@ARTICLE{Polasik-Wrzosek_Karolina_Curtural_2011,
 author={Polasik-Wrzosek, Karolina},
 volume={vol. 41},
 pages={139-144},
 journal={Historyka Studia Metodologiczne},
 howpublished={online},
 year={2011},
 publisher={Polska Akademia Nauk Oddział PAN w Krakowie},
 publisher={Instytut Historii Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego},
 abstract={In Vnutri mysliashchikh mirov, Łotman claims that there is a connection between cultural memory and the nature of culture itself. In this article I attempt to respond to this hypothesis in regards to the relationship between cultural memory and the idea of culture, while in the context of writings by Jurij Łotman and Boris Uspienski. Based on their work on this subject, I conclude that culture could not exist if there would be no cultural memory, nor changes within the duration and fabric of said memory. As such, an analysis of cultural memory while utilizing the methadology of the Moscow-Tartu school may also answer lingering questions about culture in general. It follows, therefore, that if investigating the connection between the formation of culture and the construction of cultural memory is a fruitful means of analyzing cultural history, then this may also be a legimitate method for our analysis of history in general.},
 type={Artykuł},
 title={Curtural Memory and Historiography as a Record of Culture. Contexts for Consideration},
 URL={http://journals.pan.pl/Content/124362/PDF/12_Historyka_41_2011_Polasik_Wrzosek_Pamiec.pdf},
 keywords={critical history, historical policy, social engineering, unconventional history, memory},
}