Details
Title
Modelling of methane dry reforming over Ni/CaO–Al2O3 catalystJournal title
Chemical and Process EngineeringYearbook
2021Volume
vol. 42Issue
No 3Affiliation
Cherbański, Robert : Warsaw University of Technology, Faculty of Chemical and Process Engineering, ul. Warynskiego 1, 00-645 Warsaw, Poland ; Franczyk, Ewelina : Łukasiewicz Research Network – New Chemical Syntheses Institute, Al. Tysiaclecia Panstwa Polskiego 13a, 24-110 Puławy, Poland ; Lewak, Michał : Warsaw University of Technology, Faculty of Chemical and Process Engineering, ul. Warynskiego 1, 00-645 Warsaw, Poland ; Machniewski, Piotr : Warsaw University of Technology, Faculty of Chemical and Process Engineering, ul. Warynskiego 1, 00-645 Warsaw, Poland ; Molga, Eugeniusz : Warsaw University of Technology, Faculty of Chemical and Process Engineering, ul. Warynskiego 1, 00-645 Warsaw, PolandAuthors
Keywords
dry methane reforming ; dimethyl ether ; nickel catalyst ; kinetics ; modellingDivisions of PAS
Nauki TechniczneCoverage
235-252Publisher
Polish Academy of Sciences Committee of Chemical and Process EngineeringBibliography
Alipour Z., Rezaei M., Meshkani F., 2014. Effects of support modifiers on the catalytic performance of Ni/Al2O3 catalyst in CO2 reforming methane. Fuel, 129, 197–203. DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2014.03.045.Aramouni N.A.K., Touma J.G., Tarboush B.A., Zeaiter J., Ahmad M.N., 2018. Catalyst design for dry reforming of methane: Analysis review. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev., 82, 2570–2585. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.09.076.
Bawadi A., Nur Azeanni A.G., Dai-Vet N.V., 2017. Recent advances in dry reforming of methane over Ni-based catalysts. J. Cleaner Prod., 162, 170–185. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.176.
Benguerba Y., Dehimi L., Virginie M., Dumas C., Ernst B., 2015. Modelling of methane dry reforming over Ni/Al2O3 catalyst in a fixed bed catalytic reactor. Reac. Kinet. Mech. Cat., 114, 109–119. DOI: 10.1007/s11144-014-0772-5.
Borowiecki T., 2006. Coking of catalysts in essential chemical processes. Przem. Chem., 85, 699–702. Borowiecki T., Gołebiowski A., 2005. Modern synthesis gas and hydrogen plants. Przem. Chem., 84, 503–507.
Chanburanasiri N., Ribeiro A.M., Rodrigues A.E., Laosiripojana N., Assbumrungrat S., 2013. Simulation of methane steam reforming enhanced by in situ CO2 sorption utilizing K2CO3 promoted hydrotalcites for H2 production. Energy Fuels 27, 4457–4470. DOI: 10.1021/ef302043e.
Chein R.Y., Fung W.Y., 2019. Syngas production via dry reforming of methane over CeO2 modified Ni/Al2O3 catalysts. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 44, 14303–14315. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.01.113.
Collodi G., Wheeler F., 2010. Hydrogen production via steam reforming with CO2 capture. Chem. Eng. Trans., 19, 37–42. DOI: 10.3303/CET1019007.
Debek R., Gramatyka A., Motak M., da Costa P., 2014. Syngas production by dry reforming of methane over hydrotalcite-derived catalysts. Przem. Chem., 93, 2026–2032.
Ding Y., Alpay E., 2000. Adsorption-enhanced steam-methane reforming. Chem. Eng. Sci., 55, 39–3940. DOI: 10.1016/S0009-2509(99)00597-7.
Enger B.C., Lødeng R., Holmen A., 2008. A review of catalytic partial oxidation of methane to synthesis gas with emphasis on reaction mechanisms over transition metal catalysts. Appl. Catal.,��, 346, 1–27. DOI: 10.1016/j.apcata.2008.05.018.
Farniaei M., Abbasi M., Rahnama H., Rahimpour M.R., Shariatic A., 2014. Syngas production in a novel methane dry reformer by utilizing of tri-reforming process for energy supplying: Modeling and simulation. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng., 20, 132–146. DOI: 10.1016/j.jngse.2014.06.010.
Halabi M.H., de Croon M.H.J.M., van der Schaaf J., Cobden P.D., Schouten J.C., 2012. Kinetic and structural requirements for a CO2 adsorbent in sorption enhanced catalytic reforming of methane – Part I: Reaction kinetics and sorbent capacity. Fuel, 99, 154–164. DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2012.04.016.
Oliveira E.L.G., Grande C.A., Rodrigues A.E., 2009. Steam methane reforming in a Ni/Al2O3 catalyst: Kinetics and diffusional limitations in extrudates. Can. J. Chem. Eng., 87, 945–956. DOI: 10.1002/cjce.20223.
Oliveira E.L.G., Grande C.A., Rodrigues A.E., 2010. Methane steam reforming in large pore catalyst. Chem. Eng. Sci., 65, 1539–1550. DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2009.10.018.
Pena M., Gómez J., Fierro J.L.G., 1996. New catalytic routes for syngas and hydrogen production. Appl. Catal., A., 144, 7–57. DOI: 10.1016/0926-860X(96)00108-1.
Richardson J.T., Paripatayadar S.A., 1990. Carbon dioxide reforming of methane with supported rhodium. Appl. Catal., 61, 293-309. DOI: 10.1016/S0166-9834(00)82152-1.
Rostrup-Nielsen J.R., Sehested J., Norskov J.K., 2002. Hydrogen and synthesis gas by steam- and CO2 reforming. Adv. Catal., 47, 65–138. DOI: 10.1016/S0360-0564(02)47006-X.
Snoeck J.W., Froment G.F., Fowles M., 2002. Steam/CO2 reforming of methane. Carbon filament formation by the Boundouard reaction and gasification by CO2, by H2 and by steam: Kinetics study. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 41, 4252–4265. DOI: 10.1021/ie010666h.
Wang Y.N., Rodrigues A. E., 2005. Hydrogen production from steam methane reforming coupled with in-situ CO2 capture: Conceptual parametric study. Fuel, 84, 1778–1789. DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2005.04.005.
Wender I., 1996. Reactions of synthesis gas. Fuel Process. Technol., 48, 189–297. DOI: 10.1016/S0378-3820(96)01048-X.
Xiu G., Li P., Rodrigues A.E., 2003. Adsorption-enhanced steam-methane reforming with intraparticle-diffusion limitations. Chem. Eng. J., 95, 83–93. DOI: 10.1016/S1385-8947(03)00116-5.
York A.P.E., Xiao T., Green M.L.H., 2003. Brief overview of the partial oxidation of methane to synthesis gas. Top. Catal., 22, 345-358. DOI: 10.1023/A:1023552709642.
Zambrano D., Soler J., Herguido J., Menéndez M., 2019. Kinetic study of dry reforming of methane over Ni- Ce/Al2O3 catalyst with deactivation. Top. Catal., 62, 456–466. DOI: 10.1007/s11244-019-01157-2.
Zambrano D., Soler J., Herguido J., Menéndez M., 2020. Conventional and improved fluidized bed reactors for dry reforming of methane: Mathematical models. Chem. Eng. J., 393, 124775. DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.124775.
Zhang G., Liu J., Xu Y., Sun Y., 2018. A review of CH4-CO2 reforming to synthesis gas over Ni-based catalysts in recent years (2010-2017). Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 43, 15030–15054. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.06.091.
Date
2022.01.13Type
ArticleIdentifier
DOI: 10.24425/cpe.2021.138928Editorial Board
Editorial Board
Ali Mesbah, UC Berkeley, USA 
0000-0002-1700-0600
Anna Gancarczyk, Institute of Chemical Engineering, Polish Academy of Sciences, Poland 0000-0002-2847-8992
Anna Trusek, Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Poland 0000-0002-3886-7166
Bettina Muster-Slawitsch, AAE Intec, Austria 0000-0002-5944-0831
Daria Camilla Boffito, Polytechnique Montreal, Canada 0000-0002-5252-5752
Donata Konopacka-Łyskawa, Gdańsk University of Technology, Poland 0000-0002-2924-7360
Dorota Antos, Rzeszów University of Technology, Poland 0000-0001-8246-5052
Evgeny Rebrov, University of Warwick, UK 0000-0001-6056-9520
Georgios Stefanidis, National Technical University of Athens, Greece 0000-0002-4347-1350
Ireneusz Grubecki, Bydgoszcz Univeristy of Science and Technology, Poland 0000-0001-5378-3115
Johan Tinge, Fibrant B.V., The Netherlands 0000-0003-1776-9580
Katarzyna Bizon, Cracow University of Technology, Poland 0000-0001-7600-4452
Katarzyna Szymańska, Silesian University of Technology, Poland 0000-0002-1653-9540
Marcin Bizukojć, Łódź University of Technology, Poland 0000-0003-1641-9917
Marek Ochowiak, Poznań University of Technology, Poland 0000-0003-1543-9967
Mirko Skiborowski, Hamburg University of Technology, Germany 0000-0001-9694-963X
Nikola Nikacevic, University of Belgrade, Serbia 0000-0003-1135-5336
Rafał Rakoczy, West Pomeranian University of Technology, Poland 0000-0002-5770-926X
Richard Lakerveld, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong 0000-0001-7444-2678
Tom van Gerven, KU Leuven, Belgium 0000-0003-2051-5696
Tomasz Sosnowski, Warsaw University of Technology, Poland 0000-0002-6775-3766