Search results

Filters

  • Journals
  • Authors
  • Keywords
  • Date
  • Type

Search results

Number of results: 4
items per page: 25 50 75
Sort by:
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The article presents the process of identifying discrete-continuous models with the use of heuristic algorithms. A stepped cantilever beam was used as an example of a discrete-continuous model. The theoretical model was developed based on the formalism of Lagrange multipliers and the Timoshenko theory. Based on experimental research, the theoretical model was validated and the optimization problem was formulated. Optimizations were made for two algorithms: genetic (GA) and particle swarm (PSO). The minimization of the relative error of the obtained experimental and numerical results was used as the objective function. The performed process of identifying the theoretical model can be used to determine the eigenfrequencies of models without the need to conduct experimental tests. The presented methodology regarding the parameter identification of the beams with the variable cross-sectional area (according to the Timosheno theory) with additional discrete components allows us to solve similar problems without the need to exit complex patterns.
Go to article

Bibliography

  1.  D. Cekus, B. Posiadała, and P. Warys, “Integration of modeling in SolidWorks and Matlab/Simulink environments,” Arch. Mech. Eng., vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 57–74, 2014, doi: 10.2478/meceng-2014-0003.
  2.  K. Kuliński and J. Przybylski, “Stability and vibrations control of a stepped beam using piezoelectric actuation,” MATEC Web Conf., vol. 157, p. 08004, 2018, doi: 10.1051/matecconf/201815708004.
  3.  S.A. Moezi, E. Zakeri, A. Zare, and M. Nedaei, “On the application of modified cuckoo optimization algorithm to the crack detection problem of cantilever Euler–Bernoulli beam,” Comput. Struct., vol. 157, pp. 42–50, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2015.05.008.
  4.  P.K. Jena and D.R. Parhi, “A modified particle swarm optimization technique for crack detection in cantilever beams,” Arabian J. Sci Eng., vol. 40, no. 11, pp. 3263–3272, 2015, doi: 10.1007/s13369-015-1661-6.
  5.  X.-L. Li, R. Serra, and O. Julien, “Effects of the Particle Swarm Optimization parameters for structural dynamic monitoring of cantilever beam,” in Surveillance, Vishno and AVE conferences. Lyon, France: INSA-Lyon, Université de Lyon, 2019. Available: https://hal.archives-ouvertes. fr/hal-02188562.
  6.  S. Das, S. Mondal, and S. Guchhait, “Particle swarm optimization-based characterization technique of nonproportional viscous damping parameter of a cantilever beam,” J. Vib. Control, p. 107754632110105, 2021, doi: 10.1177/10775463211010526.
  7.  J. Zolfaghari, “Optimization of dynamic response of cantilever beam by genetic algorithm,” in Nonlinear Approaches in Engineering Applications. Springer International Publishing, 2019, pp. 403–448, doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-18963-1_10.
  8.  M.A. Wahab, I. Belaidi, T. Khatir, A. Hamrani, Y.-L. Zhou, and M.A. Wahab, “Multiple damage detection in composite beams using particle swarm optimization and genetic algorithm,” Mechanics, vol. 23, no. 4, 2017, doi: 10.5755/j01.mech.23.4.15254.
  9.  Z. Xia, K. Mao, S. Wei, X. Wang, Y. Fang, and S. Yang, “Application of genetic algorithm-support vector regression model to predict damping of cantilever beam with particle damper,” J. Low Freq. Noise Vibr. Act. Control, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 138–147, 2017, doi: 10.1177/0263092317711987.
  10.  M. Friswell and J. Mottershead, Finite Element Model Updating in Structural Dynamics, Springer, Dordrecht, 1995.
  11.  S. Garus and W. Sochacki, “Structure optimization of quasi one-dimensional acoustic filters with the use of a genetic algorithm,” Wave Motion, vol. 98, p. 102645, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.wavemoti.2020.102645.
  12.  S. Mirjalili, “Genetic algorithm,” in Studies in Computational Intelligence. Springer, Cham, 2018, pp. 43–55, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-93025-1_4.
  13.  W. Sochacki, J. Garus, J. Szmidla, M. Nabiałek, K. Błoch, P. Kwiatoń, B. Jeż, K. Jeż, and S. Garus, “Designing two-band mechanical wave filters using genetic algorithm,” Acta Phys. Pol. A, vol. 139, no. 5, pp. 479–482, May 2021, doi: 10.12693/aphyspola.139.479.
  14.  J. Kennedy and R. Eberhart, “Particle swarm optimization,” in Proceedings of ICNN’95 – International Conference on Neural Networks. IEEE, 1995, doi: 10.1109/icnn.1995.488968.
  15.  D. Skrobek and D. Cekus, “Optimization of the operation of the anthropomorphic manipulator in a three-dimensional working space,” Eng. Optim., vol. 51, no. 11, pp. 1997–2010, 2019, doi: 10.1080/0305215x.2018.1564919.
  16.  P. Dziwiński, Ł. Bartczuk, and J. Paszkowski, “A new auto adaptive fuzzy hybrid particle swarm optimization and genetic algorithm,” J. Artif. Intell. Soft Comput. Res., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 95– 111, Mar. 2020, doi: 10.2478/jaiscr-2020-0007.
  17.  S. Timoshenko, “On the transverse vibrations of bars of uniform cross section,” Philos. Mag., vol. 43, no. 253, pp. 125–131, Jan. 1922, doi: 10.1080/14786442208633855.
  18.  W. Sochacki, “The dynamic stability of a stepped cantilever beam with attachments,” J. Vibroeng., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 280– 290, 2013.
  19.  M.H. Korayem and A. Nahavandi, “Analyzing the effect of the forces exerted on cantilever probe tip of atomic force microscope with tapering- shaped geometry and double piezoelectric extended layers in the air and liquid environments,” J. Sound Vib., vol. 386, pp. 251–264, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.jsv.2016. 08.031.
  20.  B. Posiadała, “Use of lagrange multiplier formalism to analyze free vibrations of combined dynamical systems,” J. Sound Vib., vol. 176, no. 4, pp. 563–572, Sep. 1994, doi: 10.1006/jsvi.1994.1396.
  21.  R. Pytlarz, “Experimental modal analysis of the beam with the help of non-contact vibration measurement method,” Master’s thesis, Czestochowa University of Technology, Częstochowa, 2008.
  22.  Z. Abo-Hammour, O.A. Arqub, O. Alsmadi, S. Momani, and A. Alsaedi, “An optimization algorithm for solving systems of singular boundary value problems,” Appl. Math. Inf. Sci., vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 2809–2821, 2014, doi: 10.12785/amis/080617.
  23.  I. Rejer, “Classic genetic algorithm vs. genetic algorithm with aggressive mutation for feature selection for a brain-computer interface,” Przegląd Elektrotechniczny, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 100–104, 2015, doi: 10.15199/48.2015.02.24.
  24.  M. Nikoo, M. Hadzima-Nyarko, E.K. Nyarko, and M. Nikoo, “Determining the natural frequency of cantilever beams using ANN and heuristic search,” Appl. Artif. Intell, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 309–334, Mar. 2018, doi: 10.1080/08839514.2018.1448003.
  25.  A. Mayer, “A genetic algorithm with randomly shifted gray codes and local optimizations based on quadratic approximations of the fitness,” in Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference Companion. ACM, 2017, doi: 10.1145/3067695.3075968.
  26.  B. Ufnalski and L. Grzesiak, “Particle swarm optimization of artificial-neural-network-based on-line trained speed controller for battery electric vehicle,” Bull. Pol. Acad. Sci. Tech. Sci., vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 661–667, 2012, doi: 10.2478/v10175-0120059-9.
  27.  M. Szczepanik and T. Burczyński, “Swarm optimization of stiffeners locations in 2-d structures,” Bull. Pol. Acad. Sci. Tech. Sci.,, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 241–246, 2012, doi: 10.2478/v10175012-0032-7.
  28.  J.C. Bansal, “Particle swarm optimization,” in Studies in Computational Intelligence. Springer, Cham, 2018, pp. 11–23, doi: 10.1007/978-3- 319-91341-4_2.
  29.  D. Cekus and P. Warys, “Identification of parameters of discretecontinuous models,” in AIP Conference Proceedings. AIP Publishing LLC, 2015, doi: 10.1063/1.4913110.
  30.  D. Cekus and D. Skrobek, “The influence of inertia weight on the particle swarm optimization algorithm,” J. Appl. Math. Comput. Mech., vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 5–11, Dec. 2018, doi: 10.17512/jamcm.2018.4.01.
  31.  A.R. Jordehi and J. Jasni, “Parameter selection in particle swarm optimisation: a survey,” J. Exp. Theor. Artif. Intell., vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 527–542, Dec. 2013, doi: 10.1080/0952813x.2013.782348.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Dawid Cekus
1
ORCID: ORCID
Paweł Kwiatoń
1
ORCID: ORCID
Michal Šofer
2
ORCID: ORCID
Pavel Šofer
3
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Department of Mechanics and Machine Design Fundamentals, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Computer Science, Czestochowa University of Technology, 42-201 Częstochowa, Poland
  2. Department of Applied Mechanics, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, VŠB-Technical University of Ostrava, 17. listopadu 15/2127, 708 33 Ostrava-Poruba, Czech Republic
  3. Department of Control Systems and Instrumentation, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, VŠB-Technical University of Ostrava, 17. listopadu 15/2127, 708 33 Ostrava-Poruba, Czech Republic
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The study investigated the effect of the fill factor, lattice constant, and the shape and type of meta-atom material on the reduction of mechanical wave transmission in quasi-two-dimensional phononic structures. A finite difference algorithm in the time domain was used for the analysis, and the obtained time series were converted into the frequency domain using the discrete Fourier transform. The use of materials with large differences in acoustic impedance allowed to determine the influence of the meta-atom material on the propagation of the mechanical wave.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Sebastian Garus
1
ORCID: ORCID
Wojciech Sochacki
1
ORCID: ORCID
Paweł Kwiatoń
1
ORCID: ORCID
Marcin Nabiałek
2
ORCID: ORCID
Jana Petrů
3
ORCID: ORCID
Mariusz Kubanek
4
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Computer Science, Department of Mechanics and Fundamentals of Machinery Design, Czestochowa University of Technology, Dąbrowskiego 73, 42-201 Częstochowa, Poland
  2. Faculty of Production Engineering and Materials Technology, Department of Physics, Czestochowa University of Technology, Armii Krajowej 19, 42-201 Częstochowa, Poland
  3. Department of Machining, Assembly and Engineering Metrology, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, VSB-Technical University of Ostrava,70833 Ostrava, Czech Republic
  4. Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Computer Science, Department of Computer Science, Czestochowa University of Technology, Dąbrowskiego 73, 42-201 Częstochowa, Poland
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The study analyzed the influence of materials and different types of damping on the dynamic stability of the Bernoulli-Euler beam. Using the mode summation method and applying an orthogonal condition of eigenfunctions and describing the analyzed system with the Mathieu equation, the problem of dynamic stability was solved. By examining the influence of internal and external damping and damping in the beam supports, their influence on the regions of stability and instability of the solution to the Mathieu equation was determined.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Sebastian Garus
1
ORCID: ORCID
Justyna Garus
1
ORCID: ORCID
Wojciech Sochacki
1
ORCID: ORCID
Marcin Nabiałek
2
ORCID: ORCID
Jana Petru
3
ORCID: ORCID
Wojciech Borek
4
ORCID: ORCID
Michal Šofer
5
ORCID: ORCID
Paweł Kwiatoń
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Computer Science, Czestochowa University of Technology, Poland
  2. Faculty of Production Engineering and Materials Technology, Department of Physics, Czestochowa University of Technology, Armii Krajowej 19, 42-201 Czestochowa, Poland
  3. Department of Machining, Assembly and Engineering Metrology, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, VSB-Technical University of Ostrava, 70833 Ostrava, Czech Republic
  4. Department of Engineering Materials and Biomaterials, Silesian University of Technology, Konarskiego 18A, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland
  5. Department of Applied Mechanics, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, VSB—Technical University of Ostrava, 17. listopadu 2172/15, 70800 Ostrava, Czech Republic
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Although the study of oscillatory motion has a long history, going back four centuries, it is still an active subject of scientificr esearch. In this review paper prospective research directions in the field of mechanical vibrations were pointed out. Four groups of important issues in which advanced research is conducted were discussed. The first are energy harvester devices, thanks to which we can obtain or save significant amounts of energy, and thus reduce the amount of greenhouse gases. The next discussed issue helps in the design of structures using vibrations and describes the algorithms that allow to identify and search for optimal parameters for the devices being developed. The next section describes vibration in multi-body systems and modal analysis, which are key to understanding the phenomena in vibrating machines. The last part describes the properties of granulated materials from which modern, intelligent vacuum-packed particles are made. They are used, for example, as intelligent vibration damping devices.
Go to article

Bibliography

  1.  K. Di et al., “Dielectric elastomer generator for electromechanical energy conversion: A mini review,” Sustainability, vol. 13, p. 9881, 2021, doi: 10.3390/su13179881.
  2.  D. Wang, J. Mo, X. Wang, H. Ouyang, and Z. Zhou, “Experimental and numerical investigations of the piezoelectric energy harvesting via friction-induced vibration,” Energy Convers. Manage., vol. 171, pp. 1134–1149, 2018, doi: 10.1016/ j.enconman.2018.06.052.
  3.  A. Anand, S. Naval, P.K. Sinha, N.K. Das, and S. Kundu, “Effects of coupling in piezoelectric multi-beam structure,” Microsyst. Technol., vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 1235–1252, 2019, doi: 10.1007/s00542-019-04653-3.
  4.  A. Anand and S. Kundu, “Design of a spiral-shaped piezoelectric energy harvester for powering pacemakers,” Nanomater. Energy, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 139–150, 2019, doi: 10.1680/jnaen.19.00016.
  5.  S.B. Ayed, A. Abdelkefi, F. Najar, and M.R. Hajj, “Design and performance of variable-shaped piezoelectric energy harvesters,” J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct., vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 174– 186, 2013, doi: 10.1177/1045389x13489365.
  6.  S. Kundu and H.B. Nemade, “Piezoelectric vibration energy harvester with tapered substrate thickness for uniform stress,” Microsyst. Technol., vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 105–113, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s00542-020-04922-6.
  7.  S. Paquin and Y. St-Amant, “Improving the performance of a piezoelectric energy harvester using a variable thickness beam,” Smart Mater. Struct., vol. 19, no. 10, p. 105020, 2010, doi: 10.1088/0964-1726/19/10/105020.
  8.  J. Zhang, X. Xie, G. Song, G. Du, and D. Liu, “A study on a near-shore cantilevered sea wave energy harvester with a variable cross section,” Energy Sci. Eng., vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 3174– 3185, 2019, doi: 10.1002/ese3.489.
  9.  R. Hosseini and M. Nouri, “Shape design optimization of unimorph piezoelectric cantilever energy harvester,” J. Comput. Appl. Mech., vol. 47, no. 2, 2016, doi: 10.22059/jcamech.2017. 224975.126.
  10.  A. Anand, S. Pal, and S. Kundu, “Bandwidth and power enhancement in the MEMS based piezoelectric energy harvester using magnetic tip mass,” Bull. Pol. Acad. Sci. Tech. Sci., vol. 70, no. 1, p. e137509, 2022, doi: 10.24425/bpasts.2021.137509.
  11.  X. Li et al., “Investigation to the influence of additional magnets positions on four magnet bi-stable piezoelectric energy harvester,” Bull. Pol. Acad. Sci. Tech. Sci., vol. 70, no. 1, p. e140151, 2022, doi: 10.24425/bpasts.2022.140151.
  12.  P. Yingyong, P. Thainiramit, S. Jayasvasti, N. ThanachIssarasak, and D. Isarakorn, “Evaluation of harvesting energy from pedestrians using piezoelectric floor tile energy harvester,” Sens. Actuators A, vol. 331, p. 113035, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.sna. 2021.113035.
  13.  P. Firoozy, S.E. Khadem, and S.M. Pourkiaee, “Broadband energy harvesting using nonlinear vibrations of a magnetopiezoelastic cantilever beam,” Int. J. Eng. Sci., vol. 111, pp. 113–133, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.ijengsci.2016.11.006.
  14.  Y. Wu, J. Qiu, S. Zhou, H. Ji, Y. Chen, and S. Li, “A piezoelectric spring pendulum oscillator used for multi-directional and ultra-low frequency vibration energy harvesting,” Appl. Energy, vol. 231, pp. 600–614, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018. 09.082.
  15.  J. He et al., “Triboelectric piezoelectric electromagnetic hybrid nanogenerator for high efficient vibration energy harvesting and self powered wireless monitoring system,” Nano Energy, vol. 43, pp. 326–339, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.11.039.
  16.  D. Zhu, S. Roberts, M.J. Tudor, and S.P. Beeby, “Design and experimental characterization of a tunable vibration-based electromagnetic micro- generator,” Sens. Actuators A, vol. 158, no. 2, pp. 284–293, Mar. 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.sna.2010.01.002.
  17.  W.-J. Su, J. Zu, and Y. Zhu, “Design and development of a broadband magnet-induced dual-cantilever piezoelectric energy harvester,” J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct., vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 430–442, Aug. 2013, doi: 10.1177/1045389x13498315.
  18.  D. Guo, X.F. Zhang, H. Y. Li, and H. Li, “Piezoelectric energy harvester array with magnetic tip mass,” in Volume 4B: Dynamics, Vibration, and Control. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Nov. 2015, doi: 10.1115/imece2015-51044.
  19.  M. Ostrowski, B. Błachowski, M. Bocheński, D. Piernikarski, P. Filipek, and W. Janicki, “Design of nonlinear electromagnetic energy harvester equipped with mechanical amplifier and spring bumpers,” Bull. Pol. Acad. Sci. Tech. Sci., vol. 68, no. 6, pp. 1373–1383, 2020, doi: 10.24425/BPASTS.2020.135384.
  20.  S.-C. Kim, J.-G. Kim, Y.-C. Kim, S.-J. Yang, and H. Lee, “A study of electromagnetic vibration energy harvesters: Design optimization and experimental validation,” Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. Green Technol., vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 779–788, Jul. 2019, doi: 10.1007/s40684-019- 00130-4.
  21.  X. Wang et al., “Similarity and duality of electromagnetic and piezoelectric vibration energy harvesters,” Mech. Syst. Sig. Process., vol. 52-53, pp. 672–684, Feb. 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2014.07.007.
  22.  K. Kecik, A. Mitura, S. Lenci, and J. Warminski, “Energy harvesting from a magnetic levitation system,” Int. J. Non Linear Mech., vol. 94, pp. 200–206, Sep. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.ijnon linmec.2017.03.021.
  23.  A. Preumont, Mechatronics – Dynamics of Electromechanical and Piezoelectric Systems. Springer Netherlands, 2006, doi: 10.1007/1-4020- 4696-0.
  24.  I. Shahosseini and K. Najafi, “Mechanical amplifier for translational kinetic energy harvesters,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 557, p. 012135, Nov. 2014, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/557/1/012135.
  25.  H. Fu, S. Theodossiades, B. Gunn, I. Abdallah, and E. Chatzi, “Ultra-low frequency energy harvesting using bi-stability and rotary-translational motion in a magnet-tethered oscillator,” Nonlinear Dyn., vol. 101, no. 4, pp. 2131–2143, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s11071-020-05889-9.
  26.  H. Zhang, L. R. Corr, and T. Ma, “Issues in vibration energy harvesting,” J. Sound Vib., vol. 421, pp. 79–90, May 2018, doi: 10.1016/j. jsv.2018.01.057.
  27.  M. Mösch, G. Fischerauer, and D. Hoffmann, “A self-adaptive and self-sufficient energy harvesting system,” Sensors, vol. 20, no. 9, p. 2519, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.3390/s20092519.
  28.  M. Ostrowski, B. Blachowski, B. Poplawski, D. Pisarski, G. Mikulowski, and L. Jankowski, “Semi-active modal control of structures with lockable joints: general methodology and applications,” Struct. Control Health Monit., vol. 28, no. 5, p. e2710, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.1002/ stc.2710.
  29.  Y. Zhao, M. Alashmori, F. Bi, and X. Wang, “Parameter identification and robust vibration control of a truck driver’s seat system using multi- objective optimization and genetic algorithm,” Applied Acoustics, vol. 173, p. 107697, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2020.107697.
  30.  S.S. Kessler, S. Spearing, M.J. Atalla, C.E. Cesnik, and C. Soutis, “Damage detection in composite materials using frequency response methods,” Composites Part B, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 87–95, 2002, doi: 10.1016/S1359-8368(01)00050-6.
  31.  R. Hou and Y. Xia, “Review on the new development of vibration-based damage identification for civil eng. struct.: 2010– 2019,” J. Sound Vib., vol. 491, p. 115741, 2021, doi: 10.1016/ j.jsv.2020.115741.
  32.  K. Dziedziech, P. Czop, W.J. Staszewski, and T. Uhl, “Combined non-parametric and parametric approach for identification of time-variant systems,” Mech. Syst. Sig. Process., vol. 103, pp. 295–311, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2017.10.020.
  33.  A. Abusoua and M. F. Daqaq, “On using a strong high-frequency excitation for parametric identification of nonlinear systems,” J. Vib. Acoust., vol. 139, no. 5, p. 051012, 2017, doi: 10.1115/ 1.4036504.
  34.  B. Zhu, Y. Dong, and Y. Li, “Nonlinear dynamics of a viscoelastic sandwich beam with parametric excitations and internal resonance,” Nonlinear Dyn., vol. 94, no. 4, pp. 2575–2612, 2018, doi: 10.1007/s11071-018-4511-8.
  35.  F. Beltran-Carbajal and G. Silva-Navarro, “Generalized nonlinear stiffness identification on controlled mechanical vibrating systems,” Asian J. Control, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 1281–1292, 2018, doi: 10.1002/asjc.1807.
  36.  B.S. Razavi, M.R. Mahmoudkelayeh, and S.S. Razavi, “Damage identification under ambient vibration and unpredictable signal nature,” J. Civ. Struct. Health Monit., vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 1253–1273, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s13349-021-00503-x.
  37.  A.C. Altunıs¸ık, F.Y. Okur, and V. Kahya, “Modal parameter identification and vibration based damage detection of a multiple cracked cantilever beam,” Eng. Fail. Anal., vol. 79, pp. 154–170, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2017.04.026.
  38.  K. Ciecieląg, A. Skoczylas, J. Matuszak, K. Zaleski, and K. Kęcik, “Defect detection and localization in polymer composites based on drilling force signal by recurrence analysis,” Measurement, vol. 186, p. 110126, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.measurement.2021.110126.
  39.  M. Bowkett and K. Thanapalan, “Comparative analysis of failure detection methods of composites materials’ systems,” Syst. Sci. Control Eng., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 168–177, 2017, doi: 10.1080/ 21642583.2017.1311240.
  40.  D. Cekus, P. Kwiatoń, M. Šofer, and P. Šofer, “Application of heuristic methods to identification of the parameters of discretecontinuous models,” Bull. Pol. Acad. Sci. Tech. Sci., vol. 70, no. 1, p. e140150, 2022, doi: 10.24425/bpasts.2022.140150.
  41.  S. Garus, W. Sochacki, M. Kubanek, and M. Nabiałek, “Minimizing the number of layers of the quasi one-dimensional phononic structures,” Bull. Pol. Acad. Sci. Tech. Sci., vol. 70, no. 1, p. e139394, 2022, doi: 10.24425/bpasts.2021.139394.
  42.  A. Cancelli, S. Laflamme, A. Alipour, S. Sritharan, and F. Ubertini, “Vibration-based damage localization and quantification in a pretensioned concrete girder using stochastic subspace identification and particle swarm model updating,” Struct. Health Monit., vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 587–605, 2019, doi: 10.1177/1475 921718820015.
  43.  S. Barman, M. Mishra, D. Maiti, and D. Maity, “Vibration-based damage detection of structures employing bayesian data fusion coupled with TLBO optimization algorithm,” Struct. Multidiscip. Optim., vol. 64, pp. 2243–2266, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s00158021-02980-6.
  44.  S. Das, S. Mondal, and S. Guchhait, “Particle swarm optimization-based characterization technique of nonproportional viscous damping parameter of a cantilever beam,” J. Vib. Control, p. 107754632110105, 2021, doi: 10.1177/1077546321101 0526.
  45.  R. Zenzen, I. Belaidi, S. Khatir, and M. A. Wahab, “A damage identification technique for beam-like and truss structures based on frf and bat algorithm,” Comptes Rendus Mécanique, vol. 346, pp. 1253–1266, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.crme.2018.09.003.
  46.  M.-S. Huang, M. Gül, and H.-P. Zhu, “Vibration-based structural damage identification under varying temperature effects,” J. Aerosp. Eng., vol. 31, no. 3, p. 04018014, 2018, doi: 10.1061/(asce)as.1943-5525.0000829.
  47.  Y. Zhang, Y. Miyamori, S. Mikami, and T. Saito, “Vibrationbased structural state identification by a 1-dimensional convolutional neural network,” Comput.-Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng., vol. 34, no. 9, pp. 822–839, 2019, doi: 10.1111/mice.12447.
  48.  H. Nick and A. Aziminejad, “Vibration-based damage identification in steel girder bridges using artificial neural network under noisy conditions,” J. Nondestr. Eval., vol. 40, no. 1, p. 15, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s10921-020-00744-8.
  49.  Y. Yang, C. Dorn, C. Farrar, and D. Mascareñas, “Blind, simultaneous identification of full-field vibration modes and large rigid-body motion of output-only structures from digital video measurements,” Eng. Struct., vol. 207, p. 110183, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110183.
  50.  Z. Fu and J. He, Modal analysis, ser. 1st edition. Delhi, Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, 2001.
  51.  R. Craig and A. Kurdila, Fundamentals of Struct. Dyn., ser. 2nd edition. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley, 2006.
  52.  D. de Klerk, D.J. Rixen, and S.N. Voormeeren, “General framework for dynamic substructuring: History, review and classification of techniques,” AIAA Journal, vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 1169–1181, 2008, doi: 10.2514/1.33274.
  53.  J. Roy Craig, Coupling of substructures for dynamic analyses – An overview, 2000, doi: 10.2514/6.2000-1573.
  54.  A. Shabana, Dynamics of Multibody Systems, ser. 4th edition. Cambridge, Chicago: Cambridge University Press, 2013.
  55.  B. Rong, X. Rui, L. Tao, and G. Wang, “Theoretical modeling and numerical solution methods for flexible multibody system dynamics,” Nonlinear Dyn., vol. 98, p. 1519–1553, 2019, doi: 10.1007/s11071-019-05191-3.
  56.  V. Sonneville, M. Scapolan, M. Shan, and O. Bauchau, “Modal reduction procedures for flexible multibody dynamics,” Multibody Sys.Dyn., vol. 51, pp. 377–418, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s11044020-09770-w.
  57.  J. Kim, J. Han, H. Lee, and S. Kim, “Flexible multibody dynamics using coordinate reduction improved by dynamic correction,” Multibody Sys.Dyn., vol. 42, pp. 411–429, 2018, doi: 10.1007/s11044-017-9607-2.
  58.  A. Cammarata, “Global modes for the reduction of flexible multibody systems,” Multibody Sys.Dyn., vol. 53, pp. 59–83, 2021, doi: 10.1007/ s11044-021-09790-0.
  59.  Y. Tang, H. Hu, and Q. Tian, “Model order reduction based on successively local linearizations for flexible multibody dynamics,” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., vol. 118, no. 3, pp. 159–180, 2019, doi: 10.1002/nme.6011.
  60.  I. Palomba and R. Vidoni, “Flexible-link multibody system eigenvalue analysis parameterized with respect to rigid-body motion,” Applied Sciences, vol. 9, no. 23, p. 5156, 2019, doi: 10.3390/app9235156.
  61.  K. Worden and P. Green, “A machine learning approach to nonlinear modal analysis,” Mech. Syst. Sig. Process., vol. 84, pp. 34–53, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2016.04.029.
  62.  G. Kerschen, Modal Analysis of Nonlinear Mechanical Systems, ser. CISM International Centre for Mechanical Sciences. Vienna, Udine: Springer, 2014.
  63.  G. Kerschen, M. Peeters, J. C. Golinval, and C. Stéphan, “Nonlinear modal analysis of a full-scale aircraft,” Journal of Aircraft, vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 1409–1419, 2013, doi: 10.2514/1.C031918.
  64.  A. Albu-Schäffer and C. Della Santina, “A review on nonlinear modes in conservative mechanical systems,” Annu. Rev. Control, vol. 50, pp. 49–71, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.arcontrol.2020.10.002.
  65.  W. Heylen, S. Lammens, and P. Sas, Modal Analysis Theory and Testing, ser. 1st edition. Heverlee, Belgium: Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, 2007.
  66.  E. Orlowitz and A. Brandt, “Comparison of experimental and operational modal analysis on a laboratory test plate,” Measurement, vol. 102, pp. 121–130, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.measurement. 2017.02.001.
  67.  F. Zahid, Z. Ong, and S. Khoo, “A review of operational modal analysis techniques for in-service modal identification,” J. Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng., vol. 42, p. 398, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s40430020-02470-8.
  68.  D. Montanari, A. Agostini, M. Bonini, G. Corti, and C. Ventisette, “The use of empirical methods for testing granular materials in analogue modelling,” Materials, vol. 10, no. 6, p. 635, Jun. 2017, doi: 10.3390/ma10060635.
  69.  B. Kou et al., “Granular materials flow like complex fluids,” Nature, vol. 551, no. 7680, pp. 360–363, Nov. 2017, doi: 10.1038/ nature24062.
  70.  C. Sandeep and K. Senetakis, “Effect of young’s modulus and surface roughness on the inter-particle friction of granu lar materials,” Materials, vol. 11, no. 2, p. 217, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.3390/ma11020217.
  71.  A. Wautier et al., “Multiscale modelling of granular materials in boundary value problems accounting for mesoscale mechanisms,” Comput. Geotech., vol. 134, p. 104143, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.compgeo.2021.104143.
  72.  G. Recchia, H. Cheng, V. Magnanimo, and L. La Ragione, “Failure in granular materials based on acoustic tensor: a numerical analysis,” EPJ Web Conf. Powders and Grains, vol. 249, p. 10005, 2021.
  73.  J. Irazábal, F. Salazar, and E. Oñate, “Numerical modelling of granular materials with spherical discrete particles and the bounded rolling friction model. Application to railway ballast,” Comput. Geotech., vol. 85, pp. 220–229, 2017, doi: 10.1016/ j.compgeo.2016.12.034.
  74.  S. Zhao, T.M. Evans, and X. Zhou, “Shear-induced anisotropy of granular materials with rolling resistance and particle shape effects,” Int. J. Solids Struct., vol. 150, pp. 268–281, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2018.06.024.
  75.  Z. Nie, C. Fang, J. Gong, and Z. Liang, “Dem study on the effect of roundness on the shear behaviour of granular materials,” Comput. Geotech., vol. 121, p. 103457, 2020, doi: 10.1016/ j.compgeo.2020.103457.
  76.  J. Huang, S. Hu, S. Xu, and S. Luo, “Fractal crushing of granular materials under confined compression at different strain rates,” Int. J. Impact Eng., vol. 106, pp. 259–265, 2017, doi: 10.1016/ j.ijimpeng.2017.04.021.
  77.  S. Larsson, J.M.R. Prieto, G. Gustafsson, H.-Å. Häggblad, and P. Jonsén, “The particle finite element method for transient granular material flow: modelling and validation,” Comput. Part. Mech., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 135–155, Feb. 2020, doi: 10.1007/ s40571-020-00317-6.
  78.  C. Zhai, E. Herbold, S. Hall, and R. Hnourley, “Particle rotations and energy dissipation during mechanical compression of granular materials,” J. Mech. Phys. Solids, vol. 129, pp. 19–38, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.jmps.2019.04.018.
  79.  S. Liu, Z. Nie, W. Hu, J. Gong, and P. Lei, “Effect of parti cle type on the shear behaviour of granular materials,” Particuology, vol. 56, pp. 124–131, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.partic.2020. 11.001.
  80.  W. Fei, G.A. Narsilio, J.H. van der Linden, and M.M. Disfani, “Quantifying the impact of rigid interparticle structures on heat transfer in granular materials using networks,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, vol. 143, p. 118514, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2019.118514.
  81.  A.M. Druckrey, K.A. Alshibli, and R.I. Al-Raoush, “Discrete particle translation gradient concept to expose strain localisation in sheared granular materials using 3d experimental kinematic measurements,” Géotechnique, vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 162–170, Feb. 2018, doi: 10.1680/ jgeot.16.p.148.
  82.  R. Gupta, S. Salager, K. Wang, and W. Sun, “Open-source support toward validating and falsifying discrete mechanics models using synthetic granular materials – part i: Experimental tests with particles manufactured by a 3d printer,” Acta Geotech., vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 923–937, Jul. 2018, doi: 10.1007/s11440-0180703-0.
  83.  Y. Sun, S. Nimbalkar, and C. Chen, “Particle breakage of granular materials during sample preparation,” J. Rock Mech. Geotech. Eng., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 417–422, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.jrmge.2018.12.001.
  84.  T. Sweijen, B. Chareyre, S. Hassanizadeh, and N. Karadimitriou, “Grain-scale modelling of swelling granular materials; application to super absorbent polymers,” Powder Technol., vol. 318, pp. 411–422, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.powtec.2017.06.015.
  85.  H. M. Beakawi Al-Hashemi and O.S. Baghabra Al-Amoudi, “A review on the angle of repose of granular materials,” Powder Technol., vol. 330, pp. 397–417, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.powtec.2018.02.003.
  86.  P. Bartkowski, H. Bukowiecki, F. Gawiński, and R. Zalewski, “Adaptive crash energy absorber based on a granular jamming mechanism,” Bull. Pol. Acad. Sci. Tech. Sci., p. e139002, 2021.
  87.  P. Bartkowski, R. Zalewski, and P. Chodkiewicz, “Parameter identification of bouc-wen model for vacuum packed particles based on genetic algorithm,” Arch. Civ. Mech. Eng., vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 322–333, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.acme.2018. 11.002.
  88.  P. Bartkowski, G. Suwała, and R. Zalewski, “Temperature and strain rate effects of jammed granular systems: experiments and modelling,” Granular Matter, vol. 23, no. 4, p. 79, Aug. 2021, doi: 10.1007/s10035-021-01138-x.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Sebastian Garus
1
ORCID: ORCID
Bartłomiej Błachowski
2
ORCID: ORCID
Wojciech Sochacki
1
ORCID: ORCID
Anna Jaskot
3
ORCID: ORCID
Paweł Kwiatoń
1
ORCID: ORCID
Mariusz Ostrowski
2
ORCID: ORCID
Michal Šofer
4
ORCID: ORCID
Tomasz Kapitaniak
5
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Computer Science, Czestochowa University of Technology, Poland
  2. Institute of Fundamental Technological Research, Polish Academy of Sciences, Poland
  3. Faculty of Civil Engineering, Czestochowa University of Technology, Poland
  4. Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, VŠB – Technical University of Ostrava, Czech Republic
  5. Division of Dynamics, Lodz University of Technology, Poland

This page uses 'cookies'. Learn more