Search results

Filters

  • Journals
  • Keywords
  • Date

Search results

Number of results: 2
items per page: 25 50 75
Sort by:
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Podwaliny [Foundations], the poem written by Leopold Staff right after the war and carrying traces of a profound trauma, takes advantage of the motifs drawn from the biblical parable of good and bad construction practices (Gospel According to St Matthew, 7:24–27). In her interpretation of the poem, the author analyses the way(s) in which the biblical paradigm has been transformed, and the consequences of this procedure. Use is made of the opinions of the scholars who have reconstructed the primary function of parabolic stories, having identified in them the original forms of thinking which preceded the evolvement of abstract concepts encoding qualities.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Teresa Dobrzyńska
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

In the Russian handwritten Tale of the Boastful Scholar, two themes are developed: the limits of human comprehension of book wisdom and the dependence of the posthumous fate of a monk on the time and circumstances of his tonsure. The Tale was first studied by V.I. Malyshev (1964), who published the only copy known to him; he concluded that the Tale was created by Russian Old Believers in the XVIII century. This article analyzes the previously unknown copies of the Tale, allowing us to revise Malyshev’s perspective. Based on the eight copies of the Tale from the early XVII-XX centuries, two editions were distinguished. One of them has a monastic origin, and its earliest copy from the beginning of the XVII century was included in the collection of instructions for newly tonsured monks titled Starchestvo. Another edition was created by an Old Believer scholar at the turn of XVIII-XIX centuries. The earlier edition is a didactic parable about the futility of human efforts to fully comprehend book knowledge. The second edition is a satirical story about the confrontation between two scribes – a true sage and a fake one. The opposition of true and false book knowledge in this edition could be perceived by Old Believer readers in the context of the church schism of the XVII century and the disputes about the correction of religious books. Another difference between the copies of the Tale is the way the problem of tonsuring a person facing death is discussed – an issue quite relevant for the Old Russian society. The episode of the Tale featuring a blue tit trying to drink off the sea is indicative of the author’s intent to combine the traditions of book narration and folklore in his work. The article contains also the text of the earliest copy of the Tale found in the Starchestvo collection from the Trinity Lavra of St. Sergius.
Go to article

Bibliography

Alekseyev A.V., Kozhevnikova Yu.N., Panchenko O.V. i drugiye, Svyatoy prepodobnyy Diodor Yurʹyegorskiy i sozdannyy im monastyrʹ, Sankt‑Peterburg 2017.
Antonov D., Mayzulʹs M., Anatomiya ada. Putevoditelʹ po drevnerusskoy vizualʹnoy demonologii, Moskva 2013.
[Arseniy, iyeromonakh], Opisaniye slavyanskikh rukopisey biblioteki Svyato‑Troitskoy Sergiyevoy lavry, ch. 3, Moskva 1879.
Cierniak U., Literacki wymiar kultury religijnej staroobrzędowców, Częstochowa 1997.
Dalʹ V., Tolkovyy slovarʹ zhivogo velikorusskogo yazyka, t. 4, Moskva 1955.
Demkova N.S., Sochineniya protopopa Avvakuma i publitsisticheskaya literatura rannego staroobryadchestva: materialy i issledovaniya, Sankt‑Peterburg 1998.
Dukhovnyye stikhi Russkogo Severa, sostavitelʹ V.P. Kuznetsova, Petrozavodsk 2015.
Fomichev S.A., Metamorfozy poslovitsy o sinitse, [v:] Russkiy folʹklor: Materialy i issledovaniya, t. 35, Sankt‑Peterburg 2016.
Gritsevskaya I.M., Chteniye i chetʹi sborniki v russkikh monastyryakh XV-XVII vv., Sankt‑Peterburg 2012.
Isaak Sirin, O Bozhestvennykh taynakh i o dukhovnoy zhizni: Novootkrytyye teksty, pere- vod s siriyskogo, primechaniya i poslesloviye iyeromonakha Ilariona (Alfeyeva), Moskva 1998.
Izbornik 1076 goda, izdaniye podgotovili V.S. Golyshenko, V.F. Dubrovina, V.G. Demʹyanov, G.F. Nefedov, Moskva 1965.
Kalugin V.V., „Knigy”: otnosheniye drevnerusskikh pisateley k knige [v:] Drevnerusskaya literatura: izobrazheniye obshchestva, Moskva 1991.
Kartashev A.V., Ocherki po istorii russkoy Tserkvi, t. 1. Moskva 1991.
Kowalska‑Stus H., Ruś XVII wieku. Spotkanie dwóch koncepcji języka i sposobów myślenia, [w:] Białostocki Przegląd Kresowy. T. 4. Słowiańszczyzna w badaniach filologicznych, red. J. Nosowicz, Białystok 1996.
Likhacheva O.P., Lev – lyutyy zverʹ, „Trudy Otdela drevnerusskoy literatury”, t. 48, Sankt‑Peterburg 1993.
Malakhova A.S., Malakhov S.N., Fenomen bolezni v soznanii i povsednevnoy zhizni cheloveka Drevney Rusi (XI – nachalo XVII veka), Armavir 2014.
Malyshev V.I., Neizvestnaya povestʹ XVIII v. o khvastlivom knizhnike, „Russkaya literatura” 1964, № 1.
Małek E., Ukazatelʹ syuzhetov russkoy narrativnoy literatury XVII-XVIII vv., t. 1, Łódź 2000.
Mikhalina A.A., Skazaniye o ptitsakh, [v:] Slovarʹ knizhnikov i knizhnosti Drevney Rusi, vyp. 2, ch. 2, Leningrad 1989. Narodno‑poeticheskaya satira, Leningrad 1960.
Panchenko A.M., Tserkovnaya reforma i kulʹtura Petrovskoy epokhi, [v:] XVIII vek. Sbornik 17, Sankt‑Peterburg 1991.
Pigin A.V., Videniya potustoronnego mira v russkoy rukopisnoy knizhnosti, Sankt‑Peterburg 2006.
Pigin A.V., Babalyk M. G., „Az ti glagolyu dobreysheye, yunoshe…”: o nekotorykh uchebnykh tekstakh v russkikh rukopisyakh XVIII-XIX vv., [v:] „Mudrosti bo ti imya podadesya…”: sbornik statey k yubileyu professora Sofʹi Mikhaylovny Loyter, Petrozavodsk 2011.
Pinezhskaya knizhno‑rukopisnaya traditsiya XVI – nachala XX vv.: Opyt issledovaniya. Istochniki, t. 1: N.V. Savelʹyeva. Ocherk istorii formirovaniya pinezhskoy knizhno- ‑rukopisnoy traditsii. Opisaniye rukopisnykh istochnikov, Sankt‑Peterburg 2003.
Ponyrko N.V., Ioann Ivanov Milyutin, [v:] Slovarʹ knizhnikov i knizhnosti Drevney Rusi, vyp. 3, ch. 2, Sankt‑Peterburg 1993.
Poslovitsy, pogovorki, zagadki v rukopisnykh sbornikakh XVIII-XX vekov, Moskva – Leningrad 1961. Povestʹ o bolezni i smerti Vasiliya III, [v:] Biblioteka literatury Drevney Rusi, t. 10: XVI vek, Sankt‑Peterburg 2000.
Povestʹ o Varlaame i Ioasafe, [v:] Pamyatniki literatury Drevney Rusi, vyp. 2: XII vek, Moskva 1980.
Prolog na iyulʹ-avgust, Moskva 1662.
Rovinskiy D., Russkiye narodnyye kartinki, kn. 1: Skazki i zabavnyye listy, Sankt‑Peterburg 1881.
Ryzhova E.A., Skazaniye o Ioanne i Loggine Yarengskikh v spiske Drevlekhranilishcha im. V.I. Malysheva, „Trudy Otdela drevnerusskoy literatury”, t. 65, Sankt‑Peterburg 2017.
Sazonov S.V., K probleme vospriyatiya smerti v srednevekovoy Rusi, [v:] Russkaya istoriya: problemy mentaliteta. Tezisy dokladov nauchnoy konferentsii. Moskva, 4-6 oktyabrya 1994 g., Moskva 1994.
Semyachko S.A., Pisʹmennaya traditsiya drevnerusskogo starchestva: Tekstologicheskoye, istochnikovedcheskoye i istoriko‑literaturnoye issledovaniye. Dissertatsiya na soiskaniye stepeni doktora filologicheskikh nauk, Sankt‑Peterburg 2016.
Semyachko S.A., Starcheskaya traditsiya Troitse‑Sergiyeva monastyrya, [v:] Prepodobnyy Sergiy Radonezhskiy: Istoriya i agiografiya, ikonopisnyy obraz i monastyrskiye traditsii: Materialy mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy konferentsii. Moskva. Gosudarstvennyy istoricheskiy muzey. 27-28 maya 2014 g., Moskva 2014.
Smolitskiy V.G., Turgeneva T.A., Chetyre proizvedeniya narodnoy satiry, „Trudy Otdela drevnerusskoy literatury”, t. 17, Moskva – Leningrad 1961.
Uspenskiy B.A., Izbrannyye trudy, t. 2, Moskva 1994.
Uspenskiy B.A., Uspenskiy F. B., Inocheskiye imena na Rusi, Moskva – Sankt‑Peterburg 2017.
Veselovskiy A.N., Bezrazlichnyye i oboyudnyye v Zhitii Vasiliya Novogo i narodnoy eskhatologii, [v:] A.N. Veselovskiy, Razyskaniya v oblasti russkogo dukhovnogo stikha, vyp. 5, Sankt‑Peterburg 1889.
Zhitiye Dimitriya Prilutskogo: zhitiye i sluzhba, izdaniye podgotovili S.A. Semyachko i F.V. Panchenko, Vologda 2018.
Zhukov V.P., Slovarʹ russkikh poslovits i pogovorok, Moskva 1991.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Александр Пигин
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Санкт‑Петербург, Институт русской литературы (Пушкинский Дом) Российской академии наук

This page uses 'cookies'. Learn more