@ARTICLE{Mróz_Tomasz_Can_2023,
 author={Mróz, Tomasz},
 number={No 1},
 pages={275-289},
 journal={Przegląd Filozoficzny. Nowa Seria},
 howpublished={online},
 year={2023},
 publisher={Komitet Nauk Filozoficznych PAN},
 publisher={Wydział Filozofii Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego},
 abstract={The purpose of the paper is to argue for the view that Władysław Tatarkiewicz’s Historia filozofii [History of Philosophy] (1931) cannot be regarded as a work derived from the philosophical tradition of the Lvov‑Warsaw School. Tatarkiewicz was inspired to take up the history of philosophy thanks to his studies in Marburg (1909). When he came into contact with Twardowski and his students, Tatarkiewicz noticed that the history of philosophy was regarded by them as a discipline belonging to the field of history, and was sometimes completely disregarded. The fact that the postulate of order and clarity of language brought Tatarkiewicz closer to Twardowski seems to have been due to Tatarkiewicz’s personal inclinations rather than to Twardowski’s influence on him.},
 title={Can Historia filozofii by Władysław Tatarkiewicz Be Regarded as a Work of the Lvov‑Warsaw School?},
 type={Artykuł},
 URL={http://journals.pan.pl/Content/132797/16_2023-01-PFIL-PDF.pdf},
 doi={10.24425/pfns.2023.146793},
 keywords={historiography of philosophy, Lvov‑Warsaw School, Marburgian Neo‑Kantianism, Polish philosophy, W. Tatarkiewicz, K. Twardowski},
}