Search results

Filters

  • Journals
  • Authors
  • Keywords
  • Date
  • Type

Search results

Number of results: 8
items per page: 25 50 75
Sort by:
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Indoor noise can greatly affect the health and comfort of users, so the significance of the right assessment of the compliance with the requirements is obvious. But noise level testing is carried out using different methods, which may not ensure consistency in assessments.
The paper presents the influence of test methods on measurement results determined based on an analysis of inter-laboratory comparative studies. The analyses presented in the paper apply to an equivalent sound pressure level determined for a permanent source of sound – an air-conditioning device. The test methods were characterised according to their precision. In order to compare them, their compatibility was analysed based on the methodology described in the literature, alongside a single-factor analysis of variance. It was determined that there were no grounds for rejecting the hypothesis about lack of statistical differences between the results obtained via different methods. Each of the methods is characterised by different precision, so consequently the same result obtained with each method carries a different risk in regards to noise assessment.
The reason for taking up this kind of research was the decision of the Polish Technical Committee in 2018 about introducing new acoustic requirements in Poland concerning the admissible indoor sound pressure levels. It was decided to implement new international methods of testing indoor sound pressure levels emanating from the service equipment in the building. It was necessary to show the differences between the current method and its new counterparts.
Go to article

Bibliography

1. Batko W.M., Stepien B. (2014), Type a standard uncertainty of long-term noise indicators, Archives of Acoustics, 39(1): 25–36, doi: 10.2478/aoa-2014-0004.
2. Berardi U. (2012), A comparison of measurement standard methods for the sound insulation of building façades, Building Acoustics, 19: 267–282, doi: 10.1260/1351-010X.19.4.267.
3. Czichos H., Saito T., Smith L. (2011), Springer Handbook of Metrology and Testing, Springer Berlin– Heidelberg, doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-16641-9.
4. Daszykowski M., Kaczmarek K., Vander Heyden Y., Walczak B. (2007), Robust statistics in data analysis – A review: basic concepts, Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 85: 203–219, doi: 10.1016/J.CHEMOLAB.2006.06.016.
5. Di Bella A., Pontarollo C.M., Granzotto N., Remigi F. (2013), Interlaboratory test for field evaluation of noise from equipment in residential buildings, [in:] AIA-DAGA 2013 Merano, Merano, pp. 1880–1883.
6. EA-4/16 G:2003 (2003), EA guidelines on the expression of uncertainty in quantitative testing, EA, https://european-accreditation.org/publications/ea-4- 16-g/ (retrieved 18.01.2021).
7. Flores M., Fernández-Casal R., Naya S., Tarrío- Saavedra J., Bossano R. (2018), ILS: An R package for statistical analysis in interlaboratory studies, Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 181: 11–20, doi: 10.1016/j.chemolab.2018.07.013.
8. ISO-10052 (2004), Acoustics – Field measurements of airborne and impact sound insulation and of service equipment sound – Survey method.
9. ISO-16032 (2004), Acoustics – Measurement of sound pressure level from service equipment in buildings – Engineering method.
10. ISO 13528 (2015), Statistical methods for use in proficiency testing by interlaboratory comparison.
11. ISO 5725-2 (1994), Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results – Part 2: Basic method for the determination of repeatability and reproducibility of a standard measurement method.
12. Jagan K., Forbes A.B. (2019), Assessing interlaboratory comparison data adjustment procedures, International Journal of Metrology and Quality Engineering, 10: 1–8, doi: 10.1051/ijmqe/2019003.
13. JCGM 100:2008 (2008), Evaluation of measurement data – Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement, JCGM. 14. JCGM 106:2012 (2012), Evaluation of measurement data: The role of measurement uncertainty in conformity assessment, JCGM.
15. JCGM 200:2012 (2008), International vocabulary of metrology – Basic and general concepts and associated terms (VIM), 3rd ed., JCGM.
16. Kacker R.N., Kessel R., Sommer K.D. (2010), Assessing differences between results determined according to the guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement, Journal of Resarch of the National Institute of Standards and Technology, 115: 453–459, doi: 10.6028/jres.115.031
17. Kessel R., Kacker R.N., Sommer K.D. (2011), Combining results from multiple evaluations of the same measurand, Journal of Resarch of the National Institute of Standards and Technology, 116: 809–820, doi: 10.6028/jres.116.023
18. Molenaar J., Cofino W.P., Torfs P.J.J.F. (2018), Efficient and robust analysis of interlaboratory studies, Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 175: 65–73, doi: 10.1016/j.chemolab.2018.01.003
19. NIST/SEMATECH (2013), e-Handbook of Statistical Methods, Ch. 1.3.5.10, http://www.itl.nist.gov/div898/handbook/ (retrieved 12.08.2020).
20. PN-B-02151-02 (1987), Building acoustics – Noise protection of apartments in buildings – Permissible values of sound level in apartments [in Polish: Akustyka budowlana – Ochrona przed hałasem pomieszczen w budynkach – Dopuszczalne wartosci poziomu dzwieku w pomieszczeniach].
21. PN-B-02156 (1987), Building acoustics – Methods for measurement of sound power of A-level in buildings [in Polish: Akustyka budowlana – Metody pomiaru poziomu dzwieku A w budynkach].
22. Pozzer T., Wunderlich P., Monteneiro C., de Frias J. (2019), Interlaboratory and proficiency tests for field measurements in Brazil, [in:] INTER-NOISE and NOISE-CON Congress and Conference Proceedings, Vol. 259, No. 1, pp. 8120–8130, Institute of Noise Control Engineering, http://www.sea-acustica.es/filead min/INTERNOISE_2019/Fchrs/Proceedings/2200.pdf.
23. Prezelj J., Murovec J. (2017), Traffic noise modelling and measurement: Inter-laboratory comparison, Applied Acoustics, 127: 160–168, doi: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2017.06.010.
24. Przysucha B., Batko W., Szelag A. (2015), Analysis of the accuracy of uncertainty noise measurement, Archives of Acoustics, 40(2): 183–189, doi: 10.1515/aoa-2015-0020.
25. Przysucha B., Szelag A., Pawlik P. (2020), Probability distributions of one-day noise indicators in the process of the type A uncertainty evaluation of longterm noise indicators, Applied Acoustics, 161: 107158, doi: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2019.107158.
26. Scamoni F. et al. (2009), Repeatability and reproducibility of field measurements in buildings, [in:] Proceedings of 8th European Conference on Noise Control 2009, EuroNoise09, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK, 26–28 October, 2009.
27. Scrosati C. et al. (2015), Uncertainty of faqade sound insulation measurements obtained by a round robin test: The influence of the low frequencies extension, [in:] Proceedings of the 22nd International Congress on Sound and Vibration (ICSV22), Florence, Italy, pp. 12– 16.
28. Scrosati C. et al. (2020), Towards more reliable measurements of sound absorption coefficient in reverberation rooms: An Inter-Laboratory Test, Applied Acoustics, 165: 107298, doi: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2020.107298
29. Seddeq H.S., Medhat A.A. (2011), Indoor noise measurements evaluations for HVAC-Unit using interlaboratory comparisons, International Journal of Metrology and Quality Engineering, 2(2): 75–81, doi: 10.1051/ijmqe/2011104
30. Szewczak E., Bondarzewski A. (2016), Is the assessment of interlaboratory comparison results for a small number of tests and limited number of participants reliable and rational?, Accreditation and Quality Assurance, 21(2): 91–100, doi: 10.1007/s00769-016-1195-y.
31. Trzpiot G. (2015), Some remarks of type III error for directional two-tailed test, Studia Ekonomiczne. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach, 219: 5–16.
32. Walker W.E. et al. (2003), Defining uncertainty: a conceptual basis for uncertainty management in model-based decision support, Integrated Assessment, 4(3): 5–17, doi: 10.1076/iaij.4.1.5.16466
33. Wszolek T. (2006), Effect of traffic noise statistical distribution on LAeq;T measurement uncertainty, Archives of Acoustics, 31(3): 311–318.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Elżbieta Nowicka
1
Ewa Szewczak
1

  1. Building Research Institute, Warsaw, Poland
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The subject presented in this paper refers to measurements and assessment of the corrected sound pressure level values (noise) occurring around a medium-power transformer. The paper presents the values of noise accompanying the operation of the power object before and after its modernization, which consisted in repeated core pressing and replacement of the cooling system. The main aim of the research work was the assessment of the influence of the repair work on the noise level emitted into the environment.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Sebastian Borucki
Andrzej Cichoń
Tomasz Boczar
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Noise is one of the most significant factors which not only disturbs working conditions, but has a large impact on workers’ health. This problem has existed in industries since the beginning and, despite technical and other solutions, it has not been solved. There is a large number of papers, supported with very detailed analyses, that investigate noise levels in industry or contain questionnaires about the impact of noise on workers’ overall health and work abilities. The purpose of this paper is to contribute to the global picture of sustainability and the development of strategies for improving the quality of working environment, with special attention to the generation of noise in different production processes in thirteen different industries in Novi Sad, Serbia. The paper also seeks to examine the advantages and drawbacks of the implemented protective methods and to provide some recommendations for their better implementation in order to contribute to solving this significant problem of today.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Uranija Kozmidis Luburić
Selena Dušan Samardžić
Robert Lakatoš
Aleksandra Mihailović
Milka Veselinović
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

In this paper, the authors study the 3D propagation of sound waves between two closed spaces. The separation element between the two rooms is considered to include either a small opening or a homogeneous lightweight panel, coupling the two spaces. A numerical study of this configuration is performed, trying to understand the influence of the position and geometry of this opening in the sound pressure level reduction curve at low and midfrequencies. Additionally, the coupling effect between the two acoustic spaces is analyzed, in order to better understand its importance when determining the sound pressure level reduction. Different boundary conditions are ascribed to the walls of these rooms, simulating both the completely reflecting and partially absorbing surfaces.

The numerical modelling was performed using a multi-domain formulation of the Method of Fundamental Solutions (MFS). The system is composed of two coupled rooms, limited by rigid or by absorbing walls, and separated by a thin wall (tending to null thickness) with a small opening. An experimental validation of the proposed model is presented, comparing its results with those found experimentally for a reduced-scale model. It is important to note that, for such a configuration, a traditional single-domain approach using methods like the MFS or the BEM would lead to undetermined equation systems, and thus the proposed model makes use of a domain decomposition technique.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Luís Godinho
Fernando Branco
Paulo Mendes
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Urethane foam mattresses are commonly used as cushioning when placing panel flooring on the floor slab of a building. Urethane foam consists of elastic fibres with pores. Both elements can affect the performance of the insulation against impact sounds. However, these effects have not yet been detailed, and they may change if the material properties or constitution of the fibres and pores in the cushioning change. In this paper, we propose an analytical model for use in evaluating the performance of insulation against floor impact sound. This model was used to examine the contribution of the pores versus the elastic fibres to wave transmissions from the flooring surface to the slab. The results reveal that the constitution of the foam (either open or closed cells of pores) and the thickness and hardness of the cushion layer strongly affect the sound insulation performance of the floor.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

RuiLin Mu
Masahiro Toyoda
Daiji Takahashi
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Mufflers are popular in the suppression of noise levels coming from various machinery. The most common parameters for the evaluation of the performance of mufflers are transmission loss, noise level, and insertion loss. The transmission loss is evaluated for tapered side outlet muffler using finite element analysis without considering the fluid-structure interaction. This study includes analytical modelling and acoustic modelling of the side outlet muffler and transmission loss is in excellent agreement with the reference paper. The feasibility of the acoustic model is also verified with the experimental work on simple expansion chamber muffler. The same finite element analysis is extended for the tapered side outlet muffler. The transmission loss of the tapered side outlet muffler in the given frequency range is found 8.96 dB better than the side outlet muffler. The acoustic pressure level and sound pressure level contours for the tapered side outlet muffler give a clear picture of wave propagation inside the muffler. The effect of the cut-off frequency on the transmission loss of the tapered side outlet muffler can be seen from the contours. This study can be helpful in the determination of the performance of the mufflers in terms of transmission loss, the performance of mufflers above cut-off frequency, and design improvements in the muffler to avoid the higher-order modes of the sound wave.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Sandeep Kumar Vishwakarma
1
Suryappa Jayappa Pawar
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Department of Applied Mechanics, Motilal Nehru National Institute of Technology Allahabad, Prayagraj, India
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The condition monitoring techniques like acoustic emission, vibration analysis, and infrared thermography, used for the failure diagnosis of bearings, require longer processing time, as they have to perform acoustical measurement followed by signal processing and further analysis using special software. However, for any bearing, its period of usage can be easily determined within an hour, by measuring the bearing sound, using sound level meter (SLM). In this paper the acoustical analysis of the spindle bearing of a radial drilling machine was performed using SLM, by measuring the sound pressure level of the bearing in decibels, for different frequencies, while muting all the other noises. Then using an experimental set up, two database readings were taken, one for new bearing and the other for completely damaged bearing, both are SKF6207, which itself is the spindle bearing. From these three sets of sound pressure level readings, the period of usage of the spindle bearing, was calculated using an interpolation equation, by substituting the life of the bearing from the manufacturer’s catalogue. Therefore, for any machine with a SKF6207 bearing, its usage time can be estimated using the database readings and one measurement on that machine, all with the same speed.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

S. Charles
Joslin D. Vijaya
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

In this paper, the relationship between Chinese speech intelligibility (CSI) scores of the elderly aged 60–69 and over 70 years old, and speech transmission index (STI) were investigated through the auralization method under different reverberation time and background noise levels (BNL, 40 dBA and 55 dBA). The results show that the CSI scores of the elderly are significantly worse than those of young adults. For the elderly over 70, the CSI scores become much lower than those of young adults. To be able to achieve the same CSI, the elderly, especially those over 70, need much higher STI and greater SNR than the young. The elderly aged 60–69 and over 70 need to improve their STI by 0.419 and 0.058 respectively under BNL 40 dBA, as well as 0.282 and 0.072 respectively under BNL 55 dBA, so as to obtain the same CSI scores as the young adults.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Jianxin Peng
1 2
Jiazhong Zeng
3
Yuezhe Zhao
2

  1. School of Physics and Optoelectronics, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510640
  2. State Key Laboratory of Subtropical Building Science, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510640
  3. School of Architecture, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510640

This page uses 'cookies'. Learn more