TitleWorkplace Innovation: Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Construct Validation
Journal titleManagement and Production Engineering Review
KeywordsWydział IV Nauk Technicznych
Divisions of PASWydział IV Nauk Technicznych
PublisherProduction Engineering Committee of the Polish Academy of Sciences, Polish Association for Production Management
SourceManagement and Production Engineering Review; 2017; No 2
ReferencesHead (2014), Public administration and the promise of evidence - based policy : experience in and beyond Australia Asia Pacific of, Journal Public Administration, 36, 48. ; Torugsa (2016), Complexity of Innovation in the public sector : a workgroup - level analysis of related factors and outcomes, Public Management Review, 18, 392. ; Hood (1991), A public management for all seasons ?, Public Administration, 69, 3. ; Kim (2015), An innovation - driven culture in local government : do senior manager s transformational leadership and the climate for creativity matter ?, Public Personnel Management, 44, 147. ; Shah (2006), Use of structural equation modeling in operations management research : looking back and forward Jan, Journal of Operations Management, 24, 148. ; Wynen (2014), van Innovation - oriented culture in the public sector : do managerial autonomy and result control lead to innovation ?, Public Management Review, 16, 45. ; Axtell (2000), Shopfloor innovation : facilitating the suggestion and implementation of ideas Sep, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73, 265. ; Fabrigar (1999), Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research Sep, Psychological Methods, 4, 272. ; Hogarty (2005), The Quality of Factor Solutions in Exploratory Factor Analysis : The Influence of Sample Size Communality and Overdetermination Apr, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 65, 202. ; Moon (1999), The pursuit of managerial entrepreneurship : does organization matter ?, Public Administration Review, 59, 31. ; Moore (2008), Innovations in governance Jan, Public Management Review, 10, 3. ; Rank (2004), Three avenues for future research on creativity innovation and initiative, Applied Psychology, 53, 518. ; Woodman (1993), Toward a theory of organizational creativity Apr, Academy of Management Review, 18, 293. ; Pot (2011), Workplace innovation for better jobs and performance of Productivity and Performance Management Apr, International Journal, 60, 404. ; MacCallum (1999), Sample size in factor analysis Mar, Psychological Methods, 4, 84. ; Koberg (1987), Organizational culture relationships with creativity and other job - related variables, Journal of Business Research, 15, 397. ; Gerbing (1988), An updated paradigm for scale development incorporating unidimensionality and its assessment pp, Journal of Marketing Research, 186. ; Gallagher (2008), A journey into the unknown taking the fear out of structural equation modeling with AMOS for the first - time user The Marketing, Review, 8, 255. ; Scott (1994), Determinants of innovative behavior : a path model of individual innovation in the workplace, Academy of Management Journal, 37, 580. ; Bagozzi (1988), On the evaluation of structural equation models Mar, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16, 74. ; Torugsa (2015), The nature and incidence of workgroup innovation in the Australian public sector : evidence from the Australian state of the service survey, Australian Journal of Public Administration, 75, 202. ; Oke (2009), The influence of leadership on innovation processes and activities Jan, Organizational Dynamics, 38, 64. ; Crockett (1987), Congruence between objective and self - report data in a sample of young adolescents, Journal of Adolescent Research, 2, 383. ; Walker (2008), An empirical evaluation of innovation types and organizational and environmental characteristics, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18, 591. ; Fernandez (2011), Understanding employee motivation to innovate : evidence from front line employees in United States federal agencies, Australian Journal of Public Administration, 70, 202. ; Bolin (2008), An empirical study of bureaucratic and post - bureaucratic characteristics in workplaces Nov, Economic and Industrial Democracy, 29, 541. ; MacCallum (1986), Specification searches in covariance structure modeling, Psychological Bulletin, 100, 107. ; Amabile (1988), A model of creativity and innovation in organizations Jan, Research in Organizational Behavior, 10, 123. ; McGregor (2007), The world s most innovative companies, Business Week Online, 9. ; Hoch (2013), Shared Leadership and Innovation : The Role of Vertical Leadership and Employee Integrity, Journal of Business and Psychology, 28, 159. ; Koufteros (1999), Testing a model of pull production : a paradigm for manufacturing research using structural equation modeling, Journal of Operations Management, 17, 467. ; Ping (2004), On assuring valid measures for theoretical models using survey data Feb, Journal of Business Research, 57, 125. ; Lowry (2014), Partial Least Squares PLS Structural Equation Modeling SEM for building and testing Behavioral Causal Theory : when to choose it and how to use it, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 57, 123. ; Shin (2003), Transformational leadership conservation and creativity : evidence from Korea Dec, Academy of Management Journal, 46, 703.
Aims and scopeMISSION STATEMENT Management and Production Engineering Review (MPER) is a peer-refereed, international, multidisciplinary journal covering a broad spectrum of topics in production engineering and management. Production engineering is a currently developing stream of science encompassing planning, design, implementation and management of production and logistic systems. Orientation towards human resources factor differentiates production engineering from other technical disciplines. The journal aims to advance the theoretical and applied knowledge of this rapidly evolving field, with a special focus on production management, organisation of production processes, manage- ment of production knowledge, computer integrated management of production flow, enterprise effectiveness, maintainability and sustainable manufacturing, productivity and organisation, forecasting, modelling and simu- lation, decision making systems, project management, innovation management and technology transfer, quality engineering and safety at work, supply chain optimization and logistics. Management and Production Engineering Review is published under the auspices of the Polish Academy of Sciences Committee on Production Engineering and Polish Association for Production Management. The main purpose of Management and Production Engineering Review is to publish the results of cutting- edge research advancing the concepts, theories and implementation of novel solutions in modern manufacturing. Papers presenting original research results related to production engineering and management education are also welcomed. We welcome original papers written in English. The Journal also publishes technical briefs, discussions of previously published papers, book reviews, and editorials. Letters to the Editor-in-Chief are highly encouraged.
SUBMISSION Papers for submission should be prepared according to the Authors Instructions available at: www.journals.pan.pl/mper
SUBSCRIPTION Only subscription guarantees receiving this journal. Subscription orders stating the period of time, along with the subscriber’s name and address should be sent directly to the Editorial Office. Back issues of all previously published volumes are available on request. Subscription price for 2021, Volume 12, including postage and handling, is 200 PLN.
Abstracting & IndexingIndex Copernicus
Web of Science - Clarivate (ESCI)
Scopus - Elsevier
(CiteScore 2020 - 2.5
SJR 2020 - 0.332
SNIP 2020 - 1.061)