@ARTICLE{Sobkow_Agata_Conceptual_2022,
 author={Sobkow, Agata and Surowski, Marcin and Olszewska, Angelika and Antoniewska, Nina and Barcik, Katarzyna and Bartkiewicz, Urszula and Brzeska, Agnieszka and Brzozowska, Adrianna and Budrewicz, Oliwia and Choja, Jakub and Choma, Kamila and Chorbotowicz, Patrycja and Filimoniak, Michalina and Filip, Łukasz and Gambuś, Paweł and Gierlik, Weronika and Gonczar, Tomasz and Goryczka, Katarzyna and Góra, Maksymilian and Haczek, Marta and Hetmańczuk, Weronika and Holka, Zuzanna and Janosz, Aneta and Kikowska, Nikola and Kołcun, Joanna and Kozłowska, Zuzanna and Kujawińska, Monika and Kuleszczyk, Marcin and Lach-Galińska, Aleksandra and Latacz, Katarzyna and Ławniczak, Adam and Majewska, Katarzyna and Makowska, Klaudia and Mamzer, Marta and Marciniszyn, Iga and Masternak, Adam and Matuszek, Magdalena and Mehr, Jonasz and Miela, Ewelina and Mleczko, Monika and Morga, Paulina and Niemczyk, Magdalena and Ostrowski, Damian and Pełdiak, Jagoda and Piotrowicz, Kamil and Płuciennik, Antoni and Ryśkiewicz, Oskar and Sekuła, Weronika and Sikora, Małgorzata and Sikora, Natalia and Sitko, Daria and Sobczak, Agata and Sosenko, Julia and Stando, Sonia and Starek, Katarzyna and Ślak, Łukasz and Świtała, Jagoda and Świtniewska, Natalia and Tyc, Agnieszka and Urban, Olga and Wcisło, Natalia and Wiśniewska, Katarzyna and Wodzińska, Joanna and Zabiełło, Aleksandra and Żygadło, Monika and Zaleskiewicz, Tomasz and Traczyk, Jakub},
 volume={vol. 53},
 number={No 3},
 journal={Polish Psychological Bulletin},
 pages={138-151},
 howpublished={online},
 year={2022},
 publisher={Committee for Psychological Science PAS},
 abstract={We conducted pre-registered replications of 15 effects in the field of judgment and decision making (JDM). We aimed to test the generalizability of different classical and modern JDM effects, including, among others: less-is- better, anchoring, and framing to different languages, cultures, or current situations (COVID-19 pandemic). Replicated studies were selected and conducted by undergraduate psychology students enrolled in a decision-making course. Two hundred and two adult volunteers completed an online battery of replicated studies. With a classical significance criterion (p < .05), seven effects were successfully replicated (47%), five partially replicated (33%), and three did not replicate (20%). Even though research materials differed from the originals in several ways, the replication rate in our project is slightly above earlier reported findings in similar replication projects. We discuss factors that may underlie replication results (success vs. failure). We also stress the role of open science practices such as open data, open research materials, pre-registration, and registered reports in improving the replicability of results in the JDM field.},
 type={Article},
 title={Conceptual replication study of fifteen JDM effects: Insights from the Polish sample},
 URL={http://journals.pan.pl/Content/124284/PDF-MASTER/2022-03-PPB-02-Sobkow.pdf},
 doi={10.24425/ppb.2022.141862},
 keywords={replication, decision making, reproducibility, pre-registration, risk perception},
}