Szczegóły

Tytuł artykułu

Anxious and distrustful – How do state anxiety and memory distrust influence the misinformation effect?

Tytuł czasopisma

Polish Psychological Bulletin

Rocznik

2021

Wolumin

vol. 52

Numer

No 4

Afiliacje

Kuczek, Marta : Institute of Psychology, Jagiellonian University, Poland ; Szpitalak, Malwina : Institute of Psychology, Jagiellonian University, Poland ; Polczyk, Romuald : Institute of Psychology, Jagiellonian University, Poland

Autorzy

Słowa kluczowe

misinformation effect ; memory ; anxiety ; memory distrust ; witness testimony

Wydział PAN

Nauki Humanistyczne i Społeczne

Zakres

341-348

Wydawca

Committee for Psychological Science PAS

Bibliografia


Ayers, M. S., & Reder, L. M. (1998). A theoretical review of the misinformation effect: Predictions from an activation-based memory model. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03209454
Bar-Haim, Y., Lamy, D., Pergamin, L., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., & van Ijzendoorn, M. H. (2007). Threat-related attentional bias in anxious and nonanxious individuals: A meta-analytic study. Psychological Bulletin, 133(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.133.1.1
Bensi, L., & Giusberti, F. (2007). Trait anxiety and reasoning under uncertainty. Personality and Individual Differences, 43(4), 827–838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2007.02.007
Blank, H. (1998). Memory states and memory tasks: An integrative framework for eyewitness memory and suggestibility. Memory, 6(5), 481–529. https://doi.org/10.1080/741943086
Boelen, P. A., & Reijntjes, A. (2009). Intolerance of uncertainty and social anxiety. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 23(1), 130–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2008.04.007
Brewer, N., & Wells, G. L. (2011). Eyewitness identification. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(1), 24–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721410389169
Cline, M. E., Herman, J., Shaw, E. R., & Morton, R. D. (1992). Standardization of the Visual Analogue Scale. Nursing Research, 41(6), 378–380. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-199211000-00013
Cohen, R. L., & Harnick, M. A. (1980). The susceptibility of child witnesses to suggestion: An empirical study. Law and Human Behavior, 4(3), 201–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01040318
Commissaris, C. J. a. M., Ponds, R. W. H. M., & Jolles, J. (1998). Subjective forgetfulness in a normal Dutch population: Possibilities for health education and other interventions. Patient Education and Counseling, 34(1), 25–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0738-3991(98)00040-8
Constans, J. I., Penn, D. L., Ihen, G. H., & Hope, D. A. (1999). Interpretive biases for ambiguous stimuli in social anxiety. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 37(7), 643–651. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7967(98)00180-6
Dalton, A. L., & Daneman, M. (2006). Social suggestibility to central and peripheral misinformation. Memory, 14(4), 486–501. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210500495073
Derakshan, N., & Eysenck, M. W. (1997). Interpretive biases for one’s own behavior and physiology in high-trait-anxious individuals and repressors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(4), 816–825. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.73.4.816
Derryberry, D., & Reed, M. A. (2002). Anxiety-related attentional biases and their regulation by attentional control. Journal of abnormal psychology, 111(2), 225–236. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021- 843X.111.2.225
Duncan, E. M., Whitney, P., & Kunen, S. (1982). Integration of visual and verbal information in children’s memories. Child Development, 53(5), 1215–1123. https://doi.org/10.2307/1129008
Eisen, M. L., Gabbert, F., Ying, R., & Williams, J. (2017). „I think he had a tattoo on his neck”: How co-witness discussions about a perpe-trator’s description can affect eyewitness identification decisions. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 6(3), 274– 282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.01.009
Eysenck, M. W., & Calvo, M. G. (1992). Anxiety and performance: The processing efficiency theory. Cognition and Emotion, 6(6), 409–434. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699939208409696
Eysenck, M. W., Derakshan, N., Santos, R., & Calvo, M. G. (2007). Anxiety and cognitive performance: Attentional control theory. Emotion, 7(2), 336–353. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.7.2.336
Frost, P., Ingraham, M., & Wilson, B. (2002). Why misinformation is more likely to be recognised over time: A source monitoring account. Memory, 10(3), 179–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210143000317
Goodwin, K. A., Kukucka, J. P., & Hawks, I. M. (2013). Co‐witness confidence, conformity, and eyewitness memory: An examination of normative and informational social influences. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 27(1), 91–100. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2877
Graeff, F. G., Parente, A., Del-Ben, C. M., & Guimarães, F. S. (2003). Pharmacology of human experimental anxiety. Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research, 36(4), 421–432. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-879X2003000400003
Gudjonsson, G. H. (2003). The Psychology of Interrogations and Confessions: A Handbook. Chichester: Jon Wiley & Sons.
Gudjonsson, G. H., & Clark, N. K. (1986). Suggestibility in police interrogation: A social psychological model. Social Behaviour, 1(2), 83–104.
Gudjonsson, G. H., & MacKeith, J. A. C. (1982). False confessions: Psychological effects of interrogation. W: A. Trankell (red.), Reconstructing the past: The role of psychologists in criminal trials (p. 253-269). Zuidpoolsingel: Kluwer Law International.
Gudjonsson, G. H., Kopelman, M. D., & MacKeith, J. A. C. (1999). Unreliable admissions to homicide: A case of misdiagnosis of amnesia and misuse of abreaction technique. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 174, 455–459. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.174.5.455
Gudjonsson, G. H., Sigurdsson, J. F., Sigurdardottir, A. S., Steinthorsson, H., & Sigurdardottir, V. M. (2014). The role of memory distrust in cases of internalised false confession. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28(3), 336–348. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3002
Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. A regression-based approach. (second edition) New York: The Guilford Press.
Hoscheidt, S. M., LaBar, K. S., Ryan, L., Jacobs, W. J., & Nadel, L. (2014). Encoding negative events under stress: High subjective arousal is related to accurate emotional memory despite misinforma-tion exposure. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 112, 237– 247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nlm.2013.09.008
Kuczek, M., Szpitalak, M., & Polczyk, R. (2018). Psychometric properties and correlates of the Polish version of the Squire Subjective Memory Questionnaire (SSMQ). Personality and Individual Differences, 120, 271–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.05.021
Lindsay, D. S., & Johnson, M. K. (1989). The eyewitness suggestibility effect and memory for source. Memory & Cognition, 17(3), 349–358. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198473
Loftus, E. F., Miller, D. G., & Burns, H. J. (1978). Semantic integration of verbal information into a visual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4(1), 19–31. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.4.1.19
Luna, K., & Martín-Luengo, B. (2012). Improving the Accuracy of Eyewitnesses in the Presence of Misinformation with the Plurality Option. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26(5), 687–693. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2845
MacLeod, C., & Cohen, I. L. (1993). Anxiety and the interpretation of ambiguity: A text comprehension study. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 102(2), 238–247. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.102.2.238
Mathews, A., May, J., Mogg, K., & Eysenck, M. (1990). Attentional bias in anxiety: Selective search or defective filtering? Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 99(2), 166–173. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.99.2.166
McEvoy, P. M., & Mahoney, A. E. J. (2012). To be sure, to be sure: Intolerance of uncertainty mediates symptoms of various anxiety disorders and depression. Behavior Therapy, 43(3), 533–545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2011.02.007
McNair, D. M., Frankenthaler, L. M., Czerlinsky, T., White, T. W., Sasson, S., & Fisher, S. (1982). Simulated public speaking as a model of clinical anxiety. Psychopharmacology, 77(1), 7–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00436092
Mogg, K., Mathews, A., & Eysenck, M. (1992). Attentional bias to threat in clinical anxiety states. Cognition and Emotion, 6(2), 149–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699939208411064
Nitschke, J. P., Chu, S., Pruessner, J. C., Bartz, J. A., & Sheldon, S. (2019). Post-learning stress reduces the misinformation effect: Effects of psychosocial stress on memory updating. Psychoneuro-endocrinology, 102, 164–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psy-neuen.2018.12.008
Pickrell, J. E., McDonald, D.-L., Bernstein, D. M., & Loftus, E. F. (2017). Misinformation effect. W R. F. Pohl (Red.), Cognitive illusions: Intriguing phenomena in thinking, judgment and memory., 2nd ed. (2016-19747-023; s. 406–423). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
Polczyk, R. (2007). Mechanizmy efektu dezinformacji w kontekście zeznań świadka naocznego [Mechanisms of the misinformation effect in the context of witness testimony]. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.
Polczyk, R. (2017). The ‘memory’ misinformation effect may not be caused by memory failures : exploring memory states of misinformed subjects. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 48(3), 388-400. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ppb-2017-0045
Ridley, A. M., & Clifford, B. R. (2004). The effects of anxious mood induction on suggestibility to misleading post-event information. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18(2), 233–244. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.963
Ridley, A. M., & Clifford, B. R. (2006). Suggestibility and state anxiety: How the two concepts relate in a source identification paradigm. Memory, 14(1), 37–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210444000494
Ridley, A. M., Clifford, B. R., & Keogh, E. (2002). The effects of state anxiety on the suggestibility and accuracy of child eyewitnesses. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16(5), 547–558. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.813
Skagerberg, E. M., & Wright, D. B. (2008). The prevalence of co- witnesses and co-witness discussions in real eyewitnesses. Psychol-ogy, Crime & Law, 14(6), 513-521. https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160801948980
Spielberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L., Lushene, R. E. (1970). The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). Test Manual for Form X. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Squire, L. R., Wetzel, C. D., & Slater, P. C. (1979). Memory complaint after electroconvulsive therapy: Assessment with a new self-rating instrument. Biological Psychiatry, 14(5), 791–801.
Tousignant, J. P., Hall, D., & Loftus, E. F. (1986). Discrepancy detection and vulnerability to misleading postevent information. Memory & Cognition, 14(4), 329–338. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202511
van Bergen, S., Brands, I., Jelicic, M., & Merckelbach, H. (2010). Assessing trait memory distrust: Psychometric properties of the Squire Subjective Memory Questionnaire. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 15(2), 373–384. https://doi.org/10.1348/135532509X471960
van Bergen, S., Jelicic, M., & Merckelbach, H. (2008). Interrogation techniques and memory distrust. Psychology, Crime & Law, 14(5), 425–434. https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160701822533
van Bergen, S., Jelicic, M., & Merckelbach, H. (2009). Are subjective memory problems related to suggestibility, compliance, false memories, and objective memory performance? The American Journal of Psychology, 122(2), 249–257.
VanOss Marin, B., Holmes, D. L., Guth, M., & Kovac, P. (1979). The potential of children as eyewitnesses: A comparison of children and adults on eyewitness tasks. Law and Human Behavior, 3(4), 295– 306. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01039808
Wade, K. A., Green, S. L., & Nash, R. A. (2010). Can fabricated evidence induce false eyewitness testimony?. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24(7), 899-908. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1607
Wilson, E. J., MacLeod, C., Mathews, A., & Rutherford, E. M. (2006). The causal role of interpretive bias in anxiety reactivity. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 115(1), 103–111. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.115.1.103
Wright, D. B., London, K., & Waechter, M. (2010). Social anxiety moderates memory conformity in adolescents. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24(7), 1034–1045. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1604
Wright, D. B., Memon, A., Skagerberg, E. M., & Gabbert, F. (2009). When eyewitnesses talk. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(3), 174–178. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01631.x
Wrześniewski, K., Sosnowski, T. (1996). Inwentarz stanu I cechy lęku (ISCL). Polska adaptacja STAI. [The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). Polish adaptaion.] Warszawa: Pracownia Testów Psychologicznych.
Zaragoza, M. S., & Lane, S. M. (1994). Source misattributions and the suggestibility of eyewitness memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20(4), 934–945. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.20.4.934
Zhu, B., Chen, C., Loftus, E. F., Lin, C., He, Q., Chen, C., Li, H., Xue, G., Lu, Z., & Dong, Q. (2010). Individual differences in false memory from misinformation: Cognitive factors. Memory, 18(5), 543–555. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2010.487051
Zhu, B., Chen, C., Loftus, E. F., Lin, C., He, Q., Chen, C., Li, H., Moyzis, R. K., Lessard, J., & Dong, Q. (2010). Individual differences in false memory from misinformation: Personality characteristics and their interactions with cognitive abilities. Personality and Individual Differences, 48(8), 889–894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010 .02.016

Data

2022.01.03

Typ

Article

Identyfikator

DOI: 10.24425/ppb.2021.139168 ; ISSN 0079-2993

O czasopiśmie

Polish Psychological Bulletin (founded in 1970) is an official journal of Polish Academy of Sciences, Committee for Psychological Science.The journal publish a variety of papers, including empirical reports of experiments, surveys and field studies, theoretical articles, controversies and analytic papers on important psychological topics. Relevance for an international readership is our prominent goal, Polish Psychological Bulletin does not publish clinical case studies, or technical articles. Submissions from all domains of psychology are encouraged, especially those that address new developments and pursue innovative approaches.

Periodically, the journal will announce a call for papers for special issues. The journal will also entertain unsolicited proposals for special issues that fit the stated scope of the Polish Psychiological Bulletin (please contact the journal’s Editor-in-Chief with a detailed description of your proposal).

All published research articles in this journal have undergone rigorous review, based on initial editor screening and anonymous evaluation of content and merit by independent expert reviewers.

For information on specific requirements, please see the Author Guidelines.

Indeksowanie w bazach


Abstracting and Indexing Information


• DESY Publication Database

• Directory of Open Access Journal (DOAJ)

• Current Contents: Social & Behavioral Sciences

• Dimensions

• EBSCO

• ERIH Plus

• Google Scholar

• Index Copernicus

• ProQuest

• PsychArchives

• Science Open

• SCOPUS (Elsevier)

• Sherpa/RoMEO

Zasady etyki publikacyjnej

Peer Review and Ethics

Polish Psychological Bulletin is committed to peer-review integrity and upholding the highest standards of review.
Once your paper has been assessed for suitability by the editor, it will then be double blind peer reviewed by independent, anonymous authorities in the field.
Our guidance on publishing ethics is in accrdance with the COPE standards (see: https://publicationethics.org).
×