@ARTICLE{Karolczuk_Aleksander_Critical_2004,
 author={Karolczuk, Aleksander and Macha, Ewald},
 volume={vol. 51},
 number={No 3},
 journal={Archive of Mechanical Engineering},
 pages={415-435},
 howpublished={online},
 year={2004},
 publisher={Polish Academy of Sciences, Committee on Machine Building},
 abstract={The critical plane orientations determined with account for maximum value of energy density parameters and the weight function method were compared to experimental fatigue fracture plane orientations. Energy density parameters used in two multiaxial fatigue failure criteria, i.e. (i) criterion of the maximum normal strain energy density on the critical plane and (ii) criterion of the maximum shear strain energy density on the critical plane were employed. In the other method, the weight functions were formed on the basis of energy parameters. These two methods were verified by experimental tests of 1802A steel. The material was subjected to cyclic and random bending, torsion and combined bending with torsion with different coefficients of cross correlation between normal and shear stresses. The calculated results are satisfactory for both methods.},
 type={Article},
 title={Critical and fracture plane orientations under multiaxial cyclic and random loading},
 URL={http://journals.pan.pl/Content/125007/PDF/10_MECHANICAL_51_2004_3_Karolczuk_Critical.pdf},
 keywords={damage accumulation method, weight function method, multiaxial random loading, fatigue fracture planes},
}