Search results

Filters

  • Journals
  • Authors
  • Keywords
  • Date
  • Type

Search results

Number of results: 8
items per page: 25 50 75
Sort by:
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The paper emphasizes the contemporary relevance of civility, understood as a respectful way of treating the other and recognition of people’s differences and sensibilities. It outlines the sociological importance of civility as being connected with its role as both a normative guidance orienting us towards prescriptive ideals and as an empirical concept with important social impact on identities and actions. The paper examines Adam Smith’s theory which roots civility in a commercial society, analyses Elias’s (1994) history of civility as the folding of the logic of the civilizing process, and it debates theories linking the idea of civility to civil society. In conclusion, emphases are put on the importance of civility, seen as the act of respectful engaging with people across deep divisions, for the quality of democracy.
Go to article

Bibliography

  1. Arendt, Hannah. 1958. The Human Condition. University of Chicago Press.
  2. Bauman, Zygmunt. 2000. Am I my brother’s keeper? European Journal of Social Work, 3, 1: 5-11.
  3. Baumgarten, Britta, Dieter Gosewinkel, Dieter Rucht. 2011. Civility: introductory notes on the history and systematic analysis of a concept. European Review of History, 18, 3: 289-312.
  4. Berger, Peter. 1998. Conclusion: general observations on normative conflicts and mediation. In: The Limits of Social Cohesion, ed., P.L. Berger. Boulder: Westview Press, 352-72.
  5. Boyd, Robert. 2006. The value of civility? Urban Studies, 43, 5-6: 863-878.
  6. Bryant, Christopher G.A. 1992. Sociology without philosophy? The case of Giddens’s structuration theory. Sociological Theory, 10, 2: 137-149.
  7. Campbell, John L., John A. Hall. 2022. What Capitalism Needs: Forgotten Lessons of Great Economists. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  8. Chambers, Simone, Jeffrey Kopstein. 2001. Bad civil society. Political Theory, 29, 6: 837-865.
  9. Cohen, John, Andrew Arato. 1992. Civil Society. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
  10. Elias, Norbert. 1996. The Germans. Power Struggles and the Development of Habitus in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Century. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  11. Elias, Norbert. 1994. The Civilizing Process. Trans. Edmund Jephcott. Oxford: Blackwell.
  12. Elias, Norbert. 1982. State Formation and Civilization. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
  13. Elias, Norbert. 1978. On the transformation of aggressiveness. Theory and Society, 5, 2: 229-242.
  14. Ferguson, Adam. [1759]1995. On Essay on the History of Civil Society. Ed. by F. Oz-Salzberger. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  15. Fleischacker, Samuel. 2022. Being Me Being You: Adam Smith and Empathy. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
  16. Goldfarb, Jeffrey. 1998. Civility and Subversion. The Intellectual in Democratic Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  17. Goldfarb, Jeffrey. 1992. After the Fall: The Pursuit of Democracy in Central Europe. New York: Basic Books.
  18. Goody, Jack. 2006. The Theft of History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  19. Gornicka, Barbara, Stephen Mennell. 2021. Processes and figurational (or process) sociology. In: P. Kivisto, ed. Cambridge Handbook of Social Theory. Cambridge University Press, vol. 1, 272-291.
  20. Hall, John A. 2013. The Importance of Being Civil. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  21. Hall, John A., Frank Trentmann. 2005. Contests over civil society. In : J.A. Hall, F. Trentmann, eds. Civil Society: A Reader in History, Theory and Global Politics. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 1-25.
  22. Hansen, Kasper. 1997. Rediscovering the social. In : J. Weintraub,K. Kumar, eds. Public and Private in Thought and Practice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 268-302. 
  23. Harrel, Cyd. 2020. A Civic Technologist’s Practice Guide. San Francisco: Seven Five Books.
  24. Heilbron, Johan. 2022. The emergence of social theory. In: P. Kivisto, ed. Cambridge Handbook of Social Theory. Cambridge University Press, vol.1, 1-24.
  25. Keane, John. 1988. Civil Society and the State. London: Verso.
  26. Koselleck, Reinhart. 2004. Futures Past: On the Semantics of Historical Time. Trans. K. Tribe. New York: Columbia University Press.
  27. Kumar, Krishan. 1993. Civil Society: An Inquiry into the usefulness of an historical term. British Journal of Sociology, 44: 375-96.
  28. Melucci, Alberto. 1989. Nomads of the Present. Social Movement and Individual Needs in Contemporary Society. London: Century Hutchinson.
  29. Mennell, Stephan. 2001. The other side of the coin. In : T. Salumets, ed. Norbert Elias and Human Independencies. Montréal: McGill-Queens’s University Press, 32-49.
  30. Montesquieu, Charles-Louis de Secondat. [1748]1988. The Spirit of the Laws. A. Cohler et al. eds. Cambridge University Press.
  31. Nehring, Holger. 2011. Civility in history: some observations on th history of the concept. European Review of History, 18, 3: 313-333.
  32. Nussbaum, Martha. 2001. Anger and Forgiveness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  33. Putnam, Robert T. 1995. Tuning in, tuning out. Political Science and Politics, 28: 664-683.
  34. Robin, Corey. 2022. Empathy & the economy. New York Review of Books, December 8: 43-46.
  35. Rucht, Dieter. 2011. Civil Society and civility. European Review of History, 18, 3: 387-407.
  36. Seligman, Adam, 1992. The Idea of Civil Society. New York: Free Press.
  37. Sennett, Richard. 2012. Together the rituals, pleasures and politics of co-operation. London: Allen Lane.
  38. Shapin, Steven. 1994. A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in SeventeenthCentury England. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
  39. Shils, Edward. 1992. The virtue of civil society. Government and Opposition, 26: 3-20.
  40. Sloss, David L. 2022. Tyrants on Twitter: Protecting Democracies from Information Warfare. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  41. Smith, Adam. [1776]1999. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of Wealth of Nations. intro A. Skinner: London: Penguin Books.
  42. Smith, Adam. [1759]1982. The Theory of Moral Sentiments. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund Press.
  43. Susen, Simon. 2021. Civil Society. In: P. Kivisto, ed.) Cambridge Handbook of Social Theory. Cambridge University Press, vol. 2, 379-406.
  44. Swann, Abram de. 2001. Dyscivilization, mass extermination, and the state. Theory, Culture and Society, 12, 2: 25-39.
  45. Taylor, Charles. 2018. A Secular Age. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  46. Thiranagama, Sharika, Tobias Kelly, Carlos Forment. 2018. Introduction: Whose civility? Anthropological Theory, 18, 2-3: 153-174. 
  47. Thomas, Keith. 2018. In Pursuit of Civility Manners and Civilization in Early Modern England. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  48. Tocqueville, Alexis de. [1856]1969. Democracy in America. Trans. S. Gillbert. London: Fontana.
  49. Touraine, Alain, Francois Dubet, Michel Wieviorka, Jan Strzelecki. 1983. Solidarity: Poland 1980-81. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  50. Walzer, Michal. 1992. The civil society argument. In: C. Mouffe, ed.. Dimensions of Radical Democracy: Pluralism, Citizenship, Community. New York: Verso, 89-107.
  51. Wirth, Morand. 2022. Saint Francis de Sales. Roma: Centro Studi de Bosco.
  52. Zuboff, Shoshana. 2019. The Age of Surveillance Capitalism. The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. New York: Public Affairs.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Barbara Misztal
1

  1. University of Leicester
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The paper analyses and develops John Rawls’s defence of his theory of justice against the conservative objection that egalitarian conceptions of social justice are an expression of envy. The defence involves the following claims: (1) The content of the difference principle does not match an essential property of envy. (2) The parties in the original position are not motivated by envy. (3) None of the conditions imposed on the original position arise from envy. Next, it is argued that there are reasons to suppose that the parties in the original position would choose a more egalitarian principle of distributive justice than the difference principle. These reasons are grounded in the claim that self respect is the most important primary good and in the fact that the level of economic inequalities is negatively correlated with self respect among the least advantaged members of society. It is shown that even though the content of the more egalitarian principle matches the essential property of envy, the conservative objection remains unjustified.
Go to article

Bibliography

Crocker J., Blanton H. (1999), Social Inequality and Self‑Esteem: The Moderating Effects of Social Comparison, Legitimacy, and Contingencies of Self‑Esteem, w: T.R. Tyler, R.M. Kramer, O.P. John (red.), The Psychology of the Social Self, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, s. 171–191.
Krauss M.W., Park J.W. (2014), The Undervalued Self: Social Class and Self-‑Evaluation, „Frontiers of Psychology” 5, s. 1–9.
Nozick R. (2010), Anarchia, państwo, utopia, przeł. P. Maciejko, M. Szczubiałka, Warszawa: Fundacja Aletheia.
Rawls J. (2009), Teoria sprawiedliwości. Wydanie nowe, przeł. M. Panufnik, J. Pasek, A. Romaniuk, przekład przejrzał i uzupełnił S. Szymański, Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Schoeck H. (1969), Envy: A Theory of Social Behavior, London: Secker and Warburg.
Tesser A. (1988), Toward a Self‑Evaluation Maintenance Model of Social Behavior, „Advances in Experimental Social Psychology” 21, s. 181–227.
Wilkinson R., Pickett K. (2011), The Spirit Level: Why Greater Equality Makes Societies Stronger, New York: Bloomsbury Publishing.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Adrian Kuźniar
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

John Rawls claims that self‑respect is arguably the most important of social primary goods. It has two aspects: the sense of self‑worth and confidence in one’s abilities. Both attitudes presuppose formation and completion of a reasonable life plan. Realization of a life plan is a stepping stone to personal achievement and happiness. Self‑respect implies acceptance of two rules of justice. Those rules presuppose an equal distribution of the social prerequisites for the growth of self‑respect. Self‑respect supports the sense of justice as well as political and social stability. A well‑ordered society makes it possible for everyone to achieve self‑respect through realization of an ambitious life plan, in accordance with Aristotelian conception of virtue. Virtue is also a prerequisite of happiness. In a poorly‑ordered society achievement of happiness is thwarted by socio‑economic inequality and artificial restrictions on selection of the life plans.
Go to article

Bibliography

Alexy R. (1987), John Rawls’ Theorie der Grundfreiheiten, w: W. Hinsch (red.), Zur Idee des politischen Liberalismus. John Rawls in der Diskussion, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Chmielewski A. (2001), Społeczeństwo otwarte czy wspólnota?, Wrocław: Oficyna Wydawnicza Arboretum.
Fukuyama F. (2004), Koniec człowieka, przeł. B. Pietrzyk, Kraków: Znak.
Gawkowska A. (2004), Biorąc wspólnotę poważnie. Komunitariańskie krytyki liberalizmu, Warszawa: Wydawnictwo IFiS PAN.
Kukathas Ch., Pettit Ph. (1998), Rawls: „A Theory of Justice” and its Critics, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Leschke M. (1995), Die Beiträge von John Rawls und James Buchanan zum Aufbau einer demokratischen Grundordnung, w: I. Pies, M. Leschke (red.), John Rawls’ politischer Liberalismus, Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).
Prostak R. (2004), Rzecz o sprawiedliwości. Komunitarystyczna krytyka współczesnego liberalizmu amerykańskiego, Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskie-go.
Rau Z. (2008), Zapomniana wolność. W poszukiwaniu historycznych podstaw liberalizmu, Warszawa: Scholar.
Rawls J. (1994), Teoria sprawiedliwości, przeł. M. Panufnik, J. Pasek, A. Romaniuk, Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Rawls J. (1998), Liberalizm polityczny, przeł. A. Romaniuk, Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Zink J.R. (2011), Reconsidering the Role of Self‑Respect in Rawls’s „A Theory of Justice”, „The Journal of Politics” 73 (2), s. 331–344.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Barbara Grabowska
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika w Toruniu, Instytut Filozofii, ul. Fosa Staromiejska 1a, 87‑100 Toruń
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The stability and positivity of linear positive Markovian jump systems with respect to part of the variables is considered. The methodologies of stability of positive systems with known transition probabilities based on common linear copositive Lyapunov function and stability of linear systems with respect to part of the variables are combined to find sufficient conditions of the stochastic stability and positivity of Markovian jump systems with respect to part of the variables. The results are extended for a class of nonlinear positive Markovian jump systems with respect to part of the variables. An example is given to illustrate the obtained results.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

L. Socha
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

We introduce the Sobolev-type multi-term μ-fractional evolution with generalized fractional orders with respect to another function. We make some applications of the generalized Laplace transform. In the sequel, we propose a novel type of Mittag-Leffler function generated by noncommutative linear bounded operators with respect to the given function and give a few of its properties. We look for the mild solution formula of the Sobolev-type evolution equation by building on the aforementioned Mittag-Leffler-type function with the aid of two different approaches. We share new special cases of the obtained findings.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Mustafa Aydin
1
ORCID: ORCID
Nazim Mahmudov
2 3
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Department of Medical Services and Techniques, Muradiye Vocational School, Van Yuzuncu Yil University, Tu¸sba 65080 Van, Turkey
  2. Department of Mathematics, Eastern Mediterranean University, Famagusta 99628 T.R. North Cyprus, Turkey
  3. Research Center of Econophysics, Azerbaijan State University of Economics (UNEC), Istiqlaliyyat Str. 6, Baku 1001, Azerbaijan
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The presented article points to the issues of self-consciousness and the possibilities of its development. It defines in this context also concepts of self-evaluation, self-respect, self-appreciation, self-recognition, self-confidence and self-realization. In the text, it is emphasized that self-consciousness is related to the awareness of one´s own psychophysical and social identity - I myself and the world and my place in it. An important means for the development of the healthy self-consciousness is also praise. In the conclusion of the article, attention is paid to the psycho-hygiene as prevention of the failure.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Alena Vališová

This page uses 'cookies'. Learn more