Szczegóły

Tytuł artykułu

Negative transgression in the context of empathy and anxiety in prisoners: A perpetrators of violence

Tytuł czasopisma

Polish Psychological Bulletin

Rocznik

2021

Wolumin

vol. 52

Numer

No 1

Afiliacje

Ślaski, Sławomir : Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University

Autorzy

Słowa kluczowe

empathy ; anxiety ; negative transgression ; prisoners

Wydział PAN

Nauki Humanistyczne i Społeczne

Zakres

40-48

Wydawca

Committee for Psychological Science PAS

Bibliografia

1. Arbach-Lucioni, K., Martinez-García, M., & Andrés-Pueyo, A. (2012). Risk factors for violent behavior in prison inmates: A cross-cultural contribution. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 39(9), 1219–1239. DOI: 10.1177/0093854812445875
2. Azevedo, J., Vieira-Coelho, M., Castelo-Branco, M., Coelho, R., & Figueiredo-Braga, M. (2020). Impulsive and premeditated aggression in male offenders with antisocial personality disorder. PLoS One, 15(3), e0229876. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229876
3. Bandura, A., Caprara, G. V., & Regalia, C. (2001). Sociocognitive self- regulatory mechanisms governing transgressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(1), 125-135. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.80.1.125
4. Bartkowicz, Z. (1996). Pomoc terapeutyczna nieletnim agresorom i ofiarom agresji w zakładach resocjalizacyjnych [Therapeutic help for minor aggressors and victims of aggression in resocialization facilities]. Lublin: Uniwersytet Marii Curie Skłodowskiej.
5. Batanova, M. D., & Loukas, A. (2011). Social anxiety and aggression in early adolescents: Examining the moderating roles of empathic concern and perspective taking. Journal Youth Adolescence, 40, 1534-1543. DOI: 10.1007/s10964-011-9634-x
6. Batson, C. D., Fultz, J., & Schoenrade, P. A. (1987). Distress and empathy: Two qualitatively distinct vicarious emotions with different motivational consequences. Journal of Personality, 55, 19-39. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1987.tb00426.x
7. Beck, C., Anderson, E., O’Hara, K. L., & Benjamin, A. (2013). Patterns of intimate partner violence in a large, epidemiological sample of divorcing couples. Journal of Family Psychology, 27, 743-753. DOI: 10.1037/a0034182
8. Bedyński K., & Wołowicz M. (1989), Zbiorowe protesty w zakładzie penitencjarnym – próba definicji, klasyfikacji przyczyn i metodologiczne propozycje badań zjawiska . [Collective actions in correctional facilities – an attempt to define and classify root causes and methodological research suggestions]. Przegląd Penitencjarny i Kryminologiczny, 14/15, 58-69.
9. Buss, A. H., & Perry, M. (1992). The Aggression Questionnaire. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(3), 452-459. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.63.3.452
10. Casares-López, M. J., González-Menéndez, A., Torres-Lobo, M., Secades-Villa, R., Fernández-Hermida, J. R., & Álvarez, M. M. (2010). Comparison of the psychopathological and addictive profile of two samples of addicts in treatment: in prison and in a therapeutic community. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 10, 225-243. DOI: 10.22544/rcps.v38i01.04
11. Davis, M. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(1), 113-126. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514 .44.1.113
12. Davis, M. H. (1999) . Empatia. O umiejętności współodczuwania. [Empathy. The ability to share feelings]. Gdańsk: Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne.
13. Dodge, K. A., & Coie, J. D. (1987) Social-information-processing factors in reactive and proactive aggression in children's peer groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(6), 1146-1158. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.53.6.1146
14. Dolan, M. C., & Fullam, R. S. (2010). Moral/conventional transgression distinction and psychopathy in conduct disordered adolescent offenders. Personality and Individual Differences, 49(8), 995-1000. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006699
15. Driessen, M., Schroeder, T., Widman, B., Schonfeld, C., & Schneider, F., (2006). Childhood trauma, psychiatric disorders, and criminal behavior in prisoners in Germany: a comparative study in incarcerated women and men. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 67, 1486–1492. DOI: 10.4088/jcp.v67n100
16. Fazel, S., Bains, P., & Doll, H. (2006). Substance abuse and dependence in prisoners: A systematic review. Addiction, 101, 181-191. DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01316.x
17. Frączek, A. (1996). Violence and aggression in children and youth: A socio-psychological perspective. European Review, 4(1), 75- 90. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1234-981X
18. Fromm, E. (1996). Zdrowe społeczeństwo. [The sane society] Warszawa: Państwowy Instytut Wydawniczy.
19. Gini, G. (2006). Social cognition and moral cognition in bullying: What’s wrong? Aggressive Behavior, 32(6), 528-539. DOI: 10.1002/ ab.20153
20. González Collado, C., Iglesias Garcia, M. T., & Sabín Fernández C. (2019). Inteligencia emocional en personas reclusas con discapacidad intelectual. Siglo Cero 50(1), 7. DOI: 10.14201/scero2019501725
21. Gordon, G, Dalton, S., Kolbert, J.B., Kanyongo, G. J., & Crothers, L. M. (2014). Proactive and reactive aggression and cognitive and affective empathy among students in middle childhood, International Journal of School and Cognitive Psychology, 1(2). DOI: 10.4172/2469- 9837.1000105.
22. Hoffman, M. (1975). Sex differences in moral internalization and values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32(4), 720-729. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.32.4.720
23. Jolliffe, D., & Farrington, D. P. (2004). Empathy and offending: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 9, 441–476. DOI: 10.1016/j.avb.2003.03.001
24. Jolliffe, D., & Farrington, D. P. (2011). Is low empathy related to bullying after controlling for individual and social background variables? Journal of Adolescence, 34, 1-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2010.02.001
25. Kasari, C., Freeman, S. F. N., & Bass, W. (2003). Empathy and response to distress in children with Down Syndrome. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 44(3), 424-431. DOI: 10.1111/1469-7610.00132
26. Kepiński, A. (1977). Lęk. [Anxiety]. Warszawa: Państwowy Zakład Wydawnictw Lekarskich.
27. Kozielecki, J. (1987). The role of hubristic motivation in transgressive behavior. New Ideas in Psychology, 5(3), 361-383. DOI: 10.1016/0732-118X(87)90006-7
28. Kozielecki, J. (2001). Psychotransgresjonizm. [Psychotransgressionism] Warszawa: Żak.
29. Kubak, F. A., & Salekin, R. T. (2009). Psychopathy and anxiety in children and adolescents: New insights on developmental pathways to offending. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavior Assessment, 31, 271-284. DOI: 10.1007/s10862-009-9144-2
30. Lauterbach, O., & Hosser, D. (2007). Assessing empathy in prisoners – A shortened version of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 66(2), 91-101. DOI: 10.1024/1421-0185.66.2.91
31. Lewicka, A. (2010). Pomiar poziomu empatii emocjonalno-poznawczej Indeksem Reaktywności Interpersonalnej M. H. Davisa [Measurement of the level of emotional and cognitive empathy with the Interpersonal Reactivity Index of M. H. Davis’s]. In: Wojnarska, A. (ed.), Diagnostyka resocjalizacyjna – wybrane zagadnienia [Resocialization diagnostics – selected issues] (pp. 91-105). Lublin: Uniwersytet Marii Curie Skłodowskiej.
32. Lewicka, A., & Lisiecka, M. (2010). Poziom empatii osób odbywających karę pozbawienia wolności [The level of empathy of persons serving the penalty of deprivation of liberty]. In: Z. Jasiński, & D., Widelak (ed.), W poszukiwaniu optymalnego modelu więzienia resocjalizującego [In search of the optimal model of a social rehabilitation prison] (pp. 67-77). Opole: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Opolskiego.
33. Lewicka-Zelent, A., & Huczuk, S. (2016). Empatia a doświadczanie i stosowanie agresji wśród młodzieży [Empathy and experiencing and applying aggression among young people]. Resocjalizacja Polska, 11, 117-132. DOI: 10.22432/pjsr.2016.11.09
34. Loinaz, I., Ortiz-Tallo, M., & Ferragut, M. (2012). MCMI-III Grossman personality facets among partner-violent men in prison. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 12(3), 389-404. DOI: 10.1080/24732850.2019.1633850
35. Loudin, J. L., Loukas, A., & Robinson, S. (2003). Relation aggression in college students: Examining the roles of social anxiety and empathy. Aggressive Behavior, 29, 430-439. DOI: 10.1002/ab.10039
36. Majchrzyk, Z. (1995). Motywacje zabójczyń. Alkohol i przemoc w rodzinie. [Motives of female killers. Alcohol and domestic abuse]. Warszawa: Państwowa Agencja Rozwiązywania Problemów Alkoholowych.
37. Majchrzyk, Z. (2008). Zabójczynie i zabójcy. [Female and male killers]. Warszawa: Uniwersytet Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego.
38. Martin, S., Zabala, C., Del-Monte, J., Graziani, P., Aizpurua, E., Barry, T. J., & Ricarte, J. (2019). Examining the relationships between impulsivity, aggression, and recidivism for prisoners with antisocial personality disorder. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 49, 101314. DOI: 10.1016/j.avb.2019.07.009
39. McCullough, M. E., Fincham, F. D., & Tsang, J. (2003). Forgiveness, forbearance and time: The temporal unfolding of transgression- related interpersonal motivations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(3), 540-557. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.84.3.540
40. Mehrabian, A., & Epstein, N. (1972), A measure of emotional empathy. Journal of Personality, 40(4), 525-543. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1972.tb00078.x
41. Metts, S. (1994). Relational transgressions. In: W. R. Cupach, & B. H. Spitzberg (Eds.), The dark side of interpersonal communication (pp. 217-241). Hillsdale, New Jork: Lawrence Erlbaum.
42. Miller, C. H., Burgoon, J. K., & Hall, J. R. (2007). The effects of implicit theories of moral character on affective reactions to moral transgressions. Social Cognition, 25(6), 819-832. DOI: 10.1521/soco.2007.25.6.819. 43. Ostrowska, K. (2014). Ukryty lęk jako źródło zaburzeń w społecznym funkcjonowaniu jednostki [Hidden anxiety as a source of disorders in an individual’s social functioning]. Profilaktyka Społeczna i Resocjalizacja. 23, 141–149.
44. Ruiz-Hernandez, J. A., Garcia-Jimenez, J. J., Llor-Esteban, B., & Godoy- Fernandez, C. (2015). Risk factors for intimate partner violence in prison inmates. The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context [online]. 7, (1), 41-49. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpal.2014.11.003.
45. Sarchiapone, M., Carli, V., Cuomo, C., Marchetti, M., & Roy, A. (2009). Association between childhood trauma and aggression in male prisoners. Psychiatry Research, 165(1-2), 187-192. DOI: 10.1016/j. psychres.2008.04.026
46. Seidel, E. M., Pfabigan, D. M., Keckeis, K., Wucherer, A. M., Jahn, T., Lamm, C., & Derntl, B. (2013). Empathic competencies in violent offenders. Psychiatry Research, 210 (3), 1168-1175. DOI: 10.1016/j. psychres.2013.08.027
47. Ślaski, S. (2012). Motywacyjno-osobowościowe wyznaczniki zachowań transgresyjnych i ochronnych. [Motivational and personal determi-nants of transgressive and defensive behaviours]. Warszawa: Uniwersytet Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego.
48. Ślaski, S. (2013). Lista Zachowań Alternatywnych i Negatywnych. [List of Alternative and Negative Behaviours]. Unpublished copy.
49. Sosnowski, T., Wrześniewski, K., Jaworowska, A., & Fecenec, D. (2011). Inwentarz Stanu i Cechy Lęku STAI. Polska adaptacja STAI. [STAI, the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Polish adaptation of STAI.] Fourth extended edition. Warszawa: Pracownia Testów Psychologicznych.
50. Sutton, J., Smith, P. K., & Swettenham, J. (1999). Bullying and ‘theory of mind’: A critique of the ‘social skills deficit’ approach to anti-social behavior. Social Development, 8, 117-127. DOI: 10.1111/1467- 9507.00083
51. Vachon, D. D., Lynam, D. R., & Johnson, J. A. (2014). The (non) relation between empathy and aggression: Surprising results: From a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin. 140(3), 751-773. DOI: 10.1037/a0035236
52. Værøy, H., Western, E., & Andersson, A. (2016). The link between facets of impulsivity and aggression in extremely violent prisoners. Open Journal of Psychiatry, 6, 86-94. DOI: 10.4236/ojpsych.2016.6101
53. Węgliński, A. (1989). Trafność Kwestionariusza Rozumienia Empatycznego Innych Ludzi (KRE) [Validity of the Empathic Understanding Questionnaire of other people (EUQ)]. In: R. Ł., Drwal (Ed.), Techniki kwestionariuszowe w diagnostyce psychologicznej [Questionnaire techniques in psychological diagnostics] (pp. 63-80). Lublin: Uniwersytet Marii Curie Skłodowskiej.
54. Wojciszke B. (2005). Affective concomitants of information on morality and competence. European Psychologist, 1, 60-70. DOI: 10.1027/1016-9040.10.1.60
55. Wrocławska, E., Rowiński, T. (2008). Kwestionarisz IRI M. Davisa – nowe opracowanie. [IRI questionnaire by M. Davis’s – a new study]. Niepublikowany maszynopis [Unpublished text].
56. Yochelson, S. & Samenow, S. E. (1982). The criminal personality. Volume I: A profile for change. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

Data

2021.07.01

Typ

Article

Identyfikator

DOI: 10.24425/ppb.2021.136815 ; ISSN 0079-2993

O czasopiśmie

Polish Psychological Bulletin (founded in 1970) is an official journal of Polish Academy of Sciences, Committee for Psychological Science.The journal publish a variety of papers, including empirical reports of experiments, surveys and field studies, theoretical articles, controversies and analytic papers on important psychological topics. Relevance for an international readership is our prominent goal, Polish Psychological Bulletin does not publish clinical case studies, or technical articles. Submissions from all domains of psychology are encouraged, especially those that address new developments and pursue innovative approaches.

Periodically, the journal will announce a call for papers for special issues. The journal will also entertain unsolicited proposals for special issues that fit the stated scope of the Polish Psychiological Bulletin (please contact the journal’s Editor-in-Chief with a detailed description of your proposal).

All published research articles in this journal have undergone rigorous review, based on initial editor screening and anonymous evaluation of content and merit by independent expert reviewers.

For information on specific requirements, please see the Author Guidelines.

Indeksowanie w bazach


Abstracting and Indexing Information


• DESY Publication Database

• Directory of Open Access Journal (DOAJ)

• Current Contents: Social & Behavioral Sciences

• Dimensions

• EBSCO

• ERIH Plus

• Google Scholar

• Index Copernicus

• ProQuest

• PsychArchives

• Science Open

• SCOPUS (Elsevier)

• Sherpa/RoMEO

Zasady etyki publikacyjnej

Peer Review and Ethics

Polish Psychological Bulletin is committed to peer-review integrity and upholding the highest standards of review.
Once your paper has been assessed for suitability by the editor, it will then be double blind peer reviewed by independent, anonymous authorities in the field.
Our guidance on publishing ethics is in accrdance with the COPE standards (see: https://publicationethics.org).
×