Title

Does Competitively Distinct Operation Enable Performance in Turbulent Business Environment? A Study on Finnish SMEs

Journal title

Management and Production Engineering Review

Yearbook

2016

Issue

No 3

Authors

Binod Timilsina

Keywords

Wydział IV Nauk Technicznych

Divisions of PAS

Wydział IV Nauk Technicznych

Publisher

Production Engineering Committee of the Polish Academy of Sciences, Polish Association for Production Management

Date

2016

Identifier

DOI: 10.1515/mper-2016-0029

Source

Management and Production Engineering Review; 2016; No 3

References

Susarla (2011), Integrated campaing planning and resource allocation in batch plants Computers &, Chemical Engineering, 35, 2990. ; Baum (2003), Strategic decision speed and firm performance, Strategic Management Journal, 24, 1107, doi.org/10.1002/smj.343 ; Ketkar (2010), Environmental dynamism human resource flexibility and firm performance : analysis of a multi - level causal model, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 21, 1173, doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2010.483841 ; Wilden (2015), The impact of dynamic capabilities on operational marketing and technological capabilities : investigating the role of environmental turbulence, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43, 181, doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0380-y ; Goodale (2011), Operations management and corporate entrepreneurship : the moderating effect of operations control on the antecedents of corporate entrepreneurial activity in relation to innovation performance, Journal of Operations Management, 29, 116, doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2010.07.005 ; Gaskill (1993), A factor analytic study of the perceived causes of small business failure, Journal of Small Business Management, 31, 18. ; Teece (1997), Dynamic capabilities and strategic management, Strategic Management Journal, 18, 509, doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z ; Rosenbusch (2013), The mediating role of entrepreneurial orientation in the task environment performance relationship A meta - analysis, Journal of Management, 39, 633, doi.org/10.1177/0149206311425612 ; Milliken (1990), Perceiving and interpreting environmental change : an examination of college administrators interpretation of changing demographics, Academy of Management Journal, 33, 42, doi.org/10.2307/256351 ; Paliszkiewicz (2014), Management trust organizational trust and organizational performance : advancing and measuring a theoretical model Management and Production, Engineering Review, 5, 32. ; Matzler (2006), Individual determinants of brand affect : the role of the personality traits of extraversion and openness to experience Journal of Product Brand, Management, 15, 427. ; Duncan (1972), Perceived environmental characteristics of operational environments and perceived environmental uncertainty, Administrative Science Quarterly, 17, 313, doi.org/10.2307/2392145 ; Vincent (2014), An integrated approach for resource allocation in manufacturing plants, Applied Mathematics and Computation, 245, 416, doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2014.07.112 ; Akgün (2008), The moderating role of environmental dynamism between firm emotional capability and performance, Journal of Organizational Change Management, 21, 230, doi.org/10.1108/09534810810856453 ; Chin (1998), The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling Modern Methods for, Business Research, 295, 295. ; Smith (1999), Role of market turbulence in shaping pricing strategy, Industrial Marketing Management, 28, 637, doi.org/10.1016/S0019-8501(98)00037-6 ; Edelman (2005), Coalignment in the resource performance relationship : strategy as mediator, Journal of Business Venturing, 20, 359, doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2004.01.004 ; Boyne (2009), Environmental turbulence organizational stability and public service performance Administration and, Society, 40, 799. ; Rodríguez (2008), Order positioning scope and outcomes of market entry, Industrial Marketing Management, 37, 154, doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2006.12.002 ; Helfat (2011), Untangling dynamic and operational capabilities : strategy for the everchanging world Role of entrepreneurship and market orientation in firm s success, Strategic Management Journal, 32, doi.org/10.1002/smj.955 ; Fornell (1981), Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error, Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39, doi.org/10.2307/3151312 ; Jaworski (1993), Market orientation : Antecedents and consequences of Marketing : a Quarterly Publication of the American Marketing Association, Journal, 57, 53. ; Tsai (2014), The contingent value of firm innovativeness for business performance under environmental turbulence International Entrepreneurship and Management, Journal, 10, 343. ; Zott (2003), Dynamic capabilities and the emergence of intraindustry differential firm performance : insights from a simulation study, Strategic Management Journal, 24, 97, doi.org/10.1002/smj.288 ; Emery (1965), The causal texture of organizational environments, Human Relations, 18, 21, doi.org/10.1177/001872676501800103 ; Coltman (2013), Modeling the operational capabilities for customized and commoditized services, Journal of Operations Management, 31, 555, doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2013.09.002 ; Camisón (2014), Organizational innovation as an enabler of technological innovation capabilities and firm performance, Journal of Business Research, 67, 2891, doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.06.004 ; Ainuddin (2007), Resource attributes and firm performance in international joint ventures, Journal of World Business, 42, 47, doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2006.11.001 ; Chakravarthy (1997), A new strategy framework for coping with turbulence, MIT Sloan Management Review, 38, 69. ; Chen (2010), Internationalization resource allocation and firm performance, Industrial Marketing Management, 39, 1103, doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2009.10.001 ; Cillo (2010), De Luca Market information approaches product innovativeness and firm performance : an empirical study in the fashion industry, Research Policy, 39, 1242, doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.06.004 ; Falshaw (2006), Evidence on formal strategic planning and company performance, Management Decision, 44, 9, doi.org/10.1108/00251740610641436 ; Kraatz (2001), How organizational resources affect strategic change and performance in turbulent environments : theory and evidence, Organization Science, 12, 632, doi.org/10.1287/orsc.12.5.632.10088 ; Verdú (2006), Environment - flexibility coalignment and performance : an analysis in large versus small firms, Journal of Small Business Management, 44, 334, doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627X.2006.00175.x ; Farahani (2010), A comparison of Partial Least Squares and Ordinary Least Squares regressions in predicting of couples mental health based on their communicational patterns Procedia - Social and Behavioral, Sciences, 5, 1459. ; Gonzalez (2009), Role of entrepreneurship and market orientation in firm s success, European Journal of Marketing, 43, 500, doi.org/10.1108/03090560910935550 ; Timilsina (2015), Competitively distinct operations as a key for superior and sustainable business performance : an example from Walmart, Management, 10, 273.

Aims and scope

MISSION STATEMENT Management and Production Engineering Review (MPER) is a peer-refereed, international, multidisciplinary journal covering a broad spectrum of topics in production engineering and management. Production engineering is a currently developing stream of science encompassing planning, design, implementation and management of production and logistic systems. Orientation towards human resources factor differentiates production engineering from other technical disciplines. The journal aims to advance the theoretical and applied knowledge of this rapidly evolving field, with a special focus on production management, organisation of production processes, manage- ment of production knowledge, computer integrated management of production flow, enterprise effectiveness, maintainability and sustainable manufacturing, productivity and organisation, forecasting, modelling and simu- lation, decision making systems, project management, innovation management and technology transfer, quality engineering and safety at work, supply chain optimization and logistics. Management and Production Engineering Review is published under the auspices of the Polish Academy of Sciences Committee on Production Engineering and Polish Association for Production Management. The main purpose of Management and Production Engineering Review is to publish the results of cutting- edge research advancing the concepts, theories and implementation of novel solutions in modern manufacturing. Papers presenting original research results related to production engineering and management education are also welcomed. We welcome original papers written in English. The Journal also publishes technical briefs, discussions of previously published papers, book reviews, and editorials. Letters to the Editor-in-Chief are highly encouraged.
SUBMISSION Papers for submission should be prepared according to the Authors Instructions available at: www.journals.pan.pl/mper
SUBSCRIPTION Only subscription guarantees receiving this journal. Subscription orders stating the period of time, along with the subscriber’s name and address should be sent directly to biuro@ptzp.org.pl. Back issues of all previously published volumes are available on request. Subscription price for 2023, Volume 14, including postage and handling, is 240 PLN.

Abstracting & Indexing

Index Copernicus
Web of Science - Clarivate (ESCI)
Scopus - Elsevier
SCIMAGO:
(CiteScore 2020 - 2.5
SJR 2020 - 0.332
SNIP 2020 - 1.061)