Search results

Filters

  • Journals
  • Authors
  • Keywords
  • Date
  • Type

Search results

Number of results: 3
items per page: 25 50 75
Sort by:
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The combination of the functional disorders of urination and defecation constitutes the Dys-functional Elimination Syndrome (DES). DES refers to an abnormal pattern of elimination of unknown etiology characterized by bowel and bladder incontinence and withholding, with no underlying anatomic or neurologic abnormalities. Essential precondition for a child to be subsumed under this entity is the exclusion of either anatomical or neurological causative factors. In the present review study the individual entities of dysfunctional filling, such as the unstable or lazy bladder, or dysfunctional urination, such as the detrusor sphincter dyssynergia and the functional constipation are being described comprehensively. Subsequently, the analysis of the pathophysiological effects of the dysfunctional elimination syndrome such as incontinence, urinary tract infections and the conservation or the deterioration of vesicoureteric reflux, is being accentuated. With the documentation of DES, the therapeutic strategy should aim at treating both the functional disorder of the vesicourethral unit and the functional constipation. The first part does not specify depending on the type of this disorder. Rarely, surgical treatment of functional urinary disorders may be required.
Go to article

Bibliography

1. Shaikh N., Hoberman A., Wise B., et al.: Dysfunctional elimination syndrome: is it related to urinary tract infection or vesicoureteral reflux diagnosed early in life? Pediatrics. 2003 Nov; 112 (5): 1134–1137.
2. Halachmi S., Farhat W.A.: Interactions of constipation, dysfunctional elimination syndrome, and vesicoureteral reflux. Adv Urol. 2008; 2008: 828275.
3. Aydoğdu O., Burgu B., Teber S., et al.: A challenging review of childhood incontinence: rare complications of dysfunctional elimination syndrome in an epileptic boy. Turk J Pediatr. 2011 Jan– Feb; 53 (1): 100–103.
4. Von Gontard A., Hollmann E.: Comorbidity of functional urinary incontinence and encopresis: somatic and behavioral associations. J Urol. 2004 Jun; 171 (6 Pt 2): 2644–2647.
5. Curran M.J., Kaefer M., Peters C., Logigian E., Bauer S.B.: The overactive bladder in childhood: long- term results with conservative management. J Urol. 2000 Feb; 163 (2): 574–577.
6. Hadjizadeh N., Motamed F., Abdollahzade S., Rafiei S.: Association of voiding dysfunction with functional constipation. Indian Pediatr. 2009 Dec; 46 (12): 1093–1095. Epub 2009 Apr 1.
7. Klijn A.J., Asselman M., Vijverberg M.A., et al.: The diameter of the rectum on ultrasonography as a diagnostic tool for constipation in children with dysfunctional voiding. J Urol. 2004 Nov; 172 (5 Pt 1): 1986–1988.
8. Wein A.J., Kavoussi L.R., Campbell M.F.: Urology Cambell-Walsh, 10th ed. Saunders Elsevier: 2012; 3418–3420.
9. O’Regan S., Yazbeck S.: Constipation: a cause of enuresis, urinary tract infection and vesico-ureteral reflux in children. Med Hypotheses. 1985 Aug; 17 (4): 409–413.
10. O’Regan S., Yazbeck S., Schick E.: Constipation, bladder instability, urinary tract infection syndrome. Clin Nephrol. 1985 Mar; 23 (3): 152–154.
11. Ab E., Schoemaker M., Van Empelen R.: Paradoxical movement of the pelvic floor in dysfunctional voiding and the results of biofeedback training. Br J Urol Int. 2002; 89: 48.
12. Patoulias I.: Voiding disturbance in childhood. 1st ed. Parisianos, Athens: 2011; 58– 59. ISBN 978- 960-394-723-3.
13. Loening-Baucke V.: Urinary incontinence and urinary tract infection and their resolution with treatment of chronic constipation of childhood. Pediatrics. 1997 Aug; 100 (2 Pt 1): 228–232.
14. Chase J., Austin P., Hoebeke P., McKenna P.: International Children's Continence Society. The management of dysfunctional voiding in children: a report from the Standardisation Committee of the International Children’s Continence Society. J Urol. 2010 Apr; 183 (4): 1296–1302.
15. Hoebeke P., Van Laecke E., Van Camp C., Raes A., Van De Walle J.: One thousand video-urodynamic studies in children with non-neurogenic bladder sphincter dysfunction. BJU Int. 2001 Apr; 87 (6): 575–580.
16. Herndon C.D., Decambre M., McKenna P.H.: Interactive computer games for treatment of pelvic floor dysfunction. J Urol. 2001 Nov; 166 (5): 1893–1898.
17. Hansson S., Hjalmas K., Jodal U., Sixt R.: Lower urinary tract dysfunction in girls with untreated asymptomatic or cover bacteriuria. J Urol. 1990; 143: 333–336.
18. Issenman R.M., Filmer R.B., Gorski P.A.: A review of bowel and bladder control development in children: how gastrointestinal and urologic conditions relate to problems in toilet training. Pediatrics 1999; 103: 1346–1352.
19. Regan S.O., Schick E., Hamburger B., Yazbeck S.: Constipation associated with vesicoureteral reflux. Urol. 1986; 28: 394–396.
20. Chen J.J., Mao W., Homayoon K., Steinhardt G.F.: A multivariate analysis of dysfunction elimination syndrome, and its relationships with gender, urinary tract infection and vesicoureteral reflux in children. J Urol. 2004; 171: 1907–1910.
21. Naseer S.R., Steinhardt G.F.: New renal scars in children with urinary tract infections, vesicoureteral reflux and voiding dysfunction: a prospective evaluation. J Urol. 1997 Aug; 158 (2): 566–568.
22. Mulders M.M., Cobussen-Boekhorst H., de Gier R.P., Feitz W.F., Kortmann B.B.: Urotherapy in children: quantitative measurements of daytime urinary incontinence before and after treatment according to the new definitions of the International Children’s Continence Society. J Pediatr Urol. 2011 Apr; 7 (2): 213–218.
23. Nevéus T., Von Gontard A., Hoebeke P., et al.: The standardization of terminology of lower urinary tract function in children and adolescents: report from the Standardisation Committee of the International Children’s Continence Society. J Urol. 2006 Jul; 176 (1): 314–324.
24. Farhat W., Bägli D.J., Capolicchio G., et al.: The dysfunctional voiding scoring system: quantitative standardization of dysfunctional voiding symptoms in children. J Urol. 2000 Sep; 164 (3 Pt 2): 1011–1015.
25. Bower W.F., Yip S.K., Yeung C.K.: Dysfunctional elimination symptoms in childhood and adulthood. J Urol. 2005 Oct; 174 (4 Pt 2): 1623–1627; discussion 1627–1628.
26. Vereecken R.L., Proesmans W.: Urethral instability as an important element of dysfunctional voiding. J Urol. 2000; 163: 585–588.
27. Dede O., Sakellaris G.: Daytime urinary incontinence. Essentials in Pediatr Urol. 2012; 57–68.
28. Desantis D.J., Leonard M.P., Preston M.A., Barrowman N.J., Guerra L.A.: Effectiveness of biofeedback for dysfunctional elimination syndrome in pediatrics: a systematic review. J Pediatr Urol. 2011 Jun; 7 (3): 342–348.
29. Dyer L.L., Franco I.: Botulinum Toxin-A Therapy in pediatric Urology: Indications for the Neurogenic and Non-Neurogenic Neurogenic Bladder. Scientific World J. 2009; 9: 1300–1305.
30. Kroll P., Jankowski A., Soltysiak J., et al.: Botulinum toxin-A injections in children with neurogenic bladder. Nephroourol. 2011; 3: 125–128.
31. Carr L.K.: Botulinum toxin A should not be first-line therapy for overactive bladder. Can Urol Assoc J. 2011 Jun; 5 (3): 204–205.
32. Steele S.S.: Botulinum toxin A: First-line therapy for idiopathic detrusor over activity. Can Urol Assoc J. 2011; 5: 207–209.
33. Barroso U. Jr, Tourinho R., Lordêlo P., Hoebeke P., Chase J.: Electrical stimulation for lower urinary tract dysfunction in children: a systematic review of the literature. Neurourol Urodyn. 2011 Nov; 30 (8): 1429–1436.
34. Lordêlo P., Soares P.V., Maciel I., Macedo A. Jr, Barroso U. Jr.: Prospective study of transcutaneous parasacral electrical stimulation for overactive bladder in children: long-term results. J Urol. 2009 Dec; 182 (6): 2900–2904.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Ioanna Gkalonaki
1
ORCID: ORCID
Ioannis Patoulias
1

  1. First Department of Pediatric Surgery, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki Greece, General Hospital “G.Gennimatas”, Thessaloniki, Greece
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Hutch Diverticulum (HD) is defined as the protrusion of the mucosal and submucosal layer through the muscle bundles of the underlying detrusor muscle. HD is located at the vesicoureteral junction with a backward direction from the homolateral ureteral orifice. As far as its etiology is con-cerned, HD is caused either by a congenital muscle wall defect at the level where the Waldeyer’s fascia occupies the clefts between the vesical part of the homolateral ureter and the detrusor, or is associated with abortive ureteral duplication or defective incorporation of mesonephric duct into the bladder at the site of ureteral hiatus or finally is associated with the development of transient urethral obstruction. HD is usually unilateral and more common in male patients. It may be associated with the Ehlers-Danlos, Williams-Elfin and Menkes syndromes. HD usually occurs in childhood and rarely during adulthood. It is found in 0.2–13% of all children presenting with urinary tract infection. Through this short review article, we attempt to present in detail the most recent bibliographic data concerning this entity, focusing on pathophysiology, diagnostic approach, and treatment strategy.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Ioanna Gkalonaki
1
ORCID: ORCID
Michail Anastasakis
1
Christina Panteli
1
Ioannis Patoulias
1

  1. First Department of Pediatric Surgery, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, General Hospital “G. Gennimatas”, Thessaloniki, Greece
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Scar development in the children’s renal cortex with vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) is one of the most important parameters of prognosis. It can develop regardless of the chosen treatment, even after the regression of VUR. The shape of the renal papillae, the ascending urinary tract infection, the greater than third-degree VUR, and finally the increased intra-calyceal pressure, induce the formation of renal scarring in the renal parenchyma. Renal scarring may complicate VUR independently of the therapeutic strategy (conservative or operative) and its regression. For restitution of this entity, many scientific terms have been used and the most common of them is intrarenal reflux (IRR). The effects of VUR on future renal function result from the limited ability of the affected kidney to grow (failure of renal growth) due to the existence of scars in the renal cortex, the worsening of these scars, or finally the creation of new scars. With the present study, we intend to clarify the etiology and the pathophysiology of IRR and the relation of VUR prognosis to newer biomarkers such as N-acetyl-beta-glycosaminidase, beta-2 microglobulin, Pen-traxin- 3 and Liver-type fatty-acid-binding protein.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Ioanna Gkalonaki
1
ORCID: ORCID
Evangelia Schoina
1
Michail Anastasakis
1
Ioannis Patoulias
1

  1. First Department of Pediatric Surgery, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, General Hospital “G. Gennimatas”, Thessaloniki, Greece

This page uses 'cookies'. Learn more