Search results

Filters

  • Journals
  • Keywords
  • Date

Search results

Number of results: 4
items per page: 25 50 75
Sort by:
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Metodologia di analisi della monodia liturgica

Riassunto

Per monodia liturgica si intendono i canti a una voce che non richiedono accompagnamento strumentale. Nel suo ambito rientrano soprattutto: canto gregoriano, repertorio neo-gregoriano e canti liturgici a una voce in lingue nazionali. I principali metodi di analisi della monodia sono stati adottati dalle science storiche (euristica e metodi indiretti: filologico, geografico, comparativo, induttivo e di riduzione). In medievistica musicologica ha guadagnato importanza il metodo genealogico che serve a determinare la cosiddetta famiglia di manoscritti cio attribuirli ad un circolo geografico e culturale preciso. Oggi un metodo applicato universalmente. Senza dubbio la priorit spetta pertanto al metodo comparativo. Il seguente un metodo basato sull’aspetto modale del canto gregoriano. Esso base sull’analisi dei tipi di scale e dei tipi di melodie. Per questo si concentra sia sui finali delle composizioni che sul sottolineare le cosiddette strutture melodiche, soprattutto iniziali. Nell’ambito dei canti neo-gregoriani non stato ancora elaborato un metodo completo di analisi. Esso basa finora sugli studi relativi al rapporto della melodia verso il testo (uso di melismi, accento dinamico). Nella melodia vengono esaminati gli intervalli, la scioltezza del movimento dei suoni, l`alternanza dei modi autentici e plagali, l’adozione del principio di quinta tonalit (invece dell’attuale tonalit quartale). Le successive analisi della monodia liturgica possono apportare sia una correzione dei metodi attuali, sia un’elaborazione dei metodi di analisi completamente nuovi.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Ks. Ireneusz Pawlak
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

In Tractatus Logico‑Philosophicus Wittgenstein referred to a relatively small number of philosophers, and Fritz Mauthner was one of them, although his work is nowadays largely forgotten. In thesis 4.0031 Wittgenstein claimed that his critique of language was quite different from Mauthner’s project. What could it mean then for contemporary discussions on the Tractatus? In this paper it is argued that for Wittgenstein it amounted to rejection of both the resolute and the materialistic interpretation of the Tractatus. On the one hand, Mauthner thought that language could not be exhaustively analyzed by semantics and logic. On the other hand, he believed that one of the greatest illusions of philosophers who investigated language was the conviction that one of the most fundamental features of language is its referential function. These are the claims that the proponents of the radical interpretation read into the Tractatus. But thesis 4.0031 shows that they are wrong. Moreover, in his critique of the referential function of language Mauthner associated states of affairs directly with brain states of a given agent. As for the representatives of the materialistic interpretation of the Tractatus, they attribute to theses 5.54–5.5422 a similar view on the relation between man and the world. Hence, thesis 4.0031 falsifies their reading, as well.
Go to article

Bibliography

Arens K. (1995), Mach und Mauthner: Der Fall eines Paradigmenwechsels, w: E. Leinfellner, H. Schleichert (red.), Fritz Mauthner: Das Werk eines Kritischen Denkers, Wien: Böhlau, s. 95–109.

Berlage A. (1994), Empfindung, Ich und Sprache um 1900: Ernst Mach, Hermann Bahr und Fritz Mauthner im Zusammenhang, Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.

Brentano F. (1977), Die Abkehr vom Nichtrealen, Hamburg: Meiner.

Conant J. (2009), Rozjaśnienie i nonsens u Fregego i wczesnego Wittgensteina, przeł. T. Zarębski, w: A. Crary, R. Read (red.), Wittgenstein – nowe spojrzenie, Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Dolnośląskiej Szkoły Wyższej, s. 211–256.

Dayton E. (1976), Tractatus 5.54–5.5422, „Canadian Journal of Philosophy” 6, s. 275–283.

Dehnel P. (2014), Ludwig Wittgenstein: teoria a terapia, Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.

Diamond C. (2009a), Etyka, wyobraźnia i metoda „Traktatu” Wittgensteina, przeł. P. Mroczkiewicz, w: A. Crary, R. Read (red.), Wittgenstein – nowe spojrzenie, Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Dolnośląskiej Szkoły Wyższej, s. 181–209.

Diamond C. (2009b), Czy Bismarck ma żuka w pudełku? Argument języka prywatnego w „Tractatus logico‑philosophicus”, przeł. M. Gusin, w: A. Crary, R. Read (red.), Wittgenstein – nowe spojrzenie, Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Dolnośląskiej Szkoły Wyższej, s. 307–341.

Gakis D. (2012), Contextual Metaphilosophy: The Case of Wittgenstein, Amsterdam: ILLC.

Hacker P. (2009), Czy próbował to zagwizdać?, przeł. P. Dehnel, w: A. Crary, R. Read (red.), Wittgenstein – nowe spojrzenie, Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Dolnośląskiej Szkoły Wyższej, s. 409–447.

Jacquette D. (1992/1993), Wittgenstein’s Critique of Propositional Attitudes and Russell’s Theory of Judgement, „Brentano Studien” 4, s. 193–220.

Le Rider J. (2012), Fritz Mauthner: scepticisme linguistique et modernité, Paris: Bartillat.

Machlarz A. (2006), Fritza Mauthnera krytyka języka i jej konsekwencje dla metodologii nauk o kulturze, „Przegląd Filozoficzny – Nowa Seria” 15, s. 49–66.

Mauthner F. (1901), Beiträge zu einer Kritik der Sprache, t. 1: Sprache und Psychologie, Stuttgart: J.G. Cotta’sche.

Mauthner F. (1902), Beiträge zu einer Kritik der Sprache, t. 3: Zur Grammatik und Logik, Stuttgart: J.G. Cotta’sche.

Mauthner F. (1906), Die Sprache, Frankfurt am Main: Rütten u. Loening.

Mauthner F. (1922), Fritz Mauthner, w: R. Schmidt (red.), Die Philosophie der Gegenwarten in Selbstdarstellungen, vol. 3, Leipzig: Meiner, s. 120–144.

Mauthner F. (1925), Die Drei Bilder der Welt – ein sprachkritischer Versuch, Erlangen: Verlag der Philosophischen Akademie.

McGuinness B. (2012), Two Cheers for the ‘New’ Wittgenstein?, w: J. Zalabardo (red.), Wittgenstein’s Early Philosophy, Oxford: Oxford University Press, s. 260–272.

Nájera E. (2007), Wittgenstein versus Mauthner: Two Critiques of Language, Two Mysticisms, w: H. Hrachovec, A. Pichler, J. Wang (red.), Papers of the 30th International Wittgenstein Symposium 5–11 August 2007, Kirchberg am Wechsel: ALWS, s. 160–162.

Ostrow M. (2002), Wittgenstein’s „Tractatus”. A Dialectical Interpretation, Cam- bridge: Cambridge University Press. Proops I. (2001), The New Wittgenstein. A Critique, „European Journal of Philosophy” 9, s. 375–404.

Puhl K. (1999), Subjekt und Körper. Untersuchungen zur Subjektkritik bei Wittgenstein und zur Theorie der Subjektivität, Paderborn: Mentis.

Revolledo Novoa Á. (2014), El „Tractatus” y la critica linguística de Fritz Mauthner, „Analítica” 8, s. 41–60.

Rusell B. (1984), Theory of Knowledge, w: tenże, The Collected Papers, vol. 7, London: George Allen & Unwin.

Sass L. (2017), Głębokie niepokoje. Uwagi o Wittgensteinie jako antyfilozofie, przeł. K. Rychter, „Przegląd Filozoficzny – Nowa Seria” 26, s. 7–70.

Seron D. (2021), Brentano and Mauthner on Grammatical Illusions, w: A. Dewalque, C. Gauvry, S. Richard (red.), Philosophy of Language in the Brentano School: Reassesing the Brentanian Legacy, London: Palgrave Macmillan, s. 77–94.

Weiler G. (1970), Mauthner’s Critique of Language, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Wittgenstein L. (2000a), Dociekania filozoficzne, przeł. B. Wolniewicz, Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.

Wittgenstein L. (2000b), Tractatus logico‑philosophicus [cyt. jako TLP], przeł. B. Wolniewicz, Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Marek Dobrzeniecki
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Akademia Katolicka w Warszawie, ul. Dewajtis 3, 01‑815 Warszawa
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

This article examines the sources of literary invention in Philtron, a treatise in verse on the theme of Christian love by the Polish and neo-Latin Renaissance poet Sebastian Fabian Klonowic. To get a better appreciation of his work it is necessary to look at his sources, especially books of humanist erudition, learned compendia, dictionaries, handbooks of rhetoric, anthologies and commonplace books. An analysis of his use of those sources in Philtron and an examination of his notes indicate that Klonowic probably did not read all of his books through from beginning to end. Some of his readings were intentionally selective. In particular, while collecting material for his treatise, he would mine the grand 16th-century reference books like Ambrogius Calepinus's multilanguage Dictionarium, Dominico Nani's anthology Polyanthea, or Erasmus' Apophtegmata. The argument and topoi in at least some parts of Philtron are much indebted to the contemporary compendia and erudite research.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Tomasz Lawenda
ORCID: ORCID
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

This article surveys the relations between the Polish Radio and the German Broadcasting Corporation (Reichs-Rundfunk-Gesellschaft) in the interwar period. In its early phase the relationship was overshadowed by disputes over programmes on Upper Silesia and the takeover by a German company of the radio station in the Free City of Gdańsk (Danzig). After Hitler became chancellor in 1933 there was a marked improve- ment in relations: the two parties even made an agreement to relay each other's programmes. However, in September 1939 the German radio network (RRG) actively aided the German army in its invasion of Poland.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Sebastian Fikus

This page uses 'cookies'. Learn more