Search results

Filters

  • Journals
  • Autorzy
  • Słowa kluczowe
  • Data
  • Typ

Search results

Number of results: 4
items per page: 25 50 75
Sort by:
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The article covers the systematic basis for the creation of new technological processes of corn harvesting machines. Modern corn-harvesting machines have reached certain thresholds according to their technological properties that most significantly affect the final production and economic indicators of planting corn for grain efficiency, still they do not meet modern requirements. The technological properties mentioned above are hardly adjusted for wide range of physical and mechanical properties of the plants and crop parameters. This situation is caused by new machine´s working parts being viewed by researchers and developers as complex technical systems not from the standpoint of general systems theory but in terms of the use of traditional knowledge of the laws of agricultural mechanics, thus not getting proper attention to their systematic coordination with working conditions. Based on this, the paper presents a structural scheme for the system “mechanized corn for grain harvesting”, key elements of which are: agricultural (А), engineering (В) and selectional (С) supply. Interconnection of the subsystem´s elements and their consistency determine the effectiveness of the whole process. Inconsistency of the links АВ and ВC is observed. The conceptual system “mechanized corn for grain harvesting” design relates to the field with clear NO-factors: incompleteness, uncertainty, inconsistency and lack of information for decision making, thus it is important to review tasks of conceptual design from the most general constructual standpoint. The method of describing systems at the conceptual level is suggested. This systematic representation of corn-harvesting machines allows to approach the task of their workflows modeling from the most general standpoint.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

D. Kuzenko
O. Krupych
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

A mine cannot function without monitoring systems: environmental, basic mining machinery and equipment. The exploitation of ore in the mine depends heavily on properly functioning machines and mining equipment, and acceptable for the miner technical environmental conditions occurring in underground excavations. The monitoring systems of the technical environment in underground mines are primarily telemetry and gasometry systems. The first part of the article shows the typical structure of gasometry systems operating in the Polish underground mines. The existing provisions include the so-called security systems of the mining plant. The article presents a quantitative summary of the telephone exchange types and count of main telecommunication lines operating in these systems. Monitoring systems of machines and mining equipment are an essential element of the effec-tive management of the mine, because they affect the safe operation and increase time of effi-ciency equipment. The second part of the article shows selected monitoring systems of mining machinery and equipment currently used in the dispatcher rooms of mines. Attention was paid to the monitoring systems, which are only software tools as well as those in which additionally use dedicated IT solutions for these systems, hardware and measuring tools. The table shows the types of monitoring systems and technological configurations used in underground mines, preferred for them.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Antoni Wojaczek
Adam Wojaczek
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The study aimed to develop a system supporting technological process planning for machining and 3D printing. Such a system should function similarly to the way human experts act in their fields of expertise and should be capable of gathering the necessary knowledge, analysing data, and drawing conclusions to solve problems. This could be done by utilising artificial intelligence (AI) methods available within such systems. The study proved the usefulness of AI methods and their significant effectiveness in supporting technological process planning. The purpose of this article is to show an intelligent system that includes knowledge, models, and procedures supporting the company’s employees as part of machining and 3D printing. Few works are combining these two types of processing. Nowadays, however, these two types of processing overlap each other into a common concept of hybrid processing. Therefore, in the opinion of the authors, such a comprehensive system is necessary. The system-embedded knowledge takes the form of neural networks, decision trees, and facts. The system is presented using the example of a real enterprise. The intelligent expert system is intended for process engineers who have not yet gathered sufficient experience in technological-process planning, or who have just begun their work in a given production enterprise and are not very familiar with its machinery and other means of production.
Go to article

Bibliography

  1.  T. Pereira, J.V. Kennedy, and J. Potgieter, “A comparison of traditional manufacturing vs additive manufacturing, the best method for the job”, Procedia Manuf. 30, 11–18 (2019).
  2.  S. Mirzababaei and S. Pasebani, “A Review on Binder Jet Additive Manufacturing of 316L Stainless Steel”, J. Manuf. Mater. Process 3, 82, 1–36 (2019).
  3.  J-P. Kruth, M.C. Leu, and T. Nakagawa, “Progress in Additive Manufacturing and Rapid Prototyping”, CIRP Ann. 47(2), 525–540 (1998).
  4.  J. Maszybrocka, B. Gapiński, M. Dworak, G. Skrabalak, and A. Stwora, “Modelling, manufacturability and compression properties of the CpTi grade 2 cellular lattice with radial gradient TPMS architecture”, Bull. Pol. Acad. Sci. Tech. Sci. 67(4), 719–727 (2019).
  5.  E. Talhi, J-C. Huet, V. Fortineau, and S. Lamouri, “A methodology for cloud manufacturing architecture in the context of industry 4.0”, Bull. Pol. Acad. Sci. Tech. Sci. 68(2), 271–284 (2020).
  6.  I. Rojek, D. Mikołajewski, P. Kotlarz, M. Macko, and J. Kopowski, “Intelligent System Supporting Technological Process Planning for Machining”, in: Machine Modelling and Simulations MMS 2020. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Cham, (to be published).
  7.  W. Grzesik, “Hybrid machining processes. Definitions, generation rules and real industrial importance”, Mechanik 5–6, 338‒342 (2018), [in Polish].
  8.  C.F. Tan, V.K. Kher, and N Ismail, “An expert system carbide cutting tools selection system for CNC lathe machine”, Int. Rev. Mech. Eng. 6(7), 1402–1405 (2012).
  9.  I. Rojek, E. Dostatni, and A. Hamrol, “Ecodesign of Technological Processes with the Use of Decision Trees Method”, in International Joint Conference SOCO’17-CISIS’17-ICEUTE’17 León, Spain, September 6–8, 2017, Proceeding. SOCO 2017, CISIS 2017, ICEUTE 2017. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 649, pp. 318–327, eds. H. Pérez García, J. Alfonso-Cendón, L. Sánchez González, H. Quintián and E. Corchado, Springer, Cham, 2018.
  10.  G. Halevi and K. Wang, “Knowledge based manufacturing system (KBMS)”, J. Intell. Manuf. 18(4), 467–474 (2007).
  11.  S. Butdee, Ch. Noomtong, and S. Tichkiewitch, “A Process Planning System with Feature Based Neural Network Search Strategy for Aluminum Extrusion Die Manufacturing”, Asian Int. J. Sci. Technol. Prod. Manuf. Eng. 2(1), 137–157 (2009).
  12.  I. Rojek, “Hybrid neural networks as prediction models”, in Artificial Intelligence and Soft Computing. Lecture Notes in Computer Science ICAISC 2010, vol. 6114, pp. 88–95, eds. L. Rutkowski, R. Scherer, R. Tadeusiewicz, L.A. Zadeh, and J.M. Zurada, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2010.
  13.  D. Rajeev, D. Dinakaran, and S. Singh. “Artificial neural network based tool wear estimation on dry hard turning processes of aisi4140
  14. steel using coated carbide tool”, Bull. Pol. Acad. Sci. Tech. Sci. 65(4), 553–559 (2017).
  15.  I. Rojek, “Classifier Models in Intelligent CAPP Systems”, in Man-Machine Interactions. Advances in Intelligent and Soft Computing, vol. 59, pp. 311–319, eds. K.A. Cyran, S. Kozielski, J.F. Peters, U. Stańczyk, and A. Wakulicz-Deja, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2009.
  16.  S. Igari, F. Tanaka, and M. Onosato, “Customization of a Micro Process Planning System for an Actual Machine Tool based on Updating a Machining Database and Generating a Database-Oriented Planning Algorithm”, J. Trans. Inst. Syst. Control Inf. Eng. 26(3), 87–94 (2013).
  17.  I. Rojek and E. Dostatni, “Machine learning methods for optimal compatibility of materials in eco-design”, Bull. Pol. Acad. Sci. Tech. Sci. 68(2), 199–206 (2020).
  18.  M. Hazarika, S. Deb, U.S. Dixit, and J.P. Davim, “Fuzzy set-based set-up planning system with the ability for online learning”, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part B-J. Eng. Manuf. 225(2), 247–263 (2011).
  19.  N. Guo and M.C. Leu, “Additive manufacturing: Technology, applications and research needs”, Front. Mech. Eng. 215–243 (2013).
  20.  J. Yang, Y. Chen, W. Huang, and Y. Li, “Survey on artificial intelligence for additive manufacturing”, in 23rd International Conference on Automation and Computing (ICAC), Huddersfield, 2017, pp. 1–6, doi: 10.23919/IConAC.2017.8082053.
  21.  I.J. Petrick and T.W. Simpson, “3D printing disrupts manufacturing: how economies of one create new rules of competition”, Res.-Technol. Manage. 56(6), 12–16 (2013).
  22.  B. Stucker, “Additive manufacturing technologies: Technology introduction and business implications”, in Frontiers of Engineering: Reports on Leading-Edge Engineering from the 2011 Symposium, pp. 19–21, National Academies Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2012.
  23.  Y. Wang, P. Zheng, and T. Peng, “Smart additive manufacturing: Current artificial intelligence-enabled methods and future perspectives”, Sci. China Technol. Sci. 1–12 (2020).
  24.  H. Chen, and Y.F. Zhao, “Process parameters optimization for improving surface quality and manufacturing accuracy of binder jetting additive manufacturing process”, Rapid Prototyp. J. 22, 527–538 (2016).
  25.  M.A. Kaleem and M. Khan, “Significance of Additive Manufacturing for Industry 4.0 With Introduction of Artificial Intelligence in Additive Manufacturing Regimes”, in 17th International Bhurban Conference on Applied Sciences and Technology (IBCAST), Islamabad, Pakistan, 2020, pp. 152–156, doi: 10.1109/IBCAST47879.2020.9044574.
  26.  L. Meng, B. McWilliams, and W. Jarosinski, “Machine Learning in Additive Manufacturing” A Review. JOM 72, 2363–2377 (2020).
  27.  Z. Jin, Z. Zhang, and G.X. Gu, “Automated Real-Time Detection and Prediction of Interlayer Imperfections in Additive Manufacturing Processes Using Artificial Intelligence”, Adv. Intell. Syst. 2(1), 1900130(1–7) (2020).
  28.  K. Wasmer, C. Kenel, C. Leinenbach, and S.A. Shevchik, “In Situ and Real-Time Monitoring of Powder-Bed AM by Combining Acoustic Emission and Artificial Intelligence.”, in Industrializing Additive Manufacturing – Proceedings of Additive Manufacturing in Products and Applications – AMPA2017, pp. 200–209, eds. M. Meboldt and C. Klahn, Springer, Cham, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319- 66866-6_20.
  29.  C. Wang, S Li, D Zeng, and X. Zhu, “An Artificial-intelligence/Statistics Solution to Quantify Material Distortion for Thermal Compensation in Additive Manufacturing”, Cornell University, arXiv:2005.09084v1 [cs.CE], 2020.
  30.  P. Hong-Seok and N. Dinh-Son, “AI-Based Optimization of Process Parameters in Selective Laser Melting”, in Advances in Manufacturing Technology XXXII, eds. P. Thorvald and K. Case, IOS Press, 2018, doi: 10.3233/978-1-61499-902-7-119.
  31.  J. Kopowski, D. Mikołajewski, M. Macko, and I. Rojek, “Bydgostian hand exoskeleton – own concept and the biomedical factors”, Bio- Algorithms and Med-Systems 15(1), 20190003 (2019).
  32.  J. Kopowski, I. Rojek, D. Mikołajewski, and M. Macko, “3D Printed Hand Exoskeleton – Own Concept”, in Advances in Manufacturing II. MANUFACTURING 2019. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering, pp. 306‒298, J. Trojanowska, O. Ciszak, J. Machado, and I. Pavlenko, Springer, Cham, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18715-6_25.
  33.  R. Tadeusiewicz, R. Chaki, and N. Chaki, “Exploring Neural Networks with C#”, CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, 2014.
  34.  L.A. Zadeh, “Fuzzy sets. Information and Control”, 8, pp. 338–353 (1965).
  35.  S. Jige Quan, J. Park, A. Economou, and S. Lee, “Artificial intelligence-aided design: Smart Design for sustainable city development,” Environment and Planning B 46(8), 1581‒1599 (2019).
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Izabela Rojek
1
ORCID: ORCID
Dariusz Mikołajewski
1
ORCID: ORCID
Piotr Kotlarz
1
ORCID: ORCID
Marek Macko
2
ORCID: ORCID
Jakub Kopowski
1 3
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Institute of Computer Science, Kazimierz Wielki University, Chodkiewicza 30, 85-064 Bydgoszcz, Poland
  2. Faculty of Mechatronics, Kazimierz Wielki University, Chodkiewicza 30, 85-064 Bydgoszcz, Poland
  3. Faculty of Psychology, Kazimierz Wielki University, Chodkiewicza 30, 85-064 Bydgoszcz, Poland
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

At present, a deep transformation of the agrobiocenose organisation under the intense anthropogenic factors’ influence is of particular importance. Thus, a significant increase in the number and harmfulness of pests’, phytopathogens’ and weeds species was noted due to the prevailing favourable conditions for their mass reproduction, expansion of habitats, and harmfulness, which inevitably leads to a significant deterioration in the phytosanitary state of cultivated crops. The phytosanitary trouble of agrobiocenoses allows us to say that today plant protection, being the final link in the cultivating technology for agricultural crops, is one of the most important stages in preserving the harvest improving the quality of the products obtained, and reducing their cost. In the current study it was tried to review the modern paradigm of the agricultural technological process efficiency. The relevance of this research is due to the fact that modern technological processes in agriculture cannot be implemented without the practical use of plant protection measures, in particular, the chemical method, which consists in the use of chemical compounds against pathogens of plants, pests, weeds, and is the most common, contributing to a significant increase in the yield of cultivated crops and labour productivity in agricultural production. All this, in our opinion, indicates the high practical significance of the results obtained.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Konstantin E. Tyupakov
1
ORCID: ORCID
Andzor K. Dikinov
2
ORCID: ORCID
Maryam A. Ortskhanova
3
ORCID: ORCID
Kheda M. Musayeva
4
ORCID: ORCID
Evgeniya A. Bolotina
5
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education “Kuban State Agrarian University named after I.T. Trubilin”, Department of Economics and Foreign Economic Activity, Krasnodar, st. Kalinina 13, 350044, Russia
  2. Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education “Kabardino-Balkarian State University named after H.M. Berbekov”, Nalchik, Kabardino-Balkar Republic, Russia
  3. Ingush State University, Department of Economics, Magas, The Republic of Ingushetia, Russia
  4. The Chechen State University named after A.A. Kadyrov, Department of Economics and Economic Security of Industries and Enterprises, Grozny city, Chechen Republic, Russia
  5. The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, Department of Economics and Finance, Institute of Public Service and Management, Moscow, Russia

This page uses 'cookies'. Learn more