Title

The Identity Dynamics Questionnaire (IDQ): Operationalization and Verification of the Identity Dynamics Model

Journal title

Polish Psychological Bulletin

Yearbook

2021

Volume

vol. 52

Issue

No 3

Affiliation

Brygoła, Elwira : SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Poznań, Poland ; Zięba, Mariusz : SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Poznań, Poland ; Kwapis, Krzysztof : Jesuit University Ignatianum in Cracow, Poland

Authors

Brygoła, Elwira ; Zięba, Mariusz ; Kwapis, Krzysztof

Keywords

identity ; Identity Dynamics Questionnaire ; Validation of method ; Discrepancies in personality ; development

Divisions of PAS

Nauki Humanistyczne i Społeczne

Coverage

270-288

Publisher

Committee for Psychological Science PAS

Bibliography

Arbuckle, J. L. (2017). Amos (Version 25.0) [Computer Program]. Chicago: IBM SPSS. Arnett, J. J. (2018). Adolescence and emerging adulthood: A cultural approach (6th ed.). Pearson.
Batory, A., Brygoła, E., & Oleś, P. (2016). Odsłony tożsamości [Views of identity]. Warsaw, Poland: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press. Berzonsky, M. D. (2008). Identity formation: The role of identity processing style and cognitive processes. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 643-653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2007.09.024
Berzonsky, M. D., Soenens, B., Luyckx, K., Smits, I., Papini, D. R., & Goossens, L. (2013). Development and validation of the revised Identity Style Inventory (ISI-5): Factor structure, reliability, and validity. Psychological Assessment, 25(3), 893-904. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032642
Block, J. (1982). Assimilation, accommodation, and the dynamics of personality development. Child Development, 53(2), 281-295. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1128971
Breakwell, G. M. (1986). Coping with threatened identities. London: Methuen. Breakwell, G. M. (2010). Resisting representations and identity processes. Papers on Social Representations, 19, 6.1-6.11.
Brygoła, E. (2018). Complex and dynamic identity means dialogical identity – or not always? In M. M. Puchalska-Wasyl, P. K. Oleś & H. J. M. Hermans (Eds.), Dialogical self: Inspirations, considerations and research (pp. 11-27). Lublin: Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL.
Caligor, E., Kernberg, O. F., & Clarkin, J. F. (2007). Handbook of dynamic psychotherapy for higher level personality pathology. Arlington: American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc.
Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larson, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71-75. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13
Durbin, C. E., & Hicks, B. M. (2014). Personality and psychopathology: A stagnant field in need of development. European Journal of Personality, 28(4), 362-386. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1962
Ebner, N. C., Freund, A. M., & Baltes, P. B. (2006). Developmental changes in personal goal orientation from young to late adulthood: From striving for gains to maintenance and prevention of losses. Psychology and Aging, 21(4), 664-678. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.21.4.664
Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. New York: Norton. Gabbard, G. O. (2014). Psychodynamic psychiatry in clinical practice (5th ed). Arlington: American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc.
Higgins, E. T. (1987). Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review, 94(3), 319-340. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.94.3.319
Higgins, E. T. (1996). The “self digest”: Self-knowledge serving self- regulatory functions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(6), 1062-1083. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.6.1062
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1-55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Kłym-Guba, M., & Karaś, D. (2018). Polish version of the Questionnaire for Eudaimonic Well-Being – three factors rather than one. Health Psychology Report, 6(3), 273-283. https://doi.org/10.5114/hpr.2018.75684
Kozielecki, J. (2007). Psychotransgresjonizm. Nowy kierunek w psychologii [Psychotransgressionism: A new direction in psychology]. Warsaw, Poland: Wydawnictwo Akademickie “Żak.”
Lachman, M. E., & Bertrand, R. M. (2001). Personality and the self in midlife. In M. E. Lachman (Ed.), Wiley series on adulthood and aging: Handbook of midlife development (pp. 279-309). Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
Luyckx, K., Schwartz, S. J., Berzonsky, M. D., Soenens, B., Vansteenkiste, M., Smits, I., & Goosens, L. (2008). Capturing ruminative exploration: Extending the four-dimensional model of identity formation in late adolescence. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 58-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2007.04.004
Luyckx, K., Schwartz, S. J., Goossens, L., Beyers, W., & Missotten, L. (2011). Processes of personal identity formation and evaluation. In S. J. Schwartz, K. Luyckx & V. L. Vignoles (Eds.), Handbook of Identity theory and research: Structure and processes (pp.77-98). New York: Springer.
Marcia, J. E. (1966). Development and validation of ego-identity status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3(5), 551-558. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0023281
Marcia, J. E. (1980). Identity in adolescence. In J. Adelson (Ed.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (pp. 159-187). New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Marcia, J. E. (2002). Identity and psychosocial development in adulthood. Identity: An International Journal of Theory and Research, 2(1) 7-28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S1532706XID0201_02
McLean, K. C. (2008). Stories of the young and the old: Personal continuity and narrative identity. Developmental Psychology, 44(1), 254-264. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.44.1.254
McWilliams, N. (2011). Psychoanalytic diagnosis: Understanding personality structure in the clinical process (2nd ed). New York: Guilford Press.
Millon, T., Davis, R., Millon, C., Escovar, L., & Meagher, S. (2000). Personality disorders in modern life. New York: John Wiley.
Oleś, P. K. (2011). Psychologia człowieka dorosłego. Ciągłość – zmiana – integracja. [Psychology of adulthood: Continuity – change – integration]. Warsaw, Poland: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Pilarska, A. (2012). Wielowymiarowy Kwestionariusz Tożsamości. [Multidimensional Questionnaire of Identity]. In W. J. Paluchowski, A. Bujacz, P. Haładziński & Ł. Kaczmarek (Eds.), Nowoczesne metody badawcze w psychologii [Modern research methods in psychology] (pp. 167-188). Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe WNS UAM.
Pilarska, A. (2015). Contextualized self-views and sense of identity. Personality and Individual Differences, 86, 326-331. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.06.042
Piotrowski, K., Brzezińska, A. I. (2017). Skala Wymiarów Rozwoju Tożsamości DIDS: Wersja zrewidowana [Dimensions of Identity Development Scale DIDS: Revised version]. Psychologia Rozwojowa, 22(4), 89-111. https://doi.org/10.4467/20843879PR.17.024.8070
Schachter, E. P. (2009). Erikson meets the postmodern: Can classic identity theory rise to the challenge?, Identity, 5(2), 137-160. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532706xid0502_4
Schachter, E. P. & Galliher, R. V. (2018). Fifty years since “Identity: Youth and Crisis”: A renewed look at Erikson’s writings on identity. Identity, 18(4), 247-250. https://doi.org/10.1080/15283488.2018.1529267
Schwartz, S. J. (2001). The evolution of Eriksonian and neo-Eriksonian identity theory and research: A review and integration. Identity: An International Journal of Theory and Research, 1(1), 7-58. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532706XSCHWARTZ
Schwartz, S. J. (2007). The structure of identity consolidation: Multiple correlated constructs or one superordinate construct? Identity: An International Journal of Theory and Research, 7(1), 27-49. https://doi.org/10.1080/15283480701319583
Senejko, A., & Łoś, Z (2015). Właściwości polskiej adaptacji Inwentarza Stylów Tożsamości (ISI-5) Michaela Berzonsky’ego i współautorów [Properties of Polish adaptation of the Identity Style Inventory (ISI- 5) by Michael Berzonsky and co-authors]. Psychologia Rozwojowa, 20(4), 91-104. https://doi.org/10.4467/20843879PR.15.024.4467
Swann, W. B., Jr., Gómez, A., Seyle, C. D., Morales, J. F., & Huici, C. (2009). Identity fusion: The interplay of personal and social identities in extreme group behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 995-1011. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721414551363
Trzebińska, E. & Lasota, O. (2009). Ogólna charakterystyka badań [General characteristics of study]. In E. Trzebińska (Ed.) Szaleństwo bez utraty rozumu. Z badań nad zaburzeniami osobowości [Madness without the loss of reason: From research on personality disorders] (pp. 102-113). Warsaw, Poland: Academica Wydawnictwo SWPS.
Van Doeselaar, L., Klimstra, T. A., Denissen, J. J. A., & Meeus, W. (2019). Distinctiveness as a marker of identity formation. Journal of Research in Personality, 78, 153-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2018.12.002
Vignoles, V. L. (2011). Identity motives. In S. J. Schwartz, K. Luyckx & V. L. Vignoles (Eds.), Handbook of identity theory and research (vol. 1, pp. 403-432). New York: Springer.
Waterman, A. S. (2011). Eudaimonic identity theory: Identity as self- discovery. In S. J. Schwartz, K. Luyckx & V. L. Vignoles (Eds.), Handbook of identity theory and research (vol. 1, pp. 357-379). New York: Springer.
Waterman, A. S., Schwartz, S. J., Zamboanga, B. L., Ravert, R. D., Williams, M. K., Bede Agocha, V., Kim, S. Y., & Brent Donnellan, M. (2010). The Questionnaire for Eudaimonic Well-Being: Psycho-metric properties, demographic comparisons, and evidence of validity. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 5(1), 41-61. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760903435208
Wheaton, B., Muthen, B., Alwin, D. F., & Summers, G. F. (1977). Assessing reliability and stability in panel models. Sociological Methodology, 8, 84-136. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/270754

Date

2021.10.06

Type

Article

Identifier

DOI: 10.24425/ppb.2021.137890

Aims and scope

Polish Psychological Bulletin (founded in 1970) is an official journal of Polish Academy of Sciences, Committee for Psychological Science.The journal publish a variety of papers, including empirical reports of experiments, surveys and field studies, theoretical articles, controversies and analytic papers on important psychological topics. Relevance for an international readership is our prominent goal, Polish Psychological Bulletin does not publish clinical case studies, or technical articles. Submissions from all domains of psychology are encouraged, especially those that address new developments and pursue innovative approaches.

Periodically, the journal will announce a call for papers for special issues. The journal will also entertain unsolicited proposals for special issues that fit the stated scope of the Polish Psychiological Bulletin (please contact the journal’s Editor-in-Chief with a detailed description of your proposal).

All published research articles in this journal have undergone rigorous review, based on initial editor screening and anonymous evaluation of content and merit by independent expert reviewers.

For information on specific requirements, please see the Author Guidelines.

Abstracting & Indexing

Abstracting and Indexing Information


• DESY Publication Database

• Directory of Open Access Journal (DOAJ)

• Current Contents: Social & Behavioral Sciences

• Dimensions

• EBSCO

• ERIH Plus

• Google Scholar

• Index Copernicus

• ProQuest

• PsychArchives

• Science Open

• SCOPUS (Elsevier)

• Sherpa/RoMEO