Title

Rutenizmy w Nomenklatorze Eliasza Kopijewskiego z 1700 roku

Journal title

Slavia Orientalis

Yearbook

2013

Numer

No 1

Authors

Fałowski, Adam

Divisions of PAS

Nauki Humanistyczne i Społeczne

Publisher

Komitet Słowianoznawstwa PAN

Identifier

ISSN 0037-6744

Source

Slavia Orientalis; 2013; No 1

Publication Ethics Policy

Publication ethics

The Slavia Orientalis quarterly adheres to the principles presented in the Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors developed by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).

The rules of conduct concern in particular:

I. Duties of Authors
1. Authors are obliged to diligently prepare the articles for publication in the Slavia Orientalis, in accordance with the rules in force.
2. By submitting the material for publication in the Slavia Orientalis quarterly, the Author warrants that the article is his/her original work, has not been published or submitted for publication elsewhere, and that it does not infringe third-party intellectual property rights.
3. The Author assumes responsibility for the credibility and proper documentation of the information provided in the article.
4. Authors are obliged to take the comments from the Reviewers into account or to justify their refusal in writing.
5. After the article is accepted for publication, the Author signs a publication agreement with the Editorial Board under the Creative Commons CC BY-NC-ND free access license.

II. Rules of the Editorial Board
1. The Slavia Orientalis quarterly accepts manuscripts that have not been published previously. Any form of plagiarism, self-plagiarism, ghostwriting and guest authorship will be treated as an act of research misconduct. Editorial Board will document all forms of ethical violations and scientific misconduct and shall notify appropriate institutions about them. In the event of a confirmed scientific misconduct, disclosed after the publication of the text, the Editorial Board will provide relevant information.
2. Only high scientific value of the work, its reliability and linguistic correctness will be taken into account when reviewing and qualifying texts for publication. The Editorial Board shall respect the principle of avoiding conflicts of interest.
3. Editorial Board may refuse to publish the manuscript if it does not agree with the Author’s reaction to the reviews.
4. The correspondence between members of the Editorial Board, members of the Scientific Council and Authors or Reviewers shall be treated as confidential.

III. Duties and responsibilities of the Scientific Council
1. Advising the Editorial Board on issues related to the scientific level of the quarterly.
2. Paying attention to observed cases of scientific dishonesty.
3. Proposing new research issues, e.g. Eastern Slavonic languages, to include in the journal’s future publishing projects.
4. Providing opinion on ideas proposed by the Editorial Board for publication in special issues.
5. Concern for the recognition and scientific prestige of the quarterly in the international scientific community.

IV. Duties of Reviewers
1. Manuscripts shall be evaluated solely on their intellectual merit.
2. Reviews should contain an explicit recommendation whether to accept or reject the paper for publication.
3. The Reviewer is obliged to notify the Editorial Board about any case of plagiarism in the reviewed text.

Peer-review Procedure

Procedure for reviewing scientific articles in the quarterly Slavia Orientalis

1. Submitted material is initially evaluated by the Editorial Board in terms of meeting all formal requirements and its compliance with the journal’s scientific and thematic profile.

2. Reviews are prepared on the peer review form.

3. In the process of reviewing the following rules are followed:
a) the principle of two independent reviews;
b) the principle of selecting reviewers on the basis of their expertise;
c) the principle of avoiding the conflict of interest in the selection of reviewers;
d) the principle of double blind peer review; e) the principle of appointing a third reviewer in the event of contradictory reviews.

4. Manuscripts shall be evaluated solely on their intellectual merit.