Search results

Filters

  • Journals
  • Authors
  • Keywords
  • Date
  • Type

Search results

Number of results: 5
items per page: 25 50 75
Sort by:
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The paper presents the first physicochemical and microbiological studies conducted in the northern area of Svalbard (Spitsbergen). Ten sediment samples were collected from the bottom of the longest fjord in the region, Wijdef jorden. Bottom sediments from ten lakes located along the shores of Wijdefjorden and Woodfjorden were also sampled. Organic matter content (LOI), water content, temperature, pH, and salinity of the sediments were determined. The quantity of aerobic bacteria cultured on various growth media at 4 ° C, 14 ° C, and 37 ° C ranged from 10 2 to 10 6 cfu/g of wet sediment mass, depending on the type of sampling station (fjord or lake). The number of bacteria did not co rrelate with organic matter content. Out of the 37 bacterial strains isolated from Wijdefjorden, 48% and 70% revealed ureolytic and proteolytic activity, respectively. The proportion of freshwater strains with ureolytic and proteolytic activity was 32% and 55%, respectively. Antibiotic resistance testing indicated that bacterial strains from the bottom sediments of the lakes were resistant to 8 antibiotics (out of the 18 investigated). Possible sources of this resistance are discussed. Using 16S DNA analysis, bacterial isolates from the lakes were identified as Pseudomonas sp., whereas frequently occurring strains in bottom sediment of the fjord were Pseudoalteromonas sp.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Iwona Konieczna
Barbara Wojtasik
Marek Kwinkowski
Dorota Burska
Kamil Nowiński
Paulina Żarnowiec
Wiesław Kaca
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The necessity of rational water resource management and reduction of water consumption demandsthat water utilities address water losses during water treatment. Therefore, the backwash water generated during the filtration process is often the focus of research aimed at its reuse within the water treatment system. The studies outlined here were conducted in a large water treatment plant (100,000 m3), focusing on the backwash water produced from sand bed filter flushing. Prior to its reintroduction into the treatment train, the backwash water underwent pre-treatment using ultrafiltration (UF) process with two different modules: a spiral module with a PVFD (200kDa) membrane and a capillary module with a PES (80kDa) membrane. The effectiveness of the process was evaluated based on the degree of retention of organic substances and microorganisms, which pose health risks in backwash water recirculation. The capillary membrane exhibited greater effectiveness in retaining these contaminants, thereby ensuring the complete elimination of pathogenic microorganisms. The study findings indicate that pre-treating backwash water using UF membranes and reintroducing it into the water treatment system before the ozonation process can lead to a reduction of environmental fees. However, this process results in a 1.5% increase in water treatment costs
Go to article

Bibliography

  1. Ahmed, A.E., Majewska-Nowak, K. & Grzegorzek, M. (2021). Removal of reactive dyes from aqueous solutions using ultrafiltration membranes, Environment Protection Engineering 47, 3, pp. 109-120. DOI:10.37190/epe210309.
  2. Alhussaini, M.A., Binger, Z., M. Souza-Chaves, B. M., Amusat, O.O., Park, J., Bartholomew, T.V., Gunter, D. & Achilli, A. (2023). Analysis of backwash settings to maximize net water production in an engineering-scale ultrafiltration system for water reuse, Journal of Water Process Engineering 53, 103761. DOI:10.1016/j.jwpe.2023.103761.
  3. Chen, M., Shen, S., Zhang, F., Zhang, C. & Xiong, J. (2022). Biodegradable dissolved organic carbon (BDOC) removal from micro-polluted water source using ultrafiltration: comparison with conventional processes, operation conditions and membrane fouling control, Polymers. 14, 21, 4689. DOI:10.3390/polym14214689.
  4. Clostridium perfringens- An overview. https://microbenotes.com/clostridium-perfringens/ Accessed January 19, 2024.
  5. Collivignarelli, M.C., Abbà, A., Benigna, I., Sorlini, S. & Torretta, V. (2017) Overview of the main disinfection processes for wastewater and drinking water treatment plants. Sustainability, 10, 86.
  6. Cordier, C., Stavrakakis, C., Morga, B., Degrémont, L., Voulgaris, A., Bacchi, A., Sauvade, P., Coelho, F. & Moulin, P. (2020). Removal of pathogens by ultrafiltration from sea water, Environment international, 142, 105809. DOI:10.1016/j.envint.2020.105809.
  7. Ćurko, J., Mijatović, I., Rumora, D., Crnek, V., Matošić, M. & Nežić, M. (2013). Treatment of spent filter backwash water from drinking water treatment with immersed ultrafiltration membranes, Desalination and Water Treatment, 51, 25-27, pp. 4901-4906. DOI:10.1080/19443994.2013.774142.
  8. de Souza, F.H., Pizzolatti, B.S. & Sens, M.L. (2021). Backwash as a simple operational alternative for small-scale slow sand filters: From conception to the current state of the art, Journal of Water Process Engineering 40, 101864. DOI:10.1016/j.jwpe.2020.101864.
  9. Ebrahimi, M.M., Amin, H., Pourzamani, Y., Hajizadeh, A.H., Mahvi, M.M. & Rad, M.H.R. (2017). Hybrid coagulation-UF processes for spent filter backwash water treatment: a comparison studies for PAFCl and FeCl 3 as a pre-treatment, Environmental monitoring and assessment, 189, pp. 1-15.DOI:10.1007/s10661-017-6091-3. [Online]. Available: link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10661-017-6091-3. Accessed 26 March 2024
  10. EPA United States Environmental Protection Agency. Drinking Water Treatment Plant Residuals Management Technical Report, Summary of Residuals Generation, Treatment, and Disposal at Large Community Water Systems. 2011.
  11. Gottfried, A., Shepard, A.D., Hardiman, K. & Walsh, M.E. (2008). Impact of recycling filter backwash water on organic removal in coagulation–sedimentation processes, Water Research, 42, 18, pp. 4683–4691. DOI:10.1016/j.watres.2008.08.011.
  12. Guidelines for drinking-water quality. 4th edition. 2017. Accessed January 19, 2024. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241549950.
  13. Guidelines to support the application of Regulation 2020/741 on minimum requirements for water reuse (including Annexes). (2022/C 298/01). 2020. Accessed January 19, 2024. https://environment.ec.europa.eu/publications/minimum-requirements-water-reuse-guidelines_en.
  14. Howe, K.J. & Clark, K. (2002). Fouling of microfiltration and ultrafiltration membranes by natural waters, Environ. Sci. Technol. 36, 16, pp. 3571-3576. DOI:10.1021/es025587r
  15. Li, W., Liang, X., Duan, J., Beechamb, S. & Mulcahy, D. (2018). Influence of spent filter backwash water recycling on pesticide removal in a conventional drinking water treatment process, Environmental Science Water Research & Technology, 4, pp. 1057-1067. DOI:10.1039/C7EW00530J.
  16. Lin, T., Zhang, J. & Chen, W. (2017). Recycling of activated carbon filter backwash water using ultrafiltration: membrane fouling caused by different dominant interfacial forces, Journal of Membrane Science, 544, pp. 174-185. DOI:10.1016/j.memsci.2017.09.028.
  17. Liu, P.Y., Chin, L.K., Ser, W., Ayi, T.C., Yap, P.H., Bourouina, T. & Leprince-Wang, Y. (2014). Real-time measurement of single bacterium’s refractive index using optofluidic immersion refractometry, Procedia Engineering, 87, pp. 356-359. DOI:10.1016/j.proeng.2014.11.743.
  18. Mahdavi, M., Ebrahimi, A., Azarpira, H., Tashauoei, H.R. & Mahvi, A.H. (2017). Dataset on the spent filter backwash water treatment by sedimentation, coagulation and ultrafiltration, Data in Brief, 15, pp. 916-921. DOI:10.1016/j.dib.2017.10.062.
  19. Mahmud, M., Elma, M., Rampun, E.L.A., Rahma, A., Pratiwi, A.E., Abdi, C. & Rossadi, R. (2020). Effect of two stages adsorption as pre-treatment of natural organic matter removal in ultrafiltration process for peat water treatment, Materials Science Forum, 988, pp. 114–121. DOI:10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.988.114.
  20. Masotti, L. (2011). Depurazione Della Acque—Tecniche ed Impianti per il Trattamento Delle Acque di Rifiuto; Ed. Calderini: Milano, Italy.
  21. Mazuki Mohamad, N.I., Teow, Y.H., Ho, K.C. & Mohammad, A.W. (2020). Techno-economic analysis of single disinfection units and integrated disinfection systems for sewage effluent reclamation, J. Water Proc. Eng. 36, 101398. DOI:10.1016/j.jwpe.2020.101398.
  22. Microbentos. https://microbenotes.com/clostridium-perfringens/ Accessed 20.12.2023.
  23. Peters, C.D., Rantissi, T., Gitis, V. & Hankins, N.P. (2021). Retention of natural organic matter by ultrafiltration and the mitigation of membrane fouling through pre-treatment, membrane enhancement, and cleaning -A review, Journal of Water Process Engineering, 44, 102374. DOI:10.1016/j.jwpe.2021.102374.
  24. Qian, Y., Shi, Y., Guo, J., Chen, Y., Hanigan, D. & Dong, A.(2023) Molecular characterization of disinfection byproduct precursors in filter backwash water from 10 drinking water treatment plants. Science of The Total Environment, 856, 159027. DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159027
  25. Radzymińska-Lenarcik, E., Urbaniak, W. & Totczyk, G. (2019). Sludge management after water treatment processes, Water Supply and Water Quality: pp. 995-1004. (in Polish). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/331967930_ZAGOSPODAROWANIE_OSADOW_POKOAGULACYJNYCH_POWSTALYCH_W_PROCESIE_UZDA_TNIANIA_WODY. Accessed January 19, 2024.
  26. Reissmann, F. G. & Uhl, W. (2006). Ultrafiltration for the reuse of spent filter backwash water from drinking water treatment, Desalination 198, 1–3, pp. 225-235. DOI:10.1016/j.desal.2006.03.517
  27. Shafiquzzaman, M., AlSaleem, S.S., Haider, H., Alresheedi, M.T. & Thabit H. (2021). Experimental study for sand filter backwash water management: low-cost treatment for recycling and residual sludge utilization for radium removal, Water, 13, 2799. DOI:10.3390/w13202799.
  28. Sosnowski, T., Suchecka, T. & Piątkiewicz, W. (2004). Penetration of the cell through the microfitration membrane, in Environmental Engineering Committee Monographs. [ed.] Polish Academy of Sciences. Environmental Engineering Committee. 22: pp. 359-367.
  29. Subasi, Y. & Cicek, C. (2017). Recent advances in hydrophilic modification of PVDF ultrafiltration membranes – a review: part I, Membrane Technology 10, pp. 7-12. DOI:10.1016/S0958-2118(17)30191-X.
  30. Sun, Y., Wu, M., Tong, T., Liu, P., Tang, P., Gan, Z., Yang, P., He, H. & Liu B. (2021). Organic compounds in Weiyuan shale gas produced water: identification, detection and rejection by ultrafiltration-reverse osmosis processes, Chemical Engineering Journal, 412, 128699. DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2021.128699.
  31. Turan, M. (2023). Backwashing of granular media filters and membranes for water treatment: a review, AQUA-Water Infrastructure, Ecosystems and Society, 72, 3, pp. 274-298. DOI:10.2166/aqua.2023.207.
  32. Wang, D., Zhou, J., Lin, H., Chen, J., Qi, J., Bai, Y. & Qu, J. (2023). Impacts of backwashing on micropollutant removal and associated microbial assembly processes in sand filters, Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 17, 3, 34. DOI:10.1007/s11783-023-1634-z.
  33. Wolska, M. & Urbańska-Kozłowska, H. (2023). Assessing the Possibilities of Backwash Water Reuse Filters in the Water Treatment System—Case Analysis, Water, 15, 13, 2452. DOI:10.3390/w15132452.
  34. Zhou, Z., Yang, Y., Li, X., Su, Z., Liu, Y., Ren, Y. & Zhang, Y. (2015) Effect of recycling filter backwash water on characteristic variability of dissolved organic matter in coagulation sedimentation process, Desalination and Water Treatment, 53, pp. 48-56, DOI:10.1080/19443994.2013.836994.
  35. Zielina, M. & Dąbrowski, W. (2021). Energy and water savings during backwashing of rapid filter plants, Energies, 14, 13, 3782. DOI:10.3390/en14133782.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Małgorzata Wolska
1
ORCID: ORCID
Małgorzata Kabsch-Korbutowicz
1
ORCID: ORCID
Małgorzata Solipiwko-Pieścik
1
ORCID: ORCID
Halina Urbanska-Kozłowska
2
ORCID: ORCID
Zbigniew Ferenc
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Poland
  2. MPWiK S.A we Wrocławiu, Poland
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The marine psychrophilic and endemic Antarctic yeast Leucosporidium antarcticum strain 171 synthesizes intracellular b-fructofuranosidase, and intra- and extracellular a-glucosidases. Each enzyme is maximally produced at 5°C , while the strain’s optimum growth temperature is 15°C . Invertase biosynthesis appeared regulated by catabolic repression, and induced by sucrose; the enzyme was extremely unstable ex vivo, and only EDTA, Mn2+, and BSA stabilized it for up to 12 h after yeast cell lysis. Thermal stability of the invertase was also low (30 min at temperatures up to 12°C). The optimum temperature for invertase activity was 30°C , and optimum pH was 4.55 to 4.75. The extracellular a-glucosidase was maximally active at 35°C and pH 6.70–7.50, and stable for 30 min up to 20°C.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Marianna Turkiewicz
Marzena Pazgier
Stuart P. Donachie
Halina Kalinowska
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Microbes living in the polar regions have some common and unique strategies to respond to thermal stress. Nevertheless, the amount of information available, especially at the molecular level is lacking for some organisms such as Antarctic psychrophilic yeast. For instance, it is not known whether molecular chaperones in Antarctic yeasts play similar roles to those from mesophilic yeasts when they are exposed to heat stress. Therefore, this project aimed to determine the gene expression patterns and roles of molecular chaperones in Antarctic psychrophilic Glaciozyma antarctica PI12 that was exposed to heat stress. G. antarctica PI12 was grown at its optimal growth temperature of 12ºC and later exposed to heat stresses at 16ºC and 20ºC for 6 hours. Transcriptomes of those cells were extracted, sequenced and analyzed. Thirty-three molecular chaperone genes demonstrated differential expression of which 23 were up-regulated while 10 were down-regulated. Functions of up-regulated molecular chaperone genes were related to protein binding, response to a stimulus, chaperone binding, cellular response to stress, oxidation, and reduction, ATP binding, DNA-damage response and regulation for cellular protein metabolic process. On the other hand, functions of down-regulated molecular chaperone genes were related to chaperone-mediated protein complex assembly, transcription, cellular macromolecule metabolic process, regulation of cell growth and ribosome biogenesis. The findings provided information on how molecular chaperones work together in a complex network to protect the cells under heat stress. It also highlights the evolutionary conserved protective role of molecular chaperones in psychrophilic yeast, G. antarctica, and mesophilic yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Nur Athirah Yusof
Clemente Michael Vui Ling Wong
ORCID: ORCID
Abdul Munir Abdul Murad
Farah Diba Abu Bakar
Nor Muhammad Mahadi
Ahmad Yamin Abdul Rahman
Nursyafiqi Zainuddin
Mohd Nazalan Mohd Najimudin
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The research covered the determination: of the numbers or hcicrorrophic bacteria: psychrophil ic, psychrctolcrant, mcsophilic and percentage participation or hemolytic bacteria and .ieromonas hydrophila (with acrolysinc and hcmolysine genes) in the waters of the Drwęca River depending on environmental Ilictors and fishery management. The mean quantities 01· hclcrotrophic bacteria (Ht'C) at 4, 14 and 2~°C ranged: O. 78-7.57-101, 1.40-6.65-101 and 1.93-16.23- 103 efuen -3, respectively. The percentage participation 01· hemolytic heterotrophic bacteria (HemPC) and A. hvdrophila among psychrophilic, psychrotolcrant, mcsophilic microorganisms determined at 4, 14, 28°C, ranged: 7.9-10.4, 6.8-12.2, 8.6-22.0 ,111d 1.1-6.4%, respectively. Statistically significant correlation between examined bacteria and temperature values, flows and O2 saturations confirm that the occurrence of those microorganisms depends on the degree of microbiological contamination of that ecosystem, resulting from the fishery management and environmental factors.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Iwona Gołaś
Karol Korzekwa
Monika Harnisz
Izabella Zmysłowska
Mariusz Todorowicz
Elżbieta Terech-Majewska
Wiesława Rodziewicz
Mariola Bieńkowska

This page uses 'cookies'. Learn more