Tytuł artykułu

Determining the influence of the size of grain moth eggson Trichogramma evanescens indicators

Tytuł czasopisma

Journal of Plant Protection Research




vol. 61


No 1


Golub, Gennadii : Department of Tractors, Automobiles and Bioenergy System, National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine ; Marus, Oleh : Department of Tractors, Automobiles and Bioenergy System, National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine


Słowa kluczowe

fecundity ; females ; regeneration of individuals ; search ability

Wydział PAN

Nauki Biologiczne i Rolnicze




Committee of Plant Protection PAS ; Institute of Plant Protection – National Research Institute


1. Buranova S., Cerny J., Mitura K., Lipinska K., Kovarik J., Balik J. 2016. Effect of organic and mineral fertilizers on yield parameters and quality of wheat grain. Scientia Agriculturae Bohemica 47 (2): 47–53. DOI: 10.1515/sab-2016-0008
2. Cagnotti С.L., Hernбndez C.M., Andormo A.V., Viscarret M., Riquelme M., Botto E.N., Lуpez S.N. 2016. Acceptability and suitability of Tuta absoluta eggs from irradiated parents to parasitism by Trichogramma nerudai and Trichogramma pretiosum (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae). Agricultural and Forest Entomology 18: 198–205. DOI: 10.1111/afe.12152
3. Davies A.P., Pufke U.S., Zalucki M.P. 2011. Spatio-temporal variation in Helicoverpa egg parasitism by Trichogramma in a tropical Bt-transgenic cotton landscape. Agricultural and Forest Entomology 13: 247–258. DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-9563.2010.00512.x
4. Delpuech J., Delahaye M. 2013. The sublethal effects of deltamethrin on Trichogramma behaviors during the exploitation of host patches. Science of the Total Environment 447: 274–279. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.12.096
5. Golub G., Marus O., Chuba V. 2019. Parameters of pneumatic calibrator of grain moth eggs for Trichogramma production. Scientia Agriculturae Bohemica 50 (2): 117–126. DOI: 10.2478/sab-2019-0017
6. Golyshin N.M. 1983. Methodical instructions for the industrial production of Trichograms at biofactories. All-Union Scientific Research Institute of Biological Methods of Plant Protection, Moscow, Science, 76 p.
7. Greenberg S.M., Legaspi J.C., Nordlund D.A., Wu Z.X., Legaspi Jr.B., Saldãna R. 1998. Evaluation of Trichogramma spp. (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) against two pyralid stemborers of Texas sugarcane. Journal of Entomological Science 33 (2): 158–164.
8. Hamouz P., Hamouzova K., Novotna K. 2015. Effects of spring herbicide treatments on winter wheat growth and grain yield. Scientia Agriculturae Bohemica 46 (1): 1–6. DOI: 10.1515/sab-2015-0010
9. Henry C.J., Day K.R. 2000. Egg allocation by Bracon hylobii Ratz., the principal parasitoid of the large pine weevil ( Hylobius abietis L.), and implications for host suppression. Agricultural and Forest Entomology 3: 11–18.
10. Khan M.A. 2017. Effects of selected baculoviruses on oviposition preference by Trichogramma chilonis (Trichogrammatidae: Hymenoptera). Journal of King Saud University 29: 214–220. DOI: 10.1016/j.jksus.2016.06.002
11. Manandhara R., Wright M.G. 2015. Enhancing biological control of corn earworm, Helicoverpa zea and thrips through habitat management and inundative release of Trichogramma pretiosum in corn cropping systems. Biological Control 89: 84–90. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2015.05.020
12. Mandour N.S., Sarhan A.A, Atwa D.H. 2012. The integration between Trichogramma evanescens West. (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) and selected bioinsecticides for controlling the potato tuber moth Phthorimaea operculella (Zell.) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) of stored potatoes. Journal of Plant Protection Research 52 (1): 40–46. DOI: 10.2478/v10045-012-0007-6
13. Marus O., Golub G., Chuba V. 2020. Investigation of influence of calibration of grain moth eggs on production of Trichogramma for biological protection of plants. Engineering for Rural Development 19: 1621–1626. DOI: 10.22616/ERDev2020.19.TF416
14. Marus O.A., Golub G.A. 2014. Problems of technical support for the production of the entomological preparation Trichogramma. Scientific and Practical Journal: Agricultural Technology and Energy Supply 1 (1): 121–126.
15. Medoni L.F., Hermicheva F.M., Shlyakhtych V.A. 1980. Characteristics of an imago Trichogramma in connection with its updating. Trichogramma 1: 33–38.
16. Oliveira C.М., Oliveira J.V., Barbosa D.R.S., Breda M.O., Franзa S.M., Duarte B.L.R. 2017. Biological parameters and thermal requirements of Trichogramma pretiosum for the management of the tomato fruit borer (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) in tomatoes. Crop Protection 99: 39–44. DOI: 10.1016/j.cropro.2017.04.005
17. Pallewatta P.K.T.N.S. 1986. Factors Afecting Progeny and Sex Allocation by the Egg Parasitoid Trichogramma evanescens Westwood. Thesis, London, 420 pp.
18. Parsaeyan E., Safavi S.A., Saber M., Poorjavad N. 2018. Effects of emamectin benzoate and cypermethrin on the demography of Trichogramma brassicae Bezdenko. Crop Protection 110: 269–274. DOI: 10.1016/j.cropro.2017.03.026
19. Preetha G., Manoharan T., Stanley J., Kuttalam S. 2010. Impact of chloronicotinyl insecticide, imidacloprid on egg, egg-larval and larval parasitoids under laboratory conditons. Journal of Plant Protection Research 50 (4): 535–540. DOI: 10.2478/v10045-010-0088-z
20. Rampelotti-Ferreira F.T., Jr A.C., Parra J.R.P., Vendramim J.D. 2017. Selectivity of plant extracts for Trichogramma pretiosum Riley (Hym.: Trichogrammatidae). Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 138: 78–82. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2016.12.026
21. Reznik S.Y., Samartsev K.G. 2015. Multigenerational maternal inhibition of prepupal diapause in two Trichogramma species (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae). Journal of Insect Physiology 81: 14–20. DOI: 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2015.06.012
22. Shelestova V.S., Melnichuk S.D., Goncharenko O.І., Drozda V.F. 2004. The indicators qualitative of Trichogramma. Methodical recommendations on the application of Trichogramma against pests of agricultural crops, Kyiv, Publishing Center of the National Agrarian University, 59 p.
23. Telenga N.A., Shchepetylnikova V.A. 1949. A Guide to the Reproduction and Use of Trichogramma for Agriculture Pest Management, Kyiv, Publishing House of the Academy of Sciences of the Ukrainian SSR, 99 p.
24. Thubru D.P., Firake D.M., Behere G.T. 2018. Assessing risks of pesticides targeting lepidopteran pests in cruciferous ecosystems to eggs parasitoid, Trichogramma brassicae (Bezdenko). Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences 25: 680–688. DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2016.04.007
25. van Alphen J.J., Jervis M.A. 1996. Foraging behaviour. p. 62. In: “Insect Natural Enemies. Practical Approaches to their Study and Evaluation” (M. Jervis and N. Kidd, eds.). Chapman & Hall, U.K.
26. Vlasicova E., Naglova Z. 2015. Differences in the financial management of conventional, organic, and biodynamic farms. Scientia Agriculturae Bohemica 46 (3): 106–111. DOI: 10.1515/sab-2015-0024
27. Waage J.K., Lane J.A. 1984. The reproductive strategy of a parasitic wasp: II. Sex allocation and local mate competition in Trichogramma evanescens. The Journal of Animal Ecology 53 (2): 417–426.
28. Waage J.K., Ming N.S. 1984. The reproductive strategy of a parasitic wasp: I. Optimal progeny and sex allocation in Trichogramma evanescens. The Journal of Animal Ecology 53 (2): 401–415.
29. Wanga Z.Y., He K.L., Zhang F., Lu X., Babendreier D. 2014. Mass rearing and release of Trichogramma for biological control of insect pests of corn in China. Biological Control 68: 136–144. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2013.06.015
30. Wu L., Hoffmann A.A., Thomson L.J. 2016. Potential impact of climate change on parasitism efficiency of egg parasitoids: A meta-analysis of Trichogramma under variable climate conditions. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 231: 143–155. DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2016.06.028






DOI: 10.24425/jppr.2021.136264 ; ISSN 1427-4345 ; eISSN 1899-007X


Journal of Plant Protection Research; 2021; vol. 61; No 1; 1-10