Search results

Filters

  • Journals
  • Keywords
  • Date

Search results

Number of results: 9
items per page: 25 50 75
Sort by:
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Latem 2022 roku obserwowaliśmy katastrofę ekologiczną w Odrze. Zapracował na nią człowiek, lecz najgorsze konsekwencje dotknęły ekosystem rzeki.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Łukasz Sługocki
1
Robert Czerniawski
1

  1. Uniwersytet Szczeciński
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Czyli błękitno-zielone aspekty adaptacji miast do zmian klimatu.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Iwona Wagner
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Jak wody rzek wpływają na jakość wód w Bałtyku? Dlaczego związki chemiczne wprowadzane przez rolnictwo są bardzo niebezpieczne dla wód morskich i jaką przyszłość ma nasze morze?

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Jan Marcin Węsławski
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

O tym, jak fascynującym elementem przyrody są rzeki, a także o nowatorskim podejściu organizacji kongresu IAHR opowiada prof. Paweł M. Rowiński, wiceprezes PAN i badacz z Instytutu Geofizyki PAN.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Paweł M. Rowiński
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The Bulletin of the Polish Academy of Sciences: Technical Sciences (Bull.Pol. Ac.: Tech.) is published bimonthly by the Division IV Engineering Sciences of the Polish Academy of Sciences, since the beginning of the existence of the PAS in 1952. The journal is peer‐reviewed and is published both in printed and electronic form. It is established for the publication of original high quality papers from multidisciplinary Engineering sciences with the following topics preferred: Artificial and Computational Intelligence, Biomedical Engineering and Biotechnology, Civil Engineering, Control, Informatics and Robotics, Electronics, Telecommunication and Optoelectronics, Mechanical and Aeronautical Engineering, Thermodynamics, Material Science and Nanotechnology, Power Systems and Power Electronics.

Journal Metrics: JCR Impact Factor 2018: 1.361, 5 Year Impact Factor: 1.323, SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.319, Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 1.005, CiteScore 2017: 1.27, The Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education 2017: 25 points.

Abbreviations/Acronym: Journal citation: Bull. Pol. Ac.: Tech., ISO: Bull. Pol. Acad. Sci.-Tech. Sci., JCR Abbrev: B POL ACAD SCI-TECH Acronym in the Editorial System: BPASTS.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Tomasz Falkowski
ORCID: ORCID
Ewa Falkowska
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Artykuł podejmuje problematykę solidarności ekologicznej jako przejawu wartości relacyjnej z rzekami. Obecne w literaturze rozważania teoretyczne nie zostały dotąd poparte wynikami badań empirycznych. Wkładem pracy w rozwój socjologii środowiska jest zatem empiryczne zbadanie przejawów solidarności ekologicznej jako wartości relacyjnej oraz weryfikacja założeń teoretycznych na jej temat, a także wytyczenie kierunków dalszej operacjonalizacji tego pojęcia w badaniach społecznych. Podstawą osiągnięcia wskazanego celu było przeprowadzenie eksploracyjnych wywiadów jakościowych z osobami zaangażowanymi w działania na rzecz rzek w Polsce. Wyniki badań pokazują, że wskazane w literaturze trzy wymiary solidarności ekologicznej są współzależne, a wspólnie mogą motywować do działania na rzecz rzek. Zrozumienie współczesnego charakteru relacji człowieka z rzekami oraz czynników kształtujących te relacje wydaje się kluczowe dla projektowania adekwatnych rozwiązań problemów dotykających ekosystemy rzeczne w Polsce.
Go to article

Bibliography

  1. Anderson, Elisabeth P., Sue Jackson, Rebecca E. Tharme i in. 2019. Understanding rivers and their social relations: A critical step to advance environmental water management. WIREs Water, 6: e1381. DOI: 10.1002/wat2.1381.
  2. Arias-Arévalo, Paola, Berta Martin-López, Erik Gómez-Baggethun. 2017. Exploring intrinsic, instrumental, and relational values for sustainable management of social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 22, 4: 43. DOI: 10.5751/ES-09812220443.
  3. Arias-Arévalo, Paola, Erik Gómez-Baggethun, Berta Martin-López, Mario Pérez-Rincón. 2018. Widening the Evaluative Space for Ecosystem Services: A Taxonomy of Plural Values and Valuation Methods. Environmental Values, 27, 1: 29-53. DOI: 10.3197/096327118X15144698637513. 
  4. Bennett, Nathan J., Tara S. Whitty i in. 2018. Environmental Stewardship: A Conceptual Review and Analytical Framework. Environmental Management, 61, 1-2: 597-614. DOI: 10.1007/s00267-017-0993-2.
  5. Boelens, Rutgerd, Arturo Escobar i in. 2023. Riverhood: political ecologies of socionature commoning and translocal struggles for water justice. The Journal of PeasantStudies, 50, 3: 1125-1156. DOI: 10.1080/03066150.2022.2120810.
  6. Bińczyk, Ewa. 2022. Planetarna myśl społeczna oraz wystudzanie wzrostu. Studia Socjologiczne, 3, 246: 9-27. DOI: 10.24425/sts.2022.142632.
  7. Chan, Kai M.A., Patricia Balvanera i in. 2016. Why protect nature? Rethinking values and the environment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), 113: 1462-1465. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1525002113.
  8. Chan, Kai M.A, Rachelle K. Gould, Unai Pascual. 2018. Relational values: what are they, and what’s the fuss about?. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 35: A1-A7. DOI: 10.1016/j.cosust.2018.11.003.
  9. Cockburn, Jessica, Georgina Cundill i in. 2019. Collaborative stewardship in multifunctional landscapes: toward relational, pluralistic approaches. Ecology and Society, 24 4: 32. DOI: 10.5751/ES-11085-240432.
  10. De Vos, Alta, Bezerra Joana C., Roux Dirk. 2018. Relational values about nature in protected area research. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 35, 8999. DOI: 10.1016/j.cosust.2018.10.018.
  11. Díaz, Sandra, Sebsebe Demissew i in. 2015. The IPBES conceptual framework - connecting nature and people. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 14: 1-16. DOI: 10.1016/j.cosust.2014.11.002.
  12. Díaz, Sandra, Unai Pascual i in. 2018. Assessing nature’s contributions to people. Recognizing culture, and diverse sources of knowledge, can improve assessments. American Association for the Advancement of Science, 359, 6373: 270-272. DOI: 10.1126/science.aap8826.
  13. Flint, Courtney G., Bailey M. Holdaway, Caitlyn S. Rogers. 2023. Human-river relationships depend on human-human relationships: River and watershed organizations in three western US states. River Research and Applications. DOI: 10.1002/rra.4136.
  14. Folke, Carl, Stephen Polasky i in. 2021. Our future in the Anthropocene biosphere. Ambio, 50: 834-869. DOI: 10.1007/s13280-021-01544-8.
  15. Franklin, Adrian. 2017. The more-than-human city. The Sociological Review, 65, 2: 202 - 217. DOI: 10.1111/1467-954X.12396.
  16. Gonzalez-Jiménez, David, Uta Berghöfer i in. 2018. Beyond Measurements: Multiple values of nature and their diverse conceptualization. Technical Report.
  17. Gorczyca, Elżbieta, Joanna Wąs. 2021. Samoistna renaturyzacja rzek i potoków górskich. W: E. Gorczyca, A. Radecki-Pawlik, K. Krzemień, red. Procesy fluwialne a utrzymanie rzek i potoków górskich. Kraków: Instytut Geografii i Gospodarki Przestrzennej UJ, 393-414.
  18. Grubert, Emily. 2018. Relational values in environmental assessment: the social context of environmental impact. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 35, 100-107. DOI: 10.1016/j.cosust.2018.10.020.
  19. Hagen, Eric J., Rachelle K. Gould. 2022. Relational values and empathy are closely connected: A study of residents of Vermont’s Winooski River watershed. Ecology&Society, 27, 3: 19. DOI: 10.5751/ES-13406-270319.
  20. Jager, Nicolas W., Edward Challies i in. 2016. Transforming European Water Governance? Participation and River Basin Management under the EU Water Framework Directive in 13 Member States. Water, 8, 4: 156. DOI: 10.3390/w8040156.
  21. Jennings, Bruce. 2015. Ecological Solidarity. Minding Nature, 8. 1.
  22. Klain, Sarah C., Paige Olmsted, Kai M.A. Chan, Terre Satterfield. 2017. Relational values resonate broadly and differently than intrinsic or instrumental values, or the New Ecological Paradigm. PLoS ONE, 12, 8: e0183962. DOI: 10.1371/journal. pone.0183962.
  23. Kleespies, Matthias W., Paul W. Dierkes. 2020. Exploring the construct of relational values: an empirical approach. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 209. DOI: 10.1111/ soc4.12303.
  24. Kowalczak, Piotr, Piotr Matczak, Lena Slavikova. 2013. Institutional Evolution in Water Management in the Czech Republic and Poland. International Journal of Water Governance, 1, 3-4: 307-322. DOI: 10.7564/13-IJWG8.
  25. Kramm, Matthias. 2020. When a river becomes a person. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 21, 4: 307-319. DOI: 10.1080/19452829.2020.1801610.
  26. Lidskog Rolf, Claire Waterton. 2016. Anthropocene - a cautious welcome from environmental sociology?. Environmental Sociology, 2, 4: 395-406. DOI: 10.1080/23251042.2016.1210841.
  27. Lockie, Stewart. 2017. A better Anthropocene?. Environmental Sociology, 3, 3: 167172. DOI: 10.1080/23251042.2017.1357096.
  28. Manfredo, Michael J., Tara L. Teel, Kimberly L. Henry. 2009. Linking Society and Environment: A Multilevel Model of Shifting Wildlife Value Orientations in the Western United States. Social Science Quarterly, 90: 407-427. DOI: 10.1111/j.15406237.2009.00624.x.
  29. Matczak, Piotr, Jakub Lewandowski i in. 2017. Doing more while remaining the same? Flood risk governance in Poland. Journal of Flood Risk Management, 11, 5. DOI: 10.1111/jfr3.12300.
  30. Mathevet, Raphaël, François Bousquet i in. 2018a. The concept of stewardship in sustainability science and conservation biology. Biological Conservation, 217: 363-370. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2017.10.015.
  31. Mathevet, Raphaël, François Bousquet i in. 2018b. Environmental stewardship and ecological solidarity: rethinking social-ecological interdependency and responsibility. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 31: 605-623. DOI: 10.1007/s10806-018-9749-0.
  32. Moyano-Fernandez, Cristian. 2022. Building ecological solidarity: rewilding practices as an example. Philosophies, 7, 4: 77. DOI: 10.3390/philosophies7040077 .
  33. Mould, Simon A., Kirstie A. Fryirs, Richard Howitt. 2020. The importance of relational values in river management: understanding enablers and barriers for effective participation. Ecology & Society, 25, 2: 17. DOI: 10.5751/ES-11505-250217. 
  34. Muradian, Roldan, Erik Gómez-Baggethun. 2021. Beyond ecosystem services and nature’s contributions: Is it time to leave utilitarian environmentalism behind? Ecological Economics, 185. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107038.
  35. Norgaard, Kari M. 2018. The sociological imagination in a time of climate change. Global and Planetary Change, 163: 171-176. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2017.09.018.
  36. O’Donnell, Erin L., Julia Talbot-Jones. 2018. Creating legal rights for rivers: lessons from Australia, New Zealand, and India. Ecology and Society, 23, 1: 7. DOI: 10.5751/ES-09854-230107.
  37. Pascual, Unai, Patricia Balvanera i in. 2017. Valuing nature’s contributions to people: the IPBES approach Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 26-27: 7-16. DOI: 10.1016/j.cosust.2016.12.006.
  38. Rabinowitz, Peter M., Marguerite Pappaioanou i in. 2018. A planetary vision for one health. BMJ Global Health, 3: e001137. DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-001137.
  39. Sanders, Benjamin, Sim Julius i in. 2018. Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Qual Quant., 52, 4:1893-1907. DOI: 10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8. Epub 2017 Sep 14. PMID: 29937585; PMCID: PMC5993836.
  40. Schultz, Paul W. 2002. Inclusion with Nature: The Psychology of Human-Nature Relations. In: P. Schmuck, W.P. Schultz, eds. Psychology of Sustainable Development. Boston MA: Springer, 61-78. DOI:10.1007/978-1-4615-0995-0_4 .
  41. Stâlhammar, Sanna, Henrik Thorén. 2019. Three perspectives on relational values of nature. Sustainability Science, 14: 1201-1212. DOI: 10.1007/s11625-019-00718-4.
  42. Strzelecka, Marianna, Solène Prince, B. Bynum Boley. 2023. Resident connection to nature and attitudes towards tourism: findings from three different rural nature tourism destinations in Poland. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 31, 3: 664-687. DOI: 10.1080/09669582.2021.1995399.
  43. Thompson, John D., Raphaël Mathevet i in. 2011. Ecological solidarity as a conceptual tool for rethinking ecological and social interdependence in conservation policy for protected areas and their surrounding landscape. Comptes Rendus Biologies, 334, 5-6: 412-419. DOI: 10.1016/j.crvi.2011.02.001.
  44. Tusznio, Joanna, Piotr Matczak i in. 2023. Rising to the Challenge? The State of the Art and Future Research Directions of Polish Environmental Sociology. Polish Sociological Review, 221, 1: 27-46. DOI: 10.26412/psr221.02.
  45. Tusznio, Joanna, Marianna Strzelecka. 2022a. Mourning Rivers: A Way of Negotiating the Future. Blue Papers, 1, 1: 77-87. DOI: 10.58981/bluepapers.2022.1.08.
  46. Tusznio, Joanna, Marianna Strzelecka. 2022b. Place Loss and Re-Negotiating Local Water Heritage: The Case of Sztoła River, Bukowno, Poland. Blue Papers, 1, 1: 129-137. DOI: 10.58981/bluepapers.2022.1.13.
  47. Tsing, Anna. 2013. More-than-Human Sociality. A Call for Critical Description. In: K. Hastrup, eds. Anthropology and Nature (1st ed.). New York: Routledge, 27-42. DOI: 10.4324/9780203795361.
  48. Urry, John. 2009. Sociology and Climate Change. The Sociological Review, 57, 2: 84-100. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-954X.2010.01887.x. 
  49. Wantzen, Karl M., eds. 2023. River Culture. Life as a dance to the rhythm of the waters. Paris: UNESCO Publishing, XIII + 901. DOI: 10.54677/HHMI3947.
  50. West, Simon, L. Jamila Haider i in. 2018. Stewardship, care and relational values. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 35, 30-38. DOI: 10.1016/j.cosust.2018.10.008.
  51. WWF. 2022. Living Planet Report 2022 - Budowanie pozytywnej przyszłości w niepewnym świecie. R.E.A Almond, M. Grooten, et al. eds. WWF, Gland, Szwajcaria. https://www.wwf.pl/sites/default/files/inline-files/WWF%20Poland%20- -%20LPR_2022_PEŁNY_RAPORT_0.pdf. Dostęp: 13. 03. 2023.
  52. WWF. 2020. Zdrowe rzeki - recepta na zmianę klimatu. https://straznicy.wwf.pl/zdro- we-rzeki-recepta-na-zmiane-klimatu/. Dostęp: 13. 03. 2023.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Adela Malak
1
Marianna Strzelecka
1
Joanna Tusznio
2

  1. Uniwersytet Jagielloński
  2. Uniwersytet Jagieloński
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Water names, using the genetic-motivational criteria, can be divided into two superior groups: deappellative and deproprial hydronyms. Among the hydronyms derived from proper names, one can distinguish between the detoponymic and deanthroponymic. The names of flowing waters from anthroponyms are the subject of this article. Preliminary statistical data regarding deanthroponymic potamonyms in the Vistula river basin, their chronology, naming models, word formation bases and geographical distribution are presented. The results of the analysis show that the deanthroponymic potamonyms account for approximately 6.8% of the names of flowing waters of the Vistula river basin, estimated at more than 13,500. They appear sporadically in documents as early as in the 13th century, with only 12% visible until the 16th century, with most of them not being noticed until the 19th and 20th centuries. Such a statistical distribution is typical for the names of the flowing waters of that basin. Deanthroponymic names of rivers represent a variety of naming models, but most often appear as a part of compound names created with the suffix -ów, one-word formations with the same suffix and derivatives from the suf. -ka. They mainly identify objects located between the Soła River and the Dunajec River, especially in the Dunajec River basin, so in mountainous and submontainous areas, as K. Rymut claimed. The basis of such potamonyms are mainly personal names with different motivations, rarely being ethnonyms and first names.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Urszula Bijak
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The Brzanka Mountain Range in the Ciężkowickie Foothills has a dense river network. Unfortunately the contemporary maps contain only the names of some main rivers of the Brzanka Mountain Range. Local communities use the same set of names of rivers as cartographers, while studies in the historical geography of the Brzanka Mountain Range reveal a wealth of local hydronyms that have seemingly been forgotten. The article attempts both to reconstruct a set of hydronyms of the Brzanka Mountain Range and to explain their etymology. It shows that hydronyms change over time and that studies on local hydronyms can help restore the collection of the names of rivers in the Brzanka Mountain Range and provide interesting information related to the past of this region. Moreover, they reveal contemporary unknown facts related to the natural environment and settlement processes in the Middle Ages. A visual summary of the article is a map showing the Brzanka Mountain Range with its river network and associated hydronyms.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Marcin Wojciech Solarz
Rafał Kroczak
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

W artykule został opisany most przez Wisłę o dwóch przęsłach rozpiętości 180 stóp angielskich (54,86 metra), zbudowany w połowie XVII wieku w Toruniu na terytorium Rzeczypospolitej Obojga Narodów. Przedstawiono wyniki badań źródeł numizmatycznych i ikonograficznych, a także planów miasta i źródeł pisanych. Badania wykazały, że konstrukcja toruńskiego mostu była wykonana z drewna w oparciu o koncepcję belki kratownicowej wspornikowej (tzw. belki Gerbera), niestosowanej wcześniej w Europie. Dwa takie przęsła o dużych rozpiętościach były użytkowane w moście pomiędzy 1632 a 1657 r. Analiza porównawcza znanych konstrukcji mostów europejskich z połowy XVII wieku wykazała, że najprawdopodobniej przęsła toruńskie były wówczas najdłuższe.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Marek Mistewicz

This page uses 'cookies'. Learn more