Self-control and Self-consciousness: Regulation or Acceleration of Self-discrepancy Distress?

Journal title

Polish Psychological Bulletin




vol. 52


No 1


Mestvirishvili, Maia : Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University ; Mestvirishvili, Natia : Caucasus University



self-discrepancy ; self-control ; Self-consciousness ; stress ; anxiety ; depression

Divisions of PAS

Nauki Humanistyczne i Społeczne




Committee for Psychological Science PAS


1.Ashford, K. J., Karageorghis, C. I., & Jackson, R. C. (2005). Modeling the relationship between self-consciousness and competition anxiety. Personality and Individual Differences, 38(4), 903–918.
2. Barnett, M. D., Moore, J. M., & Harp, A. R. (2017). Who we are and how we feel: Self-discrepancy theory and specific affective states. Personality and Individual Differences, 111, 232–237.
3. Baumeister, R. F. (1999). The nature and structure of the self: An overview. In R. F. Baumeister (Ed.),The self in social psychology (pp. 1-20). Ann Arbor, MI: Psychology Press. - Google Search. (n.d.).
4. Baumeister, R. F., & Heatherton, T. F. (1996). Self-regulation failure: An overview. Psychological Inquiry, 7(1), 1–15. s15327965pli0701_1
5. Ben-Artzi, E., & Hamburger, Y. A. (2016). Private Self-Consciousness Subscales: Correlates with Neuroticism, Extraversion, and Self-Discrepancy: Imagination, Cognition and Personality.
6. Bizman, A., Yinon, Y., & Krotman, S. (2001). Group-Based Emotional Distress: An Extension of Self-Discrepancy Theory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(10), 1291–1300.
7. Boldero, J., & Francis, J. (2000). The relation between self-discrepancies and emotion: The moderating roles of self-guide importance, location relevance, and social self-domain centrality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(1), 38–52. 3514.78.1.38
8. Bowlin, S. L., & Baer, R. A. (2012). Relationships between mindfulness, self-control, and psychological functioning. Personality and Individual Differences, 52(3), 411–415. paid.2011.10.050
9. Bruch, M. A., Rivet, K. M., & Laurenti, H. J. (2000). Type of self-discrepancy and relationships to components of the tripartite model of emotional distress. Personality and Individual Differences, 29(1), 37–44.
10. Burke, P. J., & Harrod, M. M. (2016). Too Much of a Good Thing?: Social Psychology Quarterly. 019027250506800404
11. Calogero, R. M., & Watson, N. (2009). Self-discrepancy and chronic social self-consciousness: Unique and interactive effects of gender and real–ought discrepancy. Personality and Individual Differences, 46(5), 642–647.
12. Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1978). Self-focusing effects of dispositional self-consciousness, mirror presence, and audience presence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36(3), 324–332.
13. Carver, C. S., Lawrence, J. W., & Scheier, M. F. (1999). Self-Discrepancies and Affect: Incorporating the Role of Feared Selves. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(7), 783–792. https://
14. Dickson, J. M., Moberly, N. J., & Huntley, C. D. (2019). Rumination selectively mediates the association between actual-ideal (but not actual-ought) self-discrepancy and anxious and depressive symptoms. Personality and Individual Differences, 149, 94–99.
15. Duval, S., & Wicklund, R. A. (1972). A theory of objective self awareness. Academic Press.
16. Eichstaedt, J., & Silvia, P. J. (2003). Noticing the self: Implicit assessment of self-focused attention using word recognition latencies. Social Cognition, 21(5), 349–361. 10.1521/soco.21.5.349.28686
17. Fromson, P. M. (2006). Self-discrepancies and negative affect: The moderating roles of private and public self-consciousness. Social Behavior and Personality, 34(4), 333–350. sbp.2006.34.4.333 18. Gillebaart, M. (2018). The ‘Operational’ Definition of Self-Control. Frontiers in Psychology, 9. fpsyg.2018.01231
19. Gibbons, F. X. (1990). Self-Attention and Behavior: A Review and Theoretical Update. In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 23, pp. 249–303). Elsevier.
20. Gonnerman, M. E., Parker, C. P., Lavine, H., & Huff, J. (2000). The Relationship between Self-Discrepancies and Affective States: The Moderating Roles of Self-Monitoring and Standpoints on the Self. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(7), 810–819.
21. Hardin, E. E., & Lakin, J. L. (2009). The Integrated Self-Discrepancy Index: A reliable and valid measure of self-discrepancies. Journal of Personality Assessment, 91(3), 245–253. 00223890902794291
22. Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: The Guilford Press.
23. Heppen, J. B., & Ogilvie, D. M. (2003). Predicting affect from global self-discrepancies: The dual role of the undesired self. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 22(4), 347–368.
24. Higgins, E. T., Klein, R., & Strauman, T. (1985). Self-concept discrepancy theory: A psychological model for distinguishing among different aspects of depression and anxiety. Social Cognition, 3(1), 51–76.
25. Higgins, E. T. (1987). Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review, 94(3), 319–340. 295X.94.3.319
26. Higgins, E. T. (1996). The “self digest”: Self-knowledge serving self- regulatory functions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(6), 1062–1083.
27. Hofmann, W., Luhmann, M., Fisher, R. R., Vohs, K. D., & Baumeister, R. F. (2014). Yes, But Are They Happy? Effects of Trait Self-Control on Affective Well-Being and Life Satisfaction. Journal of Personality, 82(4), 265–277.
28. Hull, J. G., Van Treuren, R. R., Ashford, S. J., Propsom, P., & Andrus, B. W. (1988). Self-consciousness and the processing of self-relevant information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(3), 452–465.
29. Ickes, W. J., Wicklund, R. A., & Ferris, C. B. (1973). Objective self awareness and self esteem. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 9(3), 202–219.
30. Kivetz, R., & Keinan, A. (2006). Repenting Hyperopia: An Analysis of Self-Control Regrets. Journal of Consumer Research, 33(2), 273– 282.
31. Koole, S. L., Tops, M., Strübin, S., Bouw, J., Schneider, I. K., & Jostmann, N. B. (2014). The ego fixation hypothesis: Involuntary persistence of self-control. In Motivation and its regulation: The control within (pp. 95–112). Psychology Press.
32. Layton, R. L., & Muraven, M. (2014). Self-control linked with restricted emotional extremes. Personality and Individual Differences, 58, 48– 53.
33. Lovibond, S. H., Lovibond, P. F., & Australia, P. F. of. (1995). Manual for the depression anxiety stress scales. Sydney, N.S.W. : Psychology Foundation of Australia.
34. Mathes, E. W., Lane, D. J., Helmers, B. R., Jamnik, M. R., Hendrickson, M., & Aleshire, B. (2017). The dark side of self-control: High self-control leads to better outcomes when engaging in bad behaviors. Personality and Individual Differences, 105, 326–329.
35. Milyavskaya, M., & Inzlicht, M. (2017). What’s So Great About Self- -Control? Examining the Importance of Effortful Self-Control and Temptation in Predicting Real-Life Depletion and Goal Attainment. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(6), 603–611.
36. Muraven, M., & Baumeister, R. F. (2000). Self-regulation and depletion of limited resources: Does self-control resemble a muscle? Psychological Bulletin, 126(2), 247–259. 2909.126.2.247
37. Petrocelli, J. V., & Smith, E. R. (2005). Who I am, who we are, and why: Links between emotions and causal attributions for self- and group discrepancies. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(12), 1628–1642.
38. Phillips, A. G., & Silvia, P. J. (2005). Self-awareness and the emotional consequences of self-discrepancies. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(5), 703–713.
39. Scheier, M. F., & Carver, C. S. (1985). The Self-Consciousness Scale: A revised version for use with general populations. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 15(8), 687–699. j.1559-1816.1985.tb02268.x
40. Scheier, M. F., & Carver, C. S. (1980). Private and public self-attention, resistance to change, and dissonance reduction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(3), 390–405. 0022-3514.39.3.390
41. Scott, L., & O’Hara, M. W. (1993). Self-discrepancies in clinically anxious and depressed university students. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 102(2), 282–287.
42. Silvia, P. J., & Gendolla, G. H. E. (2001). On Introspection and Self-Perception: Does Self-Focused Attention Enable Accurate Self-Knowledge?: Review of General Psychology.
43. Silvia, P. J. (2002). Self-awareness and emotional intensity. Cognition and Emotion, 16(2), 195–216.
44. Silvia, P. J., & Duval, T. S. (2001). Objective self-awareness theory: Recent progress and enduring problems. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5(3), 230–241. S15327957PSPR0503_4
45. Stavrova, O., Pronk, T., & Kokkoris, M. D. (2019). Choosing goals that express the true self: A novel mechanism of the effect of self-control on goal attainment. European Journal of Social Psychology, 49(6), 1329–1336.
46. Stavrova, O., Pronk, T., & Kokkoris, M. D. (2020). Finding meaning in self-control: The effect of self-control on the perception of meaning in life. Self and Identity, 19(2), 201–218.
47. Stevens, E. N., Holmberg, N. J., Lovejoy, M. C., & Pittman, L. D. (2014). When do self-discrepancies predict negative emotions? Exploring formal operational thought and abstract reasoning skills as moderators. Cognition and Emotion, 28(4), 707–716.
48. Strauman, T. J., & Higgins, E. T. (1988). Self-discrepancies as predictors of vulnerability to distinct syndromes of chronic emotional distress. Journal of Personality, 56(4), 685–707. j.1467-6494.1988.tb00472.x
49. Swann Jr., W. B. (2012). Self-verification theory. In Handbook of theories of social psychology, Vol. 2 (pp. 23–42). Sage Publications Ltd.
50. Tangney, J. P., Baumeister, R. F., & Boone, A. L. (2004). High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success. Journal of Personality, 72(2), 271–324.
51. Thomson, W. (2016). Depression, Neuroticism, and the Discrepancy Between Actual and Ideal Self-Perception. Personality and Individual Differences, 88, 219–224.
52. Tangney, J. P., Niedenthal, P. M., Covert, M. V., & Barlow, D. H. (1998). Are shame and guilt related to distinct self-discrepancies? A test of Higgins’s (1987) hypotheses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(1), 256–268. 3514.75.1.256






DOI: 10.24425/ppb.2021.136814

Aims and scope

Polish Psychological Bulletin (founded in 1970) is an official journal of Polish Academy of Sciences, Committee for Psychological Science.The journal publish a variety of papers, including empirical reports of experiments, surveys and field studies, theoretical articles, controversies and analytic papers on important psychological topics. Relevance for an international readership is our prominent goal, Polish Psychological Bulletin does not publish clinical case studies, or technical articles. Submissions from all domains of psychology are encouraged, especially those that address new developments and pursue innovative approaches.

Periodically, the journal will announce a call for papers for special issues. The journal will also entertain unsolicited proposals for special issues that fit the stated scope of the Polish Psychiological Bulletin (please contact the journal’s Editor-in-Chief with a detailed description of your proposal).

All published research articles in this journal have undergone rigorous review, based on initial editor screening and anonymous evaluation of content and merit by independent expert reviewers.

For information on specific requirements, please see the Author Guidelines.

Abstracting & Indexing

Abstracting and Indexing Information

• DESY Publication Database

• Directory of Open Access Journal (DOAJ)

• Current Contents: Social & Behavioral Sciences

• Dimensions


• ERIH Plus

• Google Scholar

• Index Copernicus

• ProQuest

• PsychArchives

• Science Open

• SCOPUS (Elsevier)

• Sherpa/RoMEO

Publication Ethics Policy

Peer Review and Ethics

Polish Psychological Bulletin is committed to peer-review integrity and upholding the highest standards of review.
Once your paper has been assessed for suitability by the editor, it will then be double blind peer reviewed by independent, anonymous authorities in the field.
Our guidance on publishing ethics is in accrdance with the COPE standards (see: