Title

Sentence Recognition in the Presence of Competing Speech Messages Presented in Audiometric Booths with Reverberation Times of 0.4 and 0.6 Seconds

Journal title

Archives of Acoustics

Yearbook

2011

Volume

vol. 36

Issue

No 1

Authors

Abouchacra, Kim ; Koehnke, Janet ; Besing, Joan ; Letowski, Tomasz

Keywords

sound field testing ; reverberation ; speech recognition

Divisions of PAS

Nauki Techniczne

Coverage

3-14

Publisher

Polish Academy of Sciences, Institute of Fundamental Technological Research, Committee on Acoustics

Date

2011

Type

Artykuły / Articles

Identifier

DOI: 10.2478/v10168-011-0001-4

Source

Archives of Acoustics; 2011; vol. 36; No 1; 3-14

References

Abouchacra K. (2000), Synchronized sentence set (S³) [Compact Disk #3]. ; Abouchacra K. (2001), Binaural Helmet: Improving speech recognition in noise with spatialized sound, Human Factors, 43, 584, doi.org/10.1518/001872001775870368 ; Abouchacra K. (2009), Clinical application of the Synchronized Sentence Set (S³), null. ; American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (1991), <i>Sound Field Measurement Tutorial. Working Group on Sound Field Calibration of the Committee on Audiological Evaluation</i>, American Speech-Language-Hearing Association <b>Supplement Jan</b>, 25-38. ; Begault D. (1994), Multichannel spatial Auditory display for speech communications, Journal of the Audio Engineering Society, 42, 819. ; Bolia R. (2000), A speech corpus for multitalker communications research, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 107, 1065, doi.org/10.1121/1.428288 ; Bregman A. (1990), Auditory Scene Analysis: The perceptual organization of sound. ; Bronkhorst A. (2000), The Cocktail Party Phenomenon: A review of research on speech intelligibility in multiple-talker conditions, Acustica - Acta Acustica, 86, 117. ; Brungart D. (2001), Informational and energetic masking effects in the perception of two simultaneous talkers, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 109, 1101, doi.org/10.1121/1.1345696 ; Cherry E. (1953), Some experiments on the recognition of speech, with one and with two ears, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 25, 975, doi.org/10.1121/1.1907229 ; Cooke M. (2006), A glimpsing model of speech perception in noise, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119, 1562, doi.org/10.1121/1.2166600 ; Cooke M. (2006), An audio-visual corpus for speech perception and automatic speech recognition, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 120, 2421, doi.org/10.1121/1.2229005 ; Darwin C. (2000a), Effectiveness of spatial cues, prosody, and talker characteristics in selective attention, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 107, 970, doi.org/10.1121/1.428278 ; Darwin C. (2000b), Effects of reverberation on spatial, prosodic and vocal-tract size cues to selective attention, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 108, 335, doi.org/10.1121/1.429468 ; Dirks D. (1969), The effect of spatially separated sound sources on speech intelligibility, Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 12, 5, doi.org/10.1044/jshr.1201.05 ; Dirks D. (1972), Speech audiometry: earphone and sound field, Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 37, 62, doi.org/10.1044/jshd.3702.176 ; Durlach N. (2003), Note on informational masking, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 113, 1984, doi.org/10.1121/1.1570435 ; Ericson M. (2004), Factors that influence intelligibility in multitalker speech displays, The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 14, 313, doi.org/10.1207/s15327108ijap1403_6 ; Festen J. (1990), Effects of fluctuating noise and interfering speech on the speech-reception threshold for impaired and normal hearing, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 88, 1725, doi.org/10.1121/1.400247 ; G. Kidd Jr. (2005), The advantage of knowing where to listen, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 118, 3804, doi.org/10.1121/1.2109187 ; G. Kidd Jr. (2008), Auditory Perception of Sound Sources, 143. ; Killion M. (2004), Development of a quick speech-in-noise test for measuring signal-to-noise ratio loss in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 116, 2395, doi.org/10.1121/1.1784440 ; MacKeith N. (1971), Binaural advantages in hearing of speech, Journal of Laryngology and Otology, 85, 214, doi.org/10.1017/S0022215100073369 ; (1997), Audiologic evaluation and management and speech perception assessment. ; Moore T. (1981), Voice communication jamming research, null. ; Nabelek A. (1989), Reverberant overlap- and self-masking in consonant identification, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 86, 1259, doi.org/10.1121/1.398740 ; Nilsson M. (1994), Development of the Hearing In Noise Test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and noise, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 95, 1085, doi.org/10.1121/1.408469 ; Peissig J. (1997), Directivity of binaural noise reduction in spatial multiple noise-source arrangements for normal and impaired listeners, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 101, 1660, doi.org/10.1121/1.418150 ; Rochlin G. (1993), Status of sound field audiometry among audiologists in the United States, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 4, 2, 59. ; Schneider B. (2007), How competing speech interferes with speech comprehension in everyday listening situations, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 18, 478, doi.org/10.3766/jaaa.18.7.4 ; Shinn-Cunningham B. (2005), Influences of spatial cues on grouping and understanding sound, null. ; Shinn-Cunningham B. (2008), Selective attention in normal and impaired hearing, Trends in Amplification, 12, 283, doi.org/10.1177/1084713808325306 ; Taylor B. (2003), Speech-in-noise tests: How and why to include them in your basic test battery, The Hearing Journal, 56, 40, doi.org/10.1097/01.HJ.0000293000.76300.ff