@ARTICLE{Chwedeńczuk_Bohdan_Ethics_2019,
 author={Chwedeńczuk, Bohdan},
 number={No 2},
 journal={Przegląd Filozoficzny. Nowa Seria},
 pages={53-67},
 howpublished={online},
 year={2019},
 publisher={Komitet Nauk Filozoficznych PAN},
 publisher={Wydział Filozofii Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego},
 abstract={The ethics of ‘theistic absolute morality’ (TAM), as any other ethical theory, must offer a definition of good, describe the connection between good and duty, and provide an effective guidance to human conduct. In the ethics of TAM we find, in my rendering of its claims, an irremediably unsuccessful definition of good, permanently loose connection between moral value and moral duty, and irreparably limited practical efficacy. It is not surprising that it has to be so, as it is a common condition of all ethical systems. The TAM ethics suffers, however, additionally from a unique conceptual trouble, but that is a story I have told elsewhere.},
 type={Artykuły / Articles},
 title={Ethics of supernaturalism},
 URL={http://journals.pan.pl/Content/112106/PDF/P.Filoz.%202-19%204-B.Chwedenczuk.pdf},
 doi={10.24425/pfns.2019.128508},
 keywords={existence of God, ‘God’, theistic absolute morality (TAM), incompleteness of TAM, ‘is’, logical commitments of TAM, master principle, moral code of TAM, ‘ought’},
}