Employees Motivation and Openness for Continuous Improvement: Comparative Study in Polish and Japanese Companies

Journal title

Management and Production Engineering Review




No 3



Wydział IV Nauk Technicznych

Divisions of PAS

Wydział IV Nauk Technicznych


Production Engineering Committee of the Polish Academy of Sciences, Polish Association for Production Management




DOI: 10.1515/mper-2017-0030


Management and Production Engineering Review; 2017; No 3


Hackman (1980), Redesign, Work. ; Aldag (1977), Brief The intrinsic - extrinsic dichotomy Toward conceptual clarity of, Academy Management Review, 30, 496. ; Hackman (1976), Motivation through the design of work : test of a theory and Performance, Organizational Behavior Human, 16, 250. ; Womack (1990), The Machine that Changed the World Publishers New York, null, 17. ; (null), https knoema com, null, 39. ; Holtskog (2013), Ringen How enablers for lean product development motivate engineers Special Issue, International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 18, 12. ; Nash (1951), Non Cooperative Games The of, Annals Mathematics, 286. ; Maslow (1943), theory of human motivation Retrieved fromhttp psychclassics yorku ca Maslow motivation htm, Psychological Review, 370. ; Pinder (1998), Motivation in Organizational Behavior Upper Saddle, Work, 28. ; Hackman (1971), Employee reactions to job characteristics of, Journal Applied Psychology, 31, 259. ; (null), http www tradingeconomics com japan gdp growth, null. ; De Treville (2006), Could lean production job design be intrinsically motivating ? Contextual configurational and levels - of - analysis issues of, Journal Operations Management, 14, 99. ; (null), http grading jpn org, null. ; Brunet (2003), New in Japan An Empirical Study of Operations and Production Management, International Journal, 22, 12. ; Rapp (2002), development of improvement activities : the long - term operation of a suggestion scheme in a Swedish company Quality, Sustainable Total Management, 13, 945. ; Bateman (2003), Companies perceptions of inhibitors and enablers for process improvement activities of, International Journal Operations Production Management, 11, 185. ; Farris (2009), Critical success factors for human resource outcomes in Kaizen events : an empirical study Production, Int J Economics, 25, 117. ; IAEA (1491), Management of continual improvement for facilities and activities a structured approach Agency, International Atomic Energy, 26. ; Chih Wei Wu (2004), new focus on overcoming the improvement failure, Technovation, 24, 585. ; Wachter (2014), system of safety management practices and worker engagement for reducing and preventing accidents : An empirical and theoretical investigation and, Accident Analysis Prevention, 68. ; Jing (2011), Empirical study on transferability of Kaizen practices The th International the th APDSI Joint Meeting, Taiwan, 21. ; Terziovski (2000), The adoption of continuous improvement and innovation strategies in Australian manufacturing firms, Technovation, 20, 539. ; Ohno (1988), Toyota Production System Beyond Large Scale Production Productivity, null. ; Holtskog (2013), Continuous Improvement beyond the Lean understanding, null, 15, 575. ; Stadnicka (null), Continuous improvement practice in large enterprises study results, Int J Qual Res, 9, 37. ; Carvalho (2016), Performance Enhancing in the Manufacturing Industry : An Improvement KATA Application International Conference on and Bali, IEEE Industrial Engineering Engineering Management, 4. ; Swartling (2013), Management Initiation of Continuous Improvement from a Motivational Perspective of Research, Journal Applied Economics Business, 13, 81. ; Latham (2005), motivation theory and research at the dawn of the twenty - first century, Work Annu Rev Psychol, 29, 485. ; Takeuchi (2008), The contradictions that drive Toyota s success, Harvard Business Review, 19, 96. ; Rother (2009), Toyota Managing People for Improvement Superior Results, null. ; Nash (1950), Equilibrium points in n person games Proceedings of the National Academy of, Sciences, 36, 1. ; Bateman (2002), Process improvement programmes : a model for assessing sustainability of Operations and Production Management, International Journal, 27, 515. ; Garcia (2011), Can we still talk about continuous improvement ? Rethinking enablers and inhibitors for successful implementation Technology Management, Int J, 12, 55. ; Venkataiah (2012), Relationship between kaizen event and perceived quality performance in Indian automobile industry of and Studies, International Journal Management Business, 23, 2231. ; Shah (2003), Lean manufacturing context practice bundles and performance of, Journal Operations Management, 16, 129. ; (2014), Situation of households in in the light of the results of household budgets studies Available in Polish in http gov pl, stat. ; Marinova (null), Change - oriented behavior meta - analysis of individual and job design predictors of, Journal Vocational Behavior, 20, 88.

Aims and scope

MISSION STATEMENT Management and Production Engineering Review (MPER) is a peer-refereed, international, multidisciplinary journal covering a broad spectrum of topics in production engineering and management. Production engineering is a currently developing stream of science encompassing planning, design, implementation and management of production and logistic systems. Orientation towards human resources factor differentiates production engineering from other technical disciplines. The journal aims to advance the theoretical and applied knowledge of this rapidly evolving field, with a special focus on production management, organisation of production processes, manage- ment of production knowledge, computer integrated management of production flow, enterprise effectiveness, maintainability and sustainable manufacturing, productivity and organisation, forecasting, modelling and simu- lation, decision making systems, project management, innovation management and technology transfer, quality engineering and safety at work, supply chain optimization and logistics. Management and Production Engineering Review is published under the auspices of the Polish Academy of Sciences Committee on Production Engineering and Polish Association for Production Management. The main purpose of Management and Production Engineering Review is to publish the results of cutting- edge research advancing the concepts, theories and implementation of novel solutions in modern manufacturing. Papers presenting original research results related to production engineering and management education are also welcomed. We welcome original papers written in English. The Journal also publishes technical briefs, discussions of previously published papers, book reviews, and editorials. Letters to the Editor-in-Chief are highly encouraged.
SUBMISSION Papers for submission should be prepared according to the Authors Instructions available at:
SUBSCRIPTION Only subscription guarantees receiving this journal. Subscription orders stating the period of time, along with the subscriber’s name and address should be sent directly to Back issues of all previously published volumes are available on request. Subscription price for 2023, Volume 14, including postage and handling, is 240 PLN.

Abstracting & Indexing

Index Copernicus
Web of Science - Clarivate (ESCI)
Scopus - Elsevier
(CiteScore 2020 - 2.5
SJR 2020 - 0.332
SNIP 2020 - 1.061)