Ukraine, War and Resistance: Reshaping Social Cohesion

Journal title

Studia Socjologiczne




No 2


Deineko, Oleksandra : Norwegian Institute for Urban and Regional Research (NIBR) OsloMet, V.N. Karazin KharkivNational University, NIBR, Karazin Kharkiv National University



social cohesion ; war ; Ukrainian society ; practices of resistance ; social trust

Divisions of PAS

Nauki Humanistyczne i Społeczne




Instytut Filozofii i Socjologii PAN ; Komitet Socjologii PAN ; Wydział Socjologii UW


1. Aasland, Aadne, Oleksii Lyska. 2016. Local democracy in Ukrainian cities: civic participation and responsiveness of local authorities. Post-Soviet Affairs, 32, 2: 152–175.
2. Aasland, Aadne, Sabine Kropp, eds. 2021. Accommodation of Regional and Ethno-cultural Diversity in Ukraine. Palgrave Macmillan.
3. Aasland, Aadne, Oleksandra Deineko, Olga Filippova, Sabine Kropp. 2021. Citizens’ perspectives: reform and social cohesion in Ukraine’s border regions. In: A. Aasland, S. Kropp, eds. Accommodation of Regional and Ethno-cultural Diversity in Ukraine. Palgrave Macmillan, 237–272.
4. ARDU – The accommodation of regional diversity in Ukraine. 2018-2021., accessed 16.12.2022.
5. Baliichuk, Vladislav. 2020. The Methodology of the ARDU Survey., accessed 23.12.2022.
6. Bauer, Michal, Christopher Blattman, Julie Chytilová, Joseph Henrich, Edward Miguel, Tamar Mitts. 2016. Can war foster cooperation? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 30, 3: 249–274.
7. Bellows, John, Edward Miguel. 2006. War and institutions: New evidence from Sierra Leone. American Economic Review, 96, 2: 394–399.
8. Bellows, John, Edward Miguel. 2009. War and local collective action in Sierra Leone. Journal of Public Economics, 93, 11-12: 1144–1157.
9. Berger-Schmitt, Regina. 2002. Considering Social Cohesion in Quality-of-Life Assessments: Concept and Measurement. Social Indicators Research, 58: 403–28.
10. Bernard, Paul. 1999. La cohésion sociale: critique dialectique d’un quasi-concept. Lien social et Politiques, 41: 47–59.
11. Blattman, Christopher. 2009. From violence to voting: War and political participation in Uganda. American Political Science Review, 103, 2: 231–247.
12. Bondarenko, Mykhailo, Svitlana Babenko, Oleksiy Borovskiy. 2017. Social cohesion in Ukraine (the experience of application of Bertelsmann Stiftung method to European Social Survey data). Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko Kyiv National University (Sociology), 1, 8: 58–65.
13. Chan, Joseph, Ho-Pong To, Elaine Chan. 2006. Reconsidering social cohesion: Developing a definition and analytical framework for empirical research. Social Indicators Research, 75, 2: 273–302.
14. Coleman, James S. 1988. Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94: S95–S120.
15. Decree of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. 2014. On confirmation of Ukraine’s course towards integration into the European Union and priority measures in this direction., accessed 12.12.2022.
16. Deineko, Оleksandra. 2021. ‘Being together’ in the pandemic conditions: social cohesion challenges of the contemporary Ukrainian society. Ukrainian Sociological Journal, 25: 37–48.
17. Deineko, Oleksandra. 2022. War in Ukraine: a Sociological Study. Report: Norwegian Institute for Urban and Regional Research., accessed 23.12.2022.
18. Dickes, Paul, Marie Valentova. 2013. Construction, validation and application of the measurement of social cohesion in 47 European countries and regions. Social Indicators Research, 113, 3: 827–846.
19. Dragolov, Georgi, Zsófia Ignácz, Jan Lorenz, Jan Delhey, Klaus Boehnke. 2013. Social cohesion radar measuring common ground: An international comparison of social cohesion methods report., accessed 30.09.2022.
20. European Values Study 2017: Integrated Dataset (EVS 2017)., accessed 02.03.2023.
21. Fiedler, Charlotte, Christopher Rohles. 2021. Social cohesion after armed conflict: a literature review. Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik., accessed 30.02.2023.
22. Fonseca, Xavier, Stephan Lukosch, Frances Brazier. 2019. Social cohesion revisited: a new definition and how to characterize it. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 32, 2: 231–253.
23. Giddens, Anthony. 1984. The constitution of society: outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
24. Golovakha, Yevhen, Natalia Panina, Olena Parakhonska. 2019. Ukrainian Society in 1992–2018: Monitoring Social Changes. Kyiv: Institute of Sociology of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine.
25. Gorbachyk, Andriy. 2022. War as a factor changing the structure and level of trust. In: Ye. Golovakha, S. Makeiev, eds. Ukrainian society in wartime. Kyiv: Institute of Sociology of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 347–358.
26. Green, Andy, Jan Germen Janmaat, Christine Han. 2009. Regimes of Social Cohesion. London: UCL London Centre for Learning and Life Chances in Knowledge Economies and Societies.
27. Grosjean, Pauline. 2014. Conflict and social and political preferences: Evidence from World War II and civil conflict in 35 European countries. Comparative Economic Studies, 56, 3: 424–451.
28. Hager, Anselm, Krzysztof Krakowski, Max Schaub. 2019. Ethnic riots and prosocial behavior: Evidence from Kyrgyzstan. American Political Science Review, 113, 4: 1029–1044.
29. Ilko Kucheriv Democratic Initiatives Foundation. 2019. Civil society in Ukraine: citizens’ view., accessed 12.12.2022.
30. Jeannotte, M. Sharon. 2003.Singing Alone? The Contribution of Cultural Capital to Social Cohesion and Sustainable Communities. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 9: 35–49.
31. Jenson, Jane. 1998. Mapping social cohesion: The state of Canadian research. Ottawa: Canadian Policy Research Networks.
32. Kaarbo, Juliet, Ryan K. Beasley. 1999. A practical guide to the comparative case study method in political psychology. Political Psychology, 20: 369–391.
33. Kharkiv Today. 2022. Until the end of the war the charge for utilities in Kharkiv won’t be charged,, accessed 02.01.2023.
34. Kuzio, Taras. 2001. Identity and nation-building in Ukraine. Ethnicities, 1, 3: 343–365.
35. Kyiv International Institute of Sociology. 2022. Attitude of Ukrainians who are currently in Ukraine towards Ukrainian refugees in Europe., accessed 02.01.2023.
36. Kyiv International Institute of Sociology. 2022. Indicators of national-civic identity of Ukrainians., accessed 02.03.2023.
37. Law of Ukraine. 2015. About the legal regime of martial law., accessed 12.12.2022.
38. Leininger, Julia et al. 2021. Social cohesion: A new definition and a proposal for its measurement in Africa. Discussion Paper, 31/2021. Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik (DIE), Bonn., accessed 02.03.2023.
39. Nair, Gautam, Nicholas Sambanis. 2019. Violence exposure and ethnic identification: Evidence from Kashmir. International Organization, 73, 2: 329–363.
40. Patulny, V. Roger, Gunnar Lind Haase Svendsen. 2007. Exploring the social capital grid: bonding, bridging, qualitative, quantitative. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 27, 1/2: 32–51.
41. Putnam, Robert D. 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. City: Touchstone Books/Simon & Schuster.
42. Radio Svoboda. 2022. Zelenskyi: On February 24 the second all-Ukrainian referendum took place., accessed 23.12.2022.
43. Radio Svoboda. 2022. The State Security Service conducts new “security measures” at the facilities of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church of Moscow Patriarchy in nine regions., accessed 02.01.2023.
44. Rashid, Yasir, Ammar Rashid, Muhammad Akib, Warraich Sana, Sameen Sabir, Ansar Waseem. 2019. Case Study Method: A Step-by-Step Guide for Business Researchers. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18: 1–13.
45. Rivne Media. 2022. Almost 7 million hryvnias were collected per day for the freed Mykhailo Dianov., accessed 02.01.2023.
46. Rohner, Dominic, Mathias Thoenig, Fabrizio Zilibotti. 2013. Seeds of Distrust: Conflict in Uganda. Journal of Economic Growth, 18, 3: 217–252.
47. Simmel, Georg. 1903. The Sociology of Conflict: II. American Journal of Sociology, 9: 672–689.
48. Sociological Group ‘Rating’. 2021 (December 14-16th). Socio-political attitudes of the population. skie_nastroeniya_naseleniya_14-16_dekabrya_2021.html, accessed 12.12.2022.
49. Sociological Group ‘Rating’. 2022 (March 1st). National survey: Ukraine in the conditions of war., accessed 12.12.2022.
50. Sociological Group ‘Rating’. 2022 (April 6th). The eighth national survey: Ukraine in war conditions., accessed 02.01.2023. 51. Sociological Group ‘Rating’. 2022 (May 18-19th). The twelfth national survey: dynamics of assessment of the image of the state, accessed 12.12.2022.
52. Sociological Group ‘Rating’. 2022 (August 17-18th). The seventeenth national survey: Identity. Patriotism. Values., accessed 02.01.2023.
53. Sociological Group ‘Rating’. 2022 (November 20-21st). The nineteenth National Survey: Results of the year. Expectations from the future. the_future_november_20-21_2022.html, accessed 12.12.2022.
54. Sociological Group ‘Rating’ (November 20-21st). The nineteenth national survey: Celebrating Christmas in Ukraine., accessed 02.01.2023.
55. Suspilne. 2022. Ukrainians collected money for four ‘Bayraktars’ for the Armed Forces during three days., accessed 12.12.2022.
56. Suspilne. 2022. The story of IDPs from Kharkiv who settled in a high mountain village in Bukovina., accessed 02.01.2023.
57. Thomas, William I., Dorothy S. Thomas. 1928. The child in America. Oxford: Knopf. 58. Trukha. 2022. Telegram channel in Kharkiv, message dated 17 March 2022.






DOI: 10.24425/sts.2023.146173