The deployment of a distributed power-flow controller (DPFC) in a single-machine infinite-bus power system with two parallel transmission lines are considered for the analysis in this paper. This paper presents the network analysis of the DPFC for power flow control. The performance is evaluated on a given test system with a single line-to-ground fault. The improvement in the stability as well as power quality is evident from the results. Thus the DPFC has the ability to enhance the stability and power quality of the system.
This paper proposes a methodology based on installation cost for locating the optimal position of interline power flow controller (IPFC) in a power system network. Here both conventional and non conventional optimization tools such as LR and ABC are applied. This methodology is formulated mathematically based on installation cost of the FACTS device and active power generation cost. The capability of IPFC to control the real and reactive power simultaneously in multiple transmission lines is exploited here. Apart from locating the optimal position of IPFC, this algorithm is used to find the optimal dispatch of the generating units and the optimal value of IPFC parameters. IPFC is modeled using Power Injection (PI) model and incorporated into the problem formulation. This proposed method is compared with that of conventional LR method by validating on standard test systems like 5-bus, IEEE 30-bus and IEEE 118-bus systems. A detailed discussion on power flow and voltage profile improvement is carried out which reveals that incorporating IPFC into power system network in its optimal location significantly enhance the load margin as well as the reliability of the system.
[1] Edris A.A., Aapa R., Baker M.H., Bohman L., Clark K., Proposed terms and definitions for flexible ac transmission system (FACTS), IEEE Trans. on Power Delivery, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 1848–1853 (1997), DOI: 10.1109/61.634216.
[2] Das D., Divan D.M., Harley R.G., Power flow control in networks using controllable network transformers, IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 25, no. 7, pp. 1753–1760 (2010), DOI: 10.1109/ TPEL.2010.2042076.
[3] Ooi B.T., Kazerrani M., Marcean R., Wolanski Z., Galiana F.D., Megillis D., Jms G., Midpoint siting of FACTS devices in transmission lines, IEEE Trans. on power delivery, vo1. 12, no. 4, pp. 1717–1722 (1997), DOI: 10.1109/61.634196.
[4] Hingorani N.G., Gyugyi L., Understanding FACTS: Concepts and Technology of Flexible AC Transmission Systems, New York: IEEE Press (2000).
[5] Nabavi-Niak A., Iravani M.R., Steady-State and Dynamic Models of Unified Power Flow Con- troller (UPFC) for Power System Studies, IEEE Trans. Power Systems, vol. 11, no. 4 (1996), DOI: 10.1109/59.544667.
[6] Harjeet Johal, Deepak Divan, Design Considerations for Series-Connected Distributed FACTS Converters, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, vol. 43, iss. 6, pp. 1609–1618 (2007), DOI: 10.1109/TIA.2007.908174.
[7] Amir Hamidi, Sajjad Golshannavaz, Daryoush Nazarpour, D-FACTS Cooperation in Renewable Inte- grated Microgrid A Linear Multiobjective Approach, IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, vol. 10, iss. 1, pp. 355–363 (2019), DOI: 10.1109/TSTE.2017.2723163.
[8] Narasimha Rao D., Srinivasa Varma P., Comparison of UPFC and DPFC, Journal of Critical Reviews, vol. 7, iss. 6 (2020), DOI: 10.31838/jcr.07.06.153.
[9]Abhilash Sen, Atanu Banerjee, Haricharan Nannam, A Comparative Analysis between UPFC and DPFC in a Grid Connected Photovoltaic System, IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Techniques in Control, Optimization and Signal Processing (INCOS) (2019), DOI: 10.1109/IN- COS45849.2019.8951352.
[10] Song W., Zhou X., Zhigang Liang, Subhashish Bhattacharya, Huang Alex Q., Modeling and Control Design of Distributed Power Flow Controller based-on Per-phase control, IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (2009), DOI: 10.1109/ECCE.2009.5316307.
[11] Chandrakar V.K., Kothari A.G., Optimal Location for Line Compensation by Shunt Connected FACTS Controller, IEEE Power Electronics and Drive Systems Conference, vol. 1, pp. 151–156 (2003), DOI: 10.1109/PEDS.2003.1282736.
[12] Vikash Anand, Sanjeev Kumar Mallik, Power flow analysis and control of distributed FACTS de- vices in power system, Archives of Electrical Engineering, vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 545–561 (2018), DOI: 10.24425/123662.
[13] Zhihui Yuan, de Haan Sjoerd W.H., Ferreira Jan A., Construction and first result of a scaled transmis- sion system with the Distributed Power Flow Controller (DPFC), 13th European Conference on Power Electronics and Applications (2009).
[14] Zhihui Yuan, de Haan Sjoerd W.H., Braham Frreira, Dalibor Cevoric, A FACTS Device: Dis- tributed Power Flow Controller (DPFC), IEEE Trans. Power Electronics, vol. 25, no. 10 (2010), DOI: 10.1109/TPEL.2010.2050494.
[15] Syona Chawla, Sheetal Garg, Bhawna Ahuja, Optimal Location of Series-Shunt FACTS Device for Transmission Line Compensation, IEEE Control, Automation, Communication and Energy Conservation Conference, pp. 1–6 (2009).
[16] Shehata Ahmed A., Refaat Ahmed, Mamdouh K. Ahmed, Korovkin Nikolay V., Optimal placement and sizing of FACTS devices based on Autonomous Groups Particle Swarm Optimization technique, AEE, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 161–172 (2021), DOI: 10.24425/aee.2021.136059.
[17] Riadh Essaadali, Anwar Jarndal, Ammar B. Kouki, Fadhel M. Ghannouch, Conversion Rules Between X-Parameters and Linearized Two-Port Network Parameters for Large-Signal Operating Conditions, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 66, no. 11, pp. 4745 4756 (2018), DOI: 10.1109/TMTT.2018.2863227.
[18] Divya S., Shyamala U., Power quality improvement in transmission systems using DPFC, IEEE 2nd International Conference on Electronics and Communication Systems (ICECS) (2015), DOI: 10.1109/ ECS.2015.7125035.
[19] Apolinar Reynoso-Hernández J., Pulido-Gaytán M.A., Cuesta R., Loo-Yau J.R., Maya-Sánchez M.C., Transmission Line Impedance Characterization Using an Uncalibrated Vector Network Analyzer, IEEE Microwave and Wireless Components Letters, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 528–530 (2020), DOI: 10.1109/ LMWC.2020.2984377.
[20] Monika Sharma, Annapurna Bhargava, Pinky Yadav, Oscillation Damping with DPFC Using Opti- mization Techniques, IEEE International Conference on Micro-Electronics and Telecommunication Engineering (ICMETE) (2017), DOI: 10.1109/ICMETE.2016.73.
[21] Mengmeng Xiao, Shaorong Wang, Yong Huang, Chao Zheng, Qiushi Xu, Hongsheng Zhao, Aihong Tang, Dichen Liu, Two-Level Control Method for DPFC Series Units Based on PLC Communication, 2nd IEEE Conference on Energy Internet and Energy System Integration (EI2), pp. 20–22 (2018), DOI: 10.1109/EI2.2018.8582109.
[22] Zhai X., Tang A., Zou X., Xu Zheng, Qiushi Xu, Research on DPFC Capacity and Parameter Design Method, IEEE International Conference on Information Technology, Big Data and Artificial Intelligence (ICIBA) (2020), DOI: 10.1109/ICIBA50161.2020.9277315.
[23] Pradhan A.K., Routray A., Banaja Mohanty, Maximum efficiency of flexible AC transmission systems, Electrical Power and Energy Systems, vol. 28, pp. 581–588 (2006), DOI: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2006.03.014.
[24] Seyed Abbas Taher, Muhammad Karim Amooshahi, New approach for optimal UPFC placement using hybrid immune algorithm in electric power systems, International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems, vol. 43, iss. 1, pp. 899–909 (2012), DOI: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2012.05.064.
The uncontrolled power flow in the AC power system caused by renewable energy sources (restless sources, distributed energy sources), dynamic loads, etc., is one of many causes of voltage perturbation, along with others, such as switching effects, faults, and adverse weather conditions. This paper presents a three-phase voltage and power flow controller, based on direct PWM AC/AC converters. The proposed solution is intended to protect sensitive loads against voltage fluctuation and problems with power flow control in an AC power system. In comparison to other solutions, such as DVR, UPFC, the presented solution is based on bipolar matrix choppers and operates without a DC energy storage unit or DC link. The proposed solution is able to compensate 50% voltage sags, in the case of three-phase symmetrical voltage perturbation, and single phase voltage interruptions. Additionally, by means of a voltage phase control with a range of ±60◦ in each phase, it is possible to control the power flow in an AC power system. The paper presents an operational description, a theoretical analysis based on the averaged state space method and four terminal descriptions, and the experimental test results from a 1 kVA laboratory model operating under active load.
en
pl
