How to search?
advanced search

Search results

Filters

  • Journals
  • Authors
  • Keywords
  • Date
  • Type

Search results

Number of results: 5
items per page: 25 50 75
Sort by:

The Homology of Musical Tastes in Poland

Henryk Domański Dariusz Przybysz Katarzyna M. Wyrzykowska Kinga Zawadzka
Studia Socjologiczne | 2020 | No 4 | 183-211 | DOI: 10.24425/sts.2020.135142
Keywords Musical taste social stratification lifestyle
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The main aim of the analysis is to determine to what extent preference for specific musical genres is related to social position. The study was based on data from a survey conducted in 2019 on a random sample of Poles. The explained phenomena are six genres representing broad spectrum of musical tastes: classical music, jazz, rock, rap, pop, and disco polo. The results of the analysis indicate that the diversity of musical tastes does not come down to one dimension. Family socialization, educational level, and, in part, class position exert the highest impact not only on preferences of classical music but also on liking jazz, rock and disco polo. The class effect appears almost negligent in preference for pop and rap which lead us to general conclusion that cultural stratification does not cover all forms of activity having a selective effect. Musical preferences turn out to be extremely strongly connected with parent’s cultural capital and respondents’ level of education.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Henryk Domański
ORCID: ORCID
Dariusz Przybysz
Katarzyna M. Wyrzykowska
ORCID: ORCID
Kinga Zawadzka
ORCID: ORCID

The art of architecture and the art of cooking

Anna Palej
Teka Komisji Urbanistyki i Architektury Oddziału Polskiej Akademii Nauk w Krakowie | 2020 | vol. XLVIII | 135-147 | DOI: 10.24425/tkuia.2020.135410
Keywords culinary art good taste ‘hearth’ regional identification Slow Food
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The art of architecture and the art of cooking are fields, where we can find numerous social and spatial relationships. This publication will enumerate the most important of these and discuss solutions, that promote moderation in using resources, space and aesthetic means, that are based on knowledge arising from context and the human scale, and that points to the necessity to slow down the pace of our lives, which are the major challenges in the face of contemporary civilisational changes.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Anna Palej
1
  1. Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski Krakow University, Faculty of Architecture and Fine Arts, Chair of Urban Design and Landscape Architecture

Shaftesbury v. Richardson: a Counterfactual Exercise. = Shaftesbury versus Richardson: ćwiczenie kontrfaktyczne

Harry Mount
Rocznik Historii Sztuki | 2020 | No XLV | 5-17 | DOI: 10.24425/rhs.2020.136889
Keywords art theory social history of art aesthetic theory 18th Century British aesthetics taste beginnings of art history neoclassicism
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

This article considers what might have happened had the 3rd Earl of Shaftesbury lived long enough to see his planned book of art theory, Second Characters, into publication. It suggests that Second Characters would have challenged, and perhaps supplanted, Jonathan Richardson the Elder’s Theory of Painting (1715) as the first substantial and original British contribution to the theory of art. Much of the article consists of a comparison between Richardson’s Theory of Painting and the ‘Plasticks’ section of Second Characters, for which Shaftsbury’s notes survive. This comparison suggests that the theory of painting which Shaftesbury would have offered to his compatriots would have differed from that offered by Richardson in certain important respects. Primarily addressing his text to his fellow aristocratic patrons rather than to painters, Shaftesbury’s vision for the future of British art was both more high-minded and more narrow than that offered by Richardson. For Shaftesbury the moral subject matter of painting was all-important, and the artistic traits he most admired, including historical subjects, grandeur of scale and austerity of style, were those he saw as best placed to transmit that moral subject matter. Richardson, by contrast, was for more tolerant of the extant British taste for portraits and more sensual styles and offered a theory of art which was in part formalist. The article also stresses the importance of the equation Shaftesbury made between the social and political health of a society and the quality of its art, and suggests that had Second Characters been published at the time when it was written we might now consider Shaftesbury, rather than Winckelmann, as the father of the social history of art. The article ends by considering two possible outcomes had Second Characters been published in the early eighteenth century, in one of which it had a profound impact on British art and British attitudes to art, and in the other of which Shaftesbury’s refusal to compromise with current British tastes condemned his text to no more than a marginal status.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Harry Mount
1
  1. Oxford Brookes University

The work of Feliks Stanisław Jasiński (1862–1901) and the question of graphic reproductions of works of art

Katarzyna Ubysz-Piasecka
Rocznik Historii Sztuki | 2020 | No XLV | 41-58 | DOI: 10.24425/rhs.2020.136892
Keywords 19th Century Polish graphic arts reproductive prints reproductive graphics 19th Century artistic culture 19th century artistic taste Renaissance art art reproductions art history as a discipline
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The article discusses the complex issues related to 19th-century reproductive prints. Its starting point is the oeuvre of Feliks Stanisław Jasiński, a Polish engraver who was mainly active in France. He specialized in reproductive prints of works of art, and is a relatively well- -known and researched figure in the history of Polish graphic arts. Outlining the context for his activities also becomes a contribution to reflections on the place of reproductive prints in 19th century artistic culture, as well as an attempt to define a framework for considering this type of graphic production. In citing various examples of modern reproductive graphics, its diversity is proven. Theses on the primacy of the criterion of “fidelity” and technological determination in the history of reproduction are rejected. Instead, the complex links between this field and various aspects of artistic culture are pointed out. Particular emphasis is placed on the links between the functions, form and production methods of such prints. Chief consideration is given to the type of reproductive graphics made by using traditional metal techniques, which apart from their informative functions, also performed important artistic functions, as evidenced by the described phenomena occurring within this field in the second half of the 19th century, and the accompanying written tradition, formed since the 18th century.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Katarzyna Ubysz-Piasecka
1
  1. Uniwersytet Warszawski

Jabłonowski after 1918: Continuation/Breakaway

Maciej Urbanowski
Ruch Literacki | 2021 | No 1 (364) | 41-59 | DOI: 10.24425/rl.2021.137298
Keywords Polish literary criticism in the early 20th century Modernism and Young Poland impressionistic criticism Polish nationalism revival of classical taste Polish Occidentalism Władysław Jabłonowski (1865–1956)
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

After 1918 it was by no means uncommon for literary critics of renown to give up their familiar pursuits and move on to new fields. This article traces and brings to light the largely forgotten literary criticism of Władysław Jabłonowski, better known as an influential politician and journalist. He had made his name as a prolific literary critic with the rising tide of the Young Poland movement, but, as life resumed in an independent Poland, he scaled down his activity in that field quite considerably. Moreover, he abandoned the ‘empathic’ model of Modernist criticism for a steady commitment to classical aesthetics, especially as it manifested itself in French literature, of which he was always a great admirer. In this new phase he remained invariably loyal to nationalist ideology and a mythologized idea of ‘the West’.
Go to article

Bibliography

dzieła i teksty W. Jabłonowskiego:

●„Amica Italia” (Rzecz o faszyzmie). Wrażenia i rozważania, Poznań–Warszawa–Wilno– Lublin 1926.
●Chwila obecna (dążności i usposobienia), Warszawa 1901.
●Dokoła Sfinksa (Studia o życiu i twórczości narodu rosyjskiego), Warszawa 1910.
●Dwie kultury. Studya historyczne i literackie, Warszawa 1913.
●Faszyzm a machiavellizm, „Myśl Narodowa”, 1927, nr 24.
●Franciszek Mauriac, „Myśl Narodowa” 1933, nr 33.
●Humanista na wygnaniu (Léon Daudet), „Myśl Narodowa”, 1929, nr 36, 37.
●Italia współczesna, „Myśl Narodowa” 1932, nr 21.
●Jak z rogu Amaltei…, „Myśl Narodowa”, 1938, nr 50.
●Jeszcze jedna krucjata, „Myśl Narodowa”, 1938, nr 7.
●Kryzys powieści, „Gazeta Warszawska” 1932, nr 274–276.
●Krytycyzm w krytyce literackiej, „Myśl Narodowa”, 1929, nr 15, 16.
●Maskarada się kończy, „Myśl Narodowa” 1935, nr 18.
●Nowa powieść autorki „Pożogi”, „Myśl Narodowa”, 1929, nr 7.
●Niemiec o Francji, „Myśl Narodowa” 1932, nr 37.
●O pewnym „arcydziele” współczesnem, „Myśl Narodowa” 1935, nr 19.
●Odczyty o Leopardim, „Myśl Narodowa”, 1939, nr 34.
●Paweł Bourget (wspomnienie pośmiertne), „Myśl Narodowa” 1936, nr 1.
●Pokłosie Barrèsa, „Myśl Narodowa” 1928, nr 8.
●Poruszyły się płazy, „Myśl Narodowa” 1925, nr 13.
●Słońce Prowansji (Fryderyk Mistral), „Myśl Narodowa”, 1929, nr 42.
●Sto pięćdziesiąta rocznica Wielkiej Rewolucji, „Myśl Narodowa” 1939, nr 28.
●W obronie Zachodu, „Myśl Narodowa”, 1927, nr 20.
●W odwiecznej sprawie (Uwagi o sztuce i krytyce), „Melitele. Noworocznik Literacki”, Kraków 1902.
●U wezgłowia chorej Europy, „Myśl Narodowa” 1932, nr 47.
●Uwagi o Wielkiej Rewolucji, „Myśl Narodowa” 1928, nr 23.
●W hołdzie Maurras’owi, „Myśl Narodowa” 1927, nr 19.
●Wesoła wiedza, „Myśl Narodowa”, 1929, nr 20.
●Wielki czarodziej, „Myśl Narodowa”, 1934, nr 52.
●Wizerunki wielkopolskie, „Myśl Narodowa”, 1937, nr 51.
●Wśród obcych, Lwów 1905. ●Z ojczyzny Danta. Szkice i wrażenia, Warszawa 1921.
●Z okazji jubileuszu Ch. Maurras’a, „Myśl Narodowa” 1936, nr 36, s. 564.
●Ze studiów dantejskich, „Myśl Narodowa” 1933, nr 42.
●[Żydzi Rudnickiego], „Nowe Książki” 1938, z. VI.

inne dzieła:

●Biernacki A., Władysław Jabłonowski (1865–1956), „Polski Słownik Biograficzny” 1962– 1964, t. X, https://www.ipsb.nina.gov.pl/a/biografia/wladyslaw-jablonowski
●Brzozowski S., Dzieła pod redakcją Mieczysława Sroki. Współczesna powieść i krytyka, wstępem poprzedził T. Burek, oprac. J. Bahr i M. Rydlowa, teksty z rękopisu opracował M. Sroka, Kraków–Wrocław 1984.
●Chlebowski B., [rec. Rozpraw i wrażeń literackich], „Książka” 1908, nr 4.
●Chmielowski P., Dzieje krytyki literackiej w Polsce, Warszawa 1902.
●Fryde L., Drogi współczesnej krytyki literackiej, „Wiedza i Życie” 1938, z. 12 [w:] tenże, Wybór pism krytycznych, oprac. A. Biernacki, Warszawa 1966.
●Głowiński M., Ekspresja i empatia. Studia o młodopolskiej krytyce literackiej, Kraków 1997.
●Hutnikiewicz A., Młoda Polska, Warszawa 1994.
●Kaźmierczyk Z., Władysław Jabłonowski a wileńska szkoła myślenia o Rosji, [w:] Poza rusofobią a rusofilią?, red. E. Mikiciuk, Słupsk 2019.
●Leśmian B., Dokoła Sfinksa. Studia o życiu i twórczości narodu rosyjskiego, „Prawda” 1910, nr 8 [cyt. za:] tenże, Dzieła wszystkie. Szkice literackie, zebrał i opracował J. Trznadel, Warszawa 2011.
●Kiwior-Filo M., „Rewolucja faszystowska” w interpretacji Władysława Jabłonowskiego, „Studia na Autorytaryzmem i Totalitaryzmem” 2011, t. 33.
●Mowy Mussoliniego, wybrał, przełożył i przedmową poprzedził W. Jabłonowski, Warszawa 1927.
●Skiwski J.E., O krytyce naukowej i profetycznej, „Myśl Narodowa” 1928, nr 15 [w:] tenże, „Na przełaj” oraz inne szkice o literaturze i kulturze, oprac. M. Urbanowski, Kraków 1999.
●Skórczewski D., Spory o krytykę literacką w dwudziestoleciu międzywojennym, Kraków 2002.
●Speina J., Władysław Jabłonowski, [w:] Obraz literatury polskiej. Literatura okresu Młodej Polski, s. 5, t. IV, Kraków 1977.
●Stern A., O zmianę metod naszej krytyki, „Wiadomości Literackie” 1928, nr 31.
●Urbanowski M., Od Brzozowskiego do Herberta. Studia o ideach literatury polskiej XX wieku, Łomianki 2012.
●Wyka K., Felietonomania, „Tygodnik Ilustrowany” 1937, nr 38 [w:] tenże, Stara szuflada i inne szkice z lat 1932–1939, oprac. M. Urbanowski, Kraków 2000.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Maciej Urbanowski
1
ORCID: ORCID
  1. Uniwersytet Jagielloński, Kraków

This page uses 'cookies'. Learn more