Search results

Filters

  • Journals
  • Authors
  • Keywords
  • Date
  • Type

Search results

Number of results: 27
items per page: 25 50 75
Sort by:
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The present study has been taken up to emphasize the role of the hybridization process for optimizing a given reinforced concrete (RC) frame. Although various primary techniques have been hybrid in the past with varying degree of success, the effect of hybridization of enhanced versions of standard optimization techniques has found little attention. The focus of the current study is to see if it is possible to maintain and carry the positive effects of enhanced versions of two different techniques while using their hybrid algorithms. For this purpose, enhanced versions of standard particle swarm optimization (PSO) and a standard gravitational search algorithm (GSA), were considered for optimizing an RC frame. The enhanced version of PSO involves its democratization by considering all good and bad experiences of the particles, whereas the enhanced version of the GSA is made self-adaptive by considering a specific range for certain parameters, like the gravitational constant and a set of agents with the best fitness values. The optimization process, being iterative in nature, has been coded in C++. The analysis and design procedure is based on the specifications of Indian codes. Two distinct advantages of enhanced versions of standard PSO and GSA, namely, better capability to escape from local optima and a faster convergence rate, have been tested for the hybrid algorithm. The entire formulation for optimal cost design of a frame includes the cost of beams and columns. The variables of each element of structural frame have been considered as continuous and rounded off appropriately to consider practical limitations. An example has also been considered to emphasize the validity of this optimum design procedure.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Sonia Chutani
Jagbir Singh
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Five models and methodology are discussed in this paper for constructing classifiers capable of recognizing in real time the type of fuel injected into a diesel engine cylinder to accuracy acceptable in practical technical applications. Experimental research was carried out on the dynamic engine test facility. The signal of in-cylinder and in-injection line pressure in an internal combustion engine powered by mineral fuel, biodiesel or blends of these two fuel types was evaluated using the vibro-acoustic method. Computational intelligence methods such as classification trees, particle swarm optimization and random forest were applied.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Andrzej Bąkowski
Michał Kekez
Leszek Radziszewski
Alžbeta Sapietova
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The hybridization of a recently suggested Harris hawk’s optimizer (HHO) with the traditional particle swarm optimization (PSO) has been proposed in this paper. The velocity function update in each iteration of the PSO technique has been adopted to avoid being trapped into local search space with HHO. The performance of the proposed Integrated HHO-PSO (IHHOPSO) is evaluated using 23 benchmark functions and compared with the novel algorithms and hybrid versions of the neighbouring standard algorithms. Statistical analysis with the proposed algorithm is presented, and the effectiveness is shown in the comparison of grey wolf optimization (GWO), Harris hawks optimizer (HHO), barnacles matting optimization (BMO) and hybrid GWO-PSO algorithms. The comparison in convergence characters with the considered set of optimization methods also presented along with the boxplot. The proposed algorithm is further validated via an emerging engineering case study of controller parameter tuning of power system stability enhancement problem. The considered case study tunes the parameters of STATCOM and power system stabilizers (PSS) connected in a sample power network with the proposed IHHOPSO algorithm. A multi-objective function has been considered and different operating conditions has been investigated in this papers which recommends proposed algorithm in an effective damping of power network oscillations.
Go to article

Bibliography

[1] M. Crepinsek, S.-H. Liu, and L. Mernik: A note on teaching–learningbased optimization algorithm. Information Sciences, 212 (2012), 79–93, DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2012.05.009.
[2] Anita and A. Yadav: AEFA: Artificial electric field algorithm for global optimization. Swarm and Evolutionary Computation, 48 (2019), 93–108, DOI: 10.1016/j.swevo.2019.03.013.
[3] R. Devarapalli and B. Bhattacharyya: A hybrid modified grey wolf optimization-sine cosine algorithm-based power system stabilizer parameter tuning in a multimachine power system. Optimal Control Applications and Methods, 41(4), (2020), 1143-1159, DOI: 10.1002/oca.2591.
[4] M. Jain, V. Singh, and A. Rani: A novel nature-inspired algorithm for optimization: Squirrel search algorithm, Swarmand Evolutionary Computation, 44 (2019), 148–175, DOI: 10.1016/j.swevo.2018.02.013.
[5] A.E. Eiben and J.E. Smith: What is an Evolutionary Algorithm? In Introduction to Evolutionary Computing, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2015, 25–48, DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-44874-8_3.
[6] A. Kaveh and M. Khayatazad: A new meta-heuristic method: Ray Optimization. Computers & Structures, 112–113, (2012), 283–294, DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2012.09.003.
[7] P.J.M. van Laarhoven and E.H.L. Aarts: Simulated annealing. In Simulated Annealing: Theory and Applications, P.J.M. van Laarhoven and E.H.L. Aarts, Eds. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1987, 7–15, DOI: 10.1007/978-94-015-7744-1_2.
[8] Agenetic algorithm tutorial. SpringerLink. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF00175354 (accessed Mar. 20, 2020).
[9] J. Kennedy and R. Eberhart: Particle Swarm Optimization. Proc. of ICNN’95 International Conference on Neural Networks, 4 (1995), 1942– 1948.
[10] M. Neshat, G. Sepidnam, M. Sargolzaei, and A.N. Toosi: Artificial fish swarm algorithm: a survey of the state-of-the-art, hybridization, combinatorial and indicative applications. Artificial Intelligence Review, 42(4), (2014), 965–997, DOI: 10.1007/s10462-012-9342-2.
[11] M. Dorigo, M. Birattari, and T. Stutzle: Ant colony optimization. IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine, 1(4), (2006), 28–39, DOI: 10.1109/ MCI.2006.329691.
[12] M. Roth and S. Wicker: Termite: ad-hoc networking with stigmergy. In GLOBECOM’03. IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37489), 5 (2003), 2937–2941, DOI: 10.1109/GLOCOM.2003.1258772.
[13] D. Karaboga and B. Akay: A comparative study of Artificial Bee Colony algorithm. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 214(1), (2009), 108– 132, DOI: 10.1016/j.amc.2009.03.090.
[14] A. Mucherino and O. Seref: Monkey search: a novel metaheuristic search for global optimization. AIP Conference Proceedings, 953(1), (2007), 162– 173, DOI: 10.1063/1.2817338.
[15] E.Atashpaz-Gargari and C. Lucas: Imperialist competitive algorithm: An algorithm for optimization inspired by imperialistic competition. In 2007 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, (2007), 4661–4667, DOI: 10.1109/CEC.2007.4425083.
[16] D. Simon: Biogeography-based optimization. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 12(6), (2008), 702–713, DOI: 10.1109/TEVC.2008.919004.
[17] X.-S. Yang: Firefly algorithm. Stochastic, test, functions and design optimisation. arXiv:1003.1409 [math], Mar. 2010, Accessed: Mar. 20, 2020. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1003.1409.
[18] K.M.Gates and P.C.M. Molenaar: Group search algorithm recovers effective connectivity maps for individuals in homogeneous and heterogeneous samples. NeuroImage, 63(1), (2012), 310–319, DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.06.026.
[19] E. Rashedi, H. Nezamabadi-Pour, and S. Saryazdi: GSA: A gravitational search algorithm. Information Sciences, 179(13), (2009), 2232–2248, DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2009.03.004.
[20] Y. Tan andY. Zhu: Fireworks Algorithm for Optimization. In: TanY., ShiY., Tan K.C. (eds) Advances in Swarm Intelligence. ICSI 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 6145, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-13495-1_44.
[21] X.-S. Yang: Bat algorithm for multi-objective optimisation. arXiv: 1203. 6571 [math], Mar. 2012, Accessed: Mar. 20, 2020. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1203.6571.
[22] LingWang, Xiao-long Zheng, and Sheng-yaoWang:Anovel binary fruit fly optimization algorithm for solving the multidimensional knapsack problem. Knowledge-Based Systems, 48 17–23, (2013), DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2013.04.003.
[23] X.-S. Yang: Flower Pollination Algorithm for Global Optimization. In Unconventional Computation and Natural Computation, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2012, 240–249, DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-32894-7_27.
[24] G.-G. Wang, L. Guo, A.H. Gandomi, G.-S. Hao, and H. Wang: Chaotic Krill Herd algorithm. Information Sciences, 274 (2014), 17–34, DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2014.02.123.
[25] A. Kaveh and N. Farhoudi: A new optimization method: Dolphin echolocation. Advances in Engineering Software, 59 (2013), 53–70, DOI: 10.1016/ j.advengsoft.2013.03.004.
[26] S. Mirjalili, S.M. Mirjalili, and A. Lewis: GreyWolf optimizer. Advances in Engineering Software, 69 (2014), 46–61, DOI: 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2013.12.007.
[27] A. Hatamlou: Black hole: A new heuristic optimization approach for data clustering. Information Sciences, 222 (2013), 175–184, DOI: 10.1016/ j.ins.2012.08.023.
[28] A. Sadollah, A. Bahreininejad, H. Eskandar and M. Hamdi: Mine blast algorithm: A new population based algorithm for solving constrained engineering optimization problem. Applied Soft Computing, 13(5), (2013), 2592–2612, DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2012.11.026.
[29] S. Mirjalili: Dragonfly algorithm: a new meta-heuristic optimization technique for solving single-objective, discrete, and multi-objective problems. Neural Computing and Applications, 27(4), (2016), 1053–1073, DOI: 10.1007/s00521-015-1920-1.
[30] S. Mirjalili: Moth-flame optimization algorithm: A novel nature-inspired heuristic paradigm. Knowledge-Based Systems, 89 (2015), 228–249, DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2015.07.006.
[31] F.A. Hashim, E.H. Houssein, M.S. Mabrouk, W. Al-Atabany, and S. Mirjalili: Henry gas solubility optimization: A novel physics-based algorithm. Future Generation Computer Systems, 101 (2019), 646–667, DOI: 10.1016/j.future.2019.07.015.
[32] S. Mirjalili: The ant lion optimizer. Advances in Engineering Software, 83 (2015), 80–98, DOI: 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2015.01.010.
[33] H. Shareef, A.A. Ibrahim, and A.H. Mutlag: Lightning search algorithm. Applied Soft Computing, 36 (2015), 315–333, DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2015.07.028.
[34] S.A. Uymaz, G. Tezel, and E. Yel: Artificial algae algorithm (AAA) for nonlinear global optimization. Applied Soft Computing, 31 (2015), 153–171, DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2015.03.003.
[35] M.D. Li, H. Zhao, X.W. Weng, and T. Han: A novel nature-inspired algorithm for optimization: Virus colony search. Advances in Engineering Software, 92 (2016), 65–88, DOI: 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2015.11.004.
[36] O. Abedinia, N. Amjady, and A. Ghasemi: A new metaheuristic algorithm based on shark smell optimization. Complexity, 21(5), (2016), 97–116, DOI: 10.1002/cplx.21634.
[37] S. Mirjalili, S.M. Mirjalili, and A. Hatamlou: Multi-Verse optimizer: a nature-inspired algorithm for global optimization. Neural Computing and Applications, 27(2), (2016), 495–513, DOI: 10.1007/s00521-015-1870-7.
[38] S. Mirjalili and A. Lewis: The whale optimization algorithm. Advances in Engineering Software, 95 (2016), 51–67, DOI: 10.1016/j.advengsoft. 2016.01.008.
[39] A. Askarzadeh: A novel metaheuristic method for solving constrained engineering optimization problems: Crow search algorithm. Computers and Structures, 169 (2016), 1–12, DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2016.03.001.
[40] T. Wu, M. Yao, and J. Yang: Dolphin swarm algorithm. Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering, 17(8), (2016), 717–729, DOI: 10.1631/FITEE.1500287.
[41] S. Mirjalili: SCA: A sine cosine algorithm for solving optimization problems. Knowledge-Based Systems, 96 (2016), 120–133, DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2015.12.022.
[42] A. Kaveh and A. Dadras: A novel meta-heuristic optimization algorithm: Thermal exchange optimization. Advances in Engineering Software, 110, (2017), 69–84, DOI: 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2017.03.014.
[43] M.M. Mafarja, I. Aljarah, A. Asghar Heidari, A.I. Hammouri, H. Faris, Ala’M. Al-Zoubi, and S. Mirjalili: Evolutionary population dynamics and grasshopper optimization approaches for feature selection problems. Knowledge-Based Systems, 145 (2018), 25–45, DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2017.12.037.
[44] A. Tabari and A. Ahmad: A new optimization method: Electro-search algorithm. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 103 (2017), 1–11, DOI: 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2017.01.046.
[45] G. Dhiman and V. Kumar: Spotted hyena optimizer: A novel bio-inspired based metaheuristic technique for engineering applications. Advances in Engineering Software, 114 (2017), 48–70, DOI: 10.1016/j.advengsoft. 2017.05.014.
[46] S.-A. Ahmadi: Human behavior-based optimization: a novel metaheuristic approach to solve complex optimization problems. Neural Comput and Applications, 28(S1), (2017), 233–244, DOI: 10.1007/s00521-016-2334-4.
[47] A.F. Nematollahi, A. Rahiminejad, and B. Vahidi: A novel physical based meta-heuristic optimization method known as lightning attachment procedure optimization. Applied Soft Computing, 59 (2017), 596–621, DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2017.06.033.
[48] R.A. Ibrahim, A.A. Ewees, D. Oliva, M. Abd Elaziz, and S. Lu: Improved salp swarm algorithm based on particle swarm optimization for feature selection. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 10(8), (2019), 3155–3169, DOI: 10.1007/s12652-018-1031-9.
[49] E. Jahani and M. Chizari: Tackling global optimization problems with a novel algorithm – Mouth brooding fish algorithm. Applied Soft Computing, 62 (2018), 987–1002, DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2017.09.035.
[50] X. Qi, Y. Zhu, and H. Zhang: A new meta-heuristic butterfly-inspired algorithm. Journal of Computational Science, 23 (2017), 226–239, DOI: 10.1016/j.jocs.2017.06.003.
[51] S. Mirjalili: Moth-flame optimization algorithm: A novel nature-inspired heuristic paradigm. Knowledge-Based Systems, 89 (2015), 228–249, DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2015.07.006.
[52] M. Dorigo, V. Maniezzo, and A. Colorni: Ant system: optimization by a colony of cooperating agents. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics), 26(1), (1996), 29–41, DOI: 10.1109/3477.484436.
[53] S. Mirjalili and S.Z.M. Hashim: A new hybrid PSOGSA algorithm for function optimization. In 2010 International Conference on Computer and Information Application, (2010), 374–377, DOI: 10.1109/ICCIA.2010.6141614.
[54] F.A. Senel, F. Gokce, A.S. Yuksel, and T. Yigit: A novel hybrid PSO– GWO algorithm for optimization problems. Engineering with Computers, 35(4), 1359–1373, DOI: 10.1007/s00366-018-0668-5.
[55] D.T. Bui, H. Moayedi, B. Kalantar, and A. Osouli: Harris hawks optimization: A novel swarm intelligence technique for spatial assessment of landslide susceptibility. Sensors, 19(14), (2019), 3590, DOI: 10.3390/s19163590.
[56] H. Chen, S. Jiao, M.Wang, A.A. Heidari, and X. Zhao: Parameters identification of photovoltaic cells and modules using diversification-enriched Harris hawks optimization with chaotic drifts. Journal of Cleaner Production, 244 (2020), p. 118778, DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118778.
[57] A.A. Heidari, S. Mirjalili, H. Faris, I. Aljarah, M. Mafarja, and H. Chen: Harris hawks optimization: Algorithm and applications. Future Generation Computer Systems, 97 (2019), 849–872, DOI: 10.1016/ j.future.2019.02.028.
[58] M. Jamil and X.-S. Yang: A literature survey of benchmark functions for global optimization problems. International Journal of Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Optimisation, 4(2), (2013), 150, DOI: 10.1504/IJMMNO.2013.055204.
[59] A. Kaveh and S. Talatahari: A novel heuristic optimization method: charged system search. Acta Mechanica, 213(3–4), (2010), 267–289, DOI: 10.1007/s00707-009-0270-4.
[60] J. Luo and B. Shi: Ahybrid whale optimization algorithm based on modified differential evolution for global optimization problems. Applied Intelligence, 49(5), (2000), 1982–2000, DOI: 10.1007/s10489-018-1362-4.
[61] A.A. Heidari, S. Mirjalili, H. Faris, I. Aljarah, M. Mafarja, and H. Chen: Harris hawks optimization: Algorithm and applications. Future Generation Computer Systems, 97 (2019), 849–872, DOI: 10.1016/ j.future.2019.02.028.
[62] P. Pruski and S. Paszek: Location of generating units most affecting the angular stability of the power system based on the analysis of instantaneous power waveforms. Archives of Control Sciences, 30(2), (2020), 273–293, DOI: 10.24425/acs.2020.133500.
[63] M.M. Hossain and A.Z. Khurshudyan: Heuristic control of nonlinear power systems: Application to the infinite bus problem. Archives of Control Sciences, 29(2), (2019), 279–288, DOI: 10.24425/acs.2019.129382.
[64] R. Devarapalli and B. Bhattacharyya:Aframework for H2=H? synthesis in damping power network oscillations with STATCOM. Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Electrical Engineering, 44 (2020), 927-948, DOI: 10.1007/s40998-019-00278-4.
[65] G. Gurrala and I. Sen: Power system stabilizers design for interconnected power systems. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 25(2), (2010), 1042– 1051, DOI: 10.1109/TPWRS.2009.2036778.
[66] R.K. Varma: Introduction to FACTS controllers. In 2009 IEEE/PES Power Systems Conference and Exposition, (2009), 1–6, DOI: 10.1109/PSCE.2009.4840114.
[67] P. Kundur: Power System Stability and Control. Tata McGraw-Hill Education, 1994.
[68] M. Belazzoug, M. Boudour, and K. Sebaa: FACTS location and size for reactive power system compensation through the multi-objective optimization. Archives of Control Sciences, 20(4), (2010), 473–489, DOI: 10.2478/v10170-010-0027-2
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Ramesh Devarapalli
1
ORCID: ORCID
Vikash Kumar
1

  1. Department of Electrical Engineering, B.I.T. Sindri, Dhanbad, Jharkhand, India
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

In this study, the inverter in a microgrid was adjusted by the particle swarm optimization (PSO) based coordinated control strategy to ensure the stability of the isolated island operation. The simulation results showed that the voltage at the inverter port reduced instantaneously, and the voltage unbalance degree of its port and the port of point of common coupling (PCC) exceeded the normal standard when the microgrid entered the isolated island mode. After using the coordinated control strategy, the voltage rapidly recovered, and the voltage unbalance degree rapidly reduced to the normal level. The coordinated control strategy is better than the normal control strategy.
Go to article

Bibliography

[1] Mohamed A., Lamhamdi T., Moussaoui H.E., Markhi H.E., Intelligent energy management system of a smart microgrid using multiagent systems, Archives of Electrical Engineering, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 23–38 (2020).
[2] Selakov A., Bekut D., Sari A.T., A novel agent-based microgrid optimal control for grid-connected, planned island and emergency island operations, International Transactions on Electrical Energy Systems, vol. 26, no. 9, pp. 1999–2022 (2016).
[3] Obara S., Sato K., Utsugi Y., Study on the operation optimization of an isolated island microgrid with renewable energy layout planning, Energy, vol. 161, no. OCT.15, pp. 1211–1225 (2018).
[4] Zhang T.F., Li X.X., A Control Strategy for Smooth Switching Between Island Operation Mode and Grid-Connection Operation Mode of Microgrid Containing Photovoltaic Generations, Power System Technology, vol. 39, pp. 904–910 (2015).
[5] Liang H., Dong Y., Huang Y., Zheng C., Li P., Modeling of Multiple Master–Slave Control under Island Microgrid and Stability Analysis Based on Control Parameter Configuration, Energies, vol. 11, no. 9 (2018).
[6] Zhang L., Chen K., Lyu L., Cai G., Research on the Operation Control Strategy of a Low-Voltage Direct Current Microgrid Based on a Disturbance Observer and Neural Network Adaptive Control Algorithm, Energies, vol. 12, no. 6 (2019).
[7] MaY.,Yang P., Guo H.,WangY., Dynamic Economic Dispatch and Control of a Stand-alone Microgrid in DongAo Island, Journal of Electrical Engineering & Technology, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 1433–1441 (2015).
[8] Worku M., Hassan M., Abido M., Real Time Energy Management and Control of Renewable Energy based Microgrid in Grid Connected and Island Modes, Energies, vol. 12, no. 2 (2019).
[9] Xu X., Zhou X., Control Strategy for Smooth Transfer Between Grid-connected and Island Operation for Micro Grid, High Voltage Engineering, vol. 44, no. 8, pp. 2754–2760 (2018).
[10] Roque J.A.M., Gonzalez R.O., Rivas J.J.R., Castillo O.C., Caporal R.M., Design of aNew Controller for an Inverter Operation in Transitional Regime Within a Microgrid, IEEE Latin America Transactions, vol. 14, no. 12, pp. 4724–4732 (2017).
[11] Ma Y., Yang P., Zhao Z., Wang Y., Optimal Economic Operation of Islanded Microgrid by Using a Modified PSO Algorithm, Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2015, pp. 1–10 (2015).
[12] Li P., Xu D., Zhou Z., Lee W., Zhao B., Stochastic Optimal Operation of Microgrid Based on Chaotic Binary Particle SwarmOptimization, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 66–73 (2016).
[13] Tan Y., Cao Y., Li C., Li Y., Yu L., Zhang Z., Tang S., Microgrid stochastic economic load dispatch based on two-point estimate method and improved particle swarm optimization, International Transactions on Electrical Energy Systems, vol. 25, no. 10, pp. 2144–2164 (2015).
[14] Radosavljevic J., Jevtic M., Klimenta D., Energy and operation management of a microgrid using particle swarm optimization, Engineering Optimization, vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 1–20 (2015).
[15] Maulik A., Das D., Optimal operation of microgrid using four different optimization techniques, Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, vol. 21, pp. 100–120 (2017), DOI: 10.1016/j.seta.2017.04.005.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Pan Wu
1
ORCID: ORCID
Xiaowei Xu
2

  1. Power Supply Co., Ltd.Luqiao District, Taizhou, Zhejiang Province, China
  2. Power Supply Co., Ltd.Tonglu, Zhejiang Province, China
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The electrical grid integration takes great attention because of the increasing population in the nonlinear load connected to the power distribution system. This manuscript deals with the power quality issues and mitigations associated with the electrical grid. The proposed single comprehensive artificial neural network (SCANN) controller with unified power quality conditioner (UPQC) is modelled in MATLAB Simulink environment. It provides series and shunt compensation that helps mitigate voltage and current distortion at the end of the distribution system. Initially, four proportional integral (PI) controllers are used to control the UPQC. Later the trained SCANN controller replaces four PI Controllers for better control action. PI and SCANN controllers’ simulation results are compared to find the optimal solutions. A prototype model of SCANN controller is constructed and tested. The test results show that the SCANN based UPQC maintains grid voltage and current magnitude within permissible limits under fluctuating conditions.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Varadharajan Balaji
1
Subramanian Chitra
2

  1. Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Kumaraguru College of Technology, Coimbatore, Tamilnadu – 641049, India and Research Scholar (Electrical), Anna University, Chennai, Tamilnadu, India
  2. Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Government College of Technology, Coimbatore, Tamilnadu – 641049, India
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The Bulletin of the Polish Academy of Sciences: Technical Sciences (Bull.Pol. Ac.: Tech.) is published bimonthly by the Division IV Engineering Sciences of the Polish Academy of Sciences, since the beginning of the existence of the PAS in 1952. The journal is peer‐reviewed and is published both in printed and electronic form. It is established for the publication of original high quality papers from multidisciplinary Engineering sciences with the following topics preferred: Artificial and Computational Intelligence, Biomedical Engineering and Biotechnology, Civil Engineering, Control, Informatics and Robotics, Electronics, Telecommunication and Optoelectronics, Mechanical and Aeronautical Engineering, Thermodynamics, Material Science and Nanotechnology, Power Systems and Power Electronics.

Journal Metrics: JCR Impact Factor 2018: 1.361, 5 Year Impact Factor: 1.323, SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.319, Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 1.005, CiteScore 2017: 1.27, The Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education 2017: 25 points.

Abbreviations/Acronym: Journal citation: Bull. Pol. Ac.: Tech., ISO: Bull. Pol. Acad. Sci.-Tech. Sci., JCR Abbrev: B POL ACAD SCI-TECH Acronym in the Editorial System: BPASTS.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Juan C. Seck-Tuoh-Mora
Joselito Medina-Marin
Erick S. Martinez-Gomez
Eva S. Hernandez-Gress
Norberto Hernandez-Romero
Valeria Volpi-Leon
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

This paper presents an adaptive particle swarm optimization (APSO) based LQR controller for optimal tuning of state feedback controller gains for a class of under actuated system (Inverted pendulum). Normally, the weights of LQR controller are chosen based on trial and error approach to obtain the optimum controller gains, but it is often cumbersome and tedious to tune the controller gains via trial and error method. To address this problem, an intelligent approach employing adaptive PSO (APSO) for optimum tuning of LQR is proposed. In this approach, an adaptive inertia weight factor (AIWF), which adjusts the inertia weight according to the success rate of the particles, is employed to not only speed up the search process but also to increase the accuracy of the algorithm towards obtaining the optimum controller gain. The performance of the proposed approach is tested on a bench mark inverted pendulum system, and the experimental results of APSO are compared with that of the conventional PSO and GA. Experimental results prove that the proposed algorithm remarkably improves the convergence speed and precision of PSO in obtaining the robust trajectory tracking of inverted pendulum.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Jovitha Jerome
Kumar E. Vinodh
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

This paper presents an effective method of network overload management in power systems. The three competing objectives 1) generation cost 2) transmission line overload and 3) real power loss are optimized to provide pareto-optimal solutions. A fuzzy ranking based non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II (NSGA-II) is used to solve this complex nonlinear optimization problem. The minimization of competing objectives is done by generation rescheduling. Fuzzy ranking method is employed to extract the best compromise solution out of the available non-dominated solutions depending upon its highest rank. N-1 contingency analysis is carried out to identify the most severe lines and those lines are selected for outage. The effectiveness of the proposed approach is demonstrated for different contingency cases in IEEE 30 and IEEE 118 bus systems with smooth cost functions and their results are compared with other single objective evolutionary algorithms like Particle swarm optimization (PSO) and Differential evolution (DE). Simulation results show the effectiveness of the proposed approach to generate well distributed pareto-optimal non-dominated solutions of multi-objective problem
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

K. Pandiarajan
C.K. Babulal
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

In this paper voltage stability is analysed based not only on the voltage deviations from the nominal values but also on the number of limit violating buses and severity of voltage limit violations. The expression of the actual state of the system as a numerical index like severity, aids the system operator in taking better security related decisions at control centres both during a period of contingency and also at a highly stressed operating condition. In contrary to conventional N – 1 contingency analysis, Northern Electric Reliability Council (NERC) recommends N – 2 line contingency analysis. The decision of the system operator to overcome the present contingency state of the system must blend harmoniously with the stability of the system. Hence the work presents a novel N – 2 contingency analysis based on the continuous severity function of the system. The study is performed on 4005 possible combinations of N – 2 contingency states for the practical Indian Utility 62 bus system. Static VAr Compensator is used to improve voltage profile during line contingencies. A multi- objective optimization with the objective of minimizing the voltage deviation and also the number of limit violating bus with optimal location and optimal sizing of SVC is achieved by Particle Swarm Optimization algorithm.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

S.P. Mangaiyarkarasi
T. Sree Renga Raja
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

This research presents a new technique which includes the principle of a Bezier curve and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) together, in order to design the planar dipole antenna for the two different targets. This technique can improve the characteristics of the antennas by modifying copper textures on the antennas with a Bezier curve. However, the time to process an algorithm will be increased due to the expansion of the solution space in optimization process. So as to solve this problem, the suitable initial parameters need to be set. Therefore this research initialized parameters with reference antenna parameters (a reference antenna operates on 2.4 GHz for IEEE 802.11 b/g/n WLAN standards) which resulted in the proposed designs, rapidly converted into the goals. The goal of the first design is to reduce the size of the antenna. As a result, the first antenna is reduced in the substrate size from areas of 5850 mm2 to 2987 mm2(48.93% approximately) and can also operates at 2.4 GHz (2.37 GHz to 2.51 GHz). The antenna with dual band application is presented in the second design. The second antenna is operated at 2.4 GHz (2.40 GHz to 2.49 GHz) and 5 GHz (5.10 GHz to 5.45 GHz) for IEEE 802.11 a/b/g/n WLAN standards.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Nuttaka Homsup
Winyou Silabut
Vuttichai Kesornpatumanum
Pravit Boonek
Waroth Kuhirun
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

In this paper two different update schemes for the recently developed plug-in direct particle swarm repetitive controller (PDPSRC) are investigated and compared. The proposed approach employs the particle swarm optimizer (PSO) to solve in on-line mode a dynamic optimization problem (DOP) related to the control task in the constant-amplitude constant-frequency voltage-source inverter (CACF VSI) with an LC output filter. The effectiveness of synchronous and asynchronous update rules, both commonly used in static optimization problems (SOPs), is assessed and compared in the case of PDPSRC. The performance of the controller, when synthesized using each of the update schemes, is studied numerically.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Bartlomiej Ufnalski
Lech M. Grzesiak
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The demand for energy on a global scale increases day by day. Unlike renewable energy sources, fossil fuels have limited reserves and meet most of the world’s energy needs despite their adverse environmental effects. This study presents a new forecast strategy, including an optimization-based S-curve approach for coal consumption in Turkey. For this approach, Genetic Algorithm (GA) and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), Grey Wolf Optimization (GWO), and Whale Optimization Algorithm (WOA) are among the meta-heuristic optimization techniques used to determine the optimum parameters of the S-curve. In addition, these algorithms and Artificial Neural Network (ANN) have also been used to estimate coal consumption. In evaluating coal consumption with ANN, energy and economic parameters such as installed capacity, gross generation, net electric consumption, import, export, and population energy are used for input parameters. In ANN modeling, the Feed Forward Multilayer Perceptron Network structure was used, and Levenberg-Marquardt Back Propagation has used to perform network training. S-curves have been calculated using optimization, and their performance in predicting coal consumption has been evaluated statistically. The findings reveal that the optimization-based S-curve approach gives higher accuracy than ANN in solving the presented problem. The statistical results calculated by the GWO have higher accuracy than the PSO, WOA, and GA with R 2 = 0.9881, RE = 0.011, RMSE = 1.079, MAE = 1.3584, and STD = 1.5187. The novelty of this study, the presented methodology does not need more input parameters for analysis. Therefore, it can be easily used with high accuracy to estimate coal consumption within other countries with an increasing trend in coal consumption, such as Turkey.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Mustafa Seker
1
ORCID: ORCID
Neslihan Unal Kartal
2
Selin Karadirek
3
Cevdet Bertan Gulludag
3

  1. Sivas Cumhuriyet University, Turkey
  2. Burdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy University, Turkey
  3. Akdeniz University, Antalya, Turkey
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Due to the nonlinear current-voltage (I-V) relationship of the photovoltaic (PV) module, building a precise mathematical model of the PV module is necessary for evaluating and optimizing the PV systems. This paper proposes a method of building PV parameter estimation models based on golden jackal optimization (GJO). GJO is a recently developed algorithm inspired by the idea of the hunting behavior of golden jackals. The explored and exploited searching strategies of GJO are built based on searching for prey as well as harassing and grabbing prey of golden jackals. The performance of GJO is considered on the commercial KC200GT module under various levels of irradiance and temperature. Its performance is compared to well-known particle swarm optimization (PSO), recent Henry gas solubility optimization (HGSO) and some previous methods. The obtained results show that GJO can estimate unknown PV parameters with high precision. Furthermore, GJO can also provide better efficiency than PSO and HGSO in terms of statistical results over several runs. Thus, GJO can be a reliable algorithm for the PV parameter estimation problem under different environmental conditions.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Thuan Thanh Nguyen
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Faculty of Electrical Engineering Technology, Industrial University of Ho Chi Minh City, No. 12 Nguyen Van Bao, Ward 4, Go Vap District, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

This paper presents the resolution of the optimal reactive power dispatch (ORPD) problem and the control of voltages in an electrical energy system by using a hybrid algorithm based on the particle swarmoptimization (PSO) method and interior point method (IPM). The IPM is based on the logarithmic barrier (LB-IPM) technique while respecting the non-linear equality and inequality constraints. The particle swarmoptimization-logarithmic barrier-interior point method (PSO-LB-IPM) is used to adjust the control variables, namely the reactive powers, the generator voltages and the load controllers of the transformers, in order to ensure convergence towards a better solution with the probability of reaching the global optimum. The proposed method was first tested and validated on a two-variable mathematical function using MATLAB as a calculation and execution tool, and then it is applied to the ORPD problem to minimize the total active losses in an electrical energy network. To validate the method a testwas carried out on the IEEE electrical energy network of 57 buses.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Aissa Benchabira
Mounir Khiat
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

A transformer is an important part of power transmission and transformation equipment. Once a fault occurs, it may cause a large-scale power outage. The safety of the transformer is related to the safe and stable operation of the power system. Aiming at the problem that the diagnosis result of transformer fault diagnosis method is not ideal and the model is unstable, a transformer fault diagnosis model based on improved particle swarm optimization online sequence extreme learning machine (IPSO-OS-ELM) algorithm is proposed. The improved particle swarmoptimization algorithm is applied to the transformer fault diagnosis model based on the OS-ELM, and the problems of randomly selecting parameters in the hidden layer of the OS-ELM and its network output not stable enough, are solved by optimization. Finally, the effectiveness of the improved fault diagnosis model in improving the accuracy is verified by simulation experiments.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Yuancheng Li
Longqiang Ma
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Economic dispatch (ED) is an essential part of any power system network. ED is howto schedule the real power outputs from the available generators to get the minimum cost while satisfying all constraints of the network. Moreover, it may be explained as allocating generation among the committed units with the most effective minimum way in accordance with all constraints of the system. There are many traditional methods for solving ED, e.g., Newton-Raphson method Lambda-Iterative technique, Gaussian-Seidel method, etc. All these traditional methods need the generators’ incremental fuel cost curves to be increasing linearly. But practically the input-output characteristics of a generator are highly non-linear. This causes a challenging non-convex optimization problem. Recent techniques like genetic algorithms, artificial intelligence, dynamic programming and particle swarm optimization solve nonconvex optimization problems in a powerful way and obtain a rapid and near global optimum solution. In addition, renewable energy resources as wind and solar are a promising option due to the environmental concerns as the fossil fuels reserves are being consumed and fuel price increases rapidly and emissions are getting higher. Therefore, the world tends to replace the old power stations into renewable ones or hybrid stations. In this paper, it is attempted to enhance the operation of electrical power system networks via economic dispatch. An ED problem is solved using various techniques, e.g., Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) technique and Sine-Cosine Algorithm (SCA). Afterwards, the results are compared. Moreover, case studies are executed using a photovoltaic-based distributed generator with constant penetration level on the IEEE 14 bus system and results are observed. All the analyses are performed on MATLAB software.
Go to article

Bibliography

[1] Zee-Lee Gaing, Particle swarm optimization to solving the economic dispatch considering the generator limits, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 18, pp. 1187–1195 (2003).
[2] Nidul Sinha, Chakrabarti R., Chattopadhyay P.K., Evolutionary programming techniques for economic load dispatch, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, vol. 7, iss. 1, pp. 83–94 (2003).
[3] Jeyakumar D., Jayabarathi T., Raghunathan T., Particle swarm optimization for various types of economic dispatch problems, International Journal of Electrical Power Energy System, vol. 36, pp. 42–28 (2006).
[4] Leandro dos Santos Coelho, Chu-Sheng Lee, Solving economic load dispatch problems in power system using chaotic and Gaussian particle swarm optimization approaches, Elsevier, International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems (IJEPES), vol. 30, iss. 5, pp. 297–307 (2008).
[5] Vishnu Prasad, Amita Mahor, Saroj Rangnekar, Economic dispatch using particle swarm optimization: A review, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 13, pp. 2134–2141 (2009).
[6] Kumar C., Alwarsamy T., Dynamic Economic Dispatch – A Review of Solution Methodologies, European Journal of Scientific Research, ISSN 1450-216X, vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 517–537 (2011).
[7] Deep K., Bansal J.C., Solving Economic Dispatch Problems with Valve-point Effects using Particle Swarm Optimization, J. UCS, vol. 18, no. 13, pp. 1842–1852 (2012).
[8] Timothy Ganesan, Pandian Vasant, Irraivan Elamvazuthy, A hybrid PSO approach for solving nonconvex optimization problems, Archives of Control Sciences, vol. 22 (LVIII) (2012).
[9] Jie Meng, Geng-yin Li, Shi-jun Cheng, Economic Dispatch for Power Generation System Incorporating Wind and Photovoltaic Power, Applied Mechanics and Materials, vol. 441, pp. 263–267 (2014).
[10] Kumar C., Anbarasan A., Karpagam M., Alwarsamy T., Artificial Intelligent Techniques in Economic Power Dispatch Problems, International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, ISSN 0973-4562, vol. 10, no. 9, pp. 23243–23254 (2015).
[11] Zeinab G. Hassan, Ezzat M., Almoataz Y. Abdelaziz, Solving Unit Commitment and Economic Load Dispatch Problems Using Modern Optimization Algorithms, International Journal of Engineering, Science and Technology, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 10–19 (2017).
[12] Quande Q., Cheng S., Xianghua C., Solving non-convex/non-smooth economic load dispatch problems via an enhanced particle swarm optimization, Applied Soft Computing, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 229–242 (2017).
[13] Sanjoy R., The maximum likelihood optima for an economic load dispatch in presence of demand and generation variability, Energy, vol. 147, pp. 915–923 (2018).
[14] Jagat Kishore Pattanaik, Mousumi Basu, Deba Prasad Dash, Dynamic economic dispatch: a comparative study for differential evolution, particle swarm optimization, evolutionary programming, genetic algorithm, and simulated annealing, Pattanaik et al., Journal of Electrical Systems and Information Technology (2019).
[15] Bishwajit Dey, Shyamal Krishna Roy, Biplab Bhattacharyya, Solving multi-objective economic emission dispatch of a renewable integrated microgrid using latest bio-inspired algorithms, Engineering Science and Technology, International Journal 22, pp. 55–66 (2019).
[16] Aissa Benchabira, Mounir Khiat, A hybrid method for the optimal reactive power dispatch and the control of voltages in an electrical energy network, Archives of Electrical Engineering, vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 535–551 (2019).
[17] Patel N., Bhattacharjee K., A comparative study of economic load dispatch using sine cosine algorithm, Scientia Iranica International Journal of Science and Technology, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 1467–1480 (2020).
[18] Tankut Yalcinoz, Halis Altun, Murat Uzam, Economic dispatch solution using a genetic algorithm based on arithmetic crossover, IEEE Porto Power Tech Proceedings (2001).
[19] Anurag Gupta, Himanshu Anand, Analysis of scheduling of solar sharing for economic/environmental dispatch using PSO, INDICON IEEE (2015).
[20] Hafez A.I., Zawbaa H.M., Emary E., Hassanien A.E., Sine cosine optimization algorithm for feature selection, International Symposium on INnovations in Intelligent SysTems and Applications (INISTA) (2016).
[21] Ajay Wadhawan, Preeti Verma, Sonia Grover, Himanshu Anand, Economic Environmental Dispatch with PV Generation Including Transmission Losses using PSO, IEEE Power India International Conference (PIICON) (2016).
[22] Suid M.H., Ahmad M.A., Ismail M.R.T.R., Ghazali M.R., Irawan A., Tumari M.Z., An Improved Sine Cosine Algorithm for Solving Optimization Problems, IEEE Conference on Systems, Process and Control (ICSPC) (2018).
[23] Jiajun Liu, Bo Song,Ye Li, An Optimum Dispatching for Photovoltaic-thermal Mutual-Complementing Power Plant Based on the Improved Particle Swarm Knowledge Algorithm, IEEE Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications (ICIEA) (2018).
[24] Kennedy J., Particle swarm optimization, Encyclopedia in Machine Learning, pp. 760–766 (2010).
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Abrar Mohamed Hafiz
1
ORCID: ORCID
M. Ezzat Abdelrahman
1
Hesham Temraz
1

  1. Electrical Power and Machines Department, Faculty of Engineering, Ain Shams University, Egypt
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The liver is a vital organ of the human body and hepatic cancer is one of the major causes of cancer deaths. Early and rapid diagnosis can reduce the mortality rate. It can be achieved through computerized cancer diagnosis and surgery planning systems. Segmentation plays a major role in these systems. This work evaluated the efficacy of the SegNet model in liver and particle swarm optimization-based clustering technique in liver lesion segmentation. Over 2400 CT images were used for training the deep learning network and ten CT datasets for validating the algorithm. The segmentation results were satisfactory. The values for Dice Coefficient and volumetric overlap error achieved were 0.940 ± 0.022 and 0.112 ± 0.038, respectively for liver and the results for lesion delineation were 0.4629 ± 0.287 and 0.6986 ± 0.203, respectively. The proposed method is effective for liver segmentation. However, lesion segmentation needs to be further improved for better accuracy.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

P Vaidehi Nayantara
1
Surekha Kamath
1
Manjunath KN
2
Rajagopal Kadavigere
2

  1. Department of Instrumentation and Control Engineering, Manipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, 576104, India
  2. Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Manipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, 576104, India
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The proportional-integral-derivative (PID) controller is widely used in various industrial applications such as process control, motor drives, magnetic and optical memory, automotive, flight control and instrumentation. PID tuning refers to the generation of PID parameters (Kp, Ki, Kd) to obtain the optimum fitness value for any system. The determination of the PID parameters is essential for any system that relies on it to function in a stable mode. This paper proposes a method in designing a predictive PID controller system using particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm for direct current (DC) motor application. Extensive numerical simulations have been done using the Mathwork’s Matlab simulation environment. In order to gain full benefits from the PSO algorithm, the PSO parameters such as inertia weight, iteration number, acceleration constant and particle number need to be carefully adjusted and determined. Therefore, the first investigation of this study is to present a comparative analysis between two important PSO parameters; inertia weight and number of iteration, to assist the predictive PID controller design. Simulation results show that inertia weight of 0.9 and iteration number 100 provide a good fitness achievement with low overshoot and fast rise and settling time. Next, a comparison between the performance of the DC motor with PID-PSO, with PID of gain 1, and without PID were also discussed. From the analysis, it can be concluded that by tuning the PID parameters using PSO method, the best gain in performance may be found. Finally, when comparing between the PID-PSO and its counterpart, the PI-PSO, the PID-PSO controller gives better performance in terms of robustness, low overshoot (0.005%), low minimum rise time (0.2806 seconds) and low settling time (0.4326 seconds).

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Norhaida Mustafa
Fazida Hanim Hashim
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The paper presents a three-phase grid-tied converter operated under unbalanced and distorted grid voltage conditions, using a multi-oscillatory current controller to provide high quality phase currents. The aim of this study is to introduce a systematic design of the current control loop. A distinctive feature of the proposed method is that the designer needs to define the required response and the disturbance characteristic, rather than usually unintuitive coefficients of controllers. Most common approach to tuning a state-feedback controller use linear-quadratic regulator (LQR) technique or pole-placement method. The tuning process for those methods usually comes down to guessing several parameters. For more complex systems including multi-oscillatory terms, control system tuning is unintuitive and cannot be effectively done by trial and error method. This paper proposes particle swarm optimization to find the optimal weights in a cost function for the LQR procedure. Complete settings for optimization procedure and numerical model are presented. Our goal here is to demonstrate an original design workflow. The proposed method has been verified in experimental study at a 10 kW laboratory setup.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

A. Gałecki
M. Michalczuk
A. Kaszewski
B. Ufnalski
L.M. Grzesiak
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

As nonlinear optimization techniques are computationally expensive, their usage in the real-time era is constrained. So this is the main challenge for researchers to develop a fast algorithm that is used in real-time computations. This work proposes a fast nonlinear model predictive control approach based on particle swarm optimization for nonlinear optimization with constraints. The suggested algorithm divide and conquer technique improves computing speed and disturbance rejection capability, demonstrating its suitability for real-time applications. The performance of this approach under constraints is validated using a highly nonlinear fast and dynamic real-time inverted pendulum system. The solution presented through work is computationally feasible for smaller sampling times and it gives promising results compared to the state of art PSO algorithm
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Supriya P. Diwan
1
Shraddha S. Deshpande
2

  1. Government College of Engineering, Karad-415124, Maharashtra, India
  2. Walchand College of Engineering, Sangli-416415, Maharashtra, India
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The paper presents the results of analyses concerning a new approach to approximating trajectory of mining-induced horizontal displacements. Analyses aimed at finding the most effective method of fitting data to the trajectory of mining-induced horizontal displacements. Two variants were made. In the first, the direct least square fitting (DLSF) method was applied based on the minimization of the objective function defined in the form of an algebraic distance. In the second, the effectiveness of differential-free optimization methods (DFO) was verified. As part of this study, the following methods were tested: genetic algorithms (GA), differential evolution (DE) and particle swarm optimization (PSO). The data for the analysis were measurements of on the ground surface caused by the mining progressive work at face no. 698 of the German Prospel-Haniel mine. The results obtained were compared in terms of the fitting quality, the stability of the results and the time needed to carry out the calculations. Finally, it was found that the direct least square fitting (DLSF) approach is the most effective for the analyzed registration data base. In the authors’ opinion, this is dictated by the angular range in which the measurements within a given measuring point oscillated.
Go to article

Bibliography

  1.  T. Chmielewski and Z. Zembaty, Podstawy dynamiki budowli, Warsaw: Arkady, 2006 [in Polish].
  2.  J. Rusek, “Influence of the Seismic Intensity of the Area on the Assessment of Dynamic Resistance of Bridge Structures”, in IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. 2017, pp. 245‒252, doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/245/3/032019.
  3.  J. Rusek and W. Kocot, “Proposed Assessment of Dynamic Resistance of the Existing Industrial Portal Frame Building Structures to the Impact of Mining Tremors” in IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. 2017, pp.162‒245, doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/245/3/032020.
  4.  J. Rusek, “A proposal for an assessment method of the dynamic resistance of concrete slab viaducts subjected to impact loads caused by mining tremors”, in JCEEA. 64(1), 469‒486 (2018), doi: 10.7862/rb.2017.43.
  5.  K. Tajduś, “Analysis of Horizontal Displacements Measured over the Mining Operations in Longwall No. 537 at the Girondelle 5 Seam of the Bw Friedrich Heinrich-Rheinland Coal Mine”, Arch. Min. Sci. 61(1), 157‒168 (2016), doi: 10.1515/amsc-2016-0012.
  6.  K. Tajdus, “The nature of mining-induced horizontal displacement of surface on the example of several coal mines”. Arch. Min. Sci. 59(4), 971‒986 (2014), doi: 10.2478/amsc-2014-0067.
  7.  K. Tajduś “Analysis of horizontal displacement distribution caused by single advancing longwall panel excavation”. J. Rock Mech. Geotech. Eng. 7(4), 395‒403 (2015), doi: 10.1016/j.jrmge.2015.03.012.
  8.  Deutsche Montan Technologie GmbH (DMT). BW Prosper Haniel measurements point – Schwarze Heide, 2001 (not published) [in German].
  9.  K. Tajduś, R. Misa, and A. Sroka, “Analysis of the surface horizontal displacement changes due to longwall panel advance”, Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 104, 119‒125 (2018), doi: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2018.02.005.
  10.  Z.L. Szpak, W. Chojnacki, and A. van den Hengel, “Guaranteed Ellipse Fitting with a Confidence Region and an Uncertainty Measure for Centre, Axes, and Orientation”, J. Math. Imaging Vision. 52(2), 173‒199 (2015), doi: 10.1007/s10851-014-0536-x.
  11.  M.A. Kashiha, C. Bahr, S. Ott, C.P.H. Moons, T.A. Niewold, F.O. Ödberg, and D. Berckmans, “Automatic identification of marked pigs in a pen using image pattern recognition”. Comput. Electron. Agric. 93, 111‒120 (2013), doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-38628-2_24.
  12.  L. Li, Y. Wang, X. Liu, Z. Tang, and Z. He, “A fast and robust ellipse detector based on top-down least-square fitting”, in BMVC, 2015, doi: 10.5244/c.29.156.
  13.  A. Xu, Z. Wang, D. Kong, Z. Fu, and Q. Lin, “A new ellipse fitting method of the minimum differential-mode noise in the atom interference gravimeter”, Chin. Phys. B – IOPscience. 27(7), 070203 (2018), doi: 10.1088/1674-1056/27/7/070203.
  14.  K. Kanatani, Y. Sugaya, and Y. Kanazawa, “Ellipse Fitting” in: Guide to 3D Vision Computation. Advances in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 11‒32, Springer, Cham, 2016, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-48493-8_2.
  15.  R. Halır and J. Flusser, “Numerically stable direct least squares fitting of ellipses” in Proc. 6th International Conference in Central Europe on Computer Graphics and Visualization, vol. 98, pp. 125‒132, WSCG, Citeseer.
  16.  A. Ray and D.C. Srivastava, “Non-linear least squares ellipse fitting using the genetic algorithm with applications to strain analysis”. J. Struct. Geol. 30(12), 1593‒1602 (2008), doi: 10.1016/j.jsg.2008.09.003.
  17.  R. Poli, J. Kennedy, and T. Blackwell, “Particle swarm optimization. An overview”, Swarm Intell. 1(1), 33‒57, (2007), doi: 10.1007/s11721- 007-0002-0.
  18.  F. Ye, “Particle swarm optimization-based automatic parameter selection for deep neural networks and its applications in large-scale and high- dimensional data”, PLos one. 12(12), e0188746 2017, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188746.
  19.  A.J. Mantau, A. Bowolaksono, B. Wiweko, and W. Jatmiko, “Detecting ellipses in embryo images using arc detection method with particle swarm for Blastomere-quality measurement system”, JACIII. 20(7), 1170‒1180 (2016), doi: 10.20965/jaciii.2016.p1170.
  20.  M. Szczepanik and T. Burczyński, “Swarm optimization of stiffeners locations in 2-D structures”, Bull. Pol. Ac.: Tech. 60(2), 241‒246 (2012), doi: 10.2478/v10175-012-0032-7.
  21.  J. Lampinen and R. Storn, Differential evolution. New optimization techniques in engineering, pp. 123–66, Springer, 2004.
  22.  L.M. Rios and N.V. Sahinidis, “Derivative-free optimization: A review of algorithms and comparison of software implementations”. J. Global Optim. Springer. 56(3), 1247‒1293 (2013), doi: 10.1007/s10898-012-9951-y.
  23.  J. Rusek, “Application of support vector machine in the analysis of the technical state of development in the LGOM mining area”, Maint. Reliab. vol.19, 54‒61, 2017, doi: 10.17531/ein.2017.1.8.
  24.  J. Rusek, “Creating a model of technical wear of building in mining area, with utilization of regressive SVM approach”. Arch. Min. Sci. 54(3), 455‒466, (2009).
  25.  D. Rainville, F.-A. Fortin, M.-A. Gardner, M. Parizeau, and C. Gagné, “Deap: A python framework for evolutionary algorithms” in GECCO ‘12, pp. 85–92, 2012.
  26.  F.A. Fortin, F.M.D. Rainville, M.A. Gardner, M. Parizeau, and C. Gagné, “DEAP: Evolutionary algorithms made easy”, J. Mach. Learn. Res. 13(1), 2171‒2175 (2012).
  27.  M.M. McKerns, P. Hung, and M.A.G. Aivazis, “Mystic: a simple model-independent inversion framework”, 2009, [Online] Available: http:// dev.danse.us/trac/mystic.
  28.  M.M. McKerns, L. Strand, T. Sullivan, A. Fang, and M.A.G. Aivazis. „Building a framework for predictive science” arXiv preprint arXiv:1202.1056, 2012.
  29.  B. Hammel and N. Sullivan-Molina, “Bdhammel/least-squares-ellipse-fitting: Initial release (Version v1.0)”, Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/ zenodo.2578663.
  30.  A.W. Fitzgibbon, M. Pilu, and R.B. Fisher, “Direct least squares fitting of ellipses”, IEEE Xplore 1, 253‒257 (1996), doi: 10.1109/ ICPR.1996.546029.
  31.  E. Cuevas, D. Zaldivar, M. Pérez-Cisneros, and M. Ramírez-Ortegón, “Circle detection using discrete differential evolution optimization”, Pattern Anal. Appl. Springer. 14, 93‒107 (2011), doi: 10.1007/s10044-010-0183-9.
  32.  E. Cuevas, M. González, D. Zaldívar, and M. Pérez-Cisneros, “Multi-ellipses detection on images inspired by collective animal behavior”, Neural. Comput. Appl. 24, 1019‒1033 (2014), doi: 10.1007/s00521-012-1332-4.
  33.  T. Witkowski, P. Antczak, and A. Antczak, “Multi-objective decision making and search space for the evaluation of production process scheduling”, Bull. Pol. Ac.: Tech. 3(57), 195‒208 (2012), doi: 10.2478/v10175-010-0121-4.
  34.  J.C. Strikwerda, Finite difference schemes and partial differential equations, SIAM, 2004.
  35.  K. Deb, A. Pratap, S. Agarwal, and T. Meyarivan, “A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II”, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 6(2), 182‒197 (2002), doi: 10.1109/4235.996017.
  36.  R. Storn and K. Price, “Differential evolution–a simple and efficient heuristic for global optimization over continuous spaces”, J. Global Optim. 11(4), 341‒359 (1997).
  37.  K. Price, R.M. Storn, and J.A Lampinen, Differential evolution: a practical approach to global optimization, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2006.
  38.  M.M. Ali and A. Törn, “Population set-based global optimization algorithms: some modifications and numerical studies”, Comput Oper Res. 31(10), 1703‒1725 (2004), doi: 10.1016/S0305-0548(03)00116-3.
  39.  Y. Fukuyama, Fundamentals of particle swarm optimization techniques. Modern Heuristic Optimization Techniques: Theory and applications to power systems, pp. 71–87, John Wiley & Sons, 2008.
  40.  C. Blum and X. Li,“Swarm Intelligence in Optimization” in Swarm Intell, pp. 43‒85, ed. Blum C. Merkle D. Natural Computing Series: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2008, doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-74089-6_2.
  41.  R. Eberhart and J. Kennedy, “A new optimizer using particle swarm theory”, in MHS’95. Proc. Sixth Int. Symp. Micro Mach. Hum. Sci, 1995, pp. 39–43, doi: 10.1109/MHS.1995.494215.
  42.  L.G. de la Fraga, I.V. Silva, and N. Cruz-Cortés, “Euclidean Distance Fit of Conics Using Differential Evolution” in: Evolutionary Image Analysis and Signal Processing, pp. 171‒184, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2009, doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-01636-3_10.
  43.  C. Robert and G. Casella, Monte Carlo statistical methods, Springer Science and Business Media, 2013.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Janusz Rusek
1
ORCID: ORCID
Krzysztof Tajduś
2
ORCID: ORCID

  1. AGH University of Science and Technology, al. Mickiewicza 30, 30-059 Krakow, Poland
  2. Strata Mechanics Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences, Reymonta 27, 30-059 Krakow, Poland
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The paper features a grid-tied converter with a repetitive current controller. Our goal here is to demonstrate the complete design workflow for a repetitive controller, including phase lead, filtering and conditional learning. All key parameters, i.e., controller gain, filter and fractional phase lead, are designed in a single optimization procedure, which is a novel approach. The description of the design and optimization process, as well as experimental verification of the entire control system, are the most important contributions of the paper. Additionally, one more novelty in the context of power converters is verified in the physical system – a conditional learning algorithm to improve transient states to abrupt reference and disturbance changes. The resulting control system is tested experimentally in a 10 kW converter.
Go to article

Bibliography

  1.  K. Kulikowski, P. Falkowski, and R. Grodzki, “Predictive and look-up table control methods of a three-level ac-dc converter under distorted grid voltage”, Bull. Pol. Acad. Sci. Tech. Sci. 65(5), 609–618 (2017).
  2.  P. Falkowski and A. Godlewska, “Finite control set mpc of lclfiltered grid-connected power converter operating under grid distortions”, Bull. Pol. Acad. Sci. Tech. Sci. 68(5), 1069–1076 (2020).
  3.  B. Ufnalski, L. Grzesiak, A. Kaszewski, and A. Gałecki, “On the similarity and challenges of multiresonant and iterative learning current controllers for grid converters and why the disturbance feedforward matters”, Prz. Elektrotechniczny 94(5), P.38–P.48 (2018).
  4.  S. Hara, Y. Yamamoto, T. Omata, and M. Nakano, “Repetitive control system: a new type servo system for periodic exogenous signals”, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 33 (7), 659–668 (1988).
  5.  W. Śleszyński, A. Cichowski, and P. Mysiak, “Current harmonic controller in multiple reference frames for series active power filter integrated with 18-pulse diode rectifier”, Bull. Pol. Acad. Sci. Tech. Sci. 66(5), 699–704 (2018).
  6.  A. Gałecki, M. Michalczuk, A. Kaszewski, B. Ufnalski, and L. Grzesiak, “Grid-tied converter operated under unbalanced and distorted grid voltage conditions”, Bull. Pol. Acad. Sci. Tech. Sci. 68(2), 389–398 (2020).
  7.  R. Nazir, “Advanced repetitive control of grid converters for power quality improvement under variable frequency conditions”, Doctor of Philosophy, Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand (2015).
  8.  Z. Liu, B. Zhang, K. Zhou, Y. Yang, and J. Wang, “Virtual variable sampling repetitive control of single-phase DC/AC PWM converters”, IEEE J. Emerg. Sel. Top. Power Electron. 7(3), 1837–1845 (2018).
  9.  W. Lu, K. Zhou, D. Wang, and M. Cheng, “A generic digital nkm-order harmonic repetitive control scheme for PWM converters”, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 61(3), 1516–1527 (2014).
  10.  H. Chen, H. Liu, Y. Xing, and H. Hu, “Enhanced DFT-based controller for selective harmonic compensation in active power filters”, IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 34(8), 8017–8030 (2019).
  11.  Z. Yang and C.W. Chan, “Conditional iterative learning control for non-linear systems with non-parametric uncertainties under alignment condition”, IET Control Theory Appl. 3(11), 1521– 1527 (2009).
  12.  B. Ufnalski, A. Kaszewski, and L.M. Grzesiak, “Particle swarm optimization of the multioscillatory LQR for a three-phase fourwire voltage-source inverter with an LC output filter”, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 62(1), 484–493 (2015).
  13.  A. Straś, B. Ufnalski, M. Michalczuk, A. Gałecki, and L. Grzesiak, “Design of fractional delay repetitive control with a deadbeat compensator for a grid-tied converter under distorted grid voltage conditions”, Control Eng. Practice 98, 104374 (2020).
  14.  E. Canelas, T. Pinto-Varela, and B. Sawik, “Electricity portfolio optimization for large consumers: Iberian electricity market case study”, Energies 13(9), 2249 (2020).
  15.  W. Xian, W. Yuan, Y. Yan, and T.A. Coombs, “Minimize frequency fluctuations of isolated power system with wind farm by using superconducting magnetic energy storage”, Proc. Int. Conf. Power Electronics and Drive Systems (PEDS), 1329–1332 (2009).
  16.  M. Tang, A. Formentini, S.A. Odhano, and P. Zanchetta, “Torque ripple reduction of pmsms using a novel angle-based repetitive observer”, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 67(4), 2689–2699 (2020).
  17.  S. Yang, P.Wang, Y. Tang, M. Zagrodnik, X. Hu, and K.J. Tseng, “Circulating current suppression in modular multilevel converters with even-harmonic repetitive control”, IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 54(1), 298–309 (2018).
  18.  Y. Wang, A. Darwish, D. Holliday, and B.W. Williams, “Plugin repetitive control strategy for high-order wide-output range impedance- source converters”, IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 32(8), 6510–6522 (2017).
  19.  B. Ufnalski, A. Gałecki, A. Kaszewski, and L. Grzesiak, “On the similarity and challenges of multiresonant and iterative learning current controllers for grid converters under frequency fluctuations and load transients”, Proc. 20th European Conf. Power Electronics and Applications (EPE’18 ECCE Europe), P.1–P.10 (2018).
  20.  K. Jackiewicz, A. Straś, B. Ufnalski, and L. Grzesiak, “Comparative study of two repetitive process control techniques for a grid-tie converter under distorted grid voltage conditions”, Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 113, 164 – 175 (2019).
  21.  A.G. Yepes, Digital resonant current controllers for voltage source converters, PhD thesis, Univeristy of Vigo, Departaments of Electronics Technology (2011).
  22.  Y. Yang, K. Zhou, and M. Cheng, “Phase compensation resonant controller for PWM converters”, IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 9(2), 957–964 (2013).
  23.  Y. Yang, K. Zhou, M. Cheng, and B. Zhang, “Phase compensation multiresonant control of cvcf PWM converters”, IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 28(8), 3923–3930 (2013).
  24.  B. Han, J.S. Lee, and M. Kim, “Repetitive controller with phaselead compensation for Cuk CCM inverter”, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 65(3), 2356–2367 (2018).
  25.  P. Zanchetta, M. Degano, J. Liu, and P. Mattavelli, “Iterative learning control with variable sampling frequency for current control of grid-connected converters in aircraft power systems”, IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 49(4), 1548–1555 (2013).
  26.  M.A. Herran, J.R. Fischer, S.A. Gonzalez, M.G. Judewicz, I. Carugati, and D.O. Carrica, “Repetitive control with adaptive sampling frequency for wind power generation systems”, IEEE J. Emerg. Sel. Top. Power Electron. 2(1), 58–69 (2014).
  27.  Z. Liu, B. Zhang, and K. Zhou, “Fractional-order phase lead compensation for multi-rate repetitive control on three-phase PWM DC/AC inverter”, Proc. IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conf. and Exposition (APEC), 1155–1162 (2016).
  28.  A. Straś, B. Ufnalski, and L. Grzesiak, “Particle swarm optimization-based gain, delay compensation and filter determination of a repetitive controller for a grid-tie converter”, Proc. Int. Symp. Industrial Electronics (INDEL), 1–7 (2018).
  29.  R. Nazir, “Taylor series expansion based repetitive controllers for power converters, subject to fractional delays”, Control Eng. Practice 64, 140–147 (2017).
  30.  J. Svensson, M. Bongiorno, and A. Sannino, “Practical implementation of delayed signal cancellation method for phasesequence separation”, IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 22(1), 18–26 (2007).
  31.  Y. Yang, K. Zhou, and F. Blaabjerg, “Frequency adaptability of harmonics controllers for grid-interfaced converters”, Int. J. Control 90(1), 3–14 (2015).
  32.  Y. Yang, K. Zhou, and F. Blaabjerg, “Enhancing the frequency adaptability of periodic current controllers with a fixed sampling rate for grid-connected power converters”, IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 31(10), 7273–7285 (2016).
  33.  P. Yu, M. Wu, J. She, K. Liu, and Y. Nakanishi, “An improved equivalent-input-disturbance approach for repetitive control system with state delay and disturbance”, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 65(1), 521–531 (2018).
  34.  G. Weiss, and T.C. Green, “H1 repetitive control of DC-AC converters in microgrids”, IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 19(1), 219‒230 (2004).
  35.  K. Zhang, Y. Kang, J. Xiong, and J. Chen, “Direct repetitive control of spwm inverter for UPS purpose”, IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 18(3), 784–792 (2003).
  36.  H.L. Broberg and R.G. Molyet, “Reduction of repetitive errors in tracking of periodic signals: theory and application of repetitive control”, Proc. 1992 The First IEEE Conf. Control Applications, 1116–1121, vol. 2 (1992).
  37.  D. Wang, “Zero-phase odd-harmonic repetitive controller for a single-phase PWM inverter”, IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 21(1), 193–201 (2006).
  38.  R. Nazir, K. Zhou, N.R. Watson, and A. Wood, “Frequency adaptive repetitive control of grid-connected inverters”, Proc. Decision and Information Technologies (CoDIT) 2014 Int. Conf. Control, 584–588 (2014).
  39.  R. Nazir, A.R. Woody, and A. Shabbir, “Low THD grid connected converter under variable frequency environment”, IEEE Access 7, 33528–33536 (2019).
  40.  Z. Liu, B. Zhang, K. Zhou, and J. Wang, “Virtual variable sampling discrete Fourier transform based selective odd-order harmonic repetitive control of DC/AC converters”, IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 33(7), 6444–6452 (2018).
  41.  T. Liu and D.Wang, “Parallel structure fractional repetitive control for PWM inverters”, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 62(8), 5045–5054 (2015).
  42.  T. Liu, D. Wang, and K. Zhou, “High-performance grid simulator using parallel structure fractional repetitive control”, IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 31(3), 2669–2679 (2016).
  43.  A. Gałecki, L. Grzesiak, B. Ufnalski, A. Kaszewski, and M. Michalczuk, “Multi-oscillatory current control with antiwindup for grid- connected VSCs operated under distorted grid voltage conditions”, Proc. 19th European Conf. Power Electronics and Applications (EPE’17 ECCE Europe), P.1–P.10 (2017).
  44.  A. Gałecki, M. Michalczuk, A. Kaszewski, B. Ufnalski, and L. Grzesiak, “Particle swarm optimization of the multioscillatory LQR for a three-phase grid-tie converter”, Prz. Elektrotechniczny 94(6), 43–48 (2018).
  45.  R. Eberhart and J. Kennedy, “A new optimizer using particle swarm theory”, Proc. Sixth Int. Symp. Micro Machine and Human Science MHS’95, 39–43 (1995).
  46.  P. Mattavelli, F. Polo, F. Dal Lago, and S. Saggini, “Analysis of control-delay reduction for the improvement of UPS voltageloop bandwidth”, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 55(8), 2903–2911 (2008).
  47.  C. Klarenbach, H. Schmirgel, and J.O. Krah, “Design of fast and robust current controllers for servo drives based on space vector modulation”, PCIM Europe, vol. 17, 19 (2011).
  48.  A.Z.A. Mazlan, Z.M. Ripin, and W.M.A. Ali, “Piezo stack actuator saturation control of the coupled active suspended handle-die grinder using various PID-anti-windup control schemes”, Proc. Computing and Engineering (ICCSCE) 2016 6th IEEE Int. Conf. Control System, 22–27 (2016).
  49.  P. Biernat, B. Ufnalski, and L.M. Grzesiak, “Real-time implementation of the multi-swarm repetitive control algorithm”, Proc. 9th Int. Conf. Compatibility and Power Electronics (CPE), 119–125 (2015).
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Bartlomiej Ufnalski
1
ORCID: ORCID
Andrzej Straś
1
ORCID: ORCID
Lech M. Grzesiak
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Warsaw University of Technology, ul. Koszykowa 75, 00-662 Warsaw, Poland
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The near net shaped manufacturing ability of squeeze casting process requiresto set the process variable combinations at their optimal

levels to obtain both aesthetic appearance and internal soundness of the cast parts. The aesthetic and internal soundness of cast parts deal

with surface roughness and tensile strength those can readily put the part in service without the requirement of costly secondary

manufacturing processes (like polishing, shot blasting, plating, hear treatment etc.). It is difficult to determine the levels of the process

variable (that is, pressure duration, squeeze pressure, pouring temperature and die temperature) combinations for extreme values of the

responses (that is, surface roughness, yield strength and ultimate tensile strength) due to conflicting requirements. In the present

manuscript, three population based search and optimization methods, namely genetic algorithm (GA), particle swarm optimization (PSO)

and multi-objective particle swarm optimization based on crowding distance (MOPSO-CD) methods have been used to optimize multiple

outputs simultaneously. Further, validation test has been conducted for the optimal casting conditions suggested by GA, PSO and

MOPSO-CD. The results showed that PSO outperformed GA with regard to computation time.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

G.C.M. Patel
P. Krishna
P.R. Vundavilli
M.B. Parappagoudar

This page uses 'cookies'. Learn more