@ARTICLE{Borodziej_Włodzimierz_Independence_2020, author={Borodziej, Włodzimierz and Gajos, Bartłomiej}, volume={Folge 13 : Plebiszite, Selbstbestimmung, Minderheitsrechte}, journal={Historie. Jahrbuch des Zentrums für Historische Forschung Berlin der Polnischen Akademie der Wissenschaften}, pages={134-152}, howpublished={online}, year={2020}, publisher={Zentrum für Historische Forschung Berlinder Polnischen Akademie der Wissenschaft}, abstract={The paper presents the comments of English, French, German, and Russian-language press, published in countries ranging from the USA to Soviet Russia, on the events in future Polish Second Republic between November 1918 till February 1919. The press certainly is not the ideal source to reconstruct the origins of reborn Poland. However, the press coverage reveals the stereotypes, misconceptions, impressions, and convictions of the authors, the expression of editors’ political line, sometimes even the governments of relevant countries. Alternatively, the press coverage reveals the lack of knowledge on the part of the above. “Old” Europe was wary of a new country, that was to emerge on the map of the continent. Simultaneously, some were seeing Poland as an important chain in the anti-Bolshevik cordon sanitaire. Most importantly, however, the contemporary press coverage reveals the lack of awareness of the basic political mechanisms and identity problems present in the lands of the emerging Polish Republic.}, type={Artykuły / Articles}, title={Independence in warped glass. Foreign Press on the First 100 Days of Reborn Poland, November 1918 – February 1919}, URL={http://journals.pan.pl/Content/116415/PDF/2020-01-HIST-08-Borodziej-Gajos.pdf}, doi={10.24425/historie.2020.133254}, keywords={World War I, Poland, independence, Eastern Europe, Treaty of Versailles}, }