Details
Title
Rodziny na widoku – koncepcja demonstrowania rodzinności jako narzędzie użyteczne do analizowania życia rodzinnegoJournal title
Studia SocjologiczneYearbook
2022Issue
No 1Affiliation
Gawrońska, Małgorzata : Uniwersytet Warszawski ; Sikorska, Małgorzata : Uniwersytet WarszawskiAuthors
Keywords
media społecznościowe ; teoria praktyk rodzinnych ; demonstrowanie rodzinności ; analiza materiałów wizualnych ; displaying familiesDivisions of PAS
Nauki Humanistyczne i SpołeczneCoverage
137-164Publisher
Instytut Filozofii i Socjologii PAN ; Komitet Socjologii PAN ; Wydział Socjologii UWBibliography
1. Almack, Kathryn. 2011. Display Work: Lesbian Parent Couples and Their Families of Origin Negotiating New Kin Relationships. In: J. Seymour, E. Dermott, eds. Displaying families: a new concept for the sociology of family life. Basingstole: Palgrave Macmillan, 102–118.2. Barnwell, Ashley, Barbara Barbosa Neves, Signe Ravn. 2021. Capured and Captioned. Representing Family life on Instagram. New Media & Society, 00, 0: 1–22. DOI: 10.1177/14614448211012791.
3. Barve, Gargi. 2016. Social Media and its Effects on Society. International Journal of School and Cognitive Psychology, 3, 1: 1–5. DOI: 10.4172/2469-9837.1000166.
4. Biehal, Nina. 2014. A Sense of Belonging: Meanings of Family and Home in Long-Term Foster Care. British Journal of Social Work, 44: 955–971. DOI: 10.1093/bjsw/bcs177.
5. Boccagni, Paolo. 2012. Practising Motherhood at a Distance: Retention and Loss in Ecuadorian Transnational Families. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 38, 2: 261–277. DOI: 10.1080/1369183X.2012.646421.
6. Buler, Marta, Paula Pustułka. 2020. Dwa pokolenia Polek o praktykach rodzinnych. Między ciągłością a zmianą. Przegląd Socjologiczny, 69, 2: 33–53. DOI: 10.26485/PS/2020/69.2/2.
7. Cabalquinto, Earvin C. 2019. They could picture me, or I could picture them: Displaying of family life beyond borders through mobile photography. Information, Communication & Society, 23, 11: 1608–1624. DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2019.1602663.
8. Cammu, Nola. 2021. “We Are Three Parents but Legally Two”: Absent Legality, Present Display. Journal of Family Issues, 42, 5: 1007–1028. DOI: 10.1177/01925I3X20983379.
9. Chambers, Deborah. 2012. ‘We play as a family’: the rise in family-centered video gaming. Leisure Studies, 31, 1: 69–82. DOI: 10.1080/02614367.2011.568065.
10. Dermott, Esther, Julie Seymour, eds. 2011. Displaying Families. A New Concept for the Sociology of Family Life. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
11. Dermott, Esther, Marco Pomati. 2016. ‘Good’ Parenting Practices: How Important are Poverty, Education and Time Pressure? Sociology, 50, 1: 125–142. DOI: 10.1177/0038038514560260.
12. Doucet, Andrea. 2011. It’s Just Not Good For a Man to be Interested in Other People’s Children: Fathers, Public Displays of Care and Relevant Others. In: J. Seymour, E. Dermott, eds. Displaying families: a new concept for the sociology of family life. Basingstole: Palgrave Macmillan, 81–101.
13. Evans, David. 2012. Beyond the Throwaway Society: Ordinary Domestic Practice and a Sociological Approach to Household Food Waste. Sociology, 46, 1: 41–56. DOI: 0.1177/0038038511416150.
14. Featherstone, Brid, Susan White, Kate Morris. 2014. Re-imagining Child Protection: Towards Humane Social Work with Families. Clifton, Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
15. Finch, Janet. 2007. Displaying Families. Sociology, 41, I: 65–81. DOI: 10.1177/0038038507072284.
16. Finch, Janet. 2011. Exploring the Concept of Display in Family Relationships. In: J. Seymour, E. Dermott, eds. Displaying families: a new concept for the sociology of family life. Basingstole: Palgrave Macmillan, 197–205.
17. Gabb, Jacqui. 2008. Research Intimacy in Families. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
18. Gabb, Jacqui. 2012. Embodying Risk: Managing Father-Child Intimacy and the Display of Nudityin Families. Sociology, 47, 4: 639–654. DOI: 10.1177/0038038512448558.
19. Gawrońska, Małgorzata. 2021. Zastosowanie koncepcji displaying families do analizy wizualnych reprezentacji macierzyństwa na portal Instagram. Fabrica Societatis, 4: 46–62. DOI: 10.34616/142703.
20. Goulden, Murray. 2021. ‘Delete the family’: platform families and the colonisation of the smart home. Information, Communication & Society, 24, 7: 903–920. DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2019.1668454.
21. Harding, Lindsey. 2016. Motherhood Reimag(in)ed: A study of domestic photography in the digital age. Photographies, 9, 1: 109–125. DOI: 10.1080/175/40763.2016.1146628.
22. Harman, Vicki, Benedetta Cappellini. 2015. Mothers on Display: Lunchboxes, Social Class and Moral Accountability. Sociology, 49, 4: 764–781. DOI: 10.1177/0038038514559322.
23. Harrington, Maureen. 2015. Practices and meaning of purposive family leisure among working- and middle-class families. Leisure Studies, 34, 4: 471–486. DOI: 10.1080/02614367.2014.938767.
24. Haynes, Jo, Esther Dermott. 2011. Displaying Mixedness: Differences and Family Relationships. In: J. Seymour, E. Dermott, eds. Displaying families: a new concept for the sociology of family life. Basingstole: Palgrave Macmillan, 145–159.
25. Heaphy, Brian. 2011. Critical relational displays. In: J. Seymour, E. Dermott, eds. Displaying families: a new concept for the sociology of family life. Basingstole: Palgrave Macmillan, 19–37.
26. Henze-Pedersen, Sofie, Margaretha Jarvinen. 2021. Displaying family at women’s refuge. Sociological Review, 69, 6: 1229–1243. DOI: 10.1177/00380261211034670.
27. James, Allison, Penny Curtis. 2010. Family Displays and Personal Lives. Sociology, 44, 6: 1163–1180. DOI: 10.1177/0038038510381612.
28. Jones, Chris, Simon Hackett. 2011. The Role of ‘Family Practices’ and ‘Displays of Family’ in the Creation of Adoptive Kinship. British Journal of Social Work, 41: 40–56. DOI: 10.1093/bjsw/bcs177.
29. Kehily, Mary J., Rachel Thomson. 2011. Displaying Motherhood: Representations, Visual Methods and the Materiality of Maternal Practice. In: J. Seymour, E. Dermott, eds. Displaying families: a new concept for the sociology of family life. Basingstole: Palgrave Macmillan, 61–80.
30. Kędra, Joanna. 2021. Virtual proximity and transnational familyhood: a case study of the digital communication practices of Poles living in Finland. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 42, 5: 462–474. DOI: 10.1080/01434632.2020.1839084.
31. Khamis, Susie, Lawrence Ang, Raymond Welling. 2017. Self-branding, micro-celebrity and the rise of Social Media Influencers. Celebrity Studies, 8, 2: 191–208. DOI: 10.1080/19392397.2016.121892.
32. Lahad, Kinnereth, Vanessa May. 2021. Holding back and hidden family displays: Reflections on aunthood as a morally charged category. Current Sociology, 00, 0: 1–16. DOI: 10.1177/0011392121992829.
33. Lahad, Kinnereth, Galia Sabar, Naama Sabar Ben-Yehoshua. 2018. Doing and Displaying Gendered Boundary Work among Blended Families in Israel. Sociology, 52, 1: 95–110. DOI: 10.1177/0038038516677220.
34. Lind, Judith, Cecilia Lindgren. 2017. Displays of parent suitability in adoption assessment reports. Child and Family Social Work, 22: 53–63. DOI: 10.1111/cfs.12305.
35. Mamali, Elizabeth, Lorna Stevens. 2020. When Same-Sex Couples Say ‘I Do’: Display Work and the (Re)Production of the Wedding Rite. Sociology, 54, 5: 987–1003. DOI: 10.1177/0038038520922523.
36. Mizielińska, Joanna, Agata Stasińska. 2014. Prywatne jest polityczne: strategie emancypacyjne rodzin z wyboru w Polsce. Studium wybranych przypadków. Studia Socjologiczne, 4, 215: 111–140.
37. Mizielińska Joanna, Marta Abramowicz, Agata Stasińska. 2014. Rodziny z wyboru w Polsce. Życie rodzinne osób nieheteroseksualnych. Warszawa: Instytut Psychologii PAN.
38. Morgan, David H.J. 1996. Family Connections. An Introduction to Family Studies. Cambridge: Polity Press.
39. Morgan, David H.J. 2011a. Locating „Family Practices”. Sociological Research Online, 16, 4, 14: 1–9. https://www.socresonline.org.uk/16/4/14.html [dostęp: 22.08.2021].
40. Morgan, David H.J. 2011b. Rethinking Family Practices. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
41. Morris, Kate. 2013. Troubled families: vulnerable families’ experiences of multiple service use. Child&Family Social Work, 18, 2: 198–206. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365- 2206.2011.00822.x.
42. May, Vanessa, Matt Dawson. 2018. Families and Relationships e-Special Issue Introduction. Sociology, 52, 4: 865–874. DOI: 10.1177/0038038518760427.
43. Nicolini, Davide. 2012. Practice Theory, Work, and Organization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
44. Nordqvist, Petra. 2012. ‘I don’t want us to stand out more than we already do’: Lesbian couples negotiating family connections in donor conception. Sexualities, 15, 5/6: 644–661. DOI: 10.1177/1363460712446271.
45. Olcoń-Kubicka, Marta. 2009. Rola Internetu w powstawaniu nowego modelu macierzyństwa. W: M. Sikorska, red. Być rodzicem we współczesnej Polsce. Nowe wzory konfrontacji z rzeczywistością. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego, 34–61.
46. Parsons, Talcott, Robert Freed Bales. 1955. Family Socialization and Interaction Process. Glencoe, Illinois: The Free Press.
47. Pilcher, Jane, Zara Hooley, Amanda Coffey. 2020. Names and naming in adoption: Birth heritage and family-making. Child & Family Social Work, 25, 3: 568–575. DOI: 1111/cfs.12728.
48. Power, Emma. 2008. Furry families: making a human–dog family through home. Social & Cultural Geography, 9, 5: 535–555. DOI: 10.1080/14649360802217790.
49. Pugh, Allison J. 2005. Selling Compromise: Toys, Motherhood, and the Cultural Deal. Gender and Society, 19, 6: 729–749. DOI: 10.1177/0891243205279286.
50. Pustułka, Paula, Magdalena Ślusarczyk. 2016. Cultivation, compensation and indulgence: Transnational short-term returns to Poland across three family generations. TransnationalSocialReview,6,1–2:78–92.DOI:10.1080/21931674.2016.1182312.
51. Reckwitz, Andreas 2002. Toward a theory of social practices: A development in culturalist theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory, 5, 2: 243–263.
52. Rose, Gillian. 2010. Doing Family Photography. The Domestic, The Public and The Politics of Sentiment. Surrey: Asghate Publishing Limited.
53. Rose, Gillian. 2014. How Digital Technologies Do Family Snaps, Only Better. In: J. Larsen, M. Sandbye, eds. Digital Snaps: The New Face of Photography. London: Routledge, 67–86.
54. Schatzki, Theodore. 2001. Introduction: Practice theory. In: T. Schatzki, K.K. Cetina, E. von Savigny, eds. The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory. London: Routledge, 10–23.
55. Schatzki, Theodore. 2012. A primer on practices: Theory and research. In: J. Higgs, R. Barnett, S. Billett, M. Hutchings, F. Trede, eds. Practice-Based Education. Perspectives and Strategies. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers, 13–26.
56. Schmidt, Filip, Joanna Mizielińska, Agata Stasińska, Marta Olcoń-Kubicka, Magdalena Żadkowska, Joanna Jasińska, Mateusz Halawa. 2018. W stronę socjologii pary: propozycja paradygmatu teoretyczno-badawczego. Studia Socjologiczne, 3, 230: 11–39. DOI: 10.24425/122471.
57. Seymour, Julie. 2015. More than putting on a performance in commercial homes: merging family practices and critical hospitality studies. Annals of Leisure Research, 18, 3: 414–430. DOI: 10.1080/11745398.2015.1078247.
58. Seymour, Julie, Julie Walsch. 2013. Displaying Families, Migrant Families and Community Connectedness: The Application of an Emerging Concept in Family Life. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 44, 6: 689–698. DOI: 10.3138/ jcfs.44.6.689.
59. Shannon, Charlene S. 2019. #Family: Exploring the Display of Family and Family Leisure on Facebook and Instagram. Leisure Sciences (online). DOI: 10.1080/01490400.2019.1597792.
60. Shannon, Charlene S. 2021. Constructing “family”. Leisure as a context for “doing” and “displaying” family. In: D. Trussell, E, R. Jeanes, eds. Families, Sport, Leisure and Social Justice. London: Routledge, 18–29.
61. Share, Michelle, Cayla Williams, Liz Kerrins. 2018. Displaying and performing: Polish transnational families in Ireland Skyping grandparents in Poland. New Media & Society, 20, 8: 3011–3028. DOI: 10.1177/1461444817739272.
62. Shove, Elizabeth, Mika Pantzar, Matt Watson. 2012. The Dynamics of Social Practices. London: Sage Publications.
63. Sikorska, Małgorzata. 2018. Teorie praktyk jako alternatywa dla badań nad rodziną prowadzonych w Polsce. Studia Socjologiczne, 2, 229: 31–63. DOI: 10.24425/122463.
64. Sikorska, Małgorzata. 2019. Praktyki rodzinne i rodzicielskie we współczesnej Polsce – rekonstrukcja codzienności. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.
65. Smart, Carol. 2008. “Can I Be Bridesmaid?” Combining the Personal and Political in Same-SexWeddings. Sexualities,11,6:761–776.DOI:10.1177/1363460708096917.
66. Taranowicz, Iwona. 2016. Jemy wspólnie niedzielne obiady, więc jesteśmy rodziną – o znaczeniu demonstrowania praktyk rodzinnych w tworzeniu rodziny. Societas Communitas, 1, 21: 251–256.
67. Tarrant, Anna. 2012. Grandfathering: the construction of new identities and masculinities. In: S. Arber, V. Timonen, eds. Contemporary grandparenting: Changing family relationships in global contexts. Bristol: Policy Press, 181–202.
68. Underwood, Carrie R., Rachel D. Robnett. 2021. “I Would Like Us to Share a Name so That We Can Be Recognized in Society.” Marital Surname Preferences in Same-Sex Relationships. Journal of Homosexuality, 68, 2: 290–310. DOI: 10.1080/00918369.2019.1651110.
69. Ursin, Marit, Siv Oltedal, Carolina Munoz. 2016. Recognizing the ‘big things’ and the ‘little things’ in child protection cases. Child & Family Social Work, 22: 932–941. DOI: 10.1111/cfs.12313.
70. Walsh, Julie C. 2018. Migrant family display: a strategy for achieving recognition and validation in the host country. Sociological Research Online, 23, 1: 67–83. DOI: 10.1177/1360780417747286.
71. Watson, Ash, Deborah Lupton, Mike Michael. 2021. Enacting intimacy and sociality at a distance in the COVID-19 crisis: the sociomaterialities of home-based communication technologies. Media International Australia, 178, 1: 136–150. DOI: 10.1177/1329878X20961568.
72. White, James M., David M. Klein. 2008. Family Theories. London: Sage Publications.
73. Van Driel, Loes, Delia Dumitrica. 2020. Selling brands while staying “Authentic”: The professionalisation of Instagram influencers. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, XX, X: 1–19. DOI: 10.1177/1354856520902136.
74. Zadeh, Sophie, Susan Imrie, Susan Golombok. 2021. Storiesof Samenessand Difference: The Views and Experiences of Children and Adolescents with a trans*Parent. Journal of GLBT Family Studies, 17, 1: 1–17. DOI: 10.1080/1550428X.2019.1683785.
75. Żadkowska, Magdalena, Marta Olcoń-Kubicka, Jacek Gądecki, Joanna Mizielińska, Agata Stasińska, Filip Schmidt, Mateusz Halawa. 2018. Metodologiczne aspekty jakościowych badań par – synteza doświadczeń terenowych. Studia Socjologiczne, 3, 230: 41–69. DOI: 10.24425/122472.