Search results

Filters

  • Journals
  • Keywords
  • Date

Search results

Number of results: 3
items per page: 25 50 75
Sort by:
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Esej odnosi się do trzech biografii Zygmunta Baumana, wydanych ostatnio przez Dariusza Rosiaka, Artura Domosławskiego i Izabelę Wagner. Dwie pierwsze to literatura faktu, a trzecia to popularna praca naukowa. Wszystkie, a zwłaszcza książki Domosławskiego i Wagner, można uznać za udane dzieła i pierwszorzędne przykłady swoich gatunków oraz cenny wkład do historii polskiej socjologii. Choć udane, prace te ujawniają pewien brak krytycznego dystansu wobec twórczości Baumana i jego działalności jako intelektualisty publicznego. Co więcej, ukazują także problematyczne aspekty gatunku, przede wszystkim właściwą mu tendencję do reprodukowania (lub tworzenia) iluzji życia jednostki jako spójnej, linearnej historii. Ich treść stanowi dla autora tekstu przesłankę do namysłu nad specyfiką warsztatu i gatunkową odrębnością pisarstwa naukowego.
Go to article

Bibliography

1. Bauman, Zygmunt. 1960. Klasa – ruch – elita. Studium socjologiczne dziejów angielskiego ruchu robotniczego. Warszawa: PWN.
2. Barnes, Barry. 2000. Understanding Agency. London: Sage.
3. Berger, Bennett M. ed. 1990. Authors of Their Own Lives: Intellectual Autobiographies by Twenty American Sociologists. Berkeley – Los Angeles – Oxford: University of California Press.
4. Bourdieu, Pierre. 1986. L’illusion biographique. Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales, 62–63: 69–72.
5. Domosławski, Artur. 2010. Kapuściński non-fiction. Warszawa: Świat Książki.
6. Domosławski, Artur. 2021. Wygnaniec. 21 scen z życia Zygmunta Baumana. Warszawa: Wielka Litera.
7. Fournier, Marcel. 2007. Émile Durkheim (1858–1917). Paris: Fayard.
8. Gdula, Maciej. 2017. Warsaw School of Marxism. Stan Rzeczy, 2, 13: 197–225.
9. Horowitz, Irving Louis. ed. 1969. Sociological Self-Images: A Collective Portrait. Beverly Hills: Sage.
10. Leckie, Shirley A. 2004. Biography Matters: Why Historians Need Well-Crafted Biographies More than Ever. In: L. E. Ambrosius, ed. Writing Biography: Historians & Their Craft. University of Nebraska Press: Lincoln & London, 1–26.
11. Łyś, Grzegorz. 2020. Dzikie żądze. Bronisław Malinowski nie tylko w terenie. Warszawa: W.A.B.
12. Ní Dhúill, Caitríona. 2020. Metabiography. Reflecting on Biography. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan (publikacja elekroniczna).
13. Ossowski, Stanisław. 2019. Dzienniki. Tom 1: 1905–1939. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.
14. Rosiak, Dariusz. 2019. Bauman. Kraków: Mando.
15. Szczepański, Jan. 2013. Dzienniki z lat 1948–1968. Ustroń: Galeria Na Gojach.
16. Thompson, Edward P. 1972. Boring from without. The Guardian, 21.12.1972: 12.
17. Wagner, Izabela. 2020. Bauman. A Biography. Cambridge – Medford: Polity Press.
18. Wagner, Izabela. 2021. Bauman. Biografia. Warszawa: Czarna Owca.
19. Weber, Marianne. 1926. Max Weber. Ein Lebensbild. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).
20. Young, Michael W. 2004. Malinowski: Odyssey of an Anthropologist 1884–1920. New Haven – London: Yale University Press.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Jarosław Kilias
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Uniwersytet Warszawski
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

According to a widespread view, reviews in science are an instrument for the selection of ideas and people. The article analyzes the gatekeeping role of habilitation proceedings in Polish sociology, taking into account three main areas: (1) the power held in the field of sociology by individual and institutional selectors, (2) statistics on the results of selection, and (3) the fate of academics rejected in the gatekeeping process. It has been found that (1) in Polish sociology there are leading institutions that play the largest role in awarding habilitation degrees, but unlike in other disciplines, there is no phenomenon of domination in the field of review by specific scholars. (2) In the proceedings from 2013–2019, 12.5% of the proceedings ended with a refusal to grant the degree. In the set, no proceedings with a controversial outcome were found (e.g., conferring a degree with a preponderance of negative reviews or vice versa). In the examination of the review results, no trend of systematic gender discrimination was found. (3) 32% of those who were denied a degree left the scientific community, while 63% are still working at the same university as before the denial.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Łukasz Remisiewicz
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Uniwersytet Gdański, Instytut Socjologii
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

This essay addresses the question of the ties between various social levels, particularly in connection with research on Polish society at various stages of its post-war history. In reference to the theoretical reflections and research presented by Mikołaj Pawlak in the book Tying Micro and Macro: What Fills Up the Sociological Vacuum in 2018, the author of the article argues for the necessity of careful consideration in formulating research generalities, especially when they refer to terms or metaphors coined earlier, such as the idea of a sociological vacuum proposed in the 1970s by Stefan Nowak.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Janusz Mucha

This page uses 'cookies'. Learn more