Details

Title

Experimental and numerical investigation of axial and tangential forces in a stirred tank with yield-stress fluids

Journal title

Chemical and Process Engineering

Yearbook

2021

Volume

vol. 42

Issue

No 2

Affiliation

Story, Anna : West Pomeranian University of Technology in Szczecin, Faculty of Chemical Technology and Engineering, Department of Chemical and Process Engineering, al. Piastów 42,71-065 Szczecin, Poland ; Story, Grzegorz : West Pomeranian University of Technology in Szczecin, Faculty of Chemical Technology and Engineering, Department of Chemical and Process Engineering, al. Piastów 42,71-065 Szczecin, Poland ; Jaworski, Zdzisław : West Pomeranian University of Technology in Szczecin, Faculty of Chemical Technology and Engineering, Department of Chemical and Process Engineering, al. Piastów 42,71-065 Szczecin, Poland

Authors

Keywords

mixing ; yield-stress fluid ; axial force ; tangential force ; CFD

Divisions of PAS

Nauki Techniczne

Coverage

173-190

Publisher

Polish Academy of Sciences Committee of Chemical and Process Engineering

Bibliography

Adams L. W., Barigou M., 2007. CFD analysis of caverns and pseudo-caverns developed during mixing of non- Newtonian fluids. Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 85, 598–604. DOI: 10.1205/cherd06170.

Amanullah A., Hjorth S.A., Nienow A.W., 1997. Cavern sizes generated in highly shear thinning viscous fluids by SCABA 3SHP1 impellers. Food Bioprod. Process., 75, 232–238. DOI: 10.1205/096030897531630.

Amanullah A., Hjorth S.A., Nienow A.W., 1998. A new mathematical model to predict cavern diameters in highly shear thinning, power law liquids using axial flow impellers. Chem. Eng. Sci., 53, 455–469. DOI: 10.1016/S0009-2509(97)00200-5.

Ameur H., 2016. Agitation of yield stress fluids in different vessel shapes. Eng. Sci. Technol., 19, 189–196. DOI: 10.1016/j.jestch.2015.06.007.

Ameur H., 2017. Mixing of a viscoplastic fluid in cylindrical vessels equipped with paddle impellers. Chemistry Select, 2, 11492–11496. DOI: 10.1002/slct.201702459.

Ameur H., 2019. Some modifications in the Scaba 6SRGT impeller to enhance the mixing characteristics of Hershel-Bulkley fluids. Food Bioprod. Process., 117, 302–309. DOI: 10.1016/j.fbp.2019.08.007.

Ameur H., Bouzit M., Helmaoui M., 2011. Numerical study of fluid flow and power consumption in a stirred vessel with a Scaba 6SRGT impeller. Chem. Process Eng., 32, 351–366. DOI: 10.2478/v10176-011-0028-0.

Arratia P.E., Kukura J., Lacombe J., Muzzio F.J., 2006. Mixing of shear-thinning fluids with yield stress in stirred tanks. AIChE J., 52, 2310–2322. DOI: 10.1002/aic.10847.

Bakker C.W., Meyer C.J., Deglon D.A., 2009. Numerical modelling of non-Newtonian slurry in a mechanical flotation cell. Miner. Eng., 22, 944–950. DOI: 10.1016/j.mineng.2009.03.016.

Bakker C.W., Meyer C.J., Deglon D.A., 2010. The development of a cavern model for mechanical flotation cells. Miner. Eng., 23, 968–972. DOI: 10.1016/j.mineng.2010.03.016.

Bhole M.R., Bennington C.P.J., 2010. Performance of four axial flow impellers for agitation of pulp suspensions in a laboratory-scale cylindrical stock chest. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 49, 4444-4451. DOI: 10.1021/ie901854d.

Bhole M.R., Hui L.K., Gomez C., Bennington C.P.J., Dumont G.A., 2011. The effect of off-wall clearance of a side-entering impeller on the mixing of pulp suspensions in a cylindrical stock chest. Can. J. Chem. Eng., 89, 985–995. DOI: 10.1002/cjce.20503.

Bonn D., Denn M.M., Berthier L., Divoux T., Manneville S., 2017. Yield stress materials in soft condensed matter. Rev. Mod. Phys., 89, 035005, 1–40. DOI: 10.1103/RevModPhys.89.035005.

del Pozo D.F., Line A., Van Geem K.M., Le Men C., Nopens I., 2020. Hydrodynamic analysis of an axial impeller in a non-Newtonian fluid through particle image velocimetry. AIChE J., 66, e16939, 1–16. DOI: 10.1002/aic.16939.

Dylak A., Jaworski Z., 2015. A CFD study of formation of the intensive mixing zone in a highly non-Newtonian fluid. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1648, 030013. DOI: 10.1063/1.4912330.

Ford C., Ein-Mozaffari F., Bennington C.P.J., Taghipour F., 2006. Simulation of mixing dynamics in agitated pulp stock chests using CFD. AIChE J., 52, 3562–3569. DOI: 10.1002/aic.10958.

Fort I., Seichter P., Pešl L., 2013. Axial thrust of axial flow impellers. Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 91, 789–794. DOI: 10.1016/j.cherd.2012.10.001.

Frigaard I. A., Nouar C., 2005. On the usage of viscosity regularisation methods for visco-plastic fluid flow computation. J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech., 127, 1-26. DOI: 10.1016/j.jnnfm.2005.01.003.

Galindo E., Arguello M., Velasco D.A., Albiter V., Martinez A., 1996. A comparison of cavern development in mixing a yield stress fluid by Rushton and intermig impellers. Chem. Eng. Technol., 19, 315–323. DOI: 10.1002/ceat.270190405.

Galindo E., NienowA.W., 1992. Mixing of highly viscous simulated Xanthan fermentation broths with the Lightinin A-315-impeller. Biotechnol. Prog., 8, 233–239. DOI: 10.1021/bp00015a009.

Herschel W. H., Bulkley R., 1926. Consistency measurements of rubber-benzol solutions. Kolloid-Zeitschrift, 39, 291–300. DOI: 10.1007/BF01432034.

Hui L.K., Bennington C.P.J., Dumont G.A., 2009. Cavern formation in pulp suspensions using side-entering axial-flow impellers. Chem. Eng. Sci., 64, 509–519. DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2008.09.021.

Jaworski Z., Nienow A.W., 1994. LDA measurements of flow fields with hydrofoil impellers in fluids with different rheological properties. Eighth European Conference on Mixing, IChemE Symp. Series, 136, 105–112.

Jaworski Z., Spychaj T., Story A., Story G., 2021. Carbomer microgels as model yield-stress fluids. Rev. Chem. Eng., 000010151520200016. DOI: 10.1515/revce-2020-0016.

Kelly W., Gigas B., 2003. Using CFD to predict the behavior of power law fluids near axial-flow impellers operating in the transitional flow regime. Chem. Eng. Sci., 58, 2141–2152. DOI: 10.1016/S0009-2509(03)00060-5.

Nienow A.W., Elson T.P., 1988. Aspects of mixing in rheologically complex fluids. Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 66, 5–15.

Rodriguez B.E., Wolfe M.S., Fryd M., 1994. Nonuniform swelling of alkali swellable microgels. Macromolecules, 27, 6642–6647. DOI: 10.1021/ma00100a058.

Russell A.W., Kahouadji L., Mirpuri K., Quarmby A., Piccione P.M., Matar O.K., Luckham P.F., Markides C.N., 2019. Mixing viscoplastic fluids in stirred vessels over multiple scales: A combined experimental and CFD approach. Chem. Eng. Sci., 208, 115129. DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2019.07.047.

Savreux F., Jay P., Magnin A., 2007. Viscoplastic fluid mixing in a rotating tank. Chem. Eng. Sci., 62, 2290–2301. DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2007.01.020.

Simmons M.J.H., Edwards I., Hall J.F., Fan X., Parker D.J., Stitt E.H., 2009. Techniques for visualization of cavern boundaries in opaque industrial mixing systems. AIChE J., 55, 2765–2772. DOI: 10.1002/aic.11889.

Sossa-Echeverria J., Taghipour F., 2014. Effect of mixer geometry and operating conditions on flow mixing of shear thinning fluids with yield stress. AIChE J., 60, 1156–1167. DOI: 10.1002/aic.14309.

Sossa-Echeverria J., Taghipour F., 2015. Computational simulation of mixing flow of shear thinning non-Newtonian fluids with various impellers in a stirred tank. Chem. Eng. Process., 93, 66–78. DOI: 10.1016/j.cep.2015.04.009.

Story A., Jaworski Z., 2017. A new model of cavern diameter based on a validated CFD study on stirring of a highly shear-thinning fluid. Chem. Pap., 71, 1255–1269. DOI: 10.1007/s11696-016-0119-y.

Story A., Jaworski Z., Major-Godlewska M., Story G., 2018. Influence of rheological properties of stirred liquids on the axial and tangential forces in a vessel with a PMT impeller. Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 138, 398–404. DOI: 10.1016/j.cherd.2018.09.006.

Story A., Story G., Jaworski Z., 2020. Effect of carbomer microgel pH and concentration on the Herschel–Bulkley parameters. Chem. Process Eng., 41, 173–182. DOI: 10.24425/cpe.2020.132540.

Stręk F., 1981. Mieszanie i mieszalniki. Wydawnictwa Naukowo-Techniczne, Warszawa.

Wichterle K., Wein O., 1975. Agitation of concentrated suspensions. CHISA ’75, Paper B.4.6. Prague, Czechoslovakia.

Wu J., Pullum L., 2000. Performance analysis of axial-flowmixing impellers. AIChE J., 46, 489–498. DOI: 10.1002/aic.690460307.

Xiao Q., Yang N., Zhu J. H., Guo L.J., 2014. Modeling of cavern formation in yield stress fluids in stirred tanks. AIChE J., 60, 3057–3070. DOI: 10.1002/aic.14470.

Date

2021.12.20

Type

Article

Identifier

DOI: 10.24425/cpe.2021.138923

Editorial Board

Editorial Board

Ali Mesbach, UC Berkeley, USA

Anna Gancarczyk, Institute of Chemical Engineering, Polish Academy of Sciences, Poland

Anna Trusek, Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Poland

Bettina Muster-Slawitsch, AAE Intec, Austria

Daria Camilla Boffito, Polytechnique Montreal, Canada

Donata Konopacka-Łyskawa, Gdańsk University of Technology, Poland

Dorota Antos, Rzeszów University of Technology, Poland

Evgeny Rebrov, University of Warwick, UK

Georgios Stefanidis, National Technical University of Athens, Greece

Ireneusz Grubecki, Bydgoszcz Univeristy of Science and Technology, Poland

Johan Tinge, Fibrant B.V., The Netherlands

Katarzyna Bizon, Cracow University of Technology, Poland

Katarzyna Szymańska, Silesian University of Technology, Poland

Marcin Bizukojć, Łódź University of Technology, Poland

Marek Ochowiak, Poznań University of Technology, Poland

Mirko Skiborowski, Hamburg University of Technology, Germany

Nikola Nikacevic, University of Belgrade, Serbia

Rafał Rakoczy, West Pomeranian University of Technology, Poland

Richard Lakerveld, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong

Tom van Gerven, KU Leuven, Belgium

Tomasz Sosnowski, Warsaw University of Technology, Poland



Publication Ethics Policy

ETHICAL PRINCIPLES

Editors of the "Chemical and Process Engineering" pay attention to maintain ethical standards in scientific publications and undertake any possible measure to counteract neglecting the standards. Papers submitted for publication are evaluated with respect to reliability, conforming to ethical standards and the advancement of science. Principles given below are based on COPE's Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors, which may be found at:
http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/Best_Practice.pdf

Authors’ duties

Authorship
Authorship should be limited to persons, who markedly contributed to the idea, project, realization and interpretation of results. All of them have to be listed as co-authors. Other persons, who affected some important parts of the study should be listed or mentioned as co-workers. Author should be certain that all co-authors were enlisted, saw and accepted final version of the paper and agreed upon its publication.

Disclosure and conflict of interests
Author should disclose all sources of financing of his/her study, the input of scientific institutions, associations and other subjects and all important conflicts of interests that might affect results and interpretation of the study.

Standards in reporting
Authors of papers based on original studies should present precise description of performed work and objective discussion on its importance. Source data should be accurately presented in the paper. The paper should contain detailed information and references that would enable others to use it. False or intentionally not true declarations are not ethical and are not accepted by the editors.

Access to and storage of data
Authors may be asked for providing raw data used in the paper for editorial assessment and should be prepared to store them within the reasonable time period after publication.

Multiple, unnecessary and competitive publications
As a rule author should not publish papers describing the same studies in more than one journal or primary publication. Submission of the same paper to more than one journal at the same time is not ethical and prohibited.

Confirmation of sources
Author should cite papers that affected the creation of submitted manuscript and every time he/she should confirm the use of other authors’ work.

Important errors in published papers
When author finds an important error or inaccuracy in his/her paper, he/she is obliged to inform Editorial Office about this as soon as possible.

Originality and plagiarism
Author may submit only original papers. He/she should be certain that the names of authors referred to in the paper and/or fragments of their texts are properly cited or mentioned.

Ghostwriting
Ghost writing/guest authorship are manifestation of scientific unreliability and all such cases will be revealed including notification of appropriate subjects. Signs of scientific unreliability, especially violation of ethical principles in science will be documented by the Editorial Office.


Duties of the Editorial Office


Editors’ duties
Editors know the rules of journal editing including the procedures applied in case of uncovering non-ethical practices.

Decisions on publication
Editor-in Chief is obliged to apply present legal status as to defamation, violation of author’s rights and plagiarism and bears the responsibility for decisions. He/she may consult thematic editors and/or referees in that matter.

Selection of referees
Editorial Office provides appropriate selection of referees and takes care about appropriate course of peer –reviewing (the review has to be substantive).

Confidentiality
Every member of editorial team is not allowed to disclose information about submitted paper to any person except its author, referees, other advisors and editors.

Discrimination
To counteract discrimination the Editorial Office obeys the legally binding rules.

Disclosure and conflict of interests
Not published papers or their fragments cannot be used in the studies of editorial team or ref-erees without written consent of the author.


Referees' duties

Editorial decisions

Referee supports Editor-in-Chief in taking editorial decisions and may also support author in improving the paper.

Back information
In case a selected referee is not able to review the paper or cannot do it in due time period, he/she should inform secretary of the Editorial Office about this fact.

Objectivity standards
Reviews should be objective. Personal criticism is inappropriate. Referees should clearly ex-press their opinions and support them with proper arguments.

Confidentiality
All reviewed papers should be dealt with as confidential. They should not be discussed or revealed to persons other than the secretary of the Editorial Office.

Anonymity
All reviews should be made anonymously and the Editorial Office does not disclose names of the authors to referees.

Disclosure and conflict of interests
Confidential information or ideas resulting from reviewing procedure should be kept secret and should not be used to gain personal benefits. Referees should not review papers, which might generate conflict of interests resulting from relationships with the author, firm or institution involved in the study.

Confirmation of sources
Referees should indicate publications which are not referred to in the paper. Any statement that the observation, source or argument was described previously should be supported by appropriate citation. Referee should also inform the secretary of the Editorial Office about significant similarity to or partial overlapping of the reviewed paper with any other published paper and about suspected plagiarism.

×