The impact of corporate social responsibility on social acceptance as a determinant of the sustainable mineral extraction – Polish case study

Journal title

Gospodarka Surowcami Mineralnymi - Mineral Resources Management




vol. 37


No 1


Łacny, Zuzanna : AGH University of Science and Technology, Kraków, Poland ; Ostręga, Anna : AGH University of Science and Technology, Kraków, Poland



corporate social responsibility ; social acceptance ; social license to operate ; mineral extraction

Divisions of PAS

Nauki Techniczne




Komitet Zrównoważonej Gospodarki Surowcami Mineralnymi PAN ; Instytut Gospodarki Surowcami Mineralnymi i Energią PAN


1. Bernatt, M. 2009. Corporate Social Responsibility. Constitutional and International Perspective, Warszawa, Centre of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies, Management Faculty, University of Warsaw, 192. [Online] https://cars. [Accessed: 2019-06-06]
2. Boutilier, R. 2017. A Measure Of The Social License To Operate For Infrastructure And Extractive Projects. [Online] [Accessed 2020-06-06].
3. Boutilier, R. and Thomson, I. 2011. Modelling and measuring the social license to operate: fruits of a dialogue between theory and practice. Social Licence, pp. 1–10.
4. Carroll, A.B. 2016. Carroll’s pyramid of CSR: taking another look. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility 1, 3.
5. Cooney, J. 2017. Reflections on the 20th anniversary of the term ‘social licence’. Journal of Energy & Natural Resources Law 35, pp. 197–200.
6. Directive 2014/95/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2014 amending Directive 2013/34/EU as regards disclosure of non-financial and diversity information by certain large undertakings and groups Text with EEA relevance. Official Journal of the European Union, L 330/1.
7. Dodd, E.M. 1932. For Whom Are Corporate Managers Trustees? Harvard Law Review 45, pp. 1145–1163.
8. Friedman, M. 2007. The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits. [In:] Zimmerli, W.C., Holzinger, M. and Richter, K. (eds.) Corporate Ethics and Corporate Governance. Berlin: Heidelberg: Springer.
9. Harjoto, M.A. and Jo, H. 2011. Corporate governance and CSR nexus. Journal of Business Ethics 100, pp. 45–67.
10. Hitch, M. and Fidler, C.R. 2007. Impact and benefit agreements: A contentious issue for environmental and aboriginal justice. Environments Journal 35(2), pp. 45–69.
11. Hop, N. and Kudełko, J. 2013. Social responsibility of business as element of development policy of mining company ( Społeczna odpowiedzialność biznesu jako element strategii rozwoju przedsiębiorstwa górniczego) [In:]. Dzieje górnictwa − element europejskiego dziedzictwa kultury 5, pp. 85–110 ( in Polish).
12. Jarosławska-Sobór, S. 2014. Responsible mine. Corporate social responsibility in the Polish Hungarian mining industry – a sociological study ( Odpowiedzialna kopalnia. Społeczna odpowiedzialność biznesu w polskim górnictwie węgla kamiennego – studium socjologiczne). Uniwersytet Śląski, pp. 88–90 ( in Polish).
13. Jedynak, T. 2012. The effectiveness of the strategy of investment in socially responsible stocks – the case of Respect Index ( Efektywność strategii inwestycji w akcje spółek społecznie odpowiedzialnych na przykładzie Respect Index). Zeszyty Naukowe/Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne 12, pp. 161–172 ( in Polish).
14. Jendrośka, J. and Bar, M. 2005. Environmental protection law: textbook ( Prawo ochrony środowiska: podręcznik). Centrum Prawa Ekologicznego (in Polish).
15. Journal of Laws of 1980 No. 3, item 6, repealed. The Environmental Protection and Development Act of January 31, 1980.
16. Kwietniewska-Sobstyl, M. and Żelazna-Blicharz, A. 2014. Socially responsible human resource management: SA 8000 human rights-based workplace standards ( Odpowiedzialne społecznie zarządzanie zasobami ludzkimi: standard miejsca pracy na przykładzie normy SA 8000). Zeszyty Naukowe Wyższej Szkoły Humanitas. Zarządzanie 1, pp. 247–256 (in Polish).
17. KGHM Polska Miedź SA, Sustainable Report of KGHM Polska Miedź SA for 2018. [Online] sites/kghm2014/files/kghm-sustainable-report-2018_0.pdf [Accessed: 2019-06-06].
18. KGHM CSR Report 2012 – KGHM Polska Miedź SA, Corporate Social Responsibility Report for 2012. [Online] [Accessed: 11.01.2021]
19. KGHM CSR Strategy 2014 – KGHM Polska Miedź SA, KGHM’s Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Strategy for 2015–2020. [Online] [Accesed : 11.01.2021]
20. Moffat, K. and Zhang, A. 2014. The paths to social licence to operate: An integrative model explaining community acceptance of mining. Resources Policy 39, pp. 61–70.
21. Ostręga, A. 2004. Management of mineral workings and areas after exploitation of carbonate minerals based on the example of Krzemionki Podgórskie in Cracow ( Sposoby zagospodarowania wyrobisk i terenów po eksploatacji złóż surowców węglanowych na przykładzie Krzemionek Podgórskich w Krakowie). PhD thesis. Kraków: AGH.
22. Prno, J. and Slocombe, S.D. 2012. Exploring the origins of ‘social license to operate’ in the mining sector: Perspectives from governance and sustainability theories. Resources Policy 37, pp. 346–357.
23. Respect Index 2019. [Online] [Accessed: 2019-12-10].
24. Satty, T.L. 2001. Decision Making for Leaders: The Analytic Hierarchy Process for Decisions in a Complex World (New Edition), Vol. II AHP series. Pittsburgh PA: RWS Publication.
25. SAAS 2019 – Social Accountability Accreditation Services. [Online] [Accessed: 2019-12-10].
26. Sheehy, B. 2015. Defining CSR: Problems and Solutions. Journal of Business Ethics 131, pp. 625–648.
27. Zhang, A. and Moffat, K. 2015. A balancing act: The role of benefits, impacts and confidence in governance in predicting acceptance of mining in Australia. Resources Policy 44, pp. 25–34.






DOI: 10.24425/gsm.2021.136294


Gospodarka Surowcami Mineralnymi - Mineral Resources Management; 2021; vol. 37; No 1; 161-178