TitleComposite Structure of Personal Networks, Age, and Well-being in Poland
Journal titlePolish Psychological Bulletin
Divisions of PASNauki Humanistyczne i Społeczne
PublisherCommittee for Psychological Science PAS
SourcePolish Psychological Bulletin; 2010; No 4
ReferencesBerkman L. (1979), Social Networks, Host Resistance, and Mortality: A Nine-Year Follow-Up Study of Alameda County Residents, American Journal of Epidemiology, 109, 186. ; Brandtstadter J. (1990), Tenacious Goal Pursuit and Flexible Goal Adjustment: Explication and Age-Related Analysis of Assimilative and Accommodative Strategies of Coping, Psychology and Aging, 5, 58, doi.org/10.1037/0882-7922.214.171.124 ; Brandtstadter J. (1994), Self-Percepts of Control in Middle and Later Adulthood: Buffering Losses by Rescaling Goals, Psychology and Aging, 9, 265, doi.org/10.1037/0882-79126.96.36.1995 ; Cacioppo J. (2009), JamesAlone in the Crowd: The Structure and Spread of Loneliness in a Large Social Network, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 977, doi.org/10.1037/a0016076 ; Cerstensen L. (1999), Taking Time Seriously: A Theory of Socioemotional Selectivity, American Psychologist, 54, 165, doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.54.3.165 ; Carstensen L. (1993), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 40. Developmental perspectives on motivation—Current theory and research in motivation, 209. ; Coleman J. (1988), Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital, The American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95, doi.org/10.1086/228943 ; Cutrona C. (1986), Objective Determinants of Perceived Social Support, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 349, doi.org/10.1037/0022-35188.8.131.529 ; Daatland S. (2003), From Variables to Lives: Inputs to a Fresh Agenda for Psychological Aging Research in Norway, European Psychologist, 8, 200, doi.org/10.1027//1016-9040.8.3.200 ; Depner C. (1988), Supportive Relationships in Later Life, Psychology and Aging, 3, 248. ; Dunbar R. (2008), Cognitive Constraints on the Structure and Dynamics of Social Networks, Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 12, 7, doi.org/10.1037/1089-26184.108.40.206 ; Hardy J. (1988), Cynical Hostility and Vulnerability to Disease: Social Support, Life Stress, and Physiological Response to Conflict, Health Psychology, 7, 447, doi.org/10.1037/0278-6220.127.116.117 ; Hawkley L. (2009), Loneliness Predicts Reduced Physical Activity: Cross-Sectional & Longitudinal Analyses, Health Psychology, 28, 354, doi.org/10.1037/a0014400 ; Lang F. (1994), Close Emotional Relationships in Late Life: Further Support for Proactive Aging in the Social Domain, Psychology and Aging, 9, 315, doi.org/10.1037/0882-7918.104.22.1685 ; Lansford J. (1998), Satisfaction With Social Networks: An Examination of Socioemotional Selectivity Theory Across Cohorts, Psychology and Aging, 13, 544, doi.org/10.1037/0882-7922.214.171.1244 ; Pagel D. (1987), Social Networks: We Get By With (and in Spite of) a Little Help From Our Friends, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 793, doi.org/10.1037/0022-35126.96.36.1993 ; Pavot W. (2004), The Subjective Evaluation of Well-Being in Adulthood: Findings and Implications, Ageing International, 29, 113, doi.org/10.1007/s12126-004-1013-4 ; Rook K. (1987), Reciprocity of Social Exchange and Social Satisfaction Among Older Women, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 145, doi.org/10.1037/0022-35188.8.131.52 ; Stephens M. (1987), Social Networks as Assets and Liabilities in Recovery From Stroke by Geriatric Patients, Psychology and Aging, 2, 125, doi.org/10.1037/0882-79184.108.40.206 ; Steverink N. (2006), Which Social Needs Are Important for Subjective Well-Being and What Happens to Them With Aging?, Psychology and Aging, 21, 281, doi.org/10.1037/0882-79220.127.116.111 ; Wahrendorf M. (2006), Social Productivity and Well-Being of Older People: Baseline Results From The SHARE Study, European Journal of Ageing, 3, 67, doi.org/10.1007/s10433-006-0028-y ; Wellman B. (1990), Different Strokes from Different Folks: Community Ties and Social Support, American Journal of Sociology, 96, 558, doi.org/10.1086/229572 ; Zacher H. (2009), Remaining Time and Opportunities at Work: Relationships Between Age, Work Characteristics, and Occupational Future Time Perspective, Psychology and Aging, 24, 487, doi.org/10.1037/a0015425
Aims and scopePolish Psychological Bulletin (founded in 1970) is an official journal of Polish Academy of Sciences, Committee for Psychological Science.The journal publish a variety of papers, including empirical reports of experiments, surveys and field studies, theoretical articles, controversies and analytic papers on important psychological topics. Relevance for an international readership is our prominent goal, Polish Psychological Bulletin does not publish clinical case studies, or technical articles. Submissions from all domains of psychology are encouraged, especially those that address new developments and pursue innovative approaches.
Periodically, the journal will announce a call for papers for special issues. The journal will also entertain unsolicited proposals for special issues that fit the stated scope of the Polish Psychiological Bulletin (please contact the journal’s Editor-in-Chief with a detailed description of your proposal).
All published research articles in this journal have undergone rigorous review, based on initial editor screening and anonymous evaluation of content and merit by independent expert reviewers.
For information on specific requirements, please see the Author Guidelines.
Abstracting & Indexing
Abstracting and Indexing Information
• DESY Publication Database
• Directory of Open Access Journal (DOAJ)
• Current Contents: Social & Behavioral Sciences
• ERIH Plus
• Google Scholar
• Index Copernicus
• Science Open
• SCOPUS (Elsevier)
Publication Ethics PolicyPeer Review and Ethics
Polish Psychological Bulletin is committed to peer-review integrity and upholding the highest standards of review.
Once your paper has been assessed for suitability by the editor, it will then be double blind peer reviewed by independent, anonymous authorities in the field.
Our guidance on publishing ethics is in accrdance with the COPE standards (see: https://publicationethics.org).