Search results

Filters

  • Journals
  • Authors
  • Keywords
  • Date
  • Type

Search results

Number of results: 99
items per page: 25 50 75
Sort by:
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The aim of the research is to assess and discuss the diversity of energy production and consumption in European Union countries. The time scope covers the years 2007 and 2016. The diversity of EU countries was examined using the cluster analysis. The following diagnostic features were adopted for the analysis: energy dependency rate (in %), gross inland consumption of energy per 10,000 inhabitants (toe/10,000 inhabitants), primary production of energy (all products) per 10,000 inhabitants (toe/10,000 inhabitants), primary production of renewable energies per 10,000 inhabitants (toe/10,000 inhabitants), primary production of energy (without renewable energy) per 10,000 inhabitants (toe/10,000 inhabitants). Comparing the included indicators from 2016 to 2007 for all EU countries, an increase was recorded only for the primary production of renewable energies per 10,000 inhabitants,. Based on the cluster analysis, the examined countries were divided into six groups. According to the results of the research carried out, Northern and Eastern European countries are characterized by low energy dependence. However, according to the analysis carried out, this dependence is guaranteed based on various energy sources. The Scandinavian countries (Sweden, Finland) owe their high independence to the production of large amounts of energy from renewable sources. On the other hand, countries such as the Netherlands, Denmark, Estonia and the whole of Eastern Europe are based on primary energy sources such as: coal, oil and gas. Southern Europe countries (Greece, Spain, Italy, Portugal, Cyprus, Malta) are characterized by high energy dependence, as evidenced by low rates in the area of energy production, both in total and renewable and non-renewable energy production.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Dorota Agnieszka Janiszewska
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The article describes selected issues falling within the scope of the technical analysis of a detached building’s heating system with a direct evaporation ground source heat pump installation. This paper covers the characteristics of modernized facility as well as calculations to determine the heat demand. What is more, the article describes the manner in which heat pumps shall be selected, its installation components as well as the receiving installation.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Karol Tucki
Michał Sikora
Magdalena Karlikowska
Wojciech Będkowski
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The purpose of the article is to present perspectives for the development of offshore wind farms in the leading, in this respect, country in the EU and in the world – Great Britain. Wind power plays a remarkable role in the process of ensuring energy security for Europe since in 2016 the produced wind energy met 10.4% of the European electricity demand while in 2017 it was already around 11.6%. The article analyses the capacity of wind farms, support systems offered by this country and the criteria related to the location of offshore wind farms. The research has been based on the analysis of legal acts, regulations, literature on the subject, information from websites. The article shows that in recent years, the production of energy at sea has been developing very rapidly, and the leading, in this matter, British offshore energy sector is character-ised by strong governmental support.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Leszek Dawid
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The present work focuses on a first study for a piezoelectric harvesting system, finalized to the obtaining of electrical energy from the kinetic energy of rainy precipitation, a renewable energy source not really considered until now. The system, after the realization, can be collocated on the roof of an house, configuring a “Piezo Roof Harvesting System”. After presenting a state of art of the harvesting systems from environmental energy, linked to vibrations, using piezoelectric structures, and of piezoelectric harvesting systems functioning with rain, the authors propose an analysis of the fundamental features of rainy precipitations for the definition of the harvesting system. Then, four key patterns for the realization of a piezoelectric energy harvesting system are discussed and analysed, arriving to the choice of a cantilever beam scheme, in which the piezoelectric material works in 31 mode. An electro-mechanical model for the simulation of performance of the unit for the energetic conversion, composed of three blocks, is proposed. The model is used for a simulation campaign to perform the final choice of the more suitable piezoelectric unit, available on the market, which will be adopted for the realization of the “Piezo Roof Harvesting System”.

Go to article

Bibliography

[1] Annual Energy Outlook 2013. Report, Energy Information Administration, Washington, DC, USA, 2013.
[2] B.S. Lee, J.J. He, W.J. Wu, and W.P. Shih. MEMS generator of power harvesting by vibrations using piezoelectric cantilever beam with digitate electrode. In Proceedings SPIE, Smart Structures and Materials 2006: Damping and Isolation, volume 6169, page 61690B, March, 15 2006. doi: 10.1117/12.658584.
[3] C.S. Lee, J. Joo, S. Han, J.H. Lee, and S.K. Koh. Poly (vinylidene fluoride) transducers with highly conducting poly (3, 4-ethylenedioxythiophene) electrodes. Synthetic Metals, 152(1-3):49–52, 2005. doi: 10.1016/j.synthmet.2005.07.116.
[4] F. Mohammadi, A. Khan, and R.B. Cass. Power generation from piezoelectric lead zirconate titanate fiber composites. In Materials Research Society Proceedings, volume 736, page D5.5, 2002. doi: 10.1557/PROC-736-D5.5.
[5] H.A. Sodano, J.M. Lloyd, and D.J. Inman. An experimental comparison between several active composite actuators for power generation. In Proceedings SPIE, Smart Structures and Materials 2004: Smart Structures and Integrated Systems, volume 5390, pages 370–378, July 26 2004. doi: 10.1117/12.540192.
[6] H.A. Sodano, D.J. Inman, and G. Park. A review of power harvesting from vibration using piezoelectric materials. Shock and Vibration Digest, 36(3):197–205, 2004.
[7] H.A. Sodano, G. Park, and D.J. Inman. Estimation of electric charge output for piezoelectric energy harvesting. Strain, 40(2):49–58, 2004. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1305.2004.00120.x.
[8] J. Baker, S. Roundy, and P. Wright. Alternative geometries for increasing power density in vibration energy scavenging for wireless sensor networks. In 3rd International Energy Conversion Engineering Conference, page 5617, San Francisco, CA, USA, 16-18 August 2005. doi: 10.2514/6.2005-5617.
[9] S. R Platt, S. Farritor, and H. Haider. On low-frequency electric power generation with PZT ceramics. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 10(2):240–252, 2005. doi: 10.1109/TMECH.2005.844704.
[10] T.H. Ng and W.H. Liao. Sensitivity analysis and energy harvesting for a self-powered piezoelectric sensor. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 16(10):785–797, 2005. doi: 10.1177/1045389X05053151.
[11] S. Roundy. On the effectiveness of vibration-based energy harvesting. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 16(10):809–823, 2005. doi: 10.1177/1045389X05054042.
[12] D. Benasciutti, E. Brusa, L. Moro, and S. Zelenika. Optimised piezoelectric energy scavengers for elder care. In Proceedings of European Society Precision Engineering & Nanotech (EUSPEN) Conference, pages 41–45, Zurich, Switzerland, May 2008.
[13] L. Mateu and F. Moll. Optimum piezoelectric bending beam structures for energy harvesting using shoe inserts. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 16(10):835–845, 2005. doi: 10.1177/1045389X05055280.
[14] K. Mossi, C. Green, Z. Ounaies, and E. Hughes. Harvesting energy using a thin unimorph prestressed bender: geometrical effects. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 16(3):249–261, 2005. doi: 10.1177/1045389X05050008.
[15] M. Ericka, D. Vasic, F. Costa, G. Poulin, and S. Tliba. Energy harvesting from vibration using a piezoelectric membrane. In Journal de Physique IV (Proceedings), volume 128, pages 187–193, September 2005. doi: 10.1051/jp4:2005128028.
[16] S. Kim, W. W Clark, and Q.M. Wang. Piezoelectric energy harvesting with a clamped circular plate: analysis. Journal of intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 16(10):847–854, 2005. doi: 10.1177/1045389X05054044.
[17] S. Kim, W. W Clark, and Q.M. Wang. Piezoelectric energy harvesting with a clamped circular plate: experimental study. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 16(10):855–863, 2005. doi: 10.1177/1045389X05054043.
[18] J. Han, A. von Jouanne, T. Le, K. Mayaram, and T.S. Fiez. Novel power conditioning circuits for piezoelectric micropower generators. In Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition, 2004. APEC’04. Nineteenth Annual IEEE, volume 3, pages 1541–1546, 2004. doi: 10.1109/APEC.2004.1296069.
[19] E. Lefeuvre, A. Badel, C. Richard, L. Petit, and D. Guyomar. A comparison between several vibration-powered piezoelectric generators for standalone systems. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 126(2):405–416, 2006. doi: 10.1016/j.sna.2005.10.043.
[20] A. Preumont. Mechatronics. Dynamics of Electromechanical and Piezoelectric Systems, volume 136. Springer, 2006. doi: 10.1007/1-4020-4696-0.
[21] R. Guigon, J.J. Chaillout, T. Jager, and G. Despesse. Harvesting raindrop energy: theory. Smart Materials and Structures, 17(1):015038, 2008. doi: 10.1088/0964-1726/17/01/015038.
[22] R. Guigon, J.J. Chaillout, T. Jager, and G. Despesse. Harvesting raindrop energy: experimental study. Smart Materials and Structures, 17(1):015039, 2008. doi: 10.1088/0964-1726/17/01/015039.
[23] P.V. Biswas, M.A. Uddin, M.A. Islam, M.A.R. Sarkar, V.G. Desa, M.H. Khan, and A.M.A. Huq. Harnessing raindrop energy in Bangladesh. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Mechanical Engineering, Dhaka, Bangladesh, 26-29 December 2009. Paper: ICME09-AM-29.
[24] J.S. Marshall andW. Mc K. Palmer. The distribution of raindrops with size. Journal of Meteorology, 5(4):165–166, 1948. doi: 10.1175/1520-0469(1948)0050165:TDORWS>2.0.CO;2.
[25] J.S. Marshall, R.C. Langille, and W. Mc K. Palmer. Measurement of rainfall by radar. Journal of Meteorology, 4(6):186–192, 1947. doi: 10.1175/1520-0469(1947)0040186:MORBR>2.0.CO;2.
[26] J.O. Laws and D.A. Parsons. The relation of raindrop-size to intensity. Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union, 24(2):452–460, 1943. doi: 10.1029/TR024i002p00452.
[27] J.W. Ryde. The attenuation and radar echoes produced at centimetre wave-lengths by various meteorological phenomena. In Report of a conference on Meteorological factors in radiowave propagation, pages 169–188, The Physical Society and the Royal Meteorological Society, London, 8 April 1946.
[28] A.C. Best. The size distribution of raindrops. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 76(327):16–36, 1950. doi: 10.1002/qj.49707632704.
[29] R. S Sekhon and R.C. Srivastava. Doppler radar observations of drop-size distributions in a thunderstorm. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 28(6):983–994, 1971. doi: 10.1175/1520-0469(1971)0280983:DROODS>2.0.CO;2.
[30] P.T. Willis. Functional fits to some observed drop size distributions and parameterization of rain. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 41(9):1648–1661, 1984. doi: 10.1175/1520-0469(1984)0411648:FFTSOD>2.0.CO;2.
[31] G. Feingold and Z. Levin. The lognormal fit to raindrop spectra from frontal convective clouds in Israel. Journal of Climate and Applied Meteorology, 25(10):1346–1363, 1986. doi: .
[32] D. Sempere-Torres, J.M. Porrà, and J.D. Creutin. A general formulation for raindrop size distribution. Journal of Applied Meteorology, 33(12):1494–1502, 1994. doi: 10.1175/1520-0450(1994)0331494:AGFFRS>2.0.CO;2.
[33] D. Sempere-Torres, J.M. Porrà, and J.D. Creutin. Experimental evidence of a general description for raindrop size distribution properties. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 103(D2):1785–1797, 1998. doi: 10.1029/97JD02065.
[34] K.V. Beard and H.R. Pruppacher. A determination of the terminal velocity and drag of small water drops by means of a wind tunnel. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 26(5):1066–1072, 1969. doi: 10.1175/1520-0469(1969)0261066:ADOTTV>2.0.CO;2.
[35] G. Montero-Martínez, A.B. Kostinski, R.A. Shaw, and F. García-García. Do all raindrops fall at terminal speed? Geophysical Research Letters, 36(11), 2009. L11818, doi: 10.1029/2008GL037111.
[36] M.A. Nearing, J.M. Bradford, and R.D. Holtz. Measurement of force vs. time relations for waterdrop impact. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 50(6):1532–1536, 1986. doi: 10.2136/sssaj1986.03615995005000060030x.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Romeo di Leo
1
Massimo Viscardi
1
Francesco Paolo Tuccinardi
2
Michele Visone
3

  1. Department of Industrial Engineering – Aerospace section, University of Naples “Federico II”, Italy
  2. Promete S.r.l., Naples, Italy
  3. Blue Design S.r.l., Naples, Italy
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

This article is devoted to the worldwide development of renewable energy in connection to the development of the socio-economic system and employment transformations. It is emphasized that the use of renewable energy sources is growing extremely fast globally, and it is generating positive socio-economic effects such as creating jobs worldwide. It is noted that in contrast to the situation in the field of traditional energy, the number of vacancies in the field of renewable energy continues to grow; photovoltaic, bioenergy, hydropower and wind forms of renewable energy are powerful employers in the world economy. It is noted that the increase in the number of people employed in the field of renewable energy is a consequence of the decentralized nature of the sector, as a result of which, renewable energy technologies produce more vacancies per unit of investment compared to traditional electricity generation technologies. It has been emphasized that the further development of renewable energy depends on the volume of investment in the creation of production facilities, which contributes to the further creation of jobs. Furthermore, it has been determined that the problem of renewable energy staffing is also extremely relevant for Ukraine. It is noted that the current system of training for this energy sector does not meet the long-term requirements; the increase of energy efficiency and the development of renewable energy transform the qualification requirements for employees, which requires the transformation of approaches to the training and development of employees.
Go to article

Bibliography


“Alternative” employment 2020. Is the personnel market keeping up with the changes in the energy sector? («Alternativnaya» zanyatost. Uspevayet li rynok kadrov za izmeneniyami v sektore energetiki?) [Online] http://economica.com.ua/solnechnaia_enerhyia/article/alternatyvnaia_zaniatost.html [Accessed: 2021-07-16] (in Russian).
AEEP 2021. Africa-EU Energy Partnership. [Online] https://africa-eu-energy-partnership.org/ [Accessed: 2021-07-31].
APN 2021. Asia-Pacific Network for Global Change Research. [Online] https://www.apn-gcr.org/ [Accessed: 2021-07-29].
BP 2021. BP Statistical Review of World Energy, Edition 2021. [Online] https://www.bp.com/en/global/ corporate/energy-economics/statistical-review-of-world-energy.html [Accessed: 2021-08-17].
Deloitte 2018. International Renewable Energy Trends (Mezhdunarodnyye tendentsii v oblasti vozobnovlyayemykh istochnikov energii). Deloitte, Insights. Deloitte Development LLC. [Online] https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/ru/Documents/energy-resources/Russian/global-renewable-energy-trends.pdf [Accessed: 2021-08-08] (in Russian).
EC 2019. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions “The European Green Deal”. European Commission. Brussels, 11.12.2019, COM(2019) 640 final.
ESMAP 2021. Energy Sector Management Assistance Program. [Online] https://www.esmap.org/ [Accessed: 2021-07-30].
IRENA 2018. Transformation of the global energy system. Roadmap to 2050 (Preobrazovaniye globalnoy energeticheskoy sistemy. Dorozhnaya karta do 2050). [Online] https://www.irena.org/-/media/ Files/IRENA/Agency/Publication/2018/Apr/IRENA_Global_Energy_Transformation_2018_summary_ RU.pdf?la=en&hash=65D7B55F58A18EFA01D7F0FB0A74DA691F9C57F9 [Accessed: 2021- 07-21] (in Russian).
IRENA 2019. Renewable Energy Employment by Country. [Online]. https://www.irena.org/Statistics/View-Data-by-Topic/Benefits/Renewable-Energy-Employment-by-Country [Accessed: 2021-08-17].
IRENA 2020. Global Renewables Outlook: Energy Transformation 2050. [Online] https://www.irena.org/-/media/Files/IRENA/Agency/Publication/2020/Apr/IRENA_Global_Renewables_Outlook_2020.pdf [Accessed: 2021-08-01].
IRENA 2020. Renewable energy and jobs. 2020 Annual Review (Vozobnovlyayemaya energetika i rabochiye mesta. Ezhegodnyy obzor za 2020 g.) [Online] https://irena.org/-/media/Files/IRENA/Agency/Publication/ 2020/Sep/Key_Findings_Jobs_Review_2020_RU.pdf?la=en&hash=DB49345C378E61214D- 197BA5FED1729AD36633F7 [Accessed: 2021-07-09] (in Russian).
IRENA 2020. Renewable Energy and Jobs. Annual Review 2020. IRENA. [Online]. https://www.irena.org/publications/2020/Sep/Renewable-Energy-and-Jobs-Annual-Review-2020 [Accessed: 2021-08-08].
IRENA 2020. The Post-Covid Recovery. [Online] https://irena.org/-/media/Files/IRENA/Agency/Publication/2020/Jun/IRENA_Post-COVID_Recovery_2020.pdf [Accessed: 2021-07-30].
IRENA 2020. The quantity of jobs in the renewable energy sector continues to grow and totals 11.5 million worldwide (Kolichestvo rabochikh mest v sektore vozobnovlyayemykh istochnikov energii prodolzhayet rasti i naschityvayet 11.5 mln po vsemu miru). [Online] https://www.irena.org/-/media/Files/IRENA/ Agency/Press-Release/2020/Sep/PRESS-RELEASE--Jobs-Russian.pdf?la=en&hash=527ACF- 3DE078EC9EEAAACC452469DCB61861FDA4 [Accessed: 2021-07-14] (in Russian).
Kalinina et al. 2019 – Kalinina, S., Mikhaylushin, L., Korovchuk, Y. and Kushnarenko, O. 2019. Monitoring of International Labor Migration in the Context of the World Economy Labour Resources Providing Problems. Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research (MDSMES) 99. Atlantis Press. 2019, pp. 389–392, DOI: 10.2991/mdsmes-19.2019.74.
Kalinina et al. 2020 – Kalinina, S., Lyndiuk, O. and Buchyk, V. 2020. Development of renewable energy in Ukraine in the context of ensuring public employment. Polityka Energetyczna – Energy Policy Journal 23(4), DOI: 10.33223/epj/130319.
Lanska, S. and Mishchenko, S. 2020. Theoretical And Methodological Aspects Of Labor Market Development Under The Influence Of Destabilizing Factors. Norwegian Journal of development of the International Science 50(3), pp. 38–45.
MEDREC 2021. Cooperation, efficiency, and Innovation for sustainability in the Mediterranean. [Online] https://www.medrec.org/about [Accessed: 2021-07-29].
REnKnow.Net 2021. Renewable Energy Research for Global Markets REnKnow.Net. [Online] http://renknow.net/ [Accessed: 2021-07-29].
SFERA 2021. Solar Facilities for the European Research Area. [Online] https://sfera.sollab.eu/ [Accessed: 2021-07-29].
Tkachuk, Y. 2020. Personnel for the power industry: what do power companies think about professional education in Ukraine (Kadry dlya energetiki: chto dumayut energokompanii o professionalnom obrazovanii v Ukraine). [Online] https://kosatka.media/category/blog/news/kadry-dlya-energetiki-chto-dumayut-energokompanii-o-professionalnom-obrazovanii-v-ukraine [Accessed: 2021-08-09] (in Russian).
TNA 2021. Technology Needs Assessment – UNEP DTU Partnership. [Online] https://tech-action.unepdtu.org/ [Accessed: 2021-07-30].
UARE 2019. Renewable energy: a chance for employment growth in Ukraine (Vozobnovlyayemaya energetika: shans dlya rosta zanyatosti v Ukraine) [Online] https://uare.com.ua/ru/novyny/556-vozobnovlyaemaya-energetika-shans-dlya-rosta-zanyatosti-v-ukraine.html [Accessed: 2021-07-21] (in Russian).
US Office of Electricity 2020. Grid Modernization and Smart Grid. [Online] https://www.energy.gov/oe/activities/technology-development/grid-modernization-and-smart-grid [Accessed: 2021-07-21].
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Svitlana Kalinina
1
ORCID: ORCID
Olena Lyndiuk
1
ORCID: ORCID
Vasyl Savchenko
1
ORCID: ORCID
Valeriya Podunay
1
ORCID: ORCID
Svitlana Lanska
1
ORCID: ORCID
Eduard Savchenko
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Theoretical and Applied Economics Department, Ukrainian State Employment Service Training Institute, Ukraine
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

This article studies the implications of the Fourth Energy Package and relevant EU Directives for households and explores their potential benefits in Ukraine. Understanding the effects of energy policies on the residential sector is crucial for promoting sustainability amidst global energy and climate challenges. Methods of descriptive legal studies and investment analysis are used to examine the primary EU legislation on renewable energy communities and citizens’ groups, focusing on their applicability to homes and renewable energy cooperatives. The analysis of Ukraine’s experiences with the adoption of green power and incentives have revealed challenges for small solar home installations operating without the feed-in tariff. Introducing net-billing makes projects unfeasible without such a tariff, and even selling electricity through aggregators on the intraday market does not help. Consequently, the payback period for small installations with batteries becomes unreasonably long (exceeding twenty-five years), while larger facilities have shorter payback termsolytechnic Institute, Ukraine (fifteen to seventeen years). These findings highlight the need for careful consideration of household green-power policies. Implementing the Fourth Energy Package in Ukraine requires measures to address the financial feasibility of small solar installations, particularly those lacking feed-in tariff support. Expanding legislative provisions to include consumers of green power, especially those in multi-apartment buildings, can enhance their participation in the electricity producers’ market. Moreover, raising household electricity prices may be necessary to support sustainable energy practices. Overall, this study underscores the importance of evidence-based policymaking for successful power transitions in homes and the broader energy sector.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Galyna Trypolska
1
ORCID: ORCID
Uliana Pysmenna
2
ORCID: ORCID
Iryna Sotnyk
3
ORCID: ORCID
Tetiana Kurbatova
3
ORCID: ORCID
Olena Kryvda
2
ORCID: ORCID

  1. SO Institute for Economics and Forecasting, UNAS, Ukraine
  2. National Technical University of Ukraine Ihor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute, Ukraine
  3. Sumy State University, Ukraine
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The paper presents an analysis of the influence of the energy generated from renewable sources on an improvement in the energy efficiency of public utility building and households. It also presents the current state of the technologies for the production of electricity from renewable sources, as well as their share in the national power supply system. The conducted analysis concerns both micro, as well as large systems generating electricity. Systems generating power from renewable sources are gaining in popularity. With an increasing awareness in the society of the beneficial influence that renewable power generating systems have on the environment, as well as the support in form of various programs offering subsidies for the construction of new systems, power generation from renewable sources is becoming increasingly popular and common. Although the renewable energy systems are still not widely considered to be a profitable solution, systems using renewable sources of energy are positively perceived and treated as a new trend in the construction of multi or single-family residential buildings. The increasing share of the renewable energy in the national power supply system significantly reduces the demand for energy produced from conventional sources. This obviously translates into a reduced consumption of primary energy, for example, fossil fuels, and, in turn, leads to the reduced exploitation of natural resources, thus contributing to the protection of the natural environment. A reduced consumption of fossil fuels also means a significant reduction in environmental pollution during their processing into electricity or heat. Actions aiming at improving energy efficiency and reducing final energy consumption are being undertaken by many countries all over the world, and by the European Union. In 2012, the European Parliament and the Council issued Directive 2012/27/EU obliging the Member States to initiate actions aiming at a reduction in the consumption of final energy by 1.5% a year. The paper presents the current status of generation of energy from renewable sources during the last 13 years. The ways for using energy from the renewable sources to improve the energy efficiency of facilities were also discussed.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Sławomir Sowa
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

There are many financial ways to intensify the construction of new renewable energy sources installations, among others: feed in tariff, grants. An example of photovoltaic grant support in Poland is the “Mój Prąd” [My Electricity] program created in 2019. This program, with a budget of PLN 1 billion, is intended for households in which installations with a capacity range of 2–10 kWp have been installed. During its first edition 27,187 application were submitted. Over 98% of installations cost less than PLN 6,000/kWp. The total installed capacity is 151.3 MWp, which gives the average amount of co-funding per unit of power at the level of PLN 884.7/kWp. The average power of the installation on the national scale is 5.57 kWp, the indicator per 1000 inhabitants is 3.94 kWp, and per unit of area is 0.484 kWp/km2. These installations will produce around 143.5 GWh of electricity annually, contributing to the reduction of CO2 emissions by approximately 109,800 Mg per year. Most applications came from the Silesian Province (3855), which translated into the largest installed capacity of 21.82 MWp, as well as 4.81 kWp/1000 inhabitants and 1.77 kWp/km2 (over 3 times higher than the average in Poland). The installed capacity in the individual province was closely correlated with the population of the province (correlation coefficient – 0.95), while the installed capacity indicator per 1,000 inhabitants with insolation (0.80). The highest power ratio per 1000 inhabitants was achieved in the Podkarpackie Province and amounted to 5.05, and the lowest in the West Pomeranian Province (2.41).

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Piotr Olczak
ORCID: ORCID
Dominika Matuszewska
ORCID: ORCID
Dominik Kryzia
ORCID: ORCID
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of pre-sowing seed stimulation of Thuringian Mallow (Lavatera thuringiaca L.) with He-Ne laser light of different exposure times on the crop yield as well as on energetic parameters such as calorific value and combustion heat. Seeds were subjected to laser light with an exposition time of 0, 1, 5, 10, 15 and 30 minutes. Measurements were carried out independently on mature plants from the first and second vegetation year. The results varied between the samples, which indicated possible impact of laser radiation on the resultant weight and calorific value of various experimental combinations. For plants from the second vegetation year the statistical differences in calorific value, combustion heat and crop mass were found between samples characterized by different exposition times: between sample irradiated for 30 min (L30) and 1 min (L1) as well as between sample L30 and sample irradiated for 5 minutes (L5). For plants after the first vegetation year the statistically significant differences in calorific value and combustion heat were found for sample with exposition time of 15 minutes (L15) and control sample, for sample L15 and sample L5 as well as between samples L15 and L30. For all the samples from the second vegetation year the increase in combustion heat and calorific values were detected as compared to control. Thus, after the application of certain parameters of laser radiation to the processing of seeds, the plant can be more useful for energetic purposes through more efficient crop.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Małgorzata Budzeń
Agnieszka Sujak
Dariusz Wiącek
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The paper treats about main problems of one phase DC-AC microinverters that allow single solar cell to be joined with the grid. One of the issues is to achieve high voltage gain with high efficiency in DC circuit, which is necessary for proper operation of inverter. The operating principles, results of practical implementation and investigations on boost-flyback converter, which meets mentioned demands, are presented. (high step-up DC-DC boost-flyback converter for single phase grid microinverter).
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Adam Kawa
Stanisław Piróg
Adam Penczek
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The energy efficiency of photovoltaic modules is one of the most important aspects in energetic and economic aspects of the project related to system installations. The efficiency of modules and the electricity produced by photovoltaic conversion in solar modules is affected by many factors, both internal, related to the module structure itself and its technical and external factors related to the energy infrastructure, which includes: cabling, inverters, climate conditions prevailing at the micro-installation location and the orientation and angle of inclination of the solar modules. The installation of photovoltaic modules should be preceded by an energy efficiency analysis, which will help to indicate the optimal solution adapted to the given conditions. The article presents a comparative analysis of the amount of energy produced under real and simulated conditions. Analyzes were made on the basis of research carried out in the Wind and Solar Energy Laboratory located at the AGH University of Science and Technology, data from solar irradiation data-bases and computer software for estimating energy resources. The study examined the correlation of the solar irradiation on the modules and the amount of electricity generated in the photovoltaic module. The electricity produced by the module was compared under real conditions and simulated based on two sources of data. The comparison and analysis of the amount of energy of the module were also made, taking simulated different angles of the module’s inclination into account.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Bartosz Soliński
Monika Stopa
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The aim of the article is to discuss and assess the diversification of renewable energy sources consumption in European Union member states. The time scope covers 2005 and 2015. The data comes from Eurostat. The analysis was based on synthetic indicators – using a non-standard method. Synthetic indicators were assessed based on three simple features such as: the share of renewable energy in energy consumption in 2015, the difference between the share of renewable energy in energy consumption in 2015 and in 2005 (in percentage points), deficit/surplus in the 2020 target reached in 2015 (in percentage points). The European Union member states were divided into four diversified group in terms of renewable energy sources consumption (first class – a very high level, second class – quite a high level, third class – quite a low level, fourth class – a very low level). Then the divided groups were analyzed according to the share of renewable energy sources in the primary production of renewable energy and the consumption of individual renewable energy sources. During the research period renewable energy consumption increased in the European Union, but individual member states are characterized by a diverse situation. The type of energy used depends largely on national resources. The countries of Northern Europe are characterized by a greater share of renewable energy sources in consumption. Biomass is the most popular renewable source of energy in the European Union. Depending on the conditions of individual countries – it is agricultural and forest biomass.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Luiza Ossowska
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The future and development of energy is one of the most important problems in both domestic and global politics. Limiting the use of fossil fuels in the energy sector results from new legal conditions related to the protection of the natural environment. These changes require the development of a new energy strategy, taking the limits of greenhouse gas emissions in the European Union and the requirements of the Community energy policy into account. One of the documents affecting the structure of Poland’s energy mix is the Directive on renewable energy sources (2009/28/EC). Poland has committed to achieving the goal of a 15% share of energy from renewable sources (RES) in gross final energy consumption by 2020. Current changes in Polish RES support systems – in particular the transition from the system of green certificates to auctions for green energy – may threaten the achievement of the above-mentioned goal. The article analyzes whether Poland will meet renewable energy obligations by 2020 under the current conditions. In addition, the article presents current energy consumption in the world and in the country, legal conditions taken into account when creating the country’s energy mix and forecasts of renewable energy demand.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Anna Manowska
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

In spite of technological, logistic and economic difficulties, interest in renewable energy sources in the world is consistently increasing. This trend is also observed in Poland, mainly due to the urgent need to tackle the problem of climate change, which is caused by the increasing concentration of gaseous pollutants in the atmosphere. The paper presents a short script of the issue of estimating renewable energy resources in Poland in the context of creating local low carbon economy plans at the level of municipalities/counties where RES sources should be taken into account. The author proposed an individual approach to estimate the potential of RES, taking the local conditions and the short characteristics of the small and medium companies sector in Poland into account. These companies have a great application potential to increase the share of renewable energies and to improve energy efficiency in their business. The actions, which are taken by the Ministry of Energy in the field of civil energy development, enhancing local energy security and the sustainable development of renewable energy resources support the development of energy clusters covering one district or five municipalities. In the article, the author presents data on the number of companies possessing a concession for generating electricity in RES installations in the power range from 40 kW to 200 kW. These companies can largely be the nucleus for creating a local cluster in which microgrids will be a key element.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Tomasz Mirowski
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Given the importance of renewable energy as it provides alternative energy sources over the traditional fossil fuel that is environmentally friendly, clean and renewable, this research aims to explore scholarly articles and books that present and investigate the challenges and barriers facing the implementation of renewable energy sources in Libya where the social, cultural, financial and awareness aspects are an important consideration against renewable energy. This study contains a review of all relevant, peer-reviewed, and published articles from journals, websites, books, conference proceedings and bulletins. An extensive literature review was carried out with the aim of researching renewable energy in Libya. This was done to take a realistic perspective of the community and the knowledge services accessible. The review of literature has shown that further renewables energy research remains necessary as the current conditions of the energy sector in Libya need to be examined to understand the challenges and difficulties to introduce renewable energy within competent authorities and businesses are examined in accordance with their managers. This indicates the need to conduct various studies in Libya to explore the various challenges, mostly financial and technological, that face the purposeful implementation of renewable energy resources in Libya. Additionally, the level of awareness and culture perception of the use of renewable energy is an important aspect to be considered as reported as barriers affecting the implementation of renewable energy in various parts of the world.
Go to article

Bibliography

2020 Predictions for the Global Economy and Markets 2020. [Online] https://www.investopedia.com/2020-predictions-for-the-global-economy-markets-and-investors-4780156 [Accessed: 2020-10-23].
Abdullahi, D. et al. 2017. Solar Energy Development and Implementation in Nigeria: Drivers and Barriers. DOI: 10.18086/swc.2017.16.01.
Adan H. et al. 2018 – Adan, H., Fuerst, F., Kavarnou, D. and Singh, R. 2018. Me or my house? Investigating the relative importance of household and dwelling characteristics for household energy consumption. [Online] https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3254320 [Accessed: 2020- 06-24].
Ahadzie, D.K. et al. 2009. Towards developing competency-based measures for project managers in mass house building projects in developing countries. Construction Management and Economics 27(1), pp. 89–102, DOI: 10.1080/01446190802621028.
Ajredi et al. 2017 – Ajredi, M.A.S., Ayedh, A.M.A. and Haron, M.S. 2017. The Relationship between Real Exchange Rate and Components of the Broader Measure of Money Supply: An Analytical Study on the Libyan Economy. Journal of Insurance and Financial Management 3(3).
Al-Hamamre, Z. et al. 2017. Wastes and biomass materials as sustainable-renewable energy resources for Jordan. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. Elsevier, 67, pp. 295–314.
Alweheshi, S. et al. 2019. Photovoltaic solar energy applications in Libya: a survey’. The 10th International Renewable Energy Congress (IREC), pp. 1–6, DOI: 10.1109/IREC.2019.8754527. [Online] https://www.researchgate.net/scientific-contributions/Shoroug-Alweheshi-2155953241 [Accessed: 2020-12- 05].
Ansari, M.F. et al. 2013. Analysis of barriers to implement solar power installations in India using interpretive structural modeling technique. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews 27, pp. 163–174.
Armaroli, N. and Balzani, V. 2007. The future of energy supply: challenges and opportunities. Angewandte Chemie International Edition 46(1–2), pp. 52–66.
Atadashi et al. 2012 – Atadashi, I.M., Aroua, M.K., Abdul Aziz, A.R. and Sulaiman, N.M.N. 2012. The effects of catalysts in biodiesel production: A review. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry 19(1), pp. 14–26, DOI: 10.1016/j.jiec.2012.07.009.
Badi, I.A. et al. 2018. A grey-based assessment approach to the site selection of a desalination plant in Libya. Grey Systems: Theory and Application, DOI: 10.1108/GS-01-2018-0002.
Blanchard, C.M. 2016. Libya: Transition and US policy. Washington United States: Congressional Research Service. [Online] https://sgp.fas.org/crs/row/RL33142.pdf [Accessed: 2020-09-22].
Bolesta, A. 2018. Myanmar-China peculiar relationship: Trade, investment and the model of development. Journal of International Studies 11(2), pp. 23–36.
Bussar, C. et al. 2014. Optimal allocation and capacity of energy storage systems in a future European power system with 100% renewable energy generation. Energy Procedia 46, pp. 40–47, DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.01.156.
Capasso, M. 2020. The war and the economy: the gradual destruction of Libya. Review of African Political Economy 47, pp. 1–23.
CBL 2009. Economic Bulletin for the Fourth Quarter of 2009. Tripoli, Libya.
Central Bank of Libya 2005. [Online] https://cbl.gov.ly/en/[Accessed: 2021-02-20].
CIA 2016. Central Intelligence Agency-The World Factbook.
Collotta, M. et al. 2018.Wastewater and waste CO2 for sustainable biofuels from microalgae. Algal research 29, pp. 12–21.
Deigaard, R. and Nielsen, P. 2018. Wind generation of waves: Energy and momentum transfer – An overview with physical discussion. Coastal Engineering 139, pp. 36–46.
Doğanalp, N. 2018. The nexus between renewable energy and sustainable development: a panel data analysi̇s for selected eu countries. Journal of Social And Humanities Sciences Research (JSHSR) 5(29), pp. 3966–3973, DOI: 10.26450/jshsr.884.
Etelawi et al. 2017 – Etelawi, A.M., Blatner, K.A. and McCluskey, J. 2017. Crude Oil and the Libyan Economy. International Journal of Economics and Finance 9(4), pp. 95–104.
Feron, S. 2016. Sustainability of off-grid photovoltaic systems for rural electrification in developing countries: A review. Sustainability 8(12), pp. 1–26, DOI: 10.3390/su8121326.
GPCEWGL 2008. The Libyan General people’s Committee for Electricity, Water and Gas. Annual Report. Tripoli – Libya.
GPCFAAL 2007. The General People’s Committee of The Financial Audit Authority. Tripoli – Libya.
He, Z.X. et al. 2018. Factors that influence renewable energy technological innovation in China: A dynamic panel approach. Sustainability 10(1), DOI: 10.3390/su10010124.
Herbert, G.M.J. and Krishnan, A.U. 2016. Quantifying environmental performance of biomass energy. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 59, pp. 292–308.
Herington, M.J. et al. 2017. Rural energy planning remains out-of-step with contemporary paradigms of energy access and development. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 67, pp. 1412–1419.
Van Horne, C. and Dutot, V. 2017. Challenges in technology transfer: an actor perspective in a quadruple helix environment. The Journal of Technology Transfer 42(2), pp. 285–301.
Jolly, W.M. et al. 2015. Climate-induced variations in global wildfire danger from 1979 to 2013. Nature Communications. Nature Publishing Group, 6(May), pp. 1–11, DOI: 10.1038/ncomms8537.
Kassem et al. 2020 – Kassem, Y., Çamur, H. and Aateg, R.A.F. 2020. Exploring Solar and Wind Energy as a Power Generation Source for Solving the Electricity Crisis in Libyax. Energies 13(14), p. 3708.
Khalifa et al. 2019 – Khalifa, R., Dabab, M. and Barham, H. 2019. A preliminary strategic framework for enhancing the sustainability of international technology transfer: The case of Libya. PICMET 2019 – Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology: Technology Management in the World of Intelligent Systems, Proceedings, 1–9, DOI: 10.23919/PICMET.2019.8893662.
Khalil, A. and Asheibe, A. 2015. The chances and challenges for renewable energy in Libya. The Proceedings of the Renewable Energy Conference (November 2015), pp. 1–6.
Khan, K.A. et al. 2018. Renewable energy scenario in Bangladesh. IJARII 4(5), pp. 270–279.
Khare et al. 2013 – Khare, V., Nema, S. and Baredar, P. 2013. Status of solar wind renewable energy. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 27(1), pp. 1–10.
Khare et al. 2017 – Khare, Vikas, Nema, S. and Baredar, P. 2013. Status of solar wind renewable energy in India. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 27, pp. 1–10, DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2013.06.018.
Khojasteh et al. 2016 – Khojasteh, D., Khojasteh, D. and Kamali, R. 2016. Wave Energy Absorption by Heaving Point Absorbers at Caspian Sea. 24th Annual International Conference on Mechanical Engineering- ISME. Yazd, Iran (April). 156 157
Komoto, K. et al. 2009. Energy from the desert: Very Large scale photovoltaic systems: Socio-economic, financial, technical and environmental aspects. Energy from the Desert: Very Large Scale Photovoltaic Systems: Socio-economic, Financial, Technical and Environmental Aspects, pp. 1–190, DOI: 10.4324/9781849770064.
Kumar, D. and Katoch, S.S. 2014. Sustainability indicators for run of the river (RoR) hydropower projects in hydro rich regions of India. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 35, pp. 101–108.
Luthra, S. et al. 2015. Barriers to renewable/sustainable energy technologies adoption: Indian perspective. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews 41, pp. 762–776.
Martinez-Manuel, L. 2021. Flux solar simulator for the development of thesis that to obtain the degree of doctor of Science (optics) Presents: Leopoldo Martínez-Manuel (April).
Mercer, N. 2016. Barriers to renewable energy development in newfoundland and labrador: a case study of wind energy applying the ‘aktesp’ framework for analysis.
Mirkouei, A. et al. 2017. A mixed biomass-based energy supply chain for enhancing economic and environmental sustainability benefits: A multi-criteria decision making framework. Applied Energy 206(May), pp. 1088–1101, DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.09.001.
Mohamed, A.M.A. 2016. Investigation into the feasibility of the utilisation of renewable energy resources in Libya (Doctoral dissertation, Nottingham Trent University).
Mohamed et al. 2019 – Mohamed, A.M.A., Elabar, S.M., Shakmak, B.H.M. and Al-Habaibeh, A. 2019 Exploring the sustainable economy and energy for Libya’s future. Nottingham Trent University: Publications. [Online] http://irep.ntu.ac.uk/id/eprint/29037/ [Accessed: 2021-03-05].
Mohamed et al. 2017 – Mohamed, A.M.A., Al-Habaibeh, A. and Abdo, H. 2016. Future prospects of the renewable energy sector in Libya. Conference: Sustainable Built Environment. [In:] SBE16 Dubai Conference, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
Mohamed, O.A. and Masood, S.H. 2018. A brief overview of solar and wind energy in Libya: Current trends and the future development. [In:] IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 377(1), DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/377/1/012136.
Murshed, M. 2020. Are Trade Liberalization policies aligned with Renewable Energy Transition in low and middle income countries? An Instrumental Variable approach. Renewable Energy 151, pp. 1110– –1123, DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2019.11.106.
Nasar, M. and Elzentani, H. 2016. Smart Roads to Generate Energy in Libya: Survey. Environment & Ecology 34(3A), pp. 1088–1092.
Nengroo et al. 2018 – Nengro, S.H., Kamran, N.A., Ali, M.U., Kim, D.-H., Kim, M.-S., Hussain, A. and Kim, H.-J. 2018. Dual battery storage system: An optimized strategy for the utilization of renewable photovoltaic energy in the United Kingdom. Electronics 7(9), p. 177. OPEC 2016. [Online] https://www.opec.org/opec_web/en/search.jsp? [Accessed: 2020-06-27].
Otman, W. and Karlberg, E. 2007. The Libyan economy: economic diversification and international repositioning. Springer Science & Business Media, DOI: 10.1007/3-540-46463-8.
Paravantis et al. 2018 – Paravantis, J., Mihalakakou, G., Stigka, E. and Evanthie, M. 2018. Social acceptance of renewable energy projects: A contingent valuation investigation in Western Greece. Renewable Energy 123, pp. 639–651.
Patil, D. 2018. Sustainable Bio-Energy Through Bagasse Co-Generation Technology: a Pestel Analysis of Sugar Hub of India, Solapur. Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research 5(12), pp. 661–669.
Piwowar, A. and Dzikuć, M. 2019. Development of renewable energy sources in the context of threats resulting from low-altitude emissions in Rural Areas in Poland: A review. Energies 12(18), DOI: 10.3390/en12183558.158
Pueyo, A. 2018. What constrains renewable energy investment in Sub-Saharan Africa? A comparison of Kenya and Ghana. World Development 109, pp. 85–100.
Le Quéré, C. et al. 2017. Global_Carbon_Budget. Earth System Science Data (November).
Reddy, S. and Painuly, J.P. 2004. Diffusion of renewable energy technologies – barriers and stakeholders’ perspectives. Renewable Energy 29(9), pp. 1431–1447. Renewable energy statistics 2020. Online: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title =Renewable_energy_statistics.
Seetharaman et al. 2019 – Seetharaman, A., Krishna Moorthy, M. and Nitin, P. 2019. Breaking barriers in deployment of renewable energy. Heliyon. Elsevier Ltd. 5(1), DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01166.
Sharma, A.K. and Thakur, N.S. 2017. Energy situation, current status and resource potential of run of the river (RoR) large hydro power projects in Jammu and Kashmir: India. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 78, pp. 233–251.
Shibin et al. 2016 – Shibin, K.T., Gunasekaran, A., Papadopoulos, T., Dubey, R., Singh, M. and Fosso Wamba, S. 2016. Enablers and barriers of flexible green supply chain management: A total interpretive structural modeling approach. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management 17(2), pp. 171–188.
Sindhu et al. 2016 – Sindhu, S., Nehra, V. and Luthra, S. 2016. Identification and analysis of barriers in implementation of solar energy in Indian rural sector using integrated ISM and fuzzy MICMAC approach. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 62, pp. 70–88.
Solangi et al. 2019 – Solangi, Y.A., Tan, Q., Mirjat, N.H., Valasai, G.D., Khan, M.W.A. and Ikram, M. 2019. An integrated Delphi-AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS approach toward ranking and selection of renewable energy resources in Pakistan. Processes 7(2), pp. 1–31, DOI: 10.3390/pr7020118.
Strantzali, E. and Aravossis, K. 2016. Decision making in renewable energy investments: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 55, pp. 885–898, DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.11.021.
Suckling, J.H. and Frasier, J.T. 2015. Adoption of the paris agreement. Experimental Mechanics 8(11), pp. 513–519, DOI: 10.1007/BF02327128.
Suman, S.K. and Ahamad, J. 2018. Solar energy potential and future energy of India: an overview. International Journal of Engineering Science, p. 17575.
Suzuki et al. 2010 – Suzuki, M., Kehdy, B.O. and Jain, S. 2010. Identifying barriers for the implementation and the operation of biogas power generation projects in Southeast Asia: An analysis of clean development mechanism projects in Thailand. Economics and Management Series Working Paper, EMS–2010–20, International University of Japan, Japan.
Tomar et al. 2017 – Tomar, V., Tiwari, G. and Norton, B. 2017. Solar dryers for tropical food preservation: Thermophysics of crops, systems and components. Solar Energy 154, pp. 2–13.
Trutnevyte, E. et al. 2016. Energy scenario choices: Insights from a retrospective review of UK energy futures. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 55, pp. 326–337, DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.067.
UNFCCC 2020. [Online] https://unfccc.int/climate-action/introduction-climate-action [Accessed: 2020-12-08]. U.S. Energy Information Administration 2019. [Online] https://www.eia.gov/ [Accessed: 2020-12-08].
Worldometers 2016a. [Online] https://www.worldometers.info/oil/libya-oil/ [Accessed: 2020-12-08].
Worldometers 2016b. [Online] https://www.worldometers.info/gas/ [Accessed: 2020-12-08].
Worldometer 2020. Libya Population. [Online] https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/libya-population/ [Accessed: 2020-12-08].
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Mussa Mohamed Bahour
1
ORCID: ORCID
M.F.M. Alkbir
2
Fatihhi Januddi
2
Adnan Bakri
2

  1. Business School, University Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  2. Advance Facilities Engineering Technology Research Cluster (AFET-RC); Facilities Maintenance Engineering Section (FAME), Malaysian Institute of Industrial Technology, Universiti Kuala Lumpur (UniKL MITEC), Persiaran Sinaran Ilmu, Bandar Seri Alam, 81750, Johor, Malaysia
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Renewable energy development is crucial for resolving global warming issues and achieving

sustainable development goals. The objective of this paper is to reveal renewable energy trends

using statistical data to identify the most developed technologies in the field, their distribution by

territory, checking the interrelation between investments in R&D and patent activity.

The changes in total investments made in renewables are studied for 2004–2019 and the increasing

trend has been observed with some fluctuations in certain years, major current investments in solar

and wind energy are detected. The dynamics of international patenting activity in solar and wind

technologies, geothermal and fuel cells, the total number of PCT applications over the past 10 years

by geographic region are considered. The results show some differences across various renewable

technologies. Solar is the most patented, wind and fuel cells are less patented but solar and wind

have shown an uptrend for the last five years, while fuel cell technologies showed a decline after

2008. Geothermal is the least patented.

The comparison between investment and patent application trends in renewables undercovers some

important issues – the leading role of Japan in patenting under the PCT procedure, while China is

a major investor in renewable energy; the US and Europe with big investments in renewables are

also leading in patent registration.

Correlation between investment in R&D and patenting activity in the field of global renewable

energy should be emphasized (correlation coefficient R = 0,849 for 2002–2019). Since private

and public investment is strongly stimulated by domestic renewable energy policies, IP indicators

can help identify policy instruments and their effectiveness within the further research

framework.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Tetiana Sobolieva
ORCID: ORCID
Nataliia Harashchenko
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The primary aim of this paper was to assess the development of prosumer energy sector in Poland. In the first point, the basic notions connected with prosumer energy (micro-installation, prosumer) were discussed on the basis of Law of Renewable Energy Sources of February 20, 2015 (Journal of Laws, item 478, as amended) and the main aspects of the European Union energy policy where presented in the context of the development of the prosumer energy sector. In this part of the study, numerous benefits for the Polish economy and consumers of electrical energy, connected with the expansion of prosumer energy sector, were presented. On the other hand, many obstacles which stall this sector in Poland were noticed. In the second point the most important regulations from the Law of Renewable Energy Sources of February 20, 2015 were analyzed (In the second point the most important regulations from the Law of Renewable Energy Sources of February 20, 2015 (hereinafter: the RES act) were analyzed). On the basis of this legal act, the so called “rebate system”, which is currently used in Poland to support prosumers of electrical energy, was described. Moreover, many legal and administrative simplifications implemented by the RES act were indicated. The analytical approach to the RES Act in this study resulted in the detection of many regulations in this legal act which may have an adverse impact on the development of the prosumer energy sector in Poland. In the third point, programs co-financed by the Polish government or the European Union, which financially support the purchase and installation of energy technologies using RES, were described. Statistical data connected with the prosumer energy sector in Poland was presented in the fourth point of this paper. On the basis thereof, the authors attempted to find the correlation between the number of prosumers and the share of the amount of electrical energy from renewable energy sources in gross electrical energy consumption. In the fifth point issues connected with energy technologies used in the Polish prosumer energy sector were discussed. Moreover, this point focuses on the great popularity of photovoltaic modules among Polish prosumers and results in the reluctance of Polish prosumers to install wind microturbines and small hydroelectric power plants.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Jan Kuchmacz
Łukasz Mika
ORCID: ORCID
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The inevitability and successive implementation of the elements of the European Union (EU) energy policy and the freedom of achieving the goals left in this regard for the member states should translate into actions taking the specificity of local markets into account, in order to carry out liberalization processes in a harmonious manner. In 2016, the European Commission published a package of guidance documents “Clean Energy for All Europeans” in the perspective of 2030, also known as the Winter Package. The recommendations contained in some of the documents assume the continuation of integration of markets in the national and regional dimension, setting ambitious targets in the field of decarbonization, the increase of energy efficiency and the increase of Renewable Energy Sources (RES) share in the energy balance of EU countries. The short time to carry out a thorough reconstruction of the energy-generating sector forces to seek solutions that are in line with the European Community recommendations and, at the same time, do not constitute an excessive burden for the national economy and legal order. One of the activities is to use the potential of micro-networks of local communities striving for energy independence based on their own energy sources and to create regulations enabling the neighborly exchange of energy. This mechanism works in the form of pilot projects in many locations around the world (Sonnen Group; Power Ledger). The paper presents the concept of functional and analytical assumptions for an exemplary structure of neighboring prosumers along with the presentation of simulation results based on real generation and consumption profiles and the presentation of investment profitability indicators for the proposed functional model.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Joanna Wróbel
Maciej Sołtysik
Radomir Rogus
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The Włocławek Hydroelectric Power Plant is one of Poland’s largest power-generation projects.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Marcin Kmieciński
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The connection of renewable energy sources with significant nominal power (in the order of MW) to the medium-voltage distribution grid affects the operating conditions of that grid. Due to the increasing number of installed renewable energy sources and the limited transmission capacity of medium-voltage networks, the cooperation of these energy sources is becoming increasingly important. This article presents the results of a six-year study on a 2 MW wind power plant and a 1 MW photovoltaic power plant in the province of Warmia and Mazury, which are located a few kilometers away from each other. In this study, active energy, currents, voltages as well as active, reactive, and apparent power and higher harmonics of currents and voltages were measured. The obtained results show the parameters determining the power quality at different load levels. Long-term analysis of the operation of these power plants in terms of the generated electricity and active power transmitted to the power grid facilitated estimating the repeatability of active energy production and the active power generated in individual months of the year and times of day by a wind power plant and a photovoltaic power plant. It also allowed us to assess the options of cooperation between these energy sources. It is important, not only from a technical but also from an economic point of view, to determine the nominal power of individual power plants connected to the same connection point. Therefore, the cooperation of two such power plants with the same nominal power of 2 MW was analyzed and the economic losses caused by a reduction in electricity production resulting from connection capacity were estimated.
Go to article

Bibliography

  1.  C. Warren, “Feature — Wind, Sun, and Water,” EPRI Journal, no. 3, pp. 8–11, May/June 2016.
  2.  The Construction Law Act of 7 July 1994. Dz.U. 2019, item 1186.
  3.  The Energy Law Act of 10 April 1997. Dz.U. 1997, no. 54, item 348 as amended.
  4.  The Environmental Protection Law Act of 27 April 2001. Dz.U. 2001, no. 62, item 627.
  5.  The Act on Providing Information about the Environment and its Protection, Public Participation in the Environmental Protection and on Environmental Impact Assessment of 3 October 2008. Dz.U. 2008, no. 199, item 1227.
  6.  The Regulation of the Council of Ministers of 10 September 2019 on projects which may significantly affect the environment. Dz.U. 2019, item 1839.
  7.  The Act amending the Renewable Energy Sources Act and Some Other Acts of 7 June 2018, Dz.U. 2018, item 1276.
  8.  The Renewable Energy Sources Act of 20 February 2015. Dz.U. 2015, item 478 as amended.
  9.  H. Ritchie and M. Roser, “Renewable Energy.” [Online]. Available: https://ourworldindata.org/renewable-energy. [Accessed: 15 Nov. 2020].
  10.  G. Chicco, J. Schlabbach, and F. Spertino, “Characterisation and assessment of the harmonic emission of grid-connected photovoltaic systems,” in Proc. IEEE Russia Power Tech, 2005, pp.  1–7, doi: 10.1109/PTC.2005.4524744.
  11.  L. Liu, H. Li, Y. Xue, and W. Liu, “Reactive power compensation and optimization strategy for grid-interactive cascaded photovoltaic systems,” IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 188–202, 2015, doi: 10.1109/TPEL.2014.2333004.
  12.  S. Mishra and P.K. Ray, “Power quality improvement using photovoltaic fed DSTATCOM based on JAYA optimization,” IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 1672–1680, 2016, doi: 10.1109/TSTE.2016.2570256.
  13.  A. Lange and M. Pasko, “Selected aspects of photovoltaic power station operation in the power system,” Przegląd Elektrotechniczny, vol. 96, no. 5, pp. 30–34, 2020, doi: 10.15199/48.2020.05.05.
  14.  H. Serghine, R. Merahi, R. Chenni, and D. Buła, “Combined operation of photovoltaic and active power filter system connected to nonlinear load,” Roum. Sci. Techn. Électrotechn. Énerg., vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 371–376, 2019, doi: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/342079034.
  15.  N. Mansouri, A. Lashab, D. Sera, J.M. Guerrero, and A. Cherif, “Large photovoltaic power plants integration: A review of challenges and solutions,” Energies, vol. 12, no. 19, pp. 3798, 2019, doi: 10.3390/en12193798.
  16.  J. Smith, S. Rönnberg, M. Bollen, J. Meyer, A.M. Blanco, K.-L. Koo, and D. Mushamalirwa, “Power quality aspects of solar power – results from CIGRE JWG C4/C6.29,” CIRED – Open Access Proceedings Journal, 2017, pp. 809–813, 2017, doi: 10.1049/oap-cired.2017.0351.
  17.  J. Meyer, A. M. Blanco, S. Rönnberg, M. Bollen, and J. Smith, “CIGRE C4/C6.29: survey of utilities experiences on power quality issues related to solar power,” CIRED – Open Access Proceedings Journal, 2017, pp. 539–543, doi: 10.1049/oap-cired.2017.0456.
  18.  Z. Chen and E. Spooner, “Grid power quality with variable speed wind turbines,” IEEE Trans. Energy Convers., vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 148–154, 2001, doi: 10.1109/60.921466.
  19.  A. Lange and M. Pasko, “Selected aspects of wind power plant operation in the power system,” in Proc. 12th Int. Conf. and Exhibition on Electrical Power Quality and Utilisation (EPQU), 2020, pp. 1–4, doi: 10.1109/EPQU50182.2020.9220302.
  20.  M. Mróz, K. Chmielowiec, and Z. Hanzelka, “Voltage fluctuations in networks with distributed power sources,” in Proc. 15th Int. Conf. on Harmonics and Quality of Power (ICHQP), 2012, pp.  920–925, doi: 10.1109/ICHQP.2012.6381206.
  21.  M. Farhoodnea, A. Mohamed, H. Shareef, and H. Zayandehroodi, “Power quality impact of renewable energy based generators and electric vehicles on distribution systems,” Procedia Technology, vol. 11, pp. 11–17, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.protcy.2013.12.156.
  22.  N. Golovanov, G.C. Lazaroiu, M. Roscia, and D. Zaninelli, “Power quality assessment in small scale renewable energy sources supplying distribution systems,” Energies, vol. 6, no. 2, pp.  634–645, 2013, doi: 10.3390/en6020634.
  23.  A. Merzic, M. Music, and M. Redzic, “A complementary hybrid system for electricity generation based on solar and wind energy taking into account local consumption – Case study,” in Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. on Electric Power and Energy Conversion Systems, 2013, pp.  1–6, doi: 10.1109/EPECS.2013.6712993.
  24.  R.N.S.R. Mukhtaruddin, H.A. Rahman, and M.O.J. Hassan, “Economic analysis of grid-connected hybrid photovoltaic-wind system in Malaysia,” in Proc. Int. Conf. on Clean Electrical Power (ICCEP), 2013, pp. 577–583, doi: 10.1109/ICCEP.2013.6586912.
  25.  K. Benyahia, L. Boumediene, and A. Mezouar, “Efficiency and performance of mixed wind farm using photovoltaic solar farm as STATCOM,” in Proc. 3rd Int. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Conference (IRSEC), 2015, pp. 1–5, doi: 10.1109/IRSEC.2015.7455092.
  26.  Ö. Kiymaz and T. Yavuz, “Wind power electrical systems integration and technical and economic analysis of hybrid wind power plants,” in Proc. IEEE International Conference on Renewable Energy Research and Applications (ICRERA), 2016, pp. 158–163, doi: 10.1109/ ICRERA.2016.7884529.
  27.  C. Wang, S. Liu, Z. Bie, and J. Wang, “Renewable Energy Accommodation Capability Evaluation of Power System with Wind Power and Photovoltaic Integration,” IFAC-PapersOnLine, vol. 51, no. 28, pp.  55–60, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.11.677.
  28.  M. Bollen, J. Meyer, H. Amaris, A.M. Blanco, A.G. de Castro, J. Desmet, M. Klatt, Ł. Kocewiak, S. Rönnberg, and K. Yang, “Future work on harmonics – some expert opinions Part I – wind and solar power,” Proc. of 16th International Conference on Harmonics and Quality of Power (ICHQP), 2014, pp. 904–908, doi: 10.1109/ICHQP.2014.6842870.
  29.  S.K. Rönnberg, K. Yang, M.H.J. Bollen, and A. Gil de Castro, “Waveform distortion – a comparison of photovoltaic and wind power,” Proc. of 16th International Conf. on Harmonics and Quality of Power (ICHQP), 2014, pp. 733–737, doi: 10.1109/ICHQP.2014.6842782.
  30.  O. Lennerhag, M. Bollen, S. Ackeby, and S. Rönnberg, “Very short variations in voltage (timescale less than 10 minutes) due to variations in wind and solar power,” Proc. of International Conference and Exhibition on Electricity Distribution, CIRED, 2015, pp. 1–5.
  31.  A. Zomers and R. Seethapathy, “The potential of hybrid systems for off-grid power supply,” ELECTRA, no. 289, Report WG C6.28, pp. 23–27, 2016.
  32.  D. Heide, L. von Bremen, M. Greiner, C. Hoffmann, M. Speckmann, and S. Bofinger, “Seasonal optimal mix of wind and solar power in a future, highly renewable Europe,” Renew. Energy, vol.  35, no. 11, pp. 2483–2489, 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2010.03.012.
  33.  L. Hirth, “The optimal share of variable renewables: How the variability of wind and solar power affects their welfare-optimal deployment,” The Energy Journal, vol. 9, no. 1, pp.  149–184, 2015, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2351754.
  34.  W. Ningbo, “The key technology of the control system of wind farm and photovoltaic power plant cluster,” in Proc. IEEE International Conference on Power System Technology, 2014, pp.  2833–2839, doi: 10.1109/POWERCON.2014.6993817.
  35.  S.S. Singh, E. Fernandez, and T.Ksh. Tompok Singh, “Reliable PV/Wind renewable energy mix for a remote area,” in Proc. Annual IEEE India Conference (INDICON), 2015, pp. 1–5, doi: 10.1109/INDICON.2015.7443419.
  36.  Y. Zhang, L. Wei, and J. Li, “Study on renewable energy integration influence and accommodation capability in regional power grid,” in Proc. 5th International Conference on Electric Utility Deregulation and Restructuring and Power Technologies (DRPT), 2015, pp. 563–568, doi: 10.1109/DRPT.2015.7432292.
  37.  L.R.A. Gabriel Filho, O.J. Seraphim, F.L. Caneppele, C.P.C. Gabriel, and F.F. Putti, “Variable analysis in wind photovoltaic hybrid systems in rural energization,” IEEE Latin America Transactions, vol. 14, no. 12, pp. 4757–4761, 2016, doi: 10.1109/TLA.2016.7817007.
  38.  Y. Shuo, B. Hongkun, W. Jiangbo, Y. Meng, M. Renyuan, and Y. Jing, “Accommodated capacity for wind and solar power under the background of supply side reform: Model and empirical study,” in Proc. 2nd International Conference on Power and Renewable Energy (ICPRE), 2017, pp.  382–386, doi: 10.1109/ICPRE.2017.8390563.
  39.  D.B. Carvalho, E.C. Guardia, and J.W. Marangon Lima, “Technical-economic analysis of the insertion of PV power into a wind-solar hybrid system,” Solar Energy, vol. 191, pp.  530–539, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2019.06.070.
  40.  A. Thomas and P. Racherla, “Constructing statutory energy goal compliant wind and solar PV infrastructure pathways,” Renewable Energy, vol. 161, pp. 1–19, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2020.06.141.
  41.  Z. Hanzelka and A. Firlit. Elektrownie ze źródłami odnawialnymi. Zagadnienia wybrane. Kraków: AGH, 2015, pp. 459–484.
  42.  K. Mousa, H. AlZu’bi, and A. Diabat, “Design of a hybrid solar-wind power plant using optimization,” in Proc. 2nd International Conference on Engineering System Management and Applications (ICESMA), 2010, pp. 1–6.
  43.  J. Jurasz and J. Mikulik, “Economic and environmental analysis of a hybrid solar, wind and pumped storage hydroelectric energy source: a Polish perspective,” Bull. Pol. Acad. Sci. Tech. Sci., vol. 65, no. 6, pp. 859–869, 2017, doi: 10.1515/bpasts-2017-0093.
  44.  P. Marchel, J. Paska, K. Pawlak, and K. Zagrajek, “A practical approach to optimal strategies of electricity contracting from Hybrid Power Sources,” Bull. Polish Acad. Sci. Tech. Sci., vol. 68, no. 6, pp. 1543–1551, 2020, doi: 10.24425/bpasts.2020.135377.
  45.  R. Al Badwawi, M. Abusara, and T. Mallick, “A review of hybrid solar PV and wind energy system,” Smart Science, vol. 3, no.  3, pp. 127–138, 2015, doi: 10.1080/23080477.2015.11665647.
  46.  F.A. Khan, N. Pal, and S.H. Saeed, “Review of solar photovoltaic and wind hybrid energy systems for sizing strategies optimization techniques and cost analysis methodologies,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 92, pp. 937–947, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j. rser.2018.04.107.
  47.  K. Sood and E. Muthusamy, “A comprehensive review on hybrid renewable energy systems,” Modern Physics Letters B, vol. 34, no.  27, pp. 2050290, 2020, doi: 10.1142/S0217984920502905.
  48.  Commission Regulation (EU) 2016/631 of 14 April 2016 establishing a network code on requirements for grid connection of generators.
  49.  International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC). Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC). Testing and measurement techniques – Power quality measurement methods (IEC 61000-4-30:2015). IEC: Geneva, Switzerland, 2015.
  50.  International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC). Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC). Power quality measurement in power supply systems – Part 2: Functional tests and uncertainty requirements (IEC 62586-2:2017). IEC: Geneva, Switzerland, 2017.
  51.  International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC). Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC). Testing and measurement techniques – General guide on harmonics and interharmonics measurements and instrumentation, for power supply systems and equipment connected thereto (IEC 61000-4-7: 2002 + AMD1: 2008 CSV). IEC: Geneva, Switzerland, 2009.
  52.  D. Buła, D. Grabowski, A. Lange, M. Maciążek, and M. Pasko, “Long- and Short-Term Comparative Analysis of Renewable Energy Sources,” Energies, vol. 13, no. 14, pp. 3610, 2020, doi: 10.3390/en13143610.
  53.  International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC). Recommendations for small renewable energy and hybrid systems for rural electrification – Part 7‒1: Generators – Photovoltaic generators (IEC TS 62257-7-1:2010). IEC: Geneva, Switzerland, 2010.
  54.  International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC). Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) – Part 3‒6: Limits – Assessment of emission limits for the connection of distorting installations to MV, HV and EHV power systems (IEC TR 61000-3-6:2008). IEC: Geneva, Switzerland, 2008.
  55.  European Committee for Electrotechnical Standardization. Standard EN 50160:2010: Voltage Characteristics of Electricity Supplied by Public Distribution Systems; CENELEC: Brussels, Belgium, 2010.
  56.  International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC). Wind energy generation systems – Part 21‒1: Measurement and assessment of electrical characteristics – Wind turbines (IEC 61400-21-1:2019). IEC: Geneva, Switzerland, 2019.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Andrzej Lange
1
ORCID: ORCID
Marian Pasko
2
Dariusz Grabowski
2
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Department of Electrical and Power Engineering, Electronics and Automation, University of Warmia and Mazury, ul. M. Oczapowskiego 11, 10-719 Olsztyn, Poland
  2. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Silesian University of Technology, ul. Akademicka 10, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

This paper discusses the impact of the European Green Deal policy on the clean energy transformation in the European Union, focusing on the generation of electricity reaching a significant milestone for the EU in 2020 – renewable energy sources for the first time in history surpassing combined fossil fuels in the generation of electrical energy. This achievement, although partially influenced by the exceptional circumstances of the COVID-19 pandemic and the electricity demand shock, is primarily an effect of the Clean Energy for all Europeans Package implementing the European Green Deal strategy designed to position the EU as a global leader in the green transformation, leading by example and turning climate challenges into a growth opportunity, and in doing so presenting an optimistic policy perspective for a global transformation towards a 100% renewable energy world, thus supporting mitigation of the global-warming threats by significantly cutting greenhouse-gas emissions. With the immediate effects of the 2018 recast Renewable Energy Directive (2018/2001/EU) and other related clean-energy policies under the umbrella of the European Green Deal, coal and lignite electric generation has fallen in 2020 by as much as 22% (87 TWh) and the nuclear generation has dropped by 11% (79 TWh), with natural gas to a much lesser extent, yet still noting an annual drop of 3%, while renewables grew, surpassing the combined fossil fuels electricity output in the whole of the EU. This is an impressive result confirmed in late 2021 and a hallmark of the European Green Deal initial success, the sustainability of which is yet to be assessed in the coming years, especially in view of the recent international situation of major destabilization. In this context, it should be added that although the newest 2022 Global Energy Review report by the IEA confirmed in 2021, the highest global CO 2emission level in history (following the post -pandemic economic rebound and also due to the gas-price crisis of late 2021 causing gas-to-coal shifts in electricity-mix, which in the EU, resulted in a 7% relative annual emissions increase), Europe’s emission level has remained in a diminishing trend following the European achievements of 2020, with an overall CO 2 emissions decrease of 2.4% in comparison with the level of 2019. Most likely, however, the 2021 gas-price crisis was only a mere prelude to a much more robust long- -term perturbation that will be expectedly due to the war in Ukraine and the necessary sanctions policy, especially impacting the energy market and probably further hampering the green-transition process jointly with other economic factors.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Agnieszka Ewa Rządkowska
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Institute of International Studies, University of Wrocław, Poland
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The article analyzes and evaluates the development of renewable energy from the standpoint of state regulation and incentives. It is noted that the global production of renewable electricity has increased by 15% over the last year. The periods of introduction of the “green tariff” as an economic stimulus for the development of solar energy, which became the starting point for the development of alternative generation in different countries, are analyzed. The role of institutional factors in the development of renewable energy, such as the free issuance of licenses for electricity generation, stimulating the creation of specialized research areas, technology development and production of relevant equipment, was observed. The necessity of taking into account the regional peculiarity in the state stimulation of the development of renewable energy is proved. The economic efficiency of the state regulation of alternative energy in time measurement per conditional unit of alternative renewable energy stations was calculated, taking the coefficient of proportionality into account. Therefore, the calculation indicates the high effectiveness of government policy in regulating energy in terms of only short-term lag (α = 1.3) and the number of stations 80 percent of full saturation relative to the basic needs of energy consumption. A separate further stage in the development of renewable energy without the introduction and expansion of the “green tariff” has been identified. This approach was introduced in Poland, which ensured the country not only the inflow of foreign investment, but also the formation of free competition among investors.
Go to article

Bibliography

Barbose, G.L. 2021. US Renewables Portfolio Standards 2021 Status Update: Early Release. Berkeley, United States: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL).
Bazaluk et al. 2021a – Bazaluk, O., Havrysh, V. and Nitsenko, V. 2021a. Energy and environmental assessment of straw production for power generation. E3S Web of Conferences 228, DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/202122801010.
Bazaluk et al. 2021b – Bazaluk, O., Havrysh, V., Fedorchuk, M. and Nitsenko, V. 2021b. Energy Assessment of Sorghum Cultivation in Southern Ukraine. Agriculture 11(8), DOI: 10.3390/agriculture11080695.
BMWi 2010. Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Technologie (BMWi) 2010. Energiekonzept für eine umweltschonende, zuverlässige und bezahlbare Energieversorgung. Berlin: Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Technologie.
Cader et al. 2021 – Cader, J., Olczak, P. and Koneczna, R. 2021. Regional dependencies of interest in the “My Electricity” photovoltaic subsidy program in Poland. Polityka Energetyczna – Energy Policy Journal 24(2), pp. 97–116, DOI: 10.33223/epj/133473.
Climate Change Act 2008. [Online] https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2008/27/contents [Accessed: 2021-09-05].
Climate Change Laws of the World 2016. 13th Five-Year Plan. [Online] https://www.climate-laws.org/geographies/china/policies/13th-five-year-plan [Accessed: 2021-09-05].
Edie Newsroom 1999. GERMANY: Shell opens solar cell factory in Europe’s ‘Solar Valley’. [Online] https://www.edie.net/news/0/GERMANY-Shell-opens-solar-cell-factory-in-Europes-Solar-Valley/1977 [Accessed: 2021-09-05].
EISA 2007. Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007. [Online] https://www.govinfo.gov/content/ pkg/BILLS-110hr6enr/pdf/BILLS-110hr6enr.pdf [Accessed: 2021-09-05].
Energy Act 2004. UK Public General Acts. [Online] https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2004/20/contents [Accessed: 2021-09-05].
Energy Act 2008. UK Public General Acts. [Online] https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2008/32/contents [Accessed: 2021-09-05].
Energy Act 2010. [Online] https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2010/27/pdfs/ukpga_20100027_en.pdf [Accessed: 2021-09-05].
Energy Act 2013. [Online] https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2013/32/pdfs/ukpga_20130032_en.pdf [Accessed: 2021-09-05].
Energy Act 2016. UK Public General Acts. [Online] https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2016/20/contents/enacted [Accessed: 2021-09-05].
EPAct 2005. Energy Policy Act of 2005, Public Law 109-58. [Online] https://www.congress.gov/109/ plaws/publ58/PLAW-109publ58.pdf [Accessed: 2021-09-05].
Erneuerbare-Energien-Gesetz 2000. [Online] https://www.clearingstelle-eeg-kwkg.de/eeg2000 [Accessed: 2021-09-05].
Erneuerbare-Energien-Gesetz 2004. [Online] https://www.clearingstelle-eeg-kwkg.de/eeg2004 [Accessed: 2021-09-05].
Erneuerbare-Energien-Gesetz 2009. [Online] https://www.clearingstelle-eeg-kwkg.de/eeg2009 [Accessed: 2021-09-05].
Erneuerbare-Energien-Gesetz 2014. Retrieved from https://www.clearingstelle-eeg-kwkg.de/eeg2014 [Accessed: 2021-09-05].
Gestore Rete Trasmissione Nazionale 2002. Provisional Data on Operation of the Italian Power System. [Online] http://collaudo.download.terna.it/terna/0000/0124/06.PDF [Accessed: 2021-09-05].
GSE 2014. Incentivazionedellaproduzione di energiaelettrica da impianti a fontirinnovabilidiversidai fotovoltaici. [Online] https://www.gse.it [Accessed: 2021-09-05].
GSE 2021. Energy consumption. [Online] https://www.gse.it/ [Accessed: 2021-09-05].
IRENA 2015. Renewable Energy Prospects: United States of America. [Online] https://www.irena.org/publications/2015/Jan/Renewable-Energy-Prospects-United-States-of-America [Accessed: 2021-09-05].
IRENA 2020. Country Rankings. [Online] https://www.irena.org/Statistics/View-Data-by-Topic/Capacity-and-Generation/Country-Rankings [Accessed: 2021-09-05].
Kholiavko et al. 2020 – Kholiavko, N., Popova, L., Marych, M., Hanzhurenko, I., Koliadenko, S. and Nitsenko, V. 2020. Comprehensive methodological approach to estimating the research component influence on the information economy development. Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu 4(178), pp. 192–199, DOI: 10.33271/nvngu/2020-4/192.
Kohler, T. 2021. Renewable Energies marketing models Poland. [Online] https://www.roedl.com/renewable-energy-consulting/markets/countries/marketing-models-poland [Accessed: 2021-09-05].
Koval et al. 2021 – Koval, V., Hrymalyuk, A., Kulish, A., Kontseva, V., Boiko, N. and Nesenenko, P. 2021. Economic policy of industrial development and investment approach to the analysis of the national economy. Estudios De Economia Aplicada 39(6), DOI: 10.25115/eea.v39i6.5263.
Koval et al. 2019 – Koval, V., Sribna, Y. and Gaska, K. 2019. Energy cooperation Ukraine-Poland to strengthen energy security. E3S Web Conference 132, 01009, DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/201913201009.
Labunska et al. 2017 – Labunska, Sv., Petrova, M. and Prokopishyna, O. 2017. Asset and cost management for innovation activity. Economic Annals – XXI 165(5–6), pp. 13–18, DOI: 10.21003/ea.V165-03.
Ministry of Economic Development of Italy 2018. Proposta di piano nazionaleintegrato per l’energia e il clima. [Online] https://www.mise.gov.it/images/stories/documenti/Proposta_di_Piano_Nazionale_Integrato_ per_Energia_e_il_Clima_Italiano.pdf [Accessed: 2021-09-05] (in Italian).
MOFCOM 2013. Renewable Energy Law of the People’s Republic of China. [Online] http://english.mofcom.gov.cn/article/policyrelease/Businessregulations/201312/20131200432160.shtml [Accessed: 2021-09-05].
National Development and Reform Comission 2019. [Online] https://web.archive.org/web/20190511191431/http://www.ndrc.gov.cn/gzdt/201509/t20150921_751695.html [Accessed: 2021-09-05].
National Energy Administration 2021. [Online] http://english.www.gov.cn/state_council/2014/10/01/content_ 281474991089761.htm [Accessed: 2021-09-05].
Olczak at al. 2020 – Olczak, P., Matuszewska, D. and Kryzia, D. 2020. “Mój Prąd” as an example of the photovoltaic one off grant program in Poland. Polityka Energetyczna – Energy Policy Journal 23(2), pp. 123–138, DOI: 10.33223/epj/122482.
Olczak at al. 2021a – Olczak, P., Kryzia, D., Matuszewska, D. and Kuta, M. 2021a. “My Electricity” Program Effectiveness Supporting the Development of PV Installation in Poland. Energies 14(1), 231, DOI: 10.3390/en14010231.
Olczak et al. 2021b – Olczak, P., Przemysław, J., Kryzia, D., Matuszewska, D., Fyk, M. and Dyczko, A. 2021b. Analyses of duck curve phenomena potential in polish PV prosumer households’ installations. Energy Reports 7, November 2021, pp. 4609–4622, DOI: 10.1016/j.egyr.2021.07.038.
Piper et al. 2019 – Piper, S., Cotting, A., Wilson, A., O’Reilly, J., Hlinka, M., Lehmann, J. and Hering, G. 2019. The 2020 US renewable energy outlook. [Online] https://www.spglobal.com/marketintelligence/en/news-insights/research/the-2020-us-renewable-energy-outlook [Accessed: 2021-09-05].
Pukala, R. and Petrova, M. 2019. Application of the AHP method to select an optimal source of financing innovation in the mining sector. E3S Web of Conferences 105, DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/201910504034.
REN21 2018. A comprehensive annual overview of the state of renewable energy. [Online] https://www.ren21.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Full-Report-2018.pdf [Accessed: 2021-09-05].
Shmygol et al. 2020 – Shmygol, N., Schiavone, F., Trokhymets, O., Pawliszczy, D., Koval, V., Zavgorodniy, R. and Vorfolomeiev, A. 2020. Model for assessing and implementing resource-efficient strategy of industry. CEUR Workshop Proceedings 2713, pp. 277–294.
Rogalski, T. 2018. A guide to support for Polish renewable energy sources following the 2018 amendments. [Online] https://www.nortonrosefulbright.com/de-de/wissen/publications/5932a770/a-guide-to-support -for-polish-renewable-energy-sources-following-the-2018-amendments [Accessed: 2021-09-05].
Tsimoshynska et al. 2021 – Tsimoshynska, O., Koval, M., Kryshtal, H., Filipishyna, L., Arsawan, W.E. and Koval, V. 2021. Investing in road construction infrastructure projects under public-private partnership in the form of concession. Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu 2, pp. 184–192, DOI: 10.33271/nvngu/2021-2/184.
Yankovyi et al. 2021 – Yankovyi, O., Koval, V., Lazorenko, L., Poberezhets, O., Novikova, M. and Gonchar, V. 2021. Modeling Sustainable Economic Development Using Production Functions. Estudios de Economia Aplicada 39(5), DOI: 10.25115/eea.v39i5.5090.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Viktor Koval
1
ORCID: ORCID
Yevheniia Sribna
2
ORCID: ORCID
Sylwester Kaczmarzewski
3
ORCID: ORCID
Alla Shapovalova
4
Viktor Stupnytskyi
5

  1. National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Ukraine
  2. National University of Water and Environmental Engineering, Ukraine
  3. Mineral and Energy Economy Research Institute Polish Akademy of Sciences, Kraków, Poland
  4. V.I. Vernadsky Taurida National University, Ukraine
  5. Dubno Branch Higher Education Institution «Open International University of Human Development «Ukraine», Ukraine
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The article aims to explore the determinants of the process of attracting financial resources for implementing renewable (alternative) energy development projects in Ukraine. The authors review and systematize the sources of funding and innovative financial instruments available for developing renewable energy sources (RES) in developing countries. Based on this, a pool of financial resources/RES development tools available for investment in Ukraine has been formed. It is proposed to build a model of the optimal structure of sources of financing renewable energy development projects. The research is founded on the forecasted schedule for increasing the share of RES in the national energy balance of Ukraine up until 2035. The limitations are connected with the lack of factual data on sources/instruments of funding in the field of RES. The model enables the prediction of the amount of funds that need to be allocated to finance renewable energy development projects, while optimizing the structure of their potential funding. The originality/value of the article lies firstly in the innovative application of the optimization model for forecasting the aggregate structure of funding sources in the energy sector; secondly, in the possibility of testing the model in practice and monitoring RES development projects in the territorial communities of the Carpathian region of Ukraine on the basis of the project-educational center for the development of innovations and investments in the region; thirdly, the proposed model can be used in the activities of state authorities and institutions of Ukraine for forming the policy of supporting alternative energy development projects.
Go to article

Bibliography


AC 2021. “Agents of Change” of Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University. [Online] http://agen-tyzmin.pnu.edu.ua/ua [Accessed: 2021-08-25].
Bilyavs`ky`j, M. 2020. Guidelines for the development of alternative energy in Ukraine until 2030 (Орієнтири розвитку альтернативної енергетики України до 2030 р.). The Razumkov Centre [Online] https://razumkov.org.ua/statti/oriientyry-rozvytku-alternatyvnoi-energetyky-ukrainy-do-2030r#a12 [Accessed: 2021-08-25] (in Ukrainian).
Bjarne, S. 2018. The importance of project finance for renewable energy projects Energy Economics. Volume 69, January 2018, рр. 280–294, DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2017.11.006.
CMU 2017. On approval of the Energy Strategy of Ukraine for the period up to 2035 “Security, en- ergy efficiency, competitiveness” (Про схвалення Енергетичної стратегії України на період до 2035 року “Безпека, енергоефективність, конкурентоспроможність”). [Online] https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/605-2017-%D1%80?lang=uk#Text [Accessed: 2021-06-25] (in Ukrainian).
DEPC 2009. Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources and amending and subsequently repealing Directives 2001/77/EC and 2003/30/EC. [Online] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX%3A32009L0028 [Accessed: 2021-06-22].
FMEAE 2015. The Energy Transition in Buildings Platform. Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy. [Online] https://www.bmwi.de/Redaktion/EN/Textsammlungen/Energy/energy-transition-buildings-platform.html?cms_artId=1328378 [Accessed: 2021-08-25].
GF 2020. Crowdfunding for development and climate finance. Globalfields. [Online] https://www.global- fields.co.uk/insights/crowdfunding-for-development-and-climate-finance [Accessed: 2021-08-25].
Goncharuk et al. 2021 – Goncharuk, A.G., Hromovenko, K., Pahlevanzade, A. and Hrinchenko, Y. 2021. Energy poverty leap during the pandemic: the case of Ukraine. Polityka Energetyczna – Energy Policy Journal 24(2), pp. 5–18, DOI: 10.33223/epj/136521.
IRENA 2009. Statute of the International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA). International Renewa- ble Energy Agency. [Online] https://irena.org/-/media/Files/IRENA/Agency/About-IRENA/Statute/IRENA_FC_Statute_signed_in_Bonn_26_01_2009_incl_declaration_on_further_authentic_versions. ashx?la=en&hash=FAB3B5AE51B8082B04A7BBB5BDE978065EF67D96&hash=FAB3B5AE51B-8082B04A7BBB5BDE978065EF67D96 [Accessed: 2021-06-21].
IRENA 2021. Renewable Power Generation Costs in 2020. International Renewable Energy Agency. [Online] https://www.irena.org/publications/2021/Jun/Renewable-Power-Costs-in-2020 [Accessed: 2021-06-21].
KPMG 2019. Renewable energy sources in Ukraine (Відновлювані джерела енергії в Україні). KPMG Ukraine. [Online] https://home.kpmg/content/dam/kpmg/ua/pdf/2019/09/Renewables-Report_2019-ua.pdf [Accessed: 2021-08-25] (in Ukrainian).
MDCTU 2021. Ministry of Development of Communities and Territories of Ukraine. [Online] https://www.minregion.gov.ua/ [Accessed: 2021-08-29].
MEcU 2021. Ministry of Economy of Ukraine. [Online] h ttps://me.gov.ua/old/?lang=en-GB [Accessed: 2021-08-29].
MEnU 2021. Ministry of Energy of Ukraine. [Online] http://mpe.kmu.gov.ua [Accessed: 2021-08-29].
Nigam et al. 2018 – Nigam, N., Mbarek, S. and Benetti, C. 2018. Crowdfunding to finance eco-innovation: case studies from leading renewable energy platforms. Journal of Innovation Economics & Management 26(2), pp. 195–219. [Online] https://www.cairn.info/revue-journal-of-innovation-economics-2018-2-page-195.htm [Accessed: 2021-08-25].
NRSDGU 2017. National Report “Sustainable Development Goals: Ukraine” (Національна доповідь «Цілі Сталого Розвитку: Україна»). [Online] https://ukraine.un.org/uk/49413-2017-nacionalna-do-povid-cili-stalogo-rozvitku-ukraina [Accessed: 2021-04-25] (in Ukrainian).
Nyenno et al. 2020 – Nyenno, I., Selivanova, N., Korolenko, N. and Truba, V. 2020. The energy policy risk management system model: theories and practices. Polityka Energetyczna – Energy Policy Journal 23(4), pp. 33–48, DOI: 10.33223/epj/127699.
RE 2020. Renewable Energy 2020: With What Ukrainians will Start Next Year. [Online] https://ua-energy.org/uk/posts/vidnovliuvana-enerhetyka-2020-z-chym-ukraintsi-uviidut-u-nastupnyi-rik [Accessed: 2021-08-25].
SAEE 2021. State support for energy saving – the program of “warm loans” State Agency for Energy Efficiency and Energy Saving of Ukraine. [Online] https://saee.gov.ua/uk/consumers/tepli-kredyty [Accessed: 2021-08-25].
SFRD 2021. State Fund for Regional Development. [Online] https://new.dfrr.minregion.gov.ua/pro-dfrr [Accessed: 2021-08-29].
SG 2019. Pioneering Poland pumps up environmental credentials and considers local green bonds. Societe Generale. [Online] https://wholesale.banking.societegenerale.com/en/insights/clients-successes/clients-successes-details/news/pioneering-poland-pumps-environmental-credentials-and-considers-local-green-bonds/ [Accessed: 2021-08-25].
SSSU 2021. Energy consumption from renewable sources for 2007–2020. State Statistics Service of Ukraine. [Online] http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/ [Accessed: 2021-06-25].
UE 2021. Without the “green” tariff: how renewable power generation is looking for new business models [Online] https://ua-energy.org/en/posts/30-07-2021-a2ce02d8-7437-4045-aefc-58557371cba8 [Accessed: 2021-08-25].
UN 2021. 17 Goals to Transform Our World. United Nations. [Online] https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals/ [Accessed: 2021-08-01].
UNCHE 1972. United Nations Conference on the Human Environment. [Online] https://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/CONF.48/14/REV.1 [Accessed: 2021-04-25].
UNDPU 2015. United Nations Development Program (UNDP) in Ukraine. [Online] https://www.ua.undp.org/content/ukraine/uk/home/sustainable-development-goals.html [Accessed: 2021-04-25].
USELF 2018. USELF – Financing of Alternative Energy by the EBRD. [Online] https://eenergy.com.ua/korysni-porady/uself-finansuvannya-alternatyvnoyi-energetyky/ [Accessed: 2021-06-25].
Zhyber, T. and Solopenko, T. 2020. The implementation of Ukraine’s energy policy using budget programs. Polityka Energetyczna – Energy Policy Journal 23(4), pp. 91–104, DOI: 10.33223/epj/127300.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Svitlana O. Kropelnytska
1
ORCID: ORCID
Tetiana V. Mayorova
2
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Department of Finance ; Project and Educational Centre „Agents of Changes” PNU, Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University, Ukraine
  2. Department of Corporate Finance and Controlling, Vadym Hetman Kyiv National Economic University, Ukraine

This page uses 'cookies'. Learn more