@ARTICLE{Mohr_Dawid_Umstrittene_2021,
 author={Mohr, Dawid},
 volume={Folge 14},
 journal={Historie. Jahrbuch des Zentrums für Historische Forschung Berlin der Polnischen Akademie der Wissenschaften},
 pages={133-152},
 howpublished={online},
 year={2021},
 publisher={Zentrum für Historische Forschung Berlinder Polnischen Akademie der Wissenschaft},
 abstract={Founding myths constitute the substrate of national identities and political orders. Especially in times of political change, the significance of such myths becomes clear as conflicts develop around them, in which various political forces attempt to embed the power of interpretation of a founding event in their programmes. In Poland, this is clearly demonstrated by the continuing polarizing power of political camps around the founding myths of the Third Polish Republic: „Solidarność“ and the Round Table. For that reason, they attempt to personify them to a high degree in the person of Lech Wałęsa. As a representative example, his behaviour serves as a reference for the legitimation of the political programme of the struggling political forces. By using both, the narrative of traitor and hero as sources of reference, political action is justified because of the denial or recognition of the founding myths. The only unifying dogma is once again anticommunism.},
 type={Artykuły / Articles},
 title={Umstrittene Gründungsmythen. Der Konflikt um die Deutungsmacht über „Solidarność“ und Runden Tisch},
 URL={http://journals.pan.pl/Content/122269/PDF-MASTER/2021-01-HIST-07-Mohr.pdf},
 doi={10.24425/historie.2021.140447},
 keywords={Conspiracy myths/theories (Verschwörungsmythen), Myths of establishment (Gründungsmythen), 1989, political myths, interpretative authority (Deutungsmacht), Solidarność, Lech Wałęsa, mass media},
}