@ARTICLE{Pyda_Janusz_Beyond_2023,
 author={Pyda, Janusz},
 volume={Tom 18},
 pages={53-71},
 journal={Studia Nauk Teologicznych PAN},
 howpublished={online},
 year={2023},
 publisher={Polskia Akademia Nauk - Komitet Nauk Teologicznych},
 abstract={The article is an attempt to present the main reasons why the anthropological hylomorphism of St. Thomas Aquinas goes beyond the monism-dualism dichotomy in metaphysical anthropology. It cannot, as is most often done, be classified as a substance dualism of the Cartesian type. It is also not a position that can be included in the group of materialistic monisms, even of the non-reductionist type. Aquinas‘s anthropological hylomorphism seems to be a position that contains both the intuitions of materialistic and dualistic positions in metaphysical anthropology, although not reducible to either of them. On closer examination of positions such as Aquinas‘s anthropological hylomorphism, the question must arise whether the dichotomous and disjunctive division of positions in metaphysical anthropology into materialistic and dualistic is justified and operational.},
 type={Artykuł},
 title={Beyond monism and dualism. Five arguments for the thesis that the anthropological hylomorphism of st. Thomas Aquinas is not a dualistic position},
 URL={http://journals.pan.pl/Content/128901/PDF/03_PYDA_146521_do%20publikacji.pdf},
 doi={10.24425/snt.2023.146521},
 keywords={metaphysical anthropology, materialistic monism, dualism, hylemorphism, Thomas Aquinas, Descartes},
}