Details

Title

Changes in Metaphor Comprehension in Children

Journal title

Polish Psychological Bulletin

Yearbook

2009

Numer

No 4

Authors

Divisions of PAS

Nauki Humanistyczne i Społeczne

Publisher

Committee for Psychological Science PAS

Date

2009

Identifier

DOI: 10.2478/s10059-009-0015-1

Source

Polish Psychological Bulletin; 2009; No 4

References

Blasko D. (1999), Only a tip of the iceberg: who understands what about metaphor?, Journal of Pragmatics, 31, 1675. ; Brisard F. (2001), Processing unfamiliar metaphors in self-paced reading task, Metaphor and Symbol, 16, 1-2, 87. ; Ciechanowicz A. (1981), Ewolucja skojarzeniowej struktury pola semantycznego wyrazów u dzieci w wieku od 2 do 15 lat. ; Chiappe D. (2003), Reversibility, aptness, and the conventionality of metaphors and similes, Metaphor and Symbol, 18, 2, 85. ; Dryll, E. M. (2006). The development of abilities of metaphor comprehension. MA thesis, under supervision of Barbara Bokus, Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw. ; Dryll E. (2007), Badanie pól semantycznych jako metoda ustalania znaczeń metafor. [Exploring semantic fields as a method of establishing the meanings of metaphors], null. ; Gąsiorek K. (1995), Językowy obraz świata dzieci i młodzieży. ; Gentner D. (2001), Convention, form and language processing, Metaphor and Symbol, 16, 3-4, 223. ; Gineste M. (2000), Emergence of features in metaphor comprehension, Metaphor and Symbol, 15, 3, 117. ; Glucksberg S. (2003), The psycholinguistics of metaphor, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 2. ; Gluckberg S. (2008), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought. ; Gluckberg S. (2001), Inhibition of the literal: Filtering of metaphor-irrelevant information during metaphor comprehension, Metaphor and Symbol, 16, 3-4, 277. ; Haman M. (2002), Pojęcia i ich rozwój: percepcja, doświadczenie i naiwne teorie. ; Jones L. (2005), Metaphor comprehension as attributive categorization, Journal of Memory and Language, 53, 110. ; Keil F. (1986), Conceptual domains and the acquisition of metaphor, Cognitive Development, 1, 73. ; Kennedy J. (1999), What makes a metaphor stronger than a simile?, Metaphor and Symbol, 14, 1, 63. ; Kittay E. (1981), Semantic Fields and the Structure of Metaphor, Studies in Language, 5, 31. ; Kliś M. (2004), Narracja. Koncepcje i badania psychologiczne. ; Kubicka, D. (1987). Kształtowanie się i funkcjonowanie znaczeń przenośnych u uczniów 10-14- letnich z różnych środowisk społecznokulturowych. [Formation and functioning of non-literal meanings in 10- 14-year-old pupils from different socio-cultural environments]. (Doctoral dissertation, under the supervision of M. Przetacznik-Gierowska, Jagiellonian University, 1987). Kraków. ; Kubicka D. (2005), Myślenie metaforyczne i jego uwarunkowania u dzieci w wieku od 4 do 10 lat. [Metaphorical thinking and it's conditions in 4-10 year olds], Studia Psychologiczne, 43, 2, 59. ; Ricoeur P. (1978), Metaphorical process as cognition, imagination, and feeling, Critical Inquiry, 5, 1, 143. ; Ricoeur P. (1984), Proces metaforyczny jako poznanie, wyobrażanie i odczuwanie [The metaphorical process as cognition, imagination, feeling], Pamiętnik Literacki, 75, 2, 267. ; Ritchie D. (2003), Categories and similarities: a note on circularity, Metaphor and Symbol, 18, 1, 49. ; Rittel T. (1995), Językowy obraz świata dzieci i młodzieży. ; Young J. (2001), Risk(ing) metaphors, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 12, 607.

Aims and scope

Polish Psychological Bulletin (founded in 1970) is an official journal of Polish Academy of Sciences, Committee for Psychological Science.The journal publish a variety of papers, including empirical reports of experiments, surveys and field studies, theoretical articles, controversies and analytic papers on important psychological topics. Relevance for an international readership is our prominent goal, Polish Psychological Bulletin does not publish clinical case studies, or technical articles. Submissions from all domains of psychology are encouraged, especially those that address new developments and pursue innovative approaches.

Periodically, the journal will announce a call for papers for special issues. The journal will also entertain unsolicited proposals for special issues that fit the stated scope of the Polish Psychiological Bulletin (please contact the journal’s Editor-in-Chief with a detailed description of your proposal).

All published research articles in this journal have undergone rigorous review, based on initial editor screening and anonymous evaluation of content and merit by independent expert reviewers.

For information on specific requirements, please see the Author Guidelines.

Abstracting & Indexing


Abstracting and Indexing Information


• DESY Publication Database

• Directory of Open Access Journal (DOAJ)

• Current Contents: Social & Behavioral Sciences

• Dimensions

• EBSCO

• ERIH Plus

• Google Scholar

• Index Copernicus

• ProQuest

• PsychArchives

• Science Open

• SCOPUS (Elsevier)

• Sherpa/RoMEO

Publication Ethics Policy

Peer Review and Ethics

Polish Psychological Bulletin is committed to peer-review integrity and upholding the highest standards of review.
Once your paper has been assessed for suitability by the editor, it will then be double blind peer reviewed by independent, anonymous authorities in the field.
Our guidance on publishing ethics is in accrdance with the COPE standards (see: https://publicationethics.org).
×