@ARTICLE{Remisiewicz_Łukasz_Gatekeeping_2023,
 author={Remisiewicz, Łukasz},
 number={No 3},
 journal={Nauka},
 pages={127-144},
 howpublished={online},
 year={2023},
 publisher={Biuro Upowszechniania i Promocji Nauki PAN},
 abstract={According to a widespread view, reviews in science are an instrument for the selection of ideas and people. The article analyzes the gatekeeping role of habilitation proceedings in Polish sociology, taking into account three main areas: (1) the power held in the field of sociology by individual and institutional selectors, (2) statistics on the results of selection, and (3) the fate of academics rejected in the gatekeeping process. It has been found that (1) in Polish sociology there are leading institutions that play the largest role in awarding habilitation degrees, but unlike in other disciplines, there is no phenomenon of domination in the field of review by specific scholars. (2) In the proceedings from 2013–2019, 12.5% of the proceedings ended with a refusal to grant the degree. In the set, no proceedings with a controversial outcome were found (e.g., conferring a degree with a preponderance of negative reviews or vice versa). In the examination of the review results, no trend of systematic gender discrimination was found. (3) 32% of those who were denied a degree left the scientific community, while 63% are still working at the same university as before the denial.},
 type={Artykuły / Articles},
 title={Gatekeeping of scientists in habilitation proceedings in Polish sociology},
 URL={http://journals.pan.pl/Content/128718/PDF-MASTER/N%23323-08-Remisiewicz.pdf},
 doi={10.24425/nauka.2023.147315},
 keywords={habilitation proceedings, gatekeeping, evaluation games, parametrization, Polish sociology, sociology of sociology},
}