiO2/Al2O3 membrane. The operating parameters have been set as follows: transmembrane pressure 105–310 kPa, cross-flow velocity 2.73–4.55 m/s, pH 5 and constant temperature of 293 K. Resistance-in-series model has been used to calculate total resistance and its components. The experimental data have been described with four pore blocking models (complete blocking, intermediate blocking, standard blocking and cake filtration). The results obtained show that the dominant fouling mechanism is represented by cake filtration model.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Martyna Borysiak
Elżbieta Gabruś
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Biological regeneration of water and organic sorbents used in the absorption of hydrophilic and hydrophobic pollutants, respectively, was studied. In both cases biodegradation takes place in a membrane bioreactor. In the case of organic sorbents regeneration of the biodegradation process is integrated with the extraction of a given pollutant to water phase. In experiments carried out in this work, the proposed systems were tested using a strain of Pseudomonas fluorescens. For hydrophilic compounds experiments were performed using alcohols (1-butanol and 2-propanol) as model substrates. Applying the mathematical model of a membrane bioreactor elaborated previously, the values of pollutant concentration were determined and positively verified in the experiments. This system of water sorbent regeneration is fully satisfying. The process of biodegradation integrated with extraction was analysed on the basis of model compounds such as benzene and toluene. The study confirmed a possibility of organic sorbent (silicone oil) regeneration. However, due to a very high partition coefficient of benzene or toluene between the organic and aqueous phases, the process could be considered only for the case of their high concentrations in the gas directed to absorption.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Anna Trusek-Holownia
Andrzej Noworyta
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

In this paper a 600 MW oxy-type coal unit with a pulverized bed boiler and a membrane-cryogenic oxygen separator and carbon capture installation was analyzed. A membrane-cryogenic oxygen separation installation consists of a membrane module and two cryogenic distillation columns. In this system oxygen is produced with the purity equal to 95%. Installation of carbon capture was based on the physical separation method and allows to reduce the CO2emission by 90%. In this work the influence of the main parameter of the membrane process – the selectivity coefficient, on the efficiency of the coal unit was presented. The economic analysis with the use of the break-even point method was carried out. The economic calculations were realized in view of the break-even price of electricity depending on a coal unit availability.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Janusz Kotowicz
Sylwia Berdowska
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The results of experimental investigations on landfill gas separation on hollow fibres membranes made of poly (4 methylpentene-1) are presented. The effect of operating parameters on the performance and effectiveness of separation process has been described. Permeation process has been carried out in countercurrent flow for medium methane landfill gases. Obtained results have been analyzed in aspect to optimization process conditions.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Barbara Białecka
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Comparative calculations with a mathematical model designed by the authors, which takes into consideration energy transfer from gas flowing through a given channel to gas which penetrates this channel from an adjacent channel, as well as a model which omits this phenomenon, respectively, were made for the process of separating gas mixtures carried out with an inert sweep gas in the fourend capillary membrane module. Calculations were made for the process of biogas separation using a PMSP polymer membrane, relative to helium as the sweep gas. It was demonstrated that omitting the energy transfer in the mathematical model might lead to obtaining results which indicate that the capacity of the process expressed by the value of feed flux subjected to separation is by several percent higher than in reality.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Maciej Szwast
Zbigniew Szwast
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Fluorine and sodium chloride are common elements present in the water environment. According to WHO guidelines fluoride content in water cannot be not higher than 1.5 mgF-/dm3. Elevated fluoride content was observed all over the world and it leads to many health issues. It can be removed with the usage of various methods (ion exchange, membrane processes, adsorption, precipitation). In this paper fluoride removal with nanofiltration usage was described. Tests were performed with the application of Amicon 86400 filtration cells. Two types of commercial nanofiltration membranes NP010P and NP030P (Microdyn Nadir) were used. Transmembrane pressure was established as 0.3 MPa. For lower fluoride concentrations (5 mgF-/dm3) NF process allowed to decrease fluoride content under level 1.5 mgF-/dm3. Removal efficiency decreased with increasing fluoride content. Membrane NP030P showed better separation properties. Sodium chloride influenced removal efficiency as well as fluoride adsorption on/in membranes during the process. According to obtained data, better hydraulic properties exhibited membrane NP010P. For both membranes decrease in permeate flux in comparison to pure water was noticed what was observed. Relative permeability was lowered even to 0.32.
Go to article

Bibliography

  1. Akuno, M. H., Nocella, G., Milia, E. P. & Gutierrez, L. (2019). Factors influencing the relationship between fluoride in drinking water and dental fluorosis: A ten-year systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Water and Health, 17(6), pp. 845–862. DOI: 10.2166/wh.2019.300
  2. Ali, I., Alothman, Z. A. & Sanagi, M. M. (2015). Green Synthesis of Iron Nano-Impregnated Adsorbent for Fast Removal of Fluoride from Water. Journal of Molecular Liquids, 211, pp. 457–465. DOI: 10.1016/j.molliq.2015.07.034
  3. Ayala, L. I. M., Paquet, M., Janowska, K., Jamard, P., Quist-Jensen, C. A., Bosio, G. N., Mártire, D. O., Fabbri, D. & Boffa, V. (2018). Water Defluoridation: Nanofiltration vs Membrane Distillation. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 57(43), pp. 14740–14748. DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.8b03620
  4. Banasiak, L. J. & Schäfer, A. I. (2009). Removal of boron, fluoride and nitrate by electrodialysis in the presence of organic matter. Journal of Membrane Science, 334(1–2), pp. 101–109. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2009.02.020
  5. Bannoud, A. H. & Darwich, Y. (2007). Elimination des ions fluorures et manganèses contenus dans les eaux par nanofiltration. Desalination, 206(1–3), pp. 449–456. DOI:10.1016/j.desal.2006.02.071
  6. Bhatnagar, A., Kumar, E. & Sillanpää, M. (2011). Fluoride removal from water by adsorption - A review. Chemical Engineering Journal, 171(3), pp. 811–840. DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2011.05.028
  7. Bowen, W. R., Mohammad, A. W. & Hilal, N. (1997). Characterisation of nanofiltration membranes for predictive purposes - Use of salts, uncharged solutes and atomic force microscopy. Journal of Membrane Science, 126(1), pp. 91–105. DOI:10.1016/S0376-7388(96)00276-1
  8. Carvalho, A. L., Maugeri, F., Silva, V., Hernández, A., Palacio, L. & Pradanos, P. (2011). AFM analysis of the surface of nanoporous membranes: Application to the nanofiltration of potassium clavulanate. Journal of Materials Science, 46(10), pp. 3356–3369. DOI:10.1007/s10853-010-5224-7
  9. Cassano, A., Bentivenga, A., Conidi, C., Galiano, F., Saoncella, O. & Figoli, A. (2019). Membrane-based clarification and fractionation of red wine lees aqueous extracts. Polymers, 11(7), pp. 1–16. DOI:10.3390/polym11071089
  10. Chatterjee, S. & De, S. (2014). Adsorptive removal of fluoride by activated alumina doped cellulose acetate phthalate (CAP) mixed matrix membrane, Sepparation and Purification Technology, 125, pp. 223–238. DOI:10.1016/j.seppur.2014.01.055
  11. Chen, C., Han, B., Li, J., Shang, T., Zou, J. & Jiang, W. (2001). A new model on the diffusion of small molecule penetrants in dense polymer membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 187(1–2), pp. 109–118. DOI:10.1016/S0376-7388(00)00689-X
  12. Chibani, A., Barhoumi, A., Ncib, S., Bouguerra, W. & Elaloui, E. (2019). Fluoride removal from synthetic groundwater by electrocoagulation process: parameters ad energy evaluation. Desalination and Water Treatment, 157, pp. 100–109. DOI:10.5004/dwt.2019.24087
  13. Damtie, M. M., Woo, Y. C., Kim, B., Hailemariam, R. H., Park, K. D., Shon, H. K., Park, C. & Choi, J. S. (2019). Removal of fluoride in membrane-based water and wastewater treatment technologies: Performance review. Journal of Environmental Management, 251, pp. 1–24. DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109524
  14. Diawara, C. K., Paugam, L., Pontié, M., Schlumpf, J. P., Jaouen, P. & Quéméneur, F. (2005). Influence of chloride, nitrate, and sulphate on the removal of fluoride ions by using nanofiltration membranes. Separation Science and Technology, 40, pp. 3339–3347. DOI:10.1080/01496390500423706
  15. Elimelech, M., Zhu, X., Childress, A. E. & Hong, S. (1997). Role of membrane surface morphology in colloidal fouling of cellulose acetate and composite aromatic polyamide reverse osmosis membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 127(1), pp. 101–109. DOI:10.1016/S0376-7388(96)00351-1
  16. Epsztein, R., Shaulsky, E., Dizge, N., Warsinger, D.M. & Elimelech, M. (2018). Role of ionic charge density in Donnan exclusion of monovalent anions by nanofiltration. Environmental Science and Technology, 52, pp. 4108–4116. DOI:10.1021/acs.est.7b06400
  17. Fierro, D., Boschetti-de-Fierro, A. & Abetz, V. (2012). The solution-diffusion with imperfections model as a method to understand organic solvent nanofiltration of multicomponent systems. Journal of Membrane Science, 413–414, pp. 91–101. DOI:10.1016/j.memsci.2012.04.027
  18. Gomes, A.C., Cabral Goncalves, I. & de Pinho, M.N, The role of adsorption on nanofiltration of azo dyes (2005). Journal of Membrane Science, 255, pp. 157–165. DOI:10.1016/j.memsci.2005.01.031
  19. He, J., Yang, Y., Wu, Z., Xie, C., Zhang, K., Kong, L. & Liu, J. (2020). Review of fluoride removal from water environment by adsorption. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 8(6), pp. 1–101. DOI:10.1016/j.jece.2020.104516
  20. Hirose, M., Ito, H. & Kamiyama, Y. (1996). Effect of skin layer surface structures on the flux behaviour of RO membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 121(2), pp. 209–215. DOI:10.1016/S0376-7388(96)00181-0
  21. Hoinkis, J., Valero-Freitag, S., Caporgno, M. P. & Pätzold, C. (2011). Removal of nitrate and fluoride by nanofiltration - A comparative study. Desalination and Water Treatment, 30(1–3), pp. 278–288. DOI:10.5004/dwt.2011.2103
  22. Hong, S.U., Malaisamy, R. & Bruening, M.L. (2007). Separation of fluoride from other monovalent anions using multilayer polyelectrolyte nanofiltration membranes, Langmuir, 23, 1716 –1722. DOI:10.1021/la061701y
  23. Hu, K. & Dickson, J. M. (2006). Nanofiltration membrane performance on fluoride removal from water. Journal of Membrane Science, 279(1–2), pp. 529–538. DOI:10.1016/j.memsci.2005.12.047
  24. Kambarani, M., Bahmanyar, H., Mousavian, M. A. & Mousavi, S. M. (2016). Crossflow filtration of sodium chloride solution by a polymeric nanofilter: Minimization of concentration polarization by a novel backpulsing method. Iranian Journal of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, 80, pp. 135–141. DOI:10.30492/IJCCE.2016.23595
  25. Klimonda, A. & Kowalska, I. (2019). Application of polymeric membranes for the purification of solutions containing cationic surfactants. Water Science and Technology, 79(7), pp. 1241–1252. DOI:10.2166/wst.2019.115
  26. Kowalik-Klimczak, A., Zalewski, M. & Gierycz, P. (2016). Removal of Cr(III) ions from salt solution by nanofiltration: Experimental and modelling analysis. Polish Journal of Chemical Technology, 18(3), pp. 10–16. DOI:10.1515/pjct-2016-0042
  27. Krieg, H. M., Modise, S. J., Keizer, K. & Neomagus, H. W. J. P. (2004). Salt rejection in nanofiltration for single and binary salt mixtures in view of sulphate removal. Desalination, 171, pp. 205–215. DOI:10.1016/j.desal.2004.05.005
  28. Labarca, F. & Bórquez, R. (2020). Comparative study of nanofiltration and ion exchange for nitrate reduction in the presence of chloride and iron in groundwater. Science of the Total Environment, 723, pp. 1–12. DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137809
  29. Lee, S., Lee, E., Elimelech, M. & Hong, S. (2011). Membrane characterization by dynamic hysteresis: Measurements, mechanisms, and implications for membrane fouling. Journal of Membrane Science, 366, pp. 17–24. DOI:10.1016/j.memsci.2010.09.024
  30. Ma, W. F., Liu, W. J. & Chen, G. W. (2009). Factors influencing the removal of fluoride from groundwater by Nanofiltration. 3rd International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering, ICBBE 2009, pp. 1–5. DOI:10.1109/ICBBE.2009.5162848
  31. Madaeni, S. S. & Salehi, E. (2009). Adsorption of cations on nanofiltration membrane: Separation mechanism, isotherm confirmation and thermodynamic analysis. Chemical Engineering Journal, 150(1), pp. 114–121. DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2008.12.005
  32. Mnif, A., Ali, M. B. S. & Hamrouni, B. (2010). Effect of some physical and chemical parameters on fluoride removal by nanofiltration. Ionics, 16, pp. 245–253. DOI:10.1007/s11581-009-0368-7
  33. Nasr, A. B., Charcosset, C., Amar, R. B. & Walha, K. (2013). Defluoridation of water by nanofiltration. Journal of Fluorine Chemistry, 150, pp. 92–97. DOI:10.1016/j.jfluchem.2013.01.021
  34. Nechifor, G., Pascu, D.E. & Pascu, M. (2013). Study of adsorption kinetics and zeta potential of phosphate and nitrate ions on a cellulosic membrane. Revue Roumaine de Chimie, 58 (7–8), pp. 591–597
  35. Park, N., Cho, J., Hong, S. & Lee, S. (2010). Ion transport characteristics in nanofiltration membranes: Measurements and mechanisms. Journal of Water Supply: Research and Technology - AQUA, 59(2–3), pp. 179–190. DOI:10.2166/aqua.2010.034
  36. Richards, L. A., Vuachère, M. & Schäfer, A. I. (2010). Impact of pH on the removal of fluoride, nitrate and boron by nanofiltration/reverse osmosis. Desalination, 261(3), pp. 331–337. DOI:10.1016/j.desal.2010.06.025
  37. Salgado, C., Carmona, F.J., Palacio, L., Hernández, A. & Prádanos, P. (2016). Fouling study of nanofiltration membranes for sugar control in grape must: Analysis of resistances and the role of osmotic pressure. Separation Science and Technology, 51(3), pp. 525–541. DOI:10.1080/01496395.2015.1094490
  38. Shen, J. & Schäfer, A. (2014a). Removal of fluoride and uranium by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis: A review. Chemosphere, 117(1), pp. 679–691. DOI:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.09.090
  39. Shen, J. & Schäfer, A. (2015). Factors affecting fluoride and natural organic matter (NOM) removal from natural waters in Tanzania by nanofiltration/reverse osmosis. Science of the Total Environment, 527–528, pp. 520–529. DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.04.037
  40. Shu, L., Waite, T. D., Bliss, P. J., Fane, A. & Jegatheesan, V. (2005). Nanofiltration for the possible reuse of water and recovery of sodium chloride salt from textile effluent. Desalination, 172, pp. 235–243. DOI:10.1016/j.desal.2004.07.037
  41. Shurvell, T., Keir, G., Jegatheesan, V., Shu, L. & Farago, L. (2014). Removal of ametryn through nanofiltration and reverse osmosis. Desalination and Water Treatment, 52, pp. 643–649. DOI:10.1080/19443994.2013.829594
  42. Silva, F. C. (2018). Fouling of Nanofiltration Membranes, IntechOpen, London 2018, DOI:10.5772/intechopen.75353
  43. Steele, D. (1966). Group la: the Alkali Metals Li, Na, K, Rb, Cs, Fr, Pergamon, Tallahassee 1966. DOI:10.1016/b978-0-08-011853-6.50010-2
  44. Szmagara, A. & Krzyszczak, A. (2019). Monitoring of fluoride content in bottled mineral and spring waters by ion chromatography. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 202, pp. 27–34. DOI:10.1016/j.gexplo.2019.03.008
  45. Tahaikt, M., El Habbani, R., Ait Haddou, A., Achary, I., Amor, Z., Taky, M., Alami, A., Boughriba, A., Hafsi, M. & Elmidaoui, A. (2007). Fluoride removal from groundwater by nanofiltration. Desalination, 212(1–3), pp. 46–53. DOI:10.1016/j.desal.2006.10.003
  46. Teixeira, M. R., Rosa, M. J. & Nyström, M. (2005). The role of membrane charge on nanofiltration performance. Journal of Membrane Science, 265(1–2), pp. 160–166. DOI:10.1016/j.memsci.2005.04.046
  47. Tsuru, T., Nakao, S.I. & Kimura, S. (1991). Calculation of ion rejection by extended nernst-planck Equation with charged reverse osmosis membranes for single and mixed electrolyte solutions. Journal of Chemical Engineering of Japan, 24(4), pp. 511–517. DOI:10.1252/jcej.24.511
  48. Van der Bruggen, B. & Vandecasteele, C. (2001). Flux decline during nanofiltration of organic components in aqueous solution. Environmental Science Technology, 35, pp. 3535–3540. DOI: 10.1021/es0100064
  49. Van Der Bruggen, B., Braeken, L. & Vandecasteele, C. (2002). Flux decline in nanofiltration due to adsorption of organic compounds. Separation and Purification Technology, 29(1), pp. 23–31. DOI:10.1016/S1383-5866(01)00199-X
  50. Vieira, G.S, Moreira, F.K.V., Matsumoto, R.L.S., Michelon, M., Filho, F.M. & Hubinger, M.D. (2018). Influence of nanofiltration membrane features on enrichment of jussara ethanolic extract (Euterpe edulis) in anthocyanins. Journal of Food Engineering, 226, pp. 31–41. DOI:10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2018.01.013
  51. Vinati, A., Mahanty, B. & Behera, S. K. (2015). Clay and clay minerals for fluoride removal from water: A state-of-the-art review. Applied Clay Science, 114, pp. 340–348. DOI:10.1016/j.clay.2015.06.013
  52. Vigneswaran, S. & Kwon, D.-Y. (2015). Effect of ionic strength and permeate flux on membrane fouling: analysis of forces acting on particle deposit and cake formation. Environmental Engineering, 19, pp. 1604–1611. DOI:10.1007/s12205-014-0079-0
  53. Wang, Y., Shu, L., Jegatheesan, V. & Gao, B. (2010). Removal and adsorption of diuron through nanofiltration membrane: The effects of ionic environment and operating pressures. Separation and Purification Technology, 74(2), pp. 236–241. DOI:10.1016/j.seppur.2010.06.011
  54. WHO, Guidelines for Drinking-Water Quality, 2017 (4th ed.), World Health Organization, 763 Geneva
  55. Xi, B., Wang, X., Liu, W., Xia, X., Li, D., He, L., Wang, H., Sun, W., Yang, T. & Tao, W. (2014). Fluoride and Arsenic Removal by Nanofiltration Technology from Groundwater in Rural Areas of China: Performances with Membrane Optimization. Separation Science and Technology (Philadelphia), 49, pp. 2642–2649. DOI:10.1080/01496395.2014.939761
  56. Xu, H., Xiao, K., Yu, J., Huang, B., Wang, X., Liang, S., Wei, C., Wen, X. & Huang, X. (2020). A simple method to identify the dominant fouling mechanisms during membrane filtration based on piecewise multiple linear regression. Membranes, 10(8), 1–14. DOI:10.3390/membranes10080171
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Martyna Grzegorzek
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Wrocław University of Science and Technology,Wrocław, Poland
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Polymer mixed-matrix nanocomposite membranes were prepared by a wet-phase inversion method and used in ultrafiltration processes to treat wastewater treatment plant effluent spiked with organic micropollutants. The effects of halloysite (Hal), TiO2, and functionalized single-walled carbon nanotube (SWCNT-COOH) nanofillers on the treatment efficiency, permeability loss, and fouling behavior of polyethersulfone (PES) membranes were investigated and compared with those of a pristine PES membrane. The nanocomposite membranes exhibited lower porosity and stronger negative surface charge because of the added hydrophilic nanofillers. The PES-Hal membrane achieved the optimal balance of permeability and micropollutant removal owing to enhanced pollutant adsorption on the membrane surface and the creation of an easily removable cake layer (i.e., reversible fouling). The PES-SWCNT-COOH membrane demonstrated the highest treatment efficiency, but also the high permeability loss. In contrast, PES-TiO2 exhibited excellent antifouling properties, but poorer treatment capabilities.
Go to article

Bibliography

  1. Adeniyi, A., Mbaya, R., Popoola, P., Gomotsegang, F., Ibrahim, I. & Onyango, M. (2020). Predicting the fouling tendency of thin film composite membranes using fractal analysis and membrane autopsy, Alexandria Engineering Journal, 59, 6, pp. 4397-4407. DOI:10.1016/j.aej.2020.07.046
  2. Arif, Z., Sethy, N.K., Mishra, P.K. & Verma, B. (2019). Antifouling behaviour of PVDF/TiO2 composite membrane: a quantitative and qualitative assessment, Iranian Polymer Journal, 19, 28, pp. 301-312. DOI:10.1007/s13726-019-00700-y
  3. Bassyouni, M., Abdel-Aziz, M.H., Zoromba, M.Sh., Abdel-Hamid, S.M.S. & Drioli, E. (2019). A review of polymeric nanocomposite membranes for water purification, Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 73, pp. 19-46. DOI:10.1016/j.jiec.2019.01.045
  4. Bodzek, M., Konieczny, K. & Kwiecińska-Mydlak, A. (2021). New generation of semipermeable membranes with carbon nanotubes for water and wastewater treatment: Critical review, Archives of Environmental Protection, 47, 3, pp. 3-27, DOI:10.24425/aep.2021.138460
  5. Bohdziewicz, J., Dudziak, M., Kamińska, G. & Kudlek, E. (2016). Chromatographic determination and toxicological potential evaluation of selected micropollutants in aquatic environment - analytical problems, Desalination and Water Treatment, 57, pp. 1361-1369. DOI:10.1080/19443994.2015.1017325
  6. Bu, F., Gao, B., Yue, Q., Liu, C., Wang, W. & Shen, X. (2019). The Combination of Coagulation and Adsorption for Controlling Ultrafiltration Membrane Fouling in Water Treatment, Water, 11, pp. 1-13. DOI:10.3390/w11010090
  7. Buruga, K., Song, H., Shan, J., Bolan, N., Thimmarajampet Kalathi, J. & Kim, K-H. (2019). A review on functional polymer-clay based nanocomposite membranes for treatment of water, Journal of Hazardous. Materials, 379, pp. 1-27. DOI:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.04.067
  8. Dudziak, M. & Burdzik-Niemiec, E. (2017). Ultrafiltration through modified membranes in wastewater treatment containing 17β-estradiol and bisphenol A, Przemysł Chemiczny, 96, pp. 448-452, DOI: 10.15199/62.2017.2.35 (in Polish).
  9. Esfahani, M.R., Aktij, S.A., Dabaghian, Z., Firouzjaei, M.D., Rahimpour, A., Eke, J.; Escobar, I.C., Abolhassani, M., Greenlee, L.F., Esfahani, A.R., Sadmani, A. & Koutahzadeh, N. (2019). Nanocomposite membranes for water separation and purification: Fabrication, modification, and applications, Separation and Purification Technolology, 213, pp. 465-499. DOI:10.1016/j.seppur.2018.12.050
  10. Farjami, M., Vatanpour, V. & Moghadassi, A. (2020). Effect of nanoboehmite/poly(ethylene glycol) on the performance and physiochemical attributes EPVC nano-composite membranes in protein separation, Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 156, pp. 371-383. DOI:10.1016/j.cherd.2020.02.009
  11. Gamoń, F., Tomaszewski, M., Cema, G. & Ziembińska-Buczyńska, A. (2022). Adsorption of oxytetracycline and ciprofloxacin on carbon-based nanomaterials as affected by pH, Archives of Environmental Protection, 48, 2, pp. 34-41. DOI:10.24425/aep.2022.140764
  12. Ghaemi, N., Madaeni, S.S., Alizadeh, A., Rajabi, H. & Daraei, P. (2011). Preparation, characterization and performance of polyethersulfone/organically modified montmorillonite nanocomposite membranes in removal of pesticides, Journal of Membrane Science, 382, pp. 135-147. DOI:10.1016/j.memsci.2011.08.004
  13. Haas, R., Opitz, R. & Grischek, T. (2019). The AquaNES Project: Coupling Riverbank Filtration and Ultrafiltration in Drinking Water Treatment, Water, 11, pp. 1-14. DOI:10.3390/w11010018.
  14. Hao, S., Jia, Z., Wen, J., Li, S., Peng, W., Huang, R. & Xu, X. (2021). Progress in adsorptive membranes for separation – A review, Separation and Purification Technology, 255, 117772. DOI:10.1016/j.seppur.2020.117772.
  15. Inurria, A., Cay-Durgun, P., Rice, D., Zhang, H., Seo, D.-K., Lind, M.L. & Perreault, F. (2019). Polyamide thin-film nanocomposite membranes with graphene oxide nanosheets: Balancing membrane performance and fouling propensity, Desalination, 451, pp. 139-147. DOI:10.1016/j.desal.2018.07.004.
  16. Kamińska, G. (2022). Modification of ultrafiltration membranes with nanoparticles and their application, Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej, Gliwice 2022. (in Polish)
  17. Kamińska, G. & Bohdziewicz, J. (2018). Separation of selected organic micropollutants on ultrafiltration membrane modified with carbon nanotubes.Ochrona. Środowiska, 40, 4, pp. 37-42. (in Polish)
  18. Kamińska, G., Bohdziewicz, J., Calvo, J.I., Prádanos, P., Palacio, L. & Hernández, A. (2015). Fabrication and characterization of polyethersulfone nanocomposite membranes for the removal of endocrine disrupting micropollutants from wastewater. Mechanisms and performance, Journal of Membrane Science, 493, pp. 66-79. DOI:10.1016/j.memsci.2015.05.047
  19. Kamińska, G., Bohdziewicz, J., Palacio, L., Hernández, A. & Prádanos, P. (2016). Polyacrylonitrile membranes modified with carbon nanotubes: characterization and micropollutants removal analysis, Desalination and Water Treatment, 57, pp. 1344-1353. DOI:10.1080/19443994.2014.1002277
  20. Kamińska, G., Pronk, W. & Traber, J. (2020). Effect of coagulant dose and backflush pressure on NOM membrane fouling in inline coagulation-ultrafiltration, Desalination and Water Treatment, 199, pp. 188-197. DOI:10.5004/dwt.2020.25657.
  21. Leo, C.P.; Chai, W.K.; Mohammad, A.W., Qi, Y., Hoedley, A.F.A. & Chai, S.P. (2011). Phosphorus removal using nanofiltration membranes, Water Science and Technology 64, pp.199-205. DOI:10.2166/wst.2011.598.
  22. Mao, Y., Huang, Q. Meng, B., Zhou, K., Liu, G., Gigliuzza, A., Drioli, E. & Jin, W. (2020). Roughness-enhanced hydrophobic graphene oxide membrane for water desalination via membrane distillation, Journal of Membrane Science, 611, 118364. DOI:10.1016/j.memsci.2020.118364.
  23. Marszałek, A. (2022). Encapsulation of halloysite with sodium alginate and application in the adsorption of copper from rainwater, Archives of Environmental Protection, 48, 1, pp. 75-82. DOI:10.24425/aep.2022.140546.
  24. Maximous, N., Nakhla, G., Wan, W. & Wong, K. (2009). Preparation, characterization and performance of Al2O3/PES membrane for wastewater filtration, Journal of Membrane Science, 341, pp. 67–75. DOI:10.1016/j.memsci.2009.05.040.
  25. Mozia, S.; Grylewicz, A.; Zgrzebnicki, M.; Darowna, D. & Czyżewski, A. (2019). Investigations on the properties and performance of mixed matrix polyethersulfone membranes modified with halloysite nanotubes, Polymers-Basel. 11, 671, pp. 1-18. DOI:10.3390/polym11040671.
  26. Muthumareeswaran, M.R. & Agarwal, G.P. (2014). Feed concentration and pH effect on arsenate and phosphate rejection via polyacrylonitrile ultrafiltration membrane, Journal of Membrane Science, 468, pp. 11-19. DOI:10.1016/j.memsci.2014.05.040.
  27. Nasir, A., Masood, F., Yasin, T. & Hammed, A. (2019). Progress in polymeric nanocomposite membranes for wastewater treatment: Preparation, properties and applications, Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 79, pp. 29-40. DOI:10.1016/j.jiec.2019.06.052.
  28. Nguyen, M.N., Trinh, P.B., Butkhardt, C.J. & Schafer, A.I. (2021). Incorporation of single-walled carbon nanotubes in ultrafiltration support structure for the removal of steroid hormone micropollutants, Separation and Purification Technology, 264, 118405. DOI:10.1016/j.seppur.2021.118405.
  29. Niedergall, K., Bach, M., Hirth, T., Tovar, G.E.M. & Schiestel, T. (2014). Removal of micropollutants from water by nanocomposite membrane adsorbers, Separation and Purification Technology, 131, 27, pp. 60-68. DOI:10.1016/j.seppur.2014.04.032.
  30. Rogowska, J., Cieszynska-Semenowicz, M., Ratajczyk, W. & Wolska, L. (2020). Micropollutants in treated wastewater, Ambio, 49(2), pp. 487-503. DOI:10.1007/s13280-019-01219-5
  31. Saki, H., Alemayehu, E., Schomburg, J. & Lennartz, B. (2019). Halloysite nanotubes as adsorptive material for phosphate removal from aqueous solution, Water 11, 2, 203. DOI:10.3390/w11020203.
  32. Shaban, M., AbdAllah, H., Said, L. & Ahmed, A.M. (2019). Water desalination and dyes separation from industrial wastewater by PES/TiO2NTs mixed matrix membranes, Journal of Polymer Research, 26, 181, pp. 1-12. DOI:10.1007/s10965-019-1831-4.
  33. Shakak, M., Rezaee, R., Maleki, A., Jafari, A., Safari, M., Shahmoradi, B., Daraei, H. & Lee, S-M. (2019). Synthesis and characterization of nanocomposite ultrafiltration membrane (PSF/PVP/SiO2) and performance evaluation for the removal of amoxicillin from aqueous solutions, Environmental Technology & Innovation, 17, 100529. DOI:10.1016/j.eti.2019.100529.
  34. Suhalim, N.S., Kasim, N., Mahmoudi, E., Shamsudin, I.J., Mohammad, A.W., Zuki, F.M. & Jamari, N. (2022). Rejection Mechanism of Ionic Solute Removal by Nanofiltration Membranes: An Overview, Nanomaterials, 12, 437. DOI:10.3390/nano12030437.
  35. Vatanpour, V., Mansourpanah, Y., Soroush Mousavi Khadem, S., Zinadini, S., Dizge, N., Reza Ganjali, M., Mirsadeghi, S., Rezapour, M., Reza Saeb, M. & Karimi-Male, H. (2021). Nanostructured polyethersulfone nanocomposite membranes for dual protein and dye separation: Lower antifouling with lanthanum (III) vanadate nanosheets as a novel nanofiller, Polymer Testing, 94, pp. 107040. DOI:10.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.107040.
  36. Vatanpour, V., Madaeni, S.S., Rajabi, L., Zinadini, S. & Derakhshan, A.A. (2012). Boehmite nanoparticles as a new nanofiller for preparation of antifouling mixed matrix membranes, Journal of Membrane Science, 401-402, pp. 132-143. DOI:10.1016/j.memsci.2012.01.040.
  37. Wang, S., Yao, S., Du, K., Yuan, R., Chen, H., Wang, F. & Zhou, B. (2021). The mechanisms of conventional pollutants adsorption by modified granular steel slag, Environmental Engineering Research, 26, 1, 190352. DOI:10.4491/eer.2019.352.
  38. Zhang, J., Nguyen, M.N., Li, Y., Yang, C. & Schafer, A.I. (2020). Steroid hormone micropollutant removal from water with activated carbon fiber-ultrafiltration composite membranes, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 391, 122020. DOI:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122020.
  39. Zhang, X., Wang, D.K., Lopez, D.R.S. & Diniz da Costa, J. (2014). Fabrication of nanostructured TiO2 hollow fiber photocatalytic membrane and application for wastewater treatment, Chemical Engineering Journal, 236, pp. 314-322. DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2013.09.059.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Gabriela Kamińska
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Institute of Water and Wastewater Engineering, Gliwice, Poland
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Electrospun membranes exhibit very promising properties, such as high surface area, high surface area-to-pore volume ratio, high pore interconnectivity, and uniform pore distribution. Nanoparticles are a promising alternative for improving the properties of the electrospun membranes. Titania nanoparticles, which are stable, resistant, and non-toxic, have various applications including water treatment, sensors, food additive and cosmetics. Due to the high hydrophilicity of titania nanoparticles, membrane fouling is reduced in titania nanoparticles doped membranes. Titania nanoparticle doped polyacrylonitrile (PAN) nanocomposite electrospun membranes were prepared by electrospinning method in this work. Compared to bare PAN electrospun membranes 0.05% titania nanoparticles doped electrospun membranes have thinner nanofibers, higher hydrophilicity and almost 2 times lower bovine serum albumin adsorption, which shows lower fouling tendency.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

E. Celik Madenli
ORCID: ORCID
Z.I. Ciftci
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Provincial Directorate of Environment and Urbanization Ministry, Governorship of Burdur, 15100, Burdur, Turkey
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The main goal of the present study was to examine the operating characteristics and mechanisms of membrane fouling in integrated membrane bioreactors (IMBRs) at diff erent temperatures. Two IMBRs, each with identical dimensions and confi gurations, were used in the study using synthetic domestic sewage at a low temperature (10°C) and high temperature (25°C). The results indicated that the removal effi ciency of chemical oxygen demand reached 93–96%, but the membrane contribution rate of IMBR2 (10°C) was higher than that of IMBR1 (25°C). The separation burden of the membrane on organic compounds increased at low temperature, which may have sped up the rate of membrane biofouling. The absolute rate of trans-membrane pressure build-up was faster at low temperature, leading to shorter IMBR operating times. Soluble microbial products (SMPs) and extracellular polymeric substances (EPSs) in the IMBRs signifi cantly increased at low temperature. These substances intensifi ed defl occulation, with an accompanying reduction of fl oc size and the release of EPSs at low temperature, which facilitated the formation of cake foulants on the surface, covering the entire membrane area. The protein and polysaccharide concentrations of SMPs and EPSs in the IMBRs were correlated with the concentration of C8-HSL. It was demonstrated that temperature aff ected the concentration of C8-HSL, which controlled the excretion of EPSs and SMPs and thus the membrane biofouling process.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Yaqin Yu
1

  1. Department of Civil Engineering, Yancheng Institute of Technology, China
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The paper presents the experimental study of a novel unsteady-statemembrane gas separation approach for recovery of a slow-permeant component in the membrane module with periodical retentate withdrawals. The case study consisted in the separation of binary test mixtures based on the fast-permeant main component (N2O, C2H2) and the slow-permeant impurity (1%vol. of N2) using a radial countercurrent membrane module. The novel semi-batch withdrawal technique was shown to intensify the separation process and provide up to 40% increase in separation efficiency compared to a steady-state operation of the same productivity.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Stanislav V. Battalov
Maxim M. Trubyanov
Egor S. Puzanov
Tatyana S. Sazanova
Pavel N. Drozdov
Ilya V. Vorotyntsev
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The partial solution for the growing contamination of the environment is the implementation of new technologies. The most of the currently operated systems for surface and groundwaters treatment as well as for wastewater treatment characterize with complex technological arrangements based on a number of unit operations. In water-wastewater management membrane processes are more often applied, especially those in which the difference of pressure at both membrane sites is used as a driving force. As an example of such application is the use of nanofi ltration for groundwaters treatment at Water Treatment Plant Zawada near Dębica or the treatment of municipal landfi ll leachate and industrial wastewater at Eko Dolina Waste Utilization Plant in Łężyce near Gdynia (reverse osmosis unit capacity of 120 m /d). Municipal wastewater treatment based on membrane technologies has already been implemented at domestic wastewater treatment plant. It is especially profi table, when the load of contaminant present in a wastewater varies within a year. In the case of membrane systems use, this issue can be neglected. As an example of membrane based system may serve WWTP in Rowy n/Ustka started up in 2013 and modernized in 2017. The latest trends and developments of selected suppliers of membrane systems are also presented.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Krystyna H. Konieczny
Małgorzata Wszelaka-Rylik
Bartłomiej Macherzyńsk
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The paper presents the results of studies on the changes in the PAHs concentration during pre-filtration and ultrafiltration (UF) processes. In the study, biologically treated wastewater (after denitrification and nitrification processes), discharged from the biological treatment plant and used in coke plant, was used. A gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) was used in order to qualify and quantify the PAHs. Sixteen PAHs listed by EPA were determined. The wastewater samples were collected three fold and initially characterized for the concentration of nitrate nitrogen, ammonium nitrogen, COD, TOC and pH. In the first step, wastewater was filtrated on the sand bed. Total concentration of 16 PAHs in the treated wastewater before initial filtration was in the range of 44.8‒53.5 mg/L. During the process the decrease in the concentration of the most studied hydrocarbons was observed. Concentration of PAHs after initial filtration ranged from 21.9 to 38.3 μg/L. After the initial filtration process the wastewater flew to the ultrafiltration module and then was separated on the membrane (type ZW-10). The total concentration of 16 PAHs in the process of ultrafiltration was in the range of 8.9‒19.3 mg/L. The efficiency of removal of PAHs from coke wastewater in the process of ultrafiltration equaled 66.6%. Taking into account the initial filtration, the total degree of removal of PAHs reached 85%. The obtained results indicate the possibility of using the ultrafiltration process with the initial filtration as additional process in the coke wastewater treatment.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Marzena Smol
Maria Włodarczyk-Makuła
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The process of carbon dioxide removal from monoethanolamine (MEA) - water solution was investigated on Poly Di Methyl Siloxane (PDMS) hydrophobic tubular membrane with a ceramic support. The effects of feed temperature, liquid flow rate and MEA concentration on CO2 mass transfer and selectivity were examined and found to be with a reasonable deviation (±25%) with predictions based on the multilayer film model. The membrane resistance was evaluated in separate experiments. The measured CO2 mass fluxes (0.17-0.45 kg/(m2h)) were found to be independent of the MEA concentration in the feed.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Roman Krupiczka
Adam Rotkegel
Zenon Ziobrowski
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The enzymatic synthesis of a highly hydrophobic product (dipeptide precursor) in which the reaction is accompanied by the mass transfer of the reaction product to the organic phase and the substrates to the water phase is considered. Equations describing both continuous and batch processes are formulated. The range of variability in the operating parameters of such a bioreactor is specified, and the correlations reported in the literature to describe mass transfer in the membrane contactor are validated. The proposed process was verified experimentally, and good agreement between the determined and calculated concentrations was obtained in both phases.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Andrzej Noworyta
Anna Trusek-Holownia
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

In this study, the process of membrane cleaning by supercritical fluid extraction was investigated. Polypropylene microfiltration membranes, contaminated with oils, were treated in a batch process with a supercritical fluid (SCF). As extractant, pure supercritical carbon dioxide or supercritical carbon dioxide with admixtures of methanol, ethanol and isopropanol were used. Single-stage and multi-stage extraction was carried out and process efficiency was determined. The obtained results showed that addition of organic solvents significantly enhances the cleaning performance, which increases with increase of organic solvent concentration and decreases with increasing temperature. All three solvents showed a comparable effect of efficiency enhancement. The results confirmed that supercritical fluid extraction can be applied for polypropylene membrane cleaning.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Jan Krzysztoforski
Andrzej Krasiński
Marek Henczka
Wojciech Piątkiewicz
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

In order to assess the influence of hydrodynamic effects on the recovery of n-butanol by means of pervaporation, a commercial PERVAP 4060 membrane was investigated. Laboratory pervaporation experiments were carried out providing a comparison of the permeation fluxes and enrichment factors. While the enrichment factors achieved in both modules under the same process conditions were comparable, the permeation fluxes differed from each other. In order to explain the observed differences, hydrodynamic conditions in the membrane module were examined by means of CFD simulation performed with ANSYS Fluent 14.5 software. Two different modules having membrane diameters of 80 mm and 150 mm were analyzed. As a result, different velocity profiles were obtained, which served to estimate the mass transfer coefficients of butanol, ethanol and acetone.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Joanna Marszałek
Michał Tylman
Paulina Rdzanek
Władysław Kamiński
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Magnetic properties of Fe nanowire arrays (NWs) electrodeposited in anodic alumina membranes have been studied. The influence of nanowire geometry (length, pore diameter) and an external magnetic field applied during electrodeposition process on the magnetic properties of nanowire arrays was investigated. With the use of the X-ray diffraction analysis the structure of iron wires was determined. The iron wires have the regular Body Centered Cubic structure. Magnetic measurements show that shape anisotropy aligns the preferential magnetization axis along the wire axis. It was found that the application of an external magnetic field in a parallel direction to the sample surface induces magnetic anisotropy with an easy axis of magnetization following the nanowire axis. The dependence of the height of Fe wires on the electrodeposition time was determined.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

I. Dobosz
W. Gumowska
M. Czapkiewicz
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

CO2 emission from combustion fossil fuels is considered as the primary factor in the global warming. Different methods for separation CO2 from combustion flue gases are extensively used across the world. The aim of this study is to analyze the most important technological solutions of CO2 separation. For this reason chemical absorption, physical absorption, adsorption approach, membrane filtration and cryogenic process were researched. Concluding, selection of the right method for carbon dioxide capture separation is a complex issue and a range of technological and economic factors should be taken into consideration prior to application on the industrial scale.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Robert Czarnota
Ewa Knapik
Paweł Wojnarowski
Damian Janiga
Jerzy Stopa
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The literature on membrane distillation and forward osmosis for treating natural and recovered wastewaters is reviewed. There is renewed interest in these membrane technologies as alternatives to pressure driven processes such as reverse osmosis, which are expensive in both capital and energy, and generally require pre-treatment of the feed water. Membrane distillation with hydrophobic microfiltration membranes can make use of low-grade heat energy, and give higher yields of product water from concentrated feed waters. Forward osmosis uses hydrophilic membranes akin to reveres osmosis, and needs a draw solution that is appropriate in the product water. or must be recovered and reused in large-scale operation. Although they show great promise as simple low energy systems, no large-scale installation of either process exists as yet. Membrane distillation has considerable potential for desalination to produce drinking water, whereas FO is currently confined to small-scale systems, especially as a source of energy drinks in emergency situations.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Brian Bolto
Manh Hoang
Thuy Tran

This page uses 'cookies'. Learn more