Do Personality Traits Have Effect on Performance in the Presence of an Audience?

Journal title

Polish Psychological Bulletin




vol. 52


No 4


Maglica, Barbara Kalebić : University of Rijeka, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Department of Psychology, Croatia ; Anić, Petra : University of Rijeka, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Department of Psychology, Croatia ; Švegar, Domagoj : University of Rijeka, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Department of Psychology, Croatia ; Mehonjić, Hana : University of Rijeka, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Department of Psychology, Croatia



personality traits ; social facilitation ; presence of an audience ; simple and complex mathematical tasks

Divisions of PAS

Nauki Humanistyczne i Społeczne




Committee for Psychological Science PAS


Ahmad, S. N. (2019). The role of social facilitation theory on consumer decision making: A conceptual framework. American Journal of Management, 16(2), 80-89.
Aiello, J. R., & Douthitt, E. A. (2001). Social facilitation from Triplett to electronic performance monitoring. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice, 5(3), 163–180.
Allport, F. H. (1924). Social psychology. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.
Baron R. S. (1986). Distraction - conflict theory: Progress and problems. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (pp. 1-40). New York: Academic Press.
Baron, R. S., & Kerr, N. L. (2010). Group process, group decision, group action. New York: Open University Press.
Baumeister, R. F. (1999). On the interface between personality and social psychology. In O. P. Oliver & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 367-377). New York, NY, US: Guilford Press.
Beidel, D. C., Turner, S. M., & Dancu, C. V. (1985). Physiological, cognitive and behavioral aspects of social anxiety. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 23(2), 109-117.
Bolger, N., & Schilling, E. A. (1991). Personality and the problems of everyday life: The role of neuroticism in exposure and reactivity to daily stressors. Journal of Personality, 59, 355-386.
Cacioppo, J. T., Rourke, T., Tassinary, L., Marshall-Goodall, B., & Baron, R. S. (1990). Rudimentary physiological effects of mere observation. Psychophysiology, 27, 177-186.
Carver, C. S., Sutton, S. K., & Scheier, M. F. (2000). Action, emotion, and personality: Emerging conceptual integration. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(6), 741–751.
Chapman, B. P., Duberstein, P. R., Sörensen, S., & Lyness, J. M. (2007). Gender differences in Five Factor Model personality traits in an elderly cohort. Personality and Individual Differences, 43(6), 1594- 1603.
Cheng, H., & Furnham, A. (2003). Personality, self-esteem, and demographic predictions of happiness and depression. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 921–942.
Cimbolic Gunther, K., Cohen, L. H., & Armeli, S. (1999). The role of neuroticism in daily stress and coping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1087-1100.
Cohen J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Routledge Academic.
Constantinou, M., Bauer, L., Ashendorf, L., Fisher, J. M., & McCaffrey, R. J. (2005). Is poor performance on recognition memory effort measures indicative of generalized poor performance on neuropsy-chological tests?. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 20(2), 191- 198.
Costa Jr, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1990). Personality disorders and the five-factor model of personality. Journal of Personality Disorders, 4(4), 362-371.
Costa Jr, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). The five-factor model of personality and its relevance to personality disorders. Journal of Personality Disorders, 6(4), 343-359.
Costa Jr, P. T., Terracciano, A., & McCrae, R. R. (2001). Gender differences in personality traits across cultures: Robust and surprising findings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(2), 322.
Cotrell, N. B. (1968). Performance in the presence of other human beings: Mere presence and affiliation effects. In E. C. Simmel, R. A. Hoppe, & G. A. Milton (Eds.), Social facilitation and imitative behavior (pp. 91-110). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Cotrell, N. B. (1972). Social facilitation. In C. G. McClintock (Ed.), Experimental social psychology (pp. 185-236). New York: Holt.
Cox-Fuenzalida, L. E., Swickert, R., & Hittner, J. B. (2004). Effects of neuroticism and workload history on performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 36(2), 447-456.
Dashiell, J. F. (1935). Experimental studies of the influence of social situations on the behavior of individual human adults. In C. Murchison (Ed.), A handbook of social psychology (pp. 1097- 1158). Worcester, MA: Clark University Press. Dube, S. K., & Tatz, S. J. (1991). Audience effects in tennis performance. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 73, 844-846.
Edwards, A. M., Dutton-Challis, L., Cottrell, D., Guy, J. H., & Hettinga, F. J. (2018). Impact of active and passive social facilitation on self- paced endurance and sprint exercise: Encouragement augments performance and motivation to exercise. BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine, 4(1), 1-7. Emmerich, K., & Masuch, M. (2018, April). Watch me play: Does social facilitation apply to digital games?. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1-12).
Eysenck, H. J. (1982). The biological basis of cross-cultural differences in personality: Blood group antigens. Psychological Reports, 51(2), 531-540.
Eysenck, M. W., Derakshan, N., Santos, R., & Calvo, M. G. (2007). Anxiety and cognitive performance: Attentional control theory. Emotion, 7(2), 336 Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, M. W. (1985). Personality and individual differences. New York: Plenum Press.
Feingold, A. (1994). Gender differences in personality: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 116(3), 429.
Fergusson, D. M., & Horwood, L. J. (1987). Vulnerability to life events exposure. Psychological Medicine, 17(3), 739-749.
Forgas, J. P., Brennan, G., Howe, S., Kane, F. J., & Sweet, S. (1980). Audience effects on squash players` performance. Journal of Social Psychology, 111, 41-47.
Geen, R. G. (1980). The effects of being observed on performance. In P.B. Paulus (Ed.), Psychology of group influence (pp. 15-51). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Geen, R. G. (1985) Test anxiety and visual vigilance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 963–70.
Gomez, R., Gomez, A., & Cooper, A. (2002). Extraversion and neuroticism as predictors of negative and positive informational processing: Comparing Eysenenck’s, Gray’s and Newman’s theories. European Journal of Personality, 16(5), 54–58.
Grant, T., & Dajee, K. (2003). Types of task, types of audience, types of actor: Interactions between mere presence and personality type in a simple mathematical task. Personality and Individual Differences, 35, 633-639.
Guerin, B. (1986). Mere presence effects in humans: A review. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 38-77.
Guerin, B. (1993). Social facilitation. Cambridge: University Press.
Guerin, B., & Innes, J. M. (1982). Social facilitation and social monitoring: A new look at Zajonc‘s mere presence hypothesis. British Journal of Social Psychology, 21, 7–18.
Harkins, S. G. (2006). Mere effort as the mediator of the evaluation- performance relationship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 436-455.
Halfmann, E., Bredehöft, J., & Häusser, J. A. (2020). Replicating roaches: A preregistered direct replication of Zajonc, Heingartner, and Herman’s (1969) social-facilitation study. Psychological Science, 31(3), 332-337.
Herman, C. P. (2015). The social facilitation of eating. A review. Appetite, 86, 61-73.
Higgs, S., & Ruddock, H. (2020) Social Influences on eating. In H. Meiselman, (Eds.), Handbook of eating and drinking (pp. 277- 291). Springer, Cham. Hollingsworth, H. L. (1935). The psychology of the audience. New York: American Book Company.
Horwitz, J. E., & McCaffrey, R. J. (2008). Effects of a third party observer and anxiety on tests of executive function. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 23(4), 409-417.
Hugnet, P., Galvaing, M. P., Monteil, J. M., & Dumas, F. (1999) Social presence effects in the Stroop task: Further evidence for an attentional view of social facilitation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1011-1025.
Hutchinson, J. G., & Ruiz, J. M. (2011). Neuroticism and cardiovascular response in women: Evidence of effects on blood pressure recovery. Journal of Personality, 79(2), 277-302.
Innes, J. M., & Gordon, M. I. (1985). The effect of mere presence and a mirror on performance motor task. Journal of Social Psychology, 125, 479-484.
John, O. P., Donahue, E. M., & Kentle, R. L. (1991). The Big Five Inventory–Versions 4a and 54. Berkeley, CA: University of California, Berkeley, Institute of personality and social research.
John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big five trait taxonomy: History, measurement and theoretical perspectives. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality, second edition: Theory and research (pp. 102-139). New York: The Guilford Press.
Jones, E. E. (1998). Major developments in five decades of social psychology. In D.T. Gilbert, T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (pp. 3-57). Boston, MA: McGraw- Hill Companies.
Kardum, I., Gračanin, A., & Hudek-Knežević, J. (2006). Odnos crta ličnosti i stilova privrženosti s različitim aspektima seksualnosti kod žena i muškaraca. Psihologijske teme, 15(1), 101-128
Kehrer, C. A., Sanchez, P. N., Habif, U., Rosenbaum, G. J., & Townes, B. D. (2000). Effects of a significant-other observer on neuropsy- chological test performance. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 14(1), 67-71.
Komarraju, M., Karau, S. J., Schmeck, R. R., & Avdić, A. (2011). The Big Five personality traits, learning styles, and academic achieve-ment. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 472-477.
Laird, B. K., Bailey, C. D., & Hester, K. (2018). The effects of monitoring environment on problem-solving performance. The Journal of Social Psychology, 158(2), 215-219.
Lynch, J. K. (2005). Effect of a third party observer on neuropsycho-logical test performance following closed head injury. Journal of Forensic Neuropsychology, 4(2), 17-25.
Martin, M., Ward, J. C., & Clark, D. M. (1983). Neuroticism and the recall of positive and negative personality information. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 21(5), 495-503.
Mathews, G. (2004) Neuroticism from the top down: Psychophysiology and negative emotionality. In R. Stelmack (Ed.), On the psychobiology of personality: Essays in honor of Marvin Zuckerman (pp. 249– 66). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
Matthews, G. (2008). Personality and information processing: A cogni-tive-adaptive theory. Handbook of Personality Theory and Assessment, 1, 56-79.
Mathews, G., Deary, I. J., & Whiteman, M. C. (2009). Stable traits and transient states. Personality Traits, 3, 85-120.
McFall, S. R., Jamieson, J. P., & Harkins, S. G. (2009). Testing the mere effort account of the evaluation-performance relationship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 135-154.
Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2007). Attachment in adulthood: Structure, dynamics, and change. New York: Guilford Press.
Neider, D. P., Fuse, M., & Suri, G. (2019). Cockroaches, performance, and an audience: Reexamining social facilitation 50 years later. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 85, Article 103851.
Nijstad, B. A. (2009). Group performance. East Sussex: Psychology Press.
Nijstad, B. A. (2013). Preformance. In J. M. Levine (Ed.), Group processes (pp. 193-214). New York: Psychology Press.
Oyibo, K., & Vassileva, J. (2019). The relationship between personality traits and susceptibility to social influence. Computers in Human Behavior, 98, 174-188.
Paivio, A. (1965). Personality and audience influence. In B. Maher (Ed.), Progress in experimental personality research (pp. 127-173). New York: Academic Press.
Pelham, B. W., & Swarm, W. B. Jr. (1989). From self-conceptions to self-worth: On the sources and structure of global self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 672–680.
Pessin, J. (1933). The comparative effects of social and mechanical stimulation on memorizing. American Journal of Psychology, 45, 263-270.
Rothweiler, J. N., Goodwin, K. A., & Kukucka, J. (2020). Presence of administrators differentially impacts eyewitness discriminability for same‐and other‐race identifications. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 34(6), 1530-1537.
Ruddock, H. K., Brunstrom, J. M., Vartanian, L. R., & Higgs, S. (2019). A systematic review and meta-analysis of the social facilitation of eating. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 110(4), 842-861.
Rusting, C. L. (1999). Interactive effects of personality and mood on emotion-congruent memory and judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(5), 1073–1086.
Sanders, G. S., & Baron, R. S. (1975). The motivating effects of distraction on task performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 956–963.
Sanna, L. J. (1992). Self-efficacy theory: Implications for social facilitation and social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62(5), 774–786.
Schmitt, B. H., Gilovich, T., Goore, N., & Joseph, L. (1986). Mere presence and social facilitation: One more time. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 242-248.
Schmukle, S. C., Back, M. D., & Egloff, B. (2008). Validity of the Five- Factor Model for the implicit self-concept of personality. European Journal of Assessment, 24(4), 263-272.
Seitchik, A. E., Brown, A. J., & Harkins, S. G. (2017). Social facilitation: Using the molecular to inform the molar. In S. G. Harkins, K. D. Williams, & J. M. Burger (Eds.), Oxford library of psychology. The Oxford handbook of social influence (pp. 183–203). Oxford University Press.
Spence, K. W. (1956). Behavior theory and conditioning. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Stein, L. M. (2009). Individual differences in social facilitation. (Master thesis). Graduate School-New Brunswick Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Jersey.
Stone, S. V., & Costa, P. T. (1990), Disease-prone personality or distress– prone personality? The role of neuroticism in coronary heart disease. In H. S. Friedman (Ed.), Personality and Disease (pp. 178-200). New York: Wiley.
Strojny, P. M., Dużmańska-Misiarczyk, N., Lipp, N., & Strojny, A. (2020). Moderators of social facilitation effect in virtual reality: Co-presence and realism of virtual agents. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1252.
Travis, L. E. (1925). The effect of small audience upon eye-hand coordination. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 29, 142- 146.
Triplett, N. (1898). The dynamogenic factors in pacemaking and competition. American Journal of Psychology, 9, 507–533.
Uziel, L. (2007). Individual differences in the social facilitation effect: A review and meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 579-601.
Uziel, L., & Baumeister, R. F. (2012). The effect of public social context on self-control: Depletion for neuroticism and restoration for impression management. Personality and Social Psychology Bulle-tin, 38(3), 384-396.
Zajonc, R. B. (1965). Social facilitation. Science, 149, 269–274.
Zelenski, J. M., & Larsen, R. J. (2002). Predicting the future: How affect- related personality traits influence likelihood judgments of future events. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(7), 1000– 1010.
Wann, D. L., & Hackathorn, J. (2019). Audience effects in sport: The reciprocal flow of influence between athletes and spectators. In M. H. Anshel, T. A. Petrie, & J. A. Steinfeldt (Eds.), APA handbooks in psychology series. APA handbook of sport and exercise psychology, Vol. 1. Sport psychology (pp. 469–488). American Psychological Association.
Wood, J. V., Heimpel, S. A., & Michela, J. L. (2003). Savoring versus dampening: Self-esteem differences in regulating positive affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(3), 566–580.






DOI: 10.24425/ppb.2021.139170

Aims and scope

Polish Psychological Bulletin (founded in 1970) is an official journal of Polish Academy of Sciences, Committee for Psychological Science.The journal publish a variety of papers, including empirical reports of experiments, surveys and field studies, theoretical articles, controversies and analytic papers on important psychological topics. Relevance for an international readership is our prominent goal, Polish Psychological Bulletin does not publish clinical case studies, or technical articles. Submissions from all domains of psychology are encouraged, especially those that address new developments and pursue innovative approaches.

Periodically, the journal will announce a call for papers for special issues. The journal will also entertain unsolicited proposals for special issues that fit the stated scope of the Polish Psychiological Bulletin (please contact the journal’s Editor-in-Chief with a detailed description of your proposal).

All published research articles in this journal have undergone rigorous review, based on initial editor screening and anonymous evaluation of content and merit by independent expert reviewers.

For information on specific requirements, please see the Author Guidelines.

Abstracting & Indexing

Abstracting and Indexing Information

• DESY Publication Database

• Directory of Open Access Journal (DOAJ)

• Current Contents: Social & Behavioral Sciences

• Dimensions


• ERIH Plus

• Google Scholar

• Index Copernicus

• ProQuest

• PsychArchives

• Science Open

• SCOPUS (Elsevier)

• Sherpa/RoMEO

Publication Ethics Policy

Peer Review and Ethics

Polish Psychological Bulletin is committed to peer-review integrity and upholding the highest standards of review.
Once your paper has been assessed for suitability by the editor, it will then be double blind peer reviewed by independent, anonymous authorities in the field.
Our guidance on publishing ethics is in accrdance with the COPE standards (see: